In Friedrich Nietzsche’s book, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, a tightrope walker is introduced as a character in a daily trivia game. The story revolves around the townpeople who gather to watch the tightrope walker perform when he descends from the mountain. Tightrope walking, also known as funambulism, is a skill associated with the circus and has a long tradition in various countries.
The tightrope walker is a symbol of true faith and is often associated with the circus. It is a combination of being a rational person, honest, and not deceiving oneself. The tightrope walker is also known as an aerialist, high wire artist, acrobat, and rope walker.
The term “tightrope walker” can be synonymous with various other terms such as diviner, prophet, forecaster, soothsayer, sibyl, mystic, oracle, seer, prognosticator, and foreteller. The word “tightrope walker” is used in various crossword puzzles, such as NY Times, Daily Celebrity, Telegraph, LA Times, and more.
In the context of the story, the tightrope walker is described as a precise and accurate figure who walks along a thin wire or rope. The story highlights the importance of balance in life, which is eternal and non-conclusive. To walk on a tightrope is a significant discipline, and one wrong step can lead to a leaning towards the wrong path.
In summary, the tightrope walker is a fascinating character in Friedrich Nietzsche’s book, offering a glimpse into the world of true faith and the challenges faced by those who try to achieve it.
📹 BBC Learning English: Video Words in the News: Tightrope walker (26 June 2013)
Watch our weekly news video. This week’s video is: Tightrope walker. Meet the American man who crossed a 450-metre-deep …
What is the word for a tightrope walker?
The term “funambulist” has its etymological roots in the Latin word “funis,” which signifies “rope.” The term “funambulist” is used to describe an acrobat who performs on a tightrope or slack rope. It should be noted that the word “fun” is not related to the concept of an enjoyable activity. The act of learning to walk on a tightrope or observing another individual performing this feat may be perceived as enjoyable by some, yet this sentiment may not be universally shared.
What is an 11-letter word for a tightrope walker?
Balancing 11 letters on a tightrope is a challenging exercise that requires precise coordination and control.
What is a tight rope walker?
A tightrope walker is an individual who traverses a narrow wire or rope, typically for the purpose of providing entertainment. This can be observed in the remarkable performance of a skilled tightrope walker at a circus.
What is the term for a person who walks on a tightrope?
A tightrope walker is an acrobat who performs on a tightrope or slack rope, also known as a funambulist.
What does the tightrope walker symbolize?
Nietzsche’s “Tightrope Walker” in Zarathustra represents the progression of human evolution from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to a transitional one towards the Übermensch, with the potential risk of not achieving this transition due to the perceived lack of survival value in intelligence.
What is the idiom of tightrope?
In a challenging situation, it’s crucial to be cautious and precise in order to satisfy opposing groups. He navigates the balance between young activists and traditional elements within the democracy movement. Collocations are essential for providing natural sounding language in speech and writing. Harper Reference offers study guides for various stages of learning, including crossword puzzles, knot-tying guides, and college essay writing tips.
What is the vocabulary of tightrope?
A tightrope is a rope utilized in circus performances, signifying a precarious equilibrium between excessive protection and inadequate care. The metaphor can be employed to convey challenging circumstances, such as the act of walking or living on a tightrope, where a person must exercise caution in their actions. To illustrate, Corinne has been navigating an emotionally precarious situation for several days.
What is the expression walking a tightrope?
Many manufacturers face the challenge of balancing high prices and low prices, which can lead to financial losses. This is particularly true when it comes to pricing their goods. The translations available for this text include English-Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Dutch Dutch, French French, German German, Indonesian Indonesian, Italian Italian, Japanese Japanese, Norwegian Norwegian, Polish Polish, Portuguese Portuguese, Spanish Spanish, Swedish Swedish, Arabic English, Bangali English, Catalan English, Czech English, Danish English, Gujarati English, Hindi, Korean English, Marathi English, Russian English, Tamil English, Telugu English, Thai English, Turkish English, Ukrainian English, Urdu English, and Vietnamese.
What is a synonym for walking a tightrope?
The term “funambulism” is used to describe the act of walking on a tightrope or slack rope, which is often referred to as “funambulism.”
What does a tightrope symbolize?
The term “tightrope” can be used in expressions such as “walk a tightrope” and “live on a tightrope” to signify a challenging scenario that necessitates cautious decision-making. The film attempts to strike a balance between drama and comedy but ultimately fails to do so. A tightrope is defined as a rope or cable that is tightly stretched and used by aerialists for walking or balancing acts.
Who is the most famous tightrope walker?
Nikolas Wallenda, born on January 24, 1979, is an American acrobat, aerialist, daredevil, high wire artist, and author known for his high-wire performances without a safety net. He holds 11 Guinness World Records for various acrobatic feats and is best known as the first person to walk a tightrope stretched directly over Niagara Falls. Wallenda made his professional tightrope walking debut at the age of 13, and chose high-wire walking as his career in 1998 after joining family members in a seven-person pyramid on the wire.
He formed his own troupe in 2005 and performed with Bello Nock in 2007 and 2008 in a double version of the Wheel of Steel. In 2009, he set new personal bests for highest and longest tightrope walks, completing 15 walks above 100 feet in the air.
In 2008, Wallenda set Guinness World Records for longest and highest bicycle ride on a high-wire 250-foot-long (76 m) at 135 feet (41 m) above the ground in New Jersey. He nearly doubled the height record in 2010 to 260 feet (79 m) and upped his personal best by tightrope walking over 2, 000 feet in a single performance. In 2011, he set a world record by performing on the Wheel of Death atop the 23-story Tropicana Casino and Resort. In 2011, he hung from a helicopter 250 feet off the ground using only his toes to hold on.
📹 Dirty Harry on feminism and women’s quotas
See preceding, equally great, scene: https://www.youtube.com/embed/8vYauFKw020.
If this article “disappears” you’ll find it here: odysee.com/$/invite/@thepointingfinger:d The preceding scene is just as priceless: – “Dirty Harry on policing minority community” youtube.com/watch?v=8vYauFKw020 – Also, please see this brilliant debunk of “racist police”: youtube.com/watch?v=ioxWvjiB9YY
I find it disappointing how many people completely miss the point of this scene – the ultimate irony is that the “neanderthal” is the only one in the room who really gives a damn about Officer Moore. He’s rightfully concerned that the mayor’s initiative will result in candidates being placed in harm’s way when they are in no way qualified to handle such situations. Harry doesn’t want someone to die because of the foolishness of the mayor’s office. Turns out his concerns are very well founded because Moore doesn’t survive the movie. Love this scene.
From what I gather, Harry genuinely cares about Officer Moore’s well-being and doesn’t want to see her or her partner get hurt or worse, hence why he keeps asking about her experience and qualifications for the job. The rest of the board only wants to hire her because of her sex and/or race and because it will make them look good for doing so. THAT is the definition of tokenism
“The woman’s place is in the home, is that what you are trying to say?” No…he said nothing remotely close to that. It’s amazing how similar 20th and 21st century is when it comes to this type of discussion. Sadly, people love to jump to conclusions on one’s character all the same. I have not seen this movie, but in this scene he’s not looking at her sex, he is looking at her qualifications and experience, which if she doesn’t have it then that means they will be ignoring candidates that absolutely do.
Women you can say whatever you want about this comment, but here is my view on this scene. Harry Callahan probably cared more about that officer than anyone else in that room. When he mentioned that she was going to have a partner, that is when the light finally turned on in her head. Granted he may not have shown it in a way that most of us are used to, but he truly did care about the safety of her well being as well as the officers that were going to be working with her. The mayor wanted to be trendy without realizing the consequences of putting someone in a position where they have little to no experience. That’s piss poor leadership, and the blood of those that get themselves killed will be on the mayor’s hands not the sergeants or inspectors that were working with her. With experience comes rank, with rank comes responsibilities, and with responsibilities comes accountability and reliability. When someone is just thrown into a situation without the proper training, experience, or knowledge, the want, desire, and ambition can be thrown out the window because that person lacks the one thing that is completely necessary. It is never sexist to care for the wellbeing of another person regardless of race, religion, sex, or age. But when stubbornness and arrogance collides with competence and wisdom, experience will be the deciding factor and those who fail to see the history behind the mistake are condemned to repeat it, or worse.
As someone who supports equal rights (or rather opposes illogical b.s.), I think Harry is totally in the right here. What he’s worried about is her experience and potential. He doesn’t want someone unqualified to become an inspector. And I think he might have been mildly impressed with her knowledge of the law at the end. Just something to note: promoting her only because she’s a woman is the exact same as not letting her even try. Either way it’s illogical, and it’s b.s.
I’ve been a cop for 3 years and I can tell you, I openly and honestly prefer not to work with most women on my shift. There are 5 females on my shift. 3 of them are rude and obnoxious to the male officers and the public, and the other two who are genuinely ncie and pleasent, can’t even subdue a 12 year old. Just yesterday I was forced to partner up with a female who is very often in a bad mood and is very unprofessional towards everyone because she can’t check her emotiosn at the door. We go to a call regarding a teen off his head on drugs, and when we get him, even though he was distrubing the peace and calling me names (because of course, I, the MALE have to to put and keep hands on him the entire time) she says and does nothing, not caring one bit. She decides herself, without consulting me, that we ‘re not arresing him and will just drop him off at his mum’s house. He’s giving me abuse most of the way over and she doesn’t give a shit, but as soon as he makes a cheecky comment at her, that’s it, he’s now under arrest, even though his comment was not profane in any way, ie she arrested him not for the laws he had broken, but because he had annoyed her… When she realises however that we notified out control room that we had picked him up 15 minutes ago to simply transport home and the time of arrest was now a lot later, she knew she would have to justify her action to arrest him in court at that point, rather than when we first found him. Being a coward, she again, for the 3rd fucking time, unilaterally decides that it’s now MY arrest, and my paperwork to deal with.
I’ve known where female officers were promoted or assigned to investigations or other support positions just to keep them from patrol duty. In this situation, a homicide investigator usually does follow ups on murders that is processing of evidence, interviewing witnesses and interrogation of suspects or the accused. Most casualties, killed, wounded or injured,in law enforcement occur in the patrol section of the agency.
The most interesting part of this scene, for me, is when Tyne Daly’s character shows she has extensive knowledge relating to Harry’s question. Harry is impressed and ready to listen as she confidently and correctly quotes the intricate legal information. But she is then shut down prematurely by the other male cop, who was all for diversity one minute, but not interested in what the recruit had to say at all… Virtue signalling at it’s finest. 😉
Nothing feminist or misogynistic here. Moore wanted to skip being a rookie on the beat under a veteran’s wing, skip experience in the streets, without Earning her position as inspector, taking a job away from someone who earned it, and putting other officers and herself in danger. And Ms. Mayor’s assistant was clueless. Callahan was as diplomatic as he knew how LOL
Harry: “You might ride in a squad car if you are given the position.” Moore: “That’s what I was hoping for!” Harry: “So why don’t you tell us about your most important felony arrest.” Moore: “I haven’t made one.” Harry: “Okay then, why don’t you tell us about your most important misdemeanor arrest.” Moore: “I haven’t made one.” Harry: “Then what gives you the right to get this position when others are out there for ten to fifteen years looking for it?” There’s literally nothing wrong with this line of questioning. The fact that the response to this was “Oh, so you think women belong in the home?” is fucking disgusting. Clearly that’s not what he was saying…
I love after 4:06 after his whole speel. His actions hearing her quote and reference the law being broken to them, just says to me, “Well… I think she is ready to hit the streets.” This scene has so much to it, but that part always stuck to me as, “If you can prove that you can do the job, and do it well, the higher ups will notice and take action.”
Lmao everyone talking about him being sexist when he’s basically just trying to see if she’s capable of dealing with herself and her future police partner. Why are some of y’all assume that she’s not qualified because she’s a female? Dirty Harry, the character didn’t question her gender at all, just her qualifications.
I’m in a specialist police department. Once I got to the final stage of selection, 25% of those who eventually reached that stage passed. Recently it was decided that the recruitment was sexist because women wouldn’t apply and couldn’t pass. So the physical competence assessment was removed and the firearms assessment made child’s play, and a women only course was run. The pass rate was…100% Of those 12 that passed, none are left, all moved elsewhere or are on long term sickness. This is what happens in the real world. The constant discrediting of women by feminists, and also the destruction of competence. But I’m an man, so I don’t have a voice.
The ultimate tragedy is that she’s actually a great cop when it comes to knowing the law and probably would have made an excellent prosecutor, but physically and mentally on the field when it came to taking action against criminals, she was extremely unqualified, which is part of the reason why Harry didn’t want her having to deal with that. He knew she was a good cop when it came to applying the law, but could see her (tragic) future on the way with the way the police department and mayor were trying to meet the quotas. It’s why Harry walks away in disgust from the mayor after they save him at the end of the film, at the expense of Kate Moore’s life.
This is one actor and celebrity I will really miss once he is no longer around. Not just because of his acting and directorial abilities, but the richness of his films that are glimpses into the various segments that make up the American cultural and historical landscape. Just a genius in front and behind the camera with real integrity and honesty, capped with a real sense of humor. Thank you Mr. Eastwood for your commitment to entertain and educate the American public as well as the world audience on what makes our country such a unique collection of people and places today as well as in the past.
Very few women perform adequately when placed in positions of high authority. Some reasons appear to be that they cannot cope with the stress of such jobs, they are over cautious leading to company stagnation, they lack interest in technical details, and if they have children their priorities are always to favour looking after their children over doing their job. And these jobs are never just 9 to 5, so you cannot fit kids around them. Just look at the long list of female top management failures in both private and public life. We can all think of the occasional excellent woman leader, such as Thatcher or Florence Nightingale, but these are freaks. Overall, having a woman in the top job is an excellent predictor of future organisational failure. The only question is how long it will take for her to damage the organisation, as it could be a slow decline (John Lewis) or a rapid and massive failure (UK Post office/USSS).
I can’t condemn Harry here. I’m retired from 32-years with a Metropolitan Police. Female officers are just as smart, trainable and brave as their male counterparts, and approach the job with the same positive frame of mind. But, there are two critical areas they are seriously lacking. The first is physical confrontations. I have never seen a female officer able to overcome and control a fighting male suspect … not nearly, and not even once. Further, it is impossible to train a 5′ female to kick a 6′ man’s ass. You can train her in every fighting art possible for as long as you wish, while training the man to eat marsh mellows on the couch, and the man will win the confrontation in seconds — it’s a factual reality; not the myth promoted by TV and movies where she roundhouse kicks the neighborhood clean of evil. Not only does she risk herself in bad fights, but the well-being of her partner. The second liability is that she can’t take punches. Knock a male cop on his ass and he’ll dust himself off and stand back up. Punch her in the face and she’ll need her jaw wired, teeth fixed, and orbital socket bones surgically reset. The trend has been moving to the military too, and I suspect the Army and Marines will handle it the same as law enforcement —- the men will carry the dead weight at their own risk (I’m also a former regular army officer). Females are NOT dead weight by nature; ONLY in those situations where they are not biologically gifted with size, upper body strength and durability.
I saw a article just the other day where 4 cops in New York City were on the scene of a purse snatching that actually happened on a train, and suddenly a woman yells “that’s him” and the purse snatcher came running off the train and through the station. It was a black man of moderate size and he ran right by 2 black female NYPD officers who both stood there with shocked looks on their faces and watched the guy run right by. They didn’t make any attempt to tackle the suspect or give chase, or do anything to subdue him. But then a young male officer took off running after the man and apparently, after chasing the man through the station, up to the street, and down a few blocks he finally caught the guy and arrested him. At the scene of the arrest, the female officers were nowhere in sight.
I find it funny in this scene that the assessor from the police that seems the most ademant about allowing Officer Moore onto the force is the one to interrupt her actual answer to Callahan’s question. Callahan, the “sexist,” was actually testing her, and allowing her to give a full answer to see what she knew as a cop instead of just a “stylish” face on the force. The others, who were “progressive,” brushed her off as she did this, almost as though to suggest they didn’t care about her qualifications or knowledge at all, despite the fact she clearly had some. They just wanted their women to show what good people they were themselves, even if it meant cops could be in danger. Damn good scene. Sad how what little development has happened in 40 years has been almost entirely backwards.
2021, and this is still just as relevant as ever. It’s not about your gender, sex, or desires, it’s all about your qualifications. If you can’t do the job, you’re going to get yourself or others hurt in some way or another. Sometimes the best love is tough love. That said, they redeem the character (at least a little) by showing she studied her ass off and did everything she could to try to compete for the job; I still don’t think they should have hired her, but they definitely would have her on their radar as someone who is motivated to get out on the street and move out of clerical work.
I am all for women participating in the military or law enforcement. But I also think we should set the same qualifications for women as we do for men. Because in the field, it doesn’t matter if you’re a man or a woman, or what society says is right or wrong. It truly comes down to ones abilities to deal with the situation at hand. A criminal with a knife or some lunatic with an AK-47 doesn’t care whether you’re a man or a woman -his bullets definitely don’t.
Thing is police forces could use more cops like Callahan. Hiring people on based solely on quotas often based around gender never ends well for anyone involved. Police forces and armed forces are suffering pretty badly because people are being hired to fill quotas and nothing about skills or experience. But overall, this could be said for any employer. It’s illegal to fire people based on race unless that race is white which actually doesn’t exist. It’s completely legal.
This is such an incredible scene. Because people who aren’t paying attention will completely miss his point and how she proves herself to him. He tests her experience when others would have taken her as a diversity hire with no effort. Even when everyone is against him, he still challenges her and once she proves her knowledge, he gives her a look of stunned approval. The only bad people here are the other interviewers who have no care whatsoever for her safety or the effectiveness of the force. They just want to pass the woman for their own benefit/reasons. In this case, to meet quotas or to prove something from women being in the police force. Even when she is giving an impressive answer, they don’t care what she says.
My grandfather was a cop for over thirty years, and stuff like this is precisely why he retired. He saw them lower standards for people based on their gender or skin color, and knew exactly what would happen. I still believe that most cops are good people, but there’s no denying that because of the constant lowering of standards there are a good deal of cops out there who would never have been hired 20-30 years ago because they don’t have the skills or mentality necessary to be a police officer. The real problem is fixing the situation. Cops are already short supply, and raising standards back up will make that shortage even worse. Yet keeping them low will only allow more unfit officers to be hired. They’ve dug themselves one hell of a hole for the sake of being PC, and I don’t see an obvious or effective way out of it.
She knew the law, I’ll give her that. But she had no practical experience. Theory is important of course, but without actual experience in how to apply the theory, bad thing can and do happen. I’m a woman and when she said she had no felony and no misdemeanor arrests, my first thought was, “Then what the HELL is she doing there?” No street experience and she was taking the inspector test? Huh???? I’m sorry, even a parking enforcement officer had more qualifications than Officer Moore did.
All credit to Dirty Harry. He is only concerned about the future safety of the police due to the lack of experience of the candidate. It seems to me that he would have treated a male candidate with the same professional background and experience as the female candidate in exactly the same way. This is absolutely nothing to do with sexism or any form of female discrimination.
This movie was back in the good old days when people actually thought putting inexperienced and unqualified people in jobs simply because of their gender or race was irresponsible. The thought was that you were selected based on your skills, experience, and knowledge regardless of your race or gender. DEI practices are not only unfair, they are racist, and place people unnecessarily in harm’s way to satisfy a political agenda.
Harry is being completely decent and absolutely normal, in other words his reaction is completely rational.. would you let person B who is undertrained, has no experience and such get into a job position that is sought after but dangerous just for the sake of satisfying quotas while other candidates who are FAR more qualified dont get the job?? This is utterly wrong in my opinion.
I just love how Harry starts asking serious questions and the female applicant, though initially being a little insecure, stands firm and in the end she even starts to gain his respect by immediately giving a brilliant answer to a difficult question. They don’t do strong female characters like this anymore…
“I’m standing on a corner, and mrs. Grey propositions me, saying for 5 dollars she’ll put on a show with a shetland pony”🤣 Not the best film of Harry Callahan saga, but amusing, ultraviolent and funnier than the previous, with a very straight idea of how attack the political correctness. It has the best punchlines of Eastwood ever.
This reminds me of when I was in the Air Force. A young lady said that she was gonna go out to be an aerial gunner on an AC-130 Spectre. I asked her if she lifted weights and she said no. “I catch Hell with my groceries,” she said. I replied, “And yet, you wanna do something that requires you wearing extra pounds of flightgear AND carry howitzer shells that weigh about 50 pounds apiece. Good luck with that!”
03:33 Lt. Dobbs : Are you finished with the questioning, Callahan? Harry Callahan : Hypothetical situation, huh? All right, I’m standing on the street corner, and Mrs. Grey there comes up and propositions me. She says if I come home with her, for $5 she’ll put on an exhibition with a Shetland pony… Mrs. Grey : If this is your idea of humor, Inspector… Lt. Dobbs : All right, what are you trying to do here, Callahan? Harry Callahan : I’m just trying to find out if anybody in this room knows what the hell law is being broken, besides cruelty to animals.
Early warning DEI hires, if they can pass all the same tests I am good with a meritocracy. When I served the girls that they said were just as good as us did pushups on their knees and assisted pull ups – the ones that could do it were embarrassed and offended at the lower standards they were held to, while the ones that couldn’t were a risk. When we are lowering standards for being stylish we are into fantasy, poor results and failure/costs, very simple.