Earning a metaphysical doctorate degree grants the title of doctor in one’s chosen specialization in metaphysical sciences. The University of Metaphysics offers a Doctor of Metaphysical Science, Msc.D. program, which requires a bachelor’s degree (B.Msc.) and a Master’s degree (M.Msc.) in Metaphysical Science. The doctoral program is completed through either the University of Metaphysics or the University.
To become eligible for the doctorate program, students must have completed their bachelor’s and master’s level requirements of metaphysics education. Home Study – Distance Learning Accelerated Doctoral and Ministerial Degree Programs offer affordable, flexible tuition plan options. The Doctor of Metaphysics degree is a non-secular (religious-based) degree, not federally recognized as an academic degree.
Peace Theological Seminary and College of Philosophy offers a three-year course to earn a Doctorate in Spiritual Science. Students study word definition, usage, context, historical background, logic, precedent, and inference relating to biblical texts.
One can also specialize late in a PhD program and write a dissertation in the sub-field of metaphysics. The average duration of a metaphysical science degree is 24 months, with 70 textbooks and 30 thesis.
Earn your metaphysical science degree at Bachelor’s, Master’s, and Doctoral levels with well-researched courses written by many writers. Students from various professional backgrounds and academic specialities are considered, as well as those with unique orientations to engaging with metaphysical studies.
📹 The Science Of Transformation, Pineal Gland Time Travel & Mystical Experiences | Dr Joe Dispenza
Dr Joe Dispenza is back on Know Thyself today for a deeper dive into how to access your innate potential for transformation.
Can you do a PhD in mythology?
The Mythological Studies Program at Pacifica University is the only doctoral program in the country that focuses on exploring human experience through the interdisciplinary and multicultural study of myth, ritual, religion, literature, depth psychology, and art. The program assumes that myth has the power to touch our deepest creative energies and generate symbolic images that confer significance upon the complexity of modern life and history. Myth thrives on paradox, ambiguity, and the shape-shifting ways that metaphor informs and transforms our lives.
Cultivating the mythic imagination leads to self-revelation and a profound understanding of cultures, both our own and others. The curriculum is animated by two basic questions: how is this material meaningful to me in my life and work, and how is it meaningful to the world within which I live? Students engage in close reading of classic works of world literature, investigate rituals and contemplative practices of religious traditions, and teach various methods of scholarly interpretation, with a special emphasis on the hermeneutical approaches of depth psychology.
What is the quickest PhD to get?
The Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) and Doctor of Occupational Therapy (OTD) degrees are two of the shortest doctoral degrees available. They are distinguished by an emphasis on practical application and a reduced emphasis on research and dissertations compared to longer programs.
Is metaphysics a pseudoscience?
Metaphysics is a branch of philosophy that investigates the fundamental nature of reality. It encompasses the study of the essential characteristics of reality, including the assumption that all phenomena in the universe are natural. In contrast, pseudoscience is a practice that purports to rely on scientific evidence but does not adhere to the scientific method.
Can you get a PhD in consciousness?
MIT-WPU offers a unique PhD program in Consciousness Studies at its School of Consciousness Studies. Eligibility criteria include a 1-year/2-semester master’s degree program after a 4-year/8-semester bachelor’s degree program or a 2-year/4-semester master’s degree program after a 3-year bachelor’s degree program or qualifications declared equivalent to the master’s degree by the corresponding statutory regulatory body, with at least 55 marks in aggregate or its equivalent grade in a point scale, or equivalent qualification from foreign educational institutions accredited by an assessment and accreditation agency approved, recognized, or authorized by an authority in their home country.
Is Nietzsche a metaphysician?
This book defends the view that Nietzsche is a metaphysician, arguing that his writings are legitimate and crucial for understanding the world and our place within it. Remhof presents a metametaphysical treatment of Nietzsche’s writings, examining aspects of his thought that have received little attention in the literature. The book examines Nietzsche’s view of metaphysics, his metaphysics of science, naturalized metaphysics, and how he appeals to readers’ intuitions. It also discusses how metaphysics is intertwined with his philosophical thinking, including becoming, ethics, nihilism, life, perspective, amor fati, and eternal recurrence.
Is there a God in metaphysics?
The existence of a God raises metaphysical questions about reality and existence. There is no single concept of God, even among monotheistic traditions. The Abrahamic religions are theistic, with God being both the creator and sustainer of the world. Theism, which emphasizes divine transcendence and immanence within the universe, is a conceptual midpoint between deism and pantheism. Deist conceptions see God as the creator of a universe that continues to exist without his intervention, while pantheism identifies God with the universe as a whole. Theism has various subvarieties, such as occasionalism, which asserts that the only real cause in the universe is God.
Metaphysical reflection on God’s nature and properties is crucial. Questions arise about God’s simplicity, complexity, omniscience, omnipotence, beauty, timeless eternity, and the knowledge of future actions of free agents. Classical philosophy has influenced Abrahamic religions, but they generally do not accept the Greek idea of the eternity of matter. Aquinas argued that neither the eternity of matter nor the doctrine of creation can be established by reason alone, and the belief that the universe is not eternal and was created by God must be derived from revelation. Some, like Augustine, claim that God created the universe from a standpoint outside time, while others claim that God is in time.
Can you get a PhD in philosophy without a master’s?
A PhD can be obtained without a Masters degree. The traditional route to obtaining a PhD is to pursue a Bachelor’s degree, followed by a Masters degree, and then a PhD. However, some students choose to bypass a Master’s degree by enrolling in a doctoral program immediately after completing their undergraduate degree. This approach offers advantages such as saving money and time by eliminating a year of study, and increasing the chances of securing a research project before it becomes unavailable. However, there are also disadvantages to this route, such as the potential for project availability and the potential for a lack of funding.
How do I become a metaphysician?
To become a metaphysical practitioner, it is recommended that one enroll in a training program that offers ordination, such as the two-year course offered by the International Metaphysical Ministry (IMM). Such a qualification will legally permit the individual to disseminate their beliefs to others, while a degree in metaphysical studies can establish them as a trained professional.
Can you get a PhD in spirituality?
The Ph. D. in Women’s Spirituality is a comprehensive online program that fosters thought leadership and change by examining various spiritual, ecological, and political perspectives centered on the Earth, each other, and the sacred.
Is metaphysical science a real degree?
A Doctor of Metaphysics (Ph. D., Ph. D., or DMETA) is a purported academic degree, not recognized as an academic degree by the federal government. It is a non-secular, religious-based degree that focuses on spiritual matters and positive thinking. The term “metaphysics” comes from the Greek words “meta” (over and beyond) and “physics”. The University of Georgia’s Department of Philosophy defines metaphysics as a branch of philosophy concerned with reality, potentiality, mind, and matter.
In the United States, a Doctor of Metaphysics degree may be offered by purported religious institutions of learning, such as churches and colleges of metaphysics. In 1938, the United States Department of the Interior published a book listing the “Doctor of Metaphysics” degree in a section titled “Counterfeit Degrees”.
How long does it take to get a PhD in metaphysics?
The International College of Metaphysical Theology offers a course that typically requires students to complete their research and coursework at their own pace, with the completion time varying depending on the student’s ability to dedicate time and the complexity of their dissertation project. The program has no set deadline, but students can work at a steady pace to complete the work. The course requirements include a Bachelor of Metaphysical Theology Degree, a Master of Metaphysical Theology Degree, and doctoral requirements. The program also includes conduct requirements, addendums, and registration instructions.
📹 How enlightenment permanently alters your brain | Dr. Andrew Newberg
Enlightenment is a traditionally mystical and slippery concept, but when it is subjected to the rigors of empirical analysis, there is a …
Impossible is a big word used by small people who find it easier to live in a world they have been given, rather than explore the power they have to change it…impossible is not a fact it is an opinion… impossible is not a declaration it is a dare, impossible is potential, impossible is temporary impossible is nothing… when people take the elevator you take the stairs…
I’m 36, after 10 years of yoga and 2 years of almost daily mediation. After readings on philosophy, Taoism, Buddhism and the Koran as well as the Bible. I had this wonderful experience one afternoon sitting on my couch. My soul and my heart have been filled with gratitude ever since and I have opened my eyes to a new world. We must stop the ego and radiate love. Peace and love for all❤
This information has been so important for me. Aged 13, I had an OBE where I saw myself from the corner of the ceiling talking to a best friend. I knew I was The Observer and that the me I was perusal was ‘my child with whom I was well pleased.’ From this, I was in a heightened awareness for nearly 2-months. It changed me completely; refusing to go back to school, I studied ancient Yogi texts, went into social work and then became a successful full-time psychotherapist for over 20-years. Aged 50, I went to the remote Himalayas to research/live ESP with the unified field for twenty years. Now 70, this is the first time I have heard anyone that really understands such an experience. Thank you <3 (PS; I have never needed to use drugs!)
Mine was a Big-E. I hurt my crush really bad. I felt so guilty how I did her. I found the reason, and looked up at other things of what’s wrong. I ate a marijuana infused cookie. I wasn’t expecting it to be so intense. I started looking back at how my relationships are present, then seeing what was wrong from the past. That’s when I had my epiphany. It’s still too early to tell if it has changed. But I must say, it really opened my eyes, and I’m trying to work towards my goal now.
6:50. “What if.” That’s not a scientific thought, but one common to belief, not even established religion, but the kind usual in conspiracy theories. Assuming that taking mind-altering substances could allow someone to experience reality better, and comparing that to eyeglasses, is not logical. How do we know it isn’t? Optics is measurable, you know exactly what you are going to get when you get a new pair of glasses, you don’t upgrade your vision, but go from deficiency to normalcy. Assuming that the drug-caused experience is ” reality normalcy” would require two things, that there were “normal” people: people who could live their lives in that state permanently and function adequately, and two, that all people who have drug-induced “illumination” experiences could give similar accounts of that “better experienced” reality. People who put on glasses don’t see different things or different worlds, they just see the same world everyone sees, clearly. It’s interesting that the neuroscientist supports his “what if” with the views of religions. Scientific research that requires mysticism to work, is scientific? Putting shamans as example is misleading: when you have a broken bone, Covid or myopia, do you go to a shaman for help? Does the neuroscientist here? Same as he says that drugs can give people a way to experience “reality” as it supposedly really is, we, who have known people whose lives were damaged or destroyed in the seeking of transcendent realities through drugs, and have watched them rambling, hurting themselves, making fools of themselves, we can testify that their “reality” is an intoxicated brain misfiring, and often getting irreparably damaged.
Lots of confusion and blurriness in this article, so it can be dangerously misleading. Real enlightenment is not to be mistaken with an experience of enlightenment, as the latter can also be an effect of WRONG realizations, that lead to the same great feeling of enlightenment but actually orients one to fundamentally wrong perception and evaluation of things. So chasing the feeling of enlightenment is NOT the way to go; instead, striving for detailed, thorough understanding of everything is the way to go for much more positive results in the long run. Not to mention that really understanding something (rather than just feeling so) will also automatically cause experiences of enlightenment, small or big, doesn’t really count. Which explains why the scientific way of thorough examination from all possible perspectives without prejudice or hopes for certain outcomes has always been and remains the best way to go for real enlightenment (rather than chasing any kind of feeling of state of mind). The last part about collective consciousness is also wrong in how/where it seeks consciousness. Consciousness, just like a mere human hand, is a higher level entity that simply does not exist on the level of its building blocks (e.g. on atomic or even cellular level). So trying to find it WITHIN the cellular or subatomic interactions is pointless. On the level of cells, there is no such thing as a hand; but a collection of cells through their interactions can form a higher level entity: tissues.
I’ve repeatedly had experiences of union with the universe, at this point I can self induce it almost all the time. At first they were isolated amazing experiences. Through a mix of meditation techniques I’ve learned to let myself enter the universal stream, the eternal song daily. It is the most amazing, blissful, thing in my life….A few years ago I was in chronic pain all the time, I would have never imagined I could access so much pleasure….I am a normal person, with a regular job in life, if I can do it anyone can do it. I don’t take any substances, nor use devices to do it. I have learned to transmit the first insight into the experience to other people. It is my biggest wish to transmit this to everyone alive ❤. Thank you for this view into the biology behind it. 😊
We are always talking about details, the pieces of the puzzle. However the puzzle (the Whole) seems to just be what it is, and humans seem to reorganize the puzzle pieces and call it progression or regression, while it seems to me to only be the same put together differently. Our perception seems to be summed up to “thought in conciousness”.
This was actually pretty good. Too many of these short lectures on this topic start with too many questionable premises. His last thought is akin to the question of ‘is water wet or dry?” Hydrogen and oxygen are not wet at a molecular level so when does this transition occur? When does consciousness/ thought experience occur? Etc. I find a lot of this kind of philosophy becomes a desperate attempt to validate religion/spirituality with our deep-seeded fears of the unknown after death. Altering your consciousness with pschadelic drugs has been going on for centuries but all it changes is your perception of it. Reality itself should remain constant.
this happened to me, the big E enlightenment. i dont know anyone else who has. thank God for youtube n articles like this. i think something was triggered in my brain after experiencing lots of grief. grief from the present and the past and all in between at the same time. one night after many nights of this i was crying, rather loudly as i mopped the kitchen floor where i worked.
This article describes the chemistry and bio-chemical observations of “enlightened” brains. Not that it helps you get there! Many world thoughts/religions (other than eastern) do NOT have a goal of getting you to an “enlightened” permanent state. For that you will have to go Eastern. However, the observations based on medical technology are very useful points of evidence. Thanks for making this article.
I think Nirvana and Enlightenment experiences are an immune response, possibly some sort of biochemical cascade involving the endocrine, nervous and immune systems, in response to psychological or physical crisis. My organic chemistry lecturer at university did research into the tears of joy and sadness and their effect on the immune system.
Interesting, but I think it would be useful for those who want to delve deeper into certain topics, read and reflect on the advaita vedanta teachings and in particular those transmitted by permanently awakened Masters. Ramana Maharshi is one of these. And then I think it is useful to have a lifestyle that supports this research and favors the timeless experience.
Next task – to use brain technologies to reverse-engineer enlightenment. Most of us don’t have 100,000 hours to spare, you know? Or 10,000 hours. We just don’t, no matter how much the teachers may want us to. Not gonna happen. So let’s use modern technology to make much more efficient the ONE area – and the most important area! – of our lives that we have neglected to apply technology to thus far!
It’s like spacial awareness is a somatic sense that works with our vision both external sight and internal dimension of thought. This perception is a travelling and dynamic energy that can stagnate on unresolved mental tasks. Waking up the limbic system and engaging with the parietal lobe is a really interesting point but I think this is as turbulent as it is because it’s the natural occurrence thus far like drug use etc. Feng shui is really cool for understanding this perception.
Our brain merely being a receiver of reality is a very accurate statement. For example, we can only perceive the visual light spectrum of the light wave. Our brain interprets “pleasant sight, colours, shapes etc.” based on the visual light spectrum we receive. However, if we were able to perceive the X-ray spectrum of reality, then our “standard of beauty” would be very different. How would our visual art, the world of architecture, fashion, etc., look if our sight perceived a different frequency? We can get a glimpse through X-rays or MRI scans, etc., and see the internal workings of our bodies. The same goes for sound frequencies, perhaps even at the level of the intellect.
Spiriituality can never be explained by science.. Spirituality begins where science ends.. Spirituality is the journey of the Atman to reach the Brahman.. Or in other words.. Dissolution of ego.. To realize the effulgent Self through Sadhana or continuous meditation.. It is beyond brain, mind or time or space… One has to contemplate on the Self to realize the Self.. No academic explanation suffices..
the question of where consciousness exists, and where does knowledge and understanding come from, is the big question 2600 years ago the Buddha came to realize there is only one life form on Earth, and that life cannot be separated from the inanimate planets and stars and the space between them, because our physical bodies are made of elements that were fused from hydrogen and helium in the core of stars into oxygen and carbon… from which DNA is composed we know today that life is a continuation, the life that is in you is the same life that was in your parents, living cells that combined and divided and make copies of themselves – not a separate different new life – one life going back billions of years How did Buddha come to understand all this just by sitting under a tree and meditating? We understand it today because we know what DNA looks like, what it is, how it divides and replaces its own molecules, how it evolves and changes. We know how oxygen is formed by fusion in the core of a star. But how did Buddha come to understand all this, without the science to reveal the secrets of the nature of the physical universe? Is the answer supernatural? The Buddha did not need to understand the details of chemistry and biology and evolution and physics to understand that we are all one with each other, and with the entire universe, but how did he reach the same correct conclusion? If we now understand it intellectually, from 500 years of successive science building that understanding, then do we need to be enlightened, emotionally – do we need to have that awaking experience to understand that we are the self aware consciousness of the Universe?
Just to add that you can have those little “e” experiences everyday. You just have to figure out the best moment or specific time (and/or even a place) during the day/night, when your brain is lot more active, creative and full of million ideas. Note: Many new/fresh ideas can come when you use any or all five senses. e.g, you smell flowers, interact with people or nature, eat some special food etc. etc.
And to enlightment.. i have heard it being defined as mainly having clarity and access to wisdom, which is exactly the state of having a good deep thinking time, but all the time. And guess who’s in that level the most.. engineers, mathmaticians and psychologists.. hence it’s some combination of a regular flow state, and that free floating attention used during all kinds of creative, abstract or social tasks. I’m not sure why that would be hyped so much.. i mean, we, as humans, already are enlighted often. Maybe yea, we’re less in awe, if it is used for work already, but it is still basically the same mental activity, i would say.
I think rupert spira would disagree that enlightenment is an extraordinary experience, but rather the end of suffering. If the suffering was previously very intense, the end of suffering is shortly felt as an enormous liberation, that will however come to an end as any emotion does. The persuit of enlightenment is the last stage of resistance towards life, where the searcher has already understood that happiness is less a matter of circumstances and more a matter of the right attitude, which is often described as humility or dignity. When the longing for happiness and the search for enlightenment finally end after sufficient failure, the last resistance towards life, the resistance towards unhappiness, also ends. And happiness is finally found.
I met and fell in love with Jean Jacques Rousseau’s Noble Savage a noble boundlessly loving creature who always laughed always smiled and never lied showering on me unconditional love – love, not religion for me I study it I don’t practice it. Read and experiment Ivan Turgenev’s First Love novel I won’t hold my breath reality is full of fucking savages and to reveal anymore is to cast pearls before swine Gospel of Matthew .👑🌎
Whatever the definition Dr. Newberg gives to enlightenment here it is not at all what asian spiritual traditions mean. For example, in the buddhist teachings there’s a clear difference between being enlightened and having an experience of some sort. So in buddhism, it makes no sense at all in saying “enlightenment experience”. If it is an experience, it is not enlightenment. Along the path, a practitioner will have many experiences before actually seeing what can’t be seen, or seeing without seeing. There’s nothing to see in enlightenment, and at the same time, all is seen. Words cannot describe it and brain activity will also never be able to describe or explain it. That said, his research seems very nice and enriching to our world and lives. We just need to be careful and not think that scientists who are not practitioners themselves will ever understand what enlightenment is.
Just one piece of advice as a practitioner of Nichiren Buddhism: if you decide to achieve enlightenment, which is not a fixed state since you have to do your homework, daily, to achieve it, take into account that true enlightenment includes helping others become happy, or at least support them in any way you can to relieve their suffering even if yourself are suffering. If one expects to achieve this noble state of life through drugs or participating in exciting events only, all one is achieving is a fleeting state of enjoyment and satisfaction of the senses. Nothing bad about these as long as they don’t mean you’re going to have to risk your life or the lives of others. But know that this is all superficial and doesn’t leave a lasting positive impression or change in your brain, in fact, in your life at large.