Adam Ruins Everything is a show that shares information about the optical industry, including the fact that a single company controls 80 of all glasses and sunglasses brands. The show highlights the importance of being aware of the potential risks associated with wearing glasses, such as the stigma associated with them and the marketing of designer fashion accessories.
Another interesting aspect of the show is the rise of scammers selling eclipse-viewing glasses that are not actually protective. Meta, the CEO of Meta, has recently revealed updates to its virtual reality platform, Orion. The company owns Ray Bans, Arnette, Oakley, Persol, and Oliver Peoples, as well as glasses for Chanel, Prada, Armani, Coach, Versace, and others.
The show also discusses the conspiracy theory that myopia is naturally correctable but kept untreated so that the vision industry can continue to extract profits. Some theories that it’s okay to stare at the eclipse are rooted in the belief that everyone should ignore experts, as they are based on the belief that everyone should ignore experts.
In conclusion, Adam Ruins Everything offers a unique perspective on the world of glasses and sunglasses, shedding light on the potential dangers and scams associated with wearing glasses.
📹 Adam Ruins Everything – The Conspiracy Behind Your Glasses
Did you know that a single company controls 80% of all glasses and sunglasses brands? Subscribe: http://bit.ly/truTVSubscribe …
What do glasses represent in film?
Glasses have evolved from being a supplement for poor eyesight to a status symbol for a character’s superior intellect. Characters like Beast from X-Men and Dexter from Dexter’s Laboratory and Dr. Venture from Venture Bros sport eyeglasses as a symbol of superior intelligence. Glasses have shed the stigma of being only for “nerds” and have become a fashion statement and useful tool for popular characters in media and celebrities. They offer cost-effectiveness, extra protection, and signature looks, making them a popular choice over contact lenses.
Glasses come in various lens materials and frame shapes, allowing individuals to stylize and choose the best look for themselves. Boss frames, for example, can be used to look like the one with all the answers.
What is the psychology behind glasses?
Eyewear’s perception and impact on self-image are influenced by cultural and societal factors. In some cultures, glasses are associated with intelligence, academic achievement, and studiousness, leading to positive connotations and respect. Conversely, there may be cultural stereotypes that view glasses wearers as nerdy or socially inept. Social trends and media representations also shape perceptions of eyewear and influence fashion choices.
Celebrity endorsements, runway trends, and popular culture can influence the styles and designs of fashionable glasses. By staying informed about current trends and experimenting with different styles, individuals can authentically express themselves through their eyewear choices.
The psychology of eyewear highlights the complex interplay between perceptions, self-image, and personal style. By recognizing the power of glasses to shape impressions and communicate personality traits, individuals can embrace eyewear as a form of self-expression and confidence. Whether choosing glasses that convey professionalism, creativity, or sophistication, wearing eyewear can enhance one’s appearance, boost self-esteem, and express their unique identity.
What is the story behind glasses?
Glasses were first used in the 13th century in Italy, with glass blowers in Venice creating the first-ever lenses with frames around them. Frames were made of bone, metal, or leather and wrapped around the head and balanced on the nose. Records of glasses use in 13th century Venice and art depicting them exist, with theories suggesting Roger Bacon, a friar, was one of the first to suggest glasses. Tommaso da Modena’s painting “Portrait of the Cardinal Hugh de Provence” in 1352 depicts a group of monks using eyeglasses to read and write manuscripts.
Who was the guy with upside down glasses?
George Malcolm Stratton was an American psychologist who pioneered the study of perception in vision by wearing special glasses that inverted images up, down, left, and right. He studied under Wilhelm Wundt, one of the founders of modern psychology, and started one of the first experimental psychology labs in America at the University of California, Berkeley. Stratton’s studies on binocular vision inspired many later studies on the subject. He was one of the initial members of the philosophy department at Berkeley and the first chair of its psychology department.
Stratton was born in Oakland, California, and spent much of his career at Berkeley. He received his undergraduate degree from the University of California, an M. A. from Yale University, and a PhD from the University of Leipzig. He returned to the philosophy department at Berkeley, teaching psychology, and was promoted to associate professor.
Stratton served in the Army during World War I, developing psychological tests to select airmen for Army aviation. Exposure to the war effort prompted his interest in international relations and causes of wars. He was an anti-war believer who held psychology should aim to assist humanity’s quest to avert future wars. He was optimistic that people and ethnicities could be taught to live in peace, though the races were not equal in inborn mental capacity. In the later part of his career, he wrote books on international relations, war, and the differences between races on emotions.
What happens if you wear inverted glasses?
In normal conditions, an inverted image forms on the retina of the eye. However, using upside down goggles, the image is straightened, creating an upside-down space around the observer. George M. Stratton designed the first goggles for a psychological experiment using short-focus lenses and a one-tube monocular device. Theodor Erismann and Ivo Kohler conducted a series of experiments using mirror-prismatic upside down goggles in 1931. Both devices aim to avoid distortion of depth perception.
Why do people put glasses upside down?
The best way to store glassware depends on the type of glassware being stored. For delicate glasses like wine glasses or champagne flutes, it’s not recommended to store them upside down as their delicate rim can cause damage. However, for everyday glasses, storing them upside down offers more hygiene and saves time in a work environment. For stem-shaped glassware, a shelf rack can be used safely, but keep them out of reach of children and animals to prevent further harm.
Storing glassware with glassjacks is a safer option for long-term storage or transporting them. These boxes are made from hardwearing plastic and come with removable inserts to separate glasses, making them a more durable option than regular cardboard boxes. These boxes are made from hardwearing plastic and come with removable inserts to separate glasses, making them a more durable option compared to breakable cardboard boxes.
What do glasses indicate?
Eyeglass prescriptions indicate the amount of correction needed for vision. Numbers marked with a plus or minus sign indicate farsightedness, while numbers marked with a minus sign indicate nearsightedness. Eyeglass strength is measured in diopters, with -1. 00 indicating 1 diopter for nearsightedness and +2. 50 requiring 2. 5 diopters for farsightedness. The higher the number, the more correction needed.
What is the story behind glass?
David Dunn and his son Joseph find Kevin, a man with multiple personalities called the Horde, in an abandoned factory near Philadelphia. The Horde is holding four cheerleaders hostage to feed the Beast, a superhuman personality they worship. The film stars M. Night Shyamalan, Jason Blum, Marc Bienstock, Ashwin Rajan, James McAvoy, Bruce Willis, Anya Taylor-Joy, Sarah Paulson, and Samuel L. Jackson. The film is distributed by Universal Pictures, Perfect World Pictures, Blinding Edge Pictures, Blumhouse Productions, and Buena Vista International.
Why do glasses not look good on me?
Matching your face shape to your eyeglass frame style is crucial for a harmonious appearance. Frames can either complement or clash with your face shape, and lens and frame size also play a significant role in your appearance. Some faces look better with square, round, large, or small lenses. To determine the best frame for your face shape, first determine your face shape. Common face shapes that typically complement these frames include oblong faces, which are longer than wide and have equal width at the forehead, cheekbones, and jawline. Aviator frames or similar wide styles can shorten and widen the face, while a low bridge can help shorten the nose.
Why wear fake glasses?
Fake glasses can enhance your appearance by expressing your individuality and personal style. They are popular for both men and women and are available in prescription-free lenses with stylish tints or bold frames. Fake fashion glasses are a serious fashion business, with notable designers and fashion icons like Iris Apfel, Edith Head, and celebrities like Diane Keaton and Justin Timberlake wearing lenses. They can also symbolize status and wealth if worn by a big-name designer. Even comic book superheroes like Superman can rock fake glasses that look real.
To find the right pair of fake eyeglasses, it is essential to consider your face shape and personal style. Glasses are a long-lasting fashion accessory, similar to jewelry or wristwatches. To make the most of your investment, look for the style and fit that flatters your face shape and personal style. Reading online reviews, blog articles, and styling tips can help you choose the best glasses for your personality.
What are the psychological facts about people who wear glasses?
Glasses can enhance one’s appearance, making them appear more honest, trustworthy, and intelligent. Studies suggest that people with glasses may appear more intelligent due to their increased reading abilities. However, if the glasses obstruct the eyes, this may lead to distrust. Therefore, it is crucial to wear glasses that fit properly, have an anti-reflective coating, and are the right size for the wearer’s face shape and size. This non-verbal message conveyed by glasses and the type of glasses worn can have a significant impact on the wearer’s reputation.
📹 Shockingconspiracy behind you branded glasses
I’ve always figured glasses had to be a rip off but have never needed them so haven’t let it upset me too much. I think episodes like this should describe what can be done about it. In a situation like this, I would think “Boycott” but …. if you need glasses, you really can’t. So what can you do? There are laws in place to prevent monopolies but I guess they technically aren’t a monopoly since they technically only own 80% of the market. So what can you do?
AAARG. My dad runs a glasses company (Independent, I know ’cause he’s the CEO) Price was $100, except partnerships. The cellulose acetate (frame material) costs something like $10-20 But we need to pay a salary (singular) And the heater And the rent And all the machines And worst of all, the competition made more So we had to raise the cost to $250 Vicious cycle.
This is a funny coincidence since the day this came out I was doing a retail course where glasses came up.The trainer was having good fun talking about their markups and where they came from. He found a budget store and got a pair for $60, much better than what a lot of people he’d meet get I’m sure. After explaining that he mentioned where the frames would be bought, as well as the lenses and the changes needed to be made for a specific prescription, the total was only $17. So many people are being made to think they’re so expensive, and until yesterday I sincerely thought that was true. The only thing of value is making it your prescription. If that’s a complicated prescription that adds more of course, but they’re still very cheap to make. Mine was from a budget store and were still $140 dollars. Markups, they’re just ridiculous.
Because of this sad truth, I have for years refused to buy anything Luxottica makes, only buying from independently owned stores. Before I even begin to look for frames there, I ask to be shown only non Luxottica brands, which is sadly not that many in a lot of stores. Crazy thing is, you can find amazing, and very unique styles if you’re willing to venture out of the malls. They’re sometimes less than what you’d get for a cookie cutter look from one of the chain stores, while not giving into this hidden monopoly; you just need to go to boutique shops to find them. For those of us with complex eye issues that make it impossible to buy online, it’s the only option to get away from the behemoth that is Luxottica!
I’ve been using the same frame for years even though the lens have changed over time. I always make sure to ask the optometrist if it’s possible for me to use the same frame when I’m getting fitted for new glasses. Not all the places I’ve been to agreed to me reusing my frame so I stick to the ones that allow it. Saves me a ton
I live in Sweden, and we have the same brands as anywhere else, i.e. basically everything is owned by Luxottica. But I’ve been thinking of going to Smarteyes instead of the one I go to now, because Smarteyes is cheaper. Turns out none of their glasses are Luxottica, so That explains why they’re cheaper. I thought the cheapness had to do with quality.
I’ve been buying my glasses on-line for several years now. I get several pairs for what I used to pay for one. And get this, by sticking with a single PD number, it doesn’t take but a few seconds to adjust to a new pair or prescription. My local glasses dealers use this crazy expensive machine to measure it, but the numbers always came out different, resulting in a lot of unnecessary dizziness, and the inability to use different glasses for different tasks.
Been wearing medicated glasses for nearly 30 years. I’ve always bought the “designer” ones – usually for between $300 – $400 equivalent. Until about 7 years ago. I stumbled on the Chinese knock-off of a $500 major brand. It was so comfortable, so cool (like its expensive cousin and, most importantly, it cost me less than 30 bucks. And it lasted 5 long years before I finally decided it’s served me long enough. I won’t be a willing victim of the frames scam again. I’m never going to spend more than 30 bucks on a frame, ever again.
I remember in high school in the early 2000s seeing Ray Bans EVERYWHERE On people’s faces, marketing everywhere, I was led to believe from one ad that Ray Bans had been around since the 30s and that they were the “Aviator’s Choice” wether you were an air force pilot or a civilian pilot. It was a great marketing campaign because I believed it, everyone in my high school believed it, and I really wanted a pair. Same think happened with Oakleys, everyone and their grandma was walking around with gascans when they came out. Then I found gas station glasses that were identical to gascans or standard non Ray Ban aviators for $15-$20 or less with full UV protection…
I have bought my own glasses three times so far. The first time was just before I fell off my parents’ insurance and the family eye doctor charged 200-and-something. Then I didn’t have money for glasses for several years, and when I went out to use my insurance in 2019, I didn’t bother shopping at the optometrist and went straight to Zenni. Bought a pair for $70 and as an out of network provider Eyemed gave me almost $50 back. A pandemic and a job change later I thought I’d let my new eye clinic quote me on a pair. It came out to $450 after insurance. My new pair from Zenni arrives next week for $80 and I expect to get more than half of it back. I’m not going to waste my time on clinic fittings again.
It was time for new glasses. I always bought 2 pairs of glasses (1 backup) and got the most expensive ones you could get (sun darkening glasses, lightweight frame and lenses, etc.) I decided to get lasik. I didn’t do it for vanity reasons, I actually thought I looked fine with glasses, but I just hated having to always clean glasses, misplace them, etc. And I just realized that I wasn’t looking at 4000 for lasik, I was looking at 3000 for it. (I have to get new prescription glasses at least every 5 years anways, so a grand in 10 years). The price is outrageous. I’m not going to lie, the convenience of no glasses was 80% of why I bit the bullet and paid for it, but the fact that glasses are so expensive was a contributing factor. Now, if you can pay 4 or 5 grand for lasik (less if you go to Canada), you can save that money over a decade if you’re getting new glasses every 2 to 3 years like you’re supposed to. I think I used to wait too long in between eye exams.
sad how true this is. for me I was born with really bad eyes so to do practicly anything in life I need them. its not cosmetic yet eye doctor plus getting the glasses is easily 200 to 700 dollars depending on deals or options. yet without them I can’t work. read play games or even watch TV hell I couldn’t drive or cook.
I have perscription Burberry glasses that were originally 600 dollars that I got for 425 at LensCrafters. I feel so jipped. Also, they are plastic frames that broke after just putting light pressure on them (this was 2 months ago). They’re holding pretty well now with construction glue, but seriously? And I’ve had them for 3 years now. I know Costco has frames that are way less expensive, so I’m getting different frames once either my old frames bite the dust or I have to get a new prescription.
Gawd, it’s really been that long since I upgraded. I got my first pair of glasses in like 2002 and I think it cost me like a combined $120 for a regular pair and a prescription sunglasses. I still have the sunglasses because I know those would be insane to pay for now. But I only replaced my everyday pair once after high school and I still have those today. Now I’d have to have a whole new eye exam on top of replacing the glasses.
The other one that I hate that seems to be a thing with in the last few years is that you can not get new glasses now, even if your prescription has not changed, with out getting an eye exam every year. I’m like….All I want to do is replace scratched up lenses, the perscription is fine. Nope, you can’t get new unscratched lenses in the exact same perscription with out spending money on an exam that is useless.
Wouldn’t that make them a parent company? A very common industry practice? Meaning that what their doing is not at all wrong comparatively and that you can just recycle this episode for a ton of different markets say “Adam ruins Fast food” because a large portion of fast food corporations are owned by massive parent companies. I am genuinely asking i am not 100% sure on this.
Let’s not mix up the frame maker (Luxottica) and the glass maker (Zeiss, Hoya, etc). The frames usually cost about $200 (Persol, so fits as a glove) and the glasses $4-500 (Persol’s own tinted prescription glasses cost about $250). You can figure out it is hard to find a “Handmade in Italy” frame less than that, probably that’s why there is not many competitor around. Yeah, Guccis and Celines have an extra markup, so does their shoes and handbags.
Simple solution: don’t buy your glasses in the US. Glasses in other countries are not as controlled by Luxottica. I’m not talking about first world countries like the ones in Europe either, as they share a lot of the same brands. I’m talking about places like Asia or South America. Still much more expensive than what they’re actually worth, but as long as you make sure you haven’t been scammed, it’s pretty worth it. Visited a friend in Taiwan recently, got a pair for $40. Had one previously from Brazil that was around the same price and only broke because someone elbowed it while playing basketball(lasted around 3 years?). Don’t go to the big malls or famous outlets to purchase them, try more local stores, since they don’t sell the same big corporate brands.
“the illusion of choice” we dont “choose” the shape of our glasses because of who makes them (well those of us who are competent) we buy them for reasons like color, shape, size, and for medical reasons. we choose glasses that would best complement the shape of our faces, my glasses for example look amazing on me, and for the low low wallmart price of 40$. they’re steel rimmed too so you know they’re nice. i enjoy adam ruins everything but sometimes this information is simply set on a bias instead of a actual problem. instead of “exposing” some heinous act, you’ve told people about something that i guarantee will just say “oh cool” and then go buy glasses anyway because lets face it, most industries are monopolized in some way or another
Thank goodness someone has the guts to out Luxotica. I remember when Oakley company was coerced to sell it’s sunglasses business to them. Oakley a California co. didn’t want to sell. Oakley was threatened with the fact that they could shut down all Oakley sales since Luxotica owned all the distribution websites ( stores at the mall etc.)
I bought a pair of raybans knowing about this, it’s been 4 years and I want some oakleys again, now it turns out lux have bought them out too. I guess the only thing I can say is that there are people who can spend 200quid on sunglasses every summer, and people who might buy a pair to last a lifetime. I like to get decent sunglasses every 3 or so years, as I don’t know of any cheap brands who make proper UV resistant sunglasses. While I agree I could get some shades for 20 quid, I’d rather spend 150 quid on sunglasses than 150 on a t shirt like many people do. It’s swings and roundabouts, everything is relative; people who care where they spend their money hopefully know about luxottica owning all the main brands, if they don’t, as the saying goes ‘they have more money than sense’.
The worst part is other companies are following in luxottica’s footsteps. Amazon has done similar things as well. Such as them dropping the price of their diapers compared to diapers.com so low that diapers.com was forced to sell their company to Amazon. The same thing is happening right now with their acquisition of Whole Foods. They’re trying to create a monopoly of all consumer products. And you can trust me. I unfortunately work for this global conglomerate.
I work for Sunglass Hut. Hear me out. The show makes it seem as if Luxottica didn’t exist all the glasses prices would magically drop. Wrong. Gas station glasses charge the exact same margins, but give you cancer instead of good looks. It may be 20 bucks at the gas station, but it’s 1 buck in China for an acrylic lens. You walk into a Sunglass hut and give that attitude and you’re going to get roasted. Buy Ray Bans, period. Ray Ban is the best bang for their buck. It’s prestigious enough to scratch the itch of conformity, but has more quality than Prada or the others due to its glass lens and options for nylon or acetate frames. Its polycarbonate (plastic) lens is cheaper than Oakley, but the same quality since the same company makes them. There are also no “levels of polarization.” It’s the same company, it will use the same anti glare tech.
You know, the problem with what he says here is that he is only talking about the American market which becomes a monopoly for each product anyway… Phone: Apple Laptops: Apple You people just make everything you buy seem like a status symbol and as a result, everyone else buys that same company… While this is not the same, some company probably had a higher sales number than the rest of the glasses companies which just happened to be linked to Lexotica in some way… If Lexotica didn’t take over, some other company would have done it… In India, Titan sells glasses and I know that Titan is not owned by Lexotica…
You know those fancy industrial machines you see in the background at Lens Crafters in the mall? Most of those aren’t actually working machines. There’s a guy whose job is to go to factories going out of business and buy machines that look like they’d belong in their store. Meaning, when you go pick up your Lens Crafters glasses, they have things like Sees Candy machinery to fool fools into thinking it’s a legit business. Americans are amazingly gullible…
It actually would not surprise me at all, and you should all be thinking about this, that if eye doctors, insurance, stores and glasses are all bought and paid for by the same entity… you’re being misdiagnosed to need something you don’t. Private insurers are scam artists. You’d do very well to always remember that.
I just bought my most expensive glasses for about $100 today about $50 for the lens (Crizal) and $50 for the frame(some European brand). Before that, I bought Pakistani or Korean or Chinese ones for about $10 – $40 here in Pakistan. I will admit that there seemed to be a some difference in comfort and quality.
$400?! For a basic pair of glasses? Is it seriously that expensive? I brought two pairs for $70, sure it was some of the cheapest variants, but still. Also the most expensive was only about $250-$300, which is a lot, but that were the most expensive ones and it’s still less than $400. $400 for one pair sounds pretty crazy. Like the glasses version of branded clothes. I think the cheapest glasses where like $40 or $50.
FELIX GRAY!! It was free for me to get out of network glasses because they covered Felix Gray which comes with blue light and anti glare coating. Lenses and glasses would have been covered in network but I would have had to pay $95 for blue light and anti glare coating! My glasses were also only $145 but I didn’t have to pay anything with healthcare. It’s insane!!
In Germany the biggest glasses Company is Fielmann. They are great! If you don’t wan’t to spend much money, you spend 17,5 Euros on the glass and 0 Euros on the frame. Furthermore you can give back every pair of glasses within six months and get your money back without having to tell an actual reason for doing so. The frames for 0 Euros are alright but if you want very high quality you might buy a frame for 20 to 60 bucks and if you wan’t to buy very high quality glass it costs 87 Euros
Is this like an America thing cause in most of Asia glasses for under the equivalent of 20-50$ is normal. Hell, Ray Bans for sale at 60-80$ is normal. Hell, when I visited America it was sort of the same price ranges. Are y’all really forced to spend 800$ on basic glasses or do you all just accidentally go to the luxury section and think that every pair of glasses costs 800$.
It’s called capitalism and you wouldn’t be complaining if you owned stock and would be banking it right now. Further more, $20 glasses are not made the same way and with the same technology. Yes luxx has a hold on the market but they earned it because we allowed it. If you don’t like the pricing make your own 😬
It is much worse than that. You don’t really need glasses. There is nothing wrong with your eyes.The muscles around your eyes is just focusing 1-2 mm in front of the back of your eye. Using glases just makes that worse. The bad focus is caused by to much close up perusal compared to distans perusal. Our anchestors used their eyes to look for fruit, berries and wild game in the distans. Not to read books and watch computer screens all day. Your eyeball is 1-2mm to long. The muscles around the eye can correct that.
hahaha it’s not conspiracy, my family own an optic store, yeah we know luxottica own almost all the branded glasses out there, but what we can do? their second generation is pure genius man, you can buy cheap frame though, it’s not make any different compare to branded glasses ( just plastic frame, but don’t buy very cheap one, don’t be to cheap, its for your eye for god sake hahahaa), just buy a genuine lens like HOYA and make sure u adjust your frame correctly
damn u people in america kinda duck on economy, while we here in asia have WAY worse healthcare we dont have different incurance for eyes and legs, they all in one insurace (While they are also scummy), glasses here are quite cheap, infact ace hardware sale perscripion glasses with .25 steps, we here dont have big corparate evil but a bunch of little guys with different prices and yes actually quality for a buck (still made in china tho)
I stay neutral because although Luxottica control 90％ branded Sunglasses and eyes glasses but there are some way to avoid expensive glasses .For example,we can buy glasses though online and maybe it can be cheaper than branded.We can go to non popular stores to buy glasses is also one way to find a pair of cheaper glasses 👓
I work at an optometrist’s office/glasses boutique and most of the glasses we sell are luxottica. They don’t just rip off our customers- they rip off small businesses as well! They charge us ridiculous amounts to stock their glasses so that we charge more, and their customer service SUCKS. All non luxottica brands have to charge just as much if not more just to meet demand and keep selling glasses. It sucks so bad
What s so bad when a company grow so big and doing good for our eyes?and all the big company have different brands the goal is to giving you different choice,cheaper and more expensive.again,what so bad about it ?and its also doing good for our eyes .stop being so green and agains Econ .you do article s also for advertisement income.
I’d like to make a request that in future Adam refrains from supporting government intervention, I am strongly against it practically and morally. I may be a minor opinion though I don’t think its too much to ask that Adam at least talks a little on the advantages and disadvantages of government intervention, as well as the moral rights of the companies as private industries wanting profit for themselves and not only their to service us.
your glasses cost as much as your phone? you’re overpaying for your phone. You can build a computer that performs and does far more than a phone for $400 and it does a hell of a lot more than a phone or console. want to attack a real problem? attack phone companies or console scams that microsoft and sony are running. pussies
Manufacturers shouldn’t be allowed to own the retail sellers to avoid this. An exemption would be if a brand decided to open a store just for their brand. All of the problems listed on this article have an easy solution, but as long as money rules politics, these solutions will never be put into action.
Eyewear is a waste of money but the companies push it. Many people buy pricey shades and only complain about having to carry them around and lose them anyway and then wawawa I lost 150 dollar useless shades they say. Throw em aside. All i carry is my phone and key with tge spending cards on it. The sunlight actually never wrecked my eyes anyway
I think it’s hilarious that I’ve been getting this ad comparing two cars, a Camry and a Hyundai, and the comparison in the commercial was “good? better?” Like I’ve gotten that same ad at the beginning of the last three articles I’ve watched. And now that I’m perusal a article about eyeglasses, I got a Verizon ad 😄😆😂