Higgins inks are not recommended for tattooing due to their lack of sterility and safety. They are not designed for use in the body, so improper usage may result in infection or allergic reactions. The Black Magic ink is a pigment-based drawing ink that is waterproof, fade-proof, and acid-free. It has a permanent, intense semi-flat (matte) black finish on most surfaces and is ideal for brushwork and dip pens.
Black Magic is a water-resistant ink that is compatible with dip pens, brushes, and airbrushes, with good adhesion to most surfaces. It is most commonly used on paper, board, and film. However, it is not sanitary and should not be mixed with acids or used as tattoo ink. It is not launder-proof and should be cleaned with tap water after use.
The traditional black drawing ink is a deep charcoal shade and can be intermixed with other Higgins Inks to create custom colors. It can be diluted with distilled water. This ink works perfectly and has stayed beautifully in the skin.
In conclusion, Higgins inks are not suitable for tattooing due to their lack of sterility and safety. They are not suitable for use in the body and should not be used for tattooing. Instead, tattoo artists should use a small amount of the ink in a disposable container and clean tools with tap water after use.
📹 Review: Ink for Stick and Poke Tattoo
Review: Higgins© Black Magic℗ Waterproof Ink for a Self-Done Stick and Poke Tattoo Stick and Poke tattoos are tattoos done …
Can you use any ink for tattoos?
Professional-grade tattoo ink is the best choice for stick and poke tattoos, as it is body-safe, long-lasting, and resistant to fading. Brands like Xtreme are favored for their quality and longevity. Black or colored inks are recommended for their better durability over time. Avoid using readily available inks like pen ink or India ink, as they are not manufactured for skin use and can lead to health risks like allergic reactions, infections, and poor healing. Instead, opt for high-quality, professional-grade ink for stick and poke tattoos.
What is the best substitute for tattoo ink?
Temporary ink is a popular option for testing out different tattoo designs and styles. It allows you to create your own temporary design, while tattoo markers offer a temporary option. Welded bracelets provide a sense of permanence without long-term commitment. Henna, a natural dye, temporarily stains the skin. Getting a tattoo can be nerve-wracking, with potential pain and design placement considerations. Temporary ink can be a fun alternative if you’re unsure about the design, placement, or style.
What is the best black tattoo ink?
Obsidian Triple is a high-pigment black ink, designed for the creation of solid, bold blacks. The ink is characterized by a substantial viscosity and a profound darkness, enabling it to cover extensive skin areas without exhibiting any signs of fading or bleeding over time. This quality renders it a highly adaptable option for a multitude of applications.
What can I use instead of tattoo ink?
Temporary ink is a popular option for testing out different tattoo designs and styles. It allows you to create your own temporary design, while tattoo markers offer a temporary option. Welded bracelets provide a sense of permanence without long-term commitment. Henna, a natural dye, temporarily stains the skin. Getting a tattoo can be nerve-wracking, with potential pain and design placement considerations. Temporary ink can be a fun alternative if you’re unsure about the design, placement, or style.
Is pen ink ok for tattoos?
Tattoo ink is the best choice for tattoo designs, but non-toxic India inks like Higgins, Speedball, or Winsor and Newton can also be used. Avoid pen ink and toxic inks. Tattoos should last for a long time, depending on the depth and type of skin applied. It is recommended to poke no deeper than 1/8 of an inch, feeling a pop of the skin during the process. Don’t rush or overdo it to avoid damaging the skin or bleeding. Aftercare involves keeping the tattoo clean with anti-bacterial soap and avoiding direct sunlight.
Aftercare is similar to a professional tattoo, ensuring the tattoo is well-cared for and not damaged. It is important to avoid overdoing the tattoo and to avoid overdoing it to avoid damaging the skin or causing bleeding.
What to avoid in tattoo ink?
Tattoo ink is a crucial part of tattooing, and it is essential to avoid ingredients that are known carcinogens, such as acrylics, solvents, and PET plastics. While natural ink may seem safer, it may contain heavy metals that can cause allergic reactions. Some of the most trusted brands for ink include Solid Ink, World Famous Ink, Dynamic Color Co., Starbrite, Eternal Ink, Nocturnal Ink, Fusion Tattoo Ink, Silverback Ink, and Kuro Sumi.
Solidar Ink is a 100% vegan ink option with a wide selection of colors, including world-famous artist color collections. Dynamic Color Co. is combating ink counterfeiting with extra precautions in their product labeling. Starbrite offers 170 different shades of ink, produced in a certified ISO8, Class A 100, 000 cleanroom. Eternal Ink offers a wide selection of colors developed by tattoo artists, while Nocturnal Ink is known for its smooth, bold, and dark color. Fusion Tattoo Ink is a family-run business with a high pigment load, Silverback Ink focuses on grey wash inks, and Kuro Sumi is a vegan-friendly ink formulated in Japan and now made in the U. S.
Is Higgins ink non toxic?
It is anticipated that the product will not have an adverse impact on aquatic life. However, the ecotoxicity data for any potentially hazardous components is available for review.
Is Higgins ink OK for tattoos?
Higgins Ink is not recommended for tattooing due to its lack of sterility and safety, as it is not manufactured for body use. Pigment inks are made from natural materials, such as minerals, carbon, and metals, and are suspended in a liquid ink base. Synthetic pigments are also available in various forms. Dye inks, on the other hand, have smaller particle sizes and are soluble in the liquid ink base. They chemically bond to surfaces like paper or cloth, and can be natural or synthetic. Synthetic dyes were first developed in 1856, while natural dyes have been used for centuries.
Dyes-based inks are readily available and have vibrant colors. However, they are not very lightfast, making them suitable for temporary applications or digital works. Higgins Inks are not suitable for tattooing due to their lack of sterility and safety. While some tattoo enthusiasts recommend using Higgins inks for DIY or Stick and Poke tattoos, they do not endorse this practice.
What is the safest tattoo ink in the world?
World Famous Tattoo Ink is a leading in the tattooing industry, known for its exceptional safety and quality standards. The company’s Safety Data Sheet (SDS) provides information on potential hazards, work procedures, storage, handling, and emergency procedures related to the material. The SDS is prepared to ensure the highest level of safety while using World Famous Tattoo Ink, a product that has become increasingly popular due to its popularity in tattooing and body art. This sets World Famous Tattoo Ink apart from other ink companies in the industry.
What is the best brand for tattoo ink?
Killer Ink Tattoo offers a wide range of tattoo inks in 2024, including popular brands like World Famous INK, World Famous Limitless, KURO SUMI, KURO SUMI IMPERIAL, Dynamic Color Company, Intenze INK, Allegory INK, FUSION INK, EtERNAL INK, Panthera INK, CARBON BLACK TATTOO INK, RADIANT COLORS, VIKING INK BY DYNAMIC, and Quantum TATTOO INK GOLD LABEL. These inks are essential for creating stunning and unique tattoo designs.
What kind of ink is safe for tattoos?
World Famous Tattoo Ink is renowned for its safety and quality in the tattooing industry. With ISO and CTL certifications, safety data sheets, and 100 vegan and cruelty-free options, it is the safest ink in the industry. Choose World Famous Ink for best-healed results and true color matching, elevating your tattooing experience. They are open Monday through Saturday and are available to answer any questions.
📹 EU’s Ban On Tattoo Ink: Breaking Down the Chemistry
Recently, a handful of tattoo inks have been banned by the European Union for safety reasons. Blue 15:3 and Green 7 made its …
This could be a very good thing for tattoos in the long term; if this creates a demand for researching and creating tattoo specific pigments we could possibly get not only safer inks but also perhaps inks that interact optically better with the skin to create more vibrant colours; inks that are permanent but easier to remove, maybe even pigments that can be “turned on and off” like e-ink using magnets or something like that, etc. Also tattoos with medical purposes like you discussed sounds pretty cool too. I have little to no feeling or awareness of hunger so I often just forget to eat until I’m nauseous; so while I’m not really into tattoos, if I could get a subtle colour changing tattoo bracelet that changed colour when my blood sugar started to drop to remind me to eat and drink, that would be pretty cool.
I dunno, as someone with a few tats, I’d be interested in ink that changes color or appears and disappears depending on conditions… xD The only fear is that they are later revealed to also come with all sorts of problems when they break down and whatnot. Oh well, nothing I can do with the ones I already have…. don’t have any intention of removing them at any point in my life too. 😛 As for doing more in the future, remains to be seen… is there even such a thing as being too old for it? xD I think most people with tattoos that made them completely conscious and without pressure never completely let go of the idea of making a few more. xD Mine are over 20yrs old already… and I still occasionally think of doing a few more.
‘Pushes up glasses’ Aktshully, that’s not how tattoo guns work at 0:44. It’s a common misconception. Tattoo guns work with capillary movement. They create holes in the skin that then gets filled by the ink that is sitting on the surface of the skin. That’s why hand operated “Stick and Poke” needles can still tattoo!
I would totally get a glucose-reactive tattoo (MIT’s Dermal Abyss project was many years ago but still occasionally resurfaces via viral social media posts), though as a type 1 diabetic it would still be more just a cool tattoo than anything actually useful in gauging the precise insulin/carbohydrate doses needed to stay alive at any given moment. It could definitely be interesting for those with type 2 or MODY, though, where numbers are less likely to change quickly and precision is less life-or-death. Something tells me most of the first use of this technology will be in the livestock industry.
REACH was sort of the icing on the unappetizing poop cake that were the last 3 years. The recent public health crisis already left many tattoo artists basically out of a job, and then the remaining artists found themselves with a severely limited range of colors just as they start getting back on their feet again. As if they did not have enough issues already. Although certainly well-intended, the EU‘s approach was deemed…let’s say „pretty heavy handed” by many and could really have done with out it at this point in time. The timing was really not ideal here. I mean…imagine you are a painter and make a living from painting flowers or sunsets. Then some crisis hits and commissions dry up completely. Then commissions start rolling in again, finally – and then some bureaucrat comes in, yoinks all your reds and tells you „sorry, red is illegal now – go find something else” Sure, compliant alternatives are starting to show up gradually. But for a while, it kind of felt personal, like the folks in Brussels were hell bent on regulating something, anything, just to drive tattoo artists out of business. And if I look at certain political figures, I am sure they would have welcomed a wholesale ban on tattooing, because in their antiquated world view, only hardened criminals and outlaws have tattoos. That said, the ingredient list of the inks that went in my tattoos was like 5 ingredients long, give or take. Now some bottles have fold-out labels and you need to squint in order to read the entire list.
My take on it: having to use fewer colours will force tattoo artists to improve their composition, rather than relying on vibrant colours to distract from the flaws in the design. It’s like how manga has way better shading and panel composition than anime, since manga can’t use colour as a band-aid for poor technique.
the opening animation is painfully mistaken. the needle enters the skin to the dermis. it is actually cleaned by the skin but leaves a puddle of ink around the needle, however it creates a pocket with a vacuum seal around the needle. when the needle is removed suction pulls the ink into the skin filling the pocket.
4:16 Well, the actual copper in the statue of liberty is actually from Norway, a country that’s not a EU member. So technically not from the EU in that sense. But we here in Norway didn’t make it or pay for it… It was a gift from France that is a EU member. However, the statue of liberty predates the EU, so France was not yet a EU member at that time.
This is a little off mark. A blue pigment and a green pigment have been banned. Not all green or blue. I am a tattooist in Europe and we have all colors available currently. Otherwise all of your information seems to be correct. I forget what green is currently being used but the blue pigment is now Blue #1.
Even if you don’t have diabetes, a marker that indicates the blood sugar level is kind of useful? Or am I just thinking wrong? I know that Insulin is about regulating blood sugar so that it stays more or less consistent. But like it could be a reminder to take a break after an exercise, or showing of dark green after you have downed a bottle of apple juice. Kinda cool no matter what.
American Traditional artists have been using heavily saturated greens and blues for 70+ years with millions of people wearing them their entire lives without issue. But, because when you hit the pigment with a million watt removal laser, they say it’s dangerous? Sounds like we should be educating people of the dangers of tattoo removal, as opposed to regulating color pigments that have never proven dangerous in real life…
Until about 30 years ago, it was pretty much a given that tattoos were for prisoners, prostitutes, and sailors. I personally had no expectation that there was any inherent “healthiness” about the whole procedure, and have considered that not directly getting hepatitis was only a fairly recent expectation. Edit: Wow, Tattoos that change color with blood sugar levels? I completely take back the previous statement with the advent of actual usefulness of tattoos.
😹😹😹I just turn 60 and for decades I have dreamed of having a dragon done on my left shoulder and arm, in purples, reds and blue, but I keep seeing me Dad and Hubbies face before me with disapproving looks on their faces, now this information comes up, now I’m even more conflicted than before. The other problem is here in Australia I have been looking but have no idea where to find a really good Tattoo artist as I live 2-3 hours plus in all direction from a city.😹😳😹
If you have those colors and want them removed, maybe the best idea is to take it veeeery slow. Get small parts of it lasered each time, and wait longer than they suggest before your next session. They recommend 6-8 weeks, but you wait 3 – 4.5 months. That way you give your body a good chance to detox. Drink a lot of water, green juice, vitamin C, antioxidants, and do cardio to work up a sweat.
The last time I got a tattoo, I had a long chat with the tattoo artist about new developments. You can’t have metallic pigments in tattoos, nor can you have ink that glows under UV light. I’m sure some enterprising chemist could create pigments that don’t do nasty things to our bodies. And remember the fashion craze in the Victorian era for “Paris Green” fashions – everything from clothes to wallpaper. And the dye contained arsenic and antimony, both seriously poisonous.
I worry that this ban is not only based on a lack of science, but also poor data collection that may or may not have been ideologically motivated. I saw mentioned they relied on one study from a dermatologist who interviewed 3000+ participants and 2/3 reported having a reaction to their tattoo and my immediate question was “have these people ever been tattooed before?” Because as someone who is heavily tattooed, and has spent a lot of time in the tattooing community, I can confidently state that that result is just not true. But I also know that tattoos have a healing process that is really like no other wounds, and if the participant was unaware of this they may well interpret the normal healing process as an adverse reaction. Or the questions may have been formulated in such a way that the normal healing process is counted as an adverse reaction. In the cases of those experiencing adverse reactions 2–3 weeks later, I would want to know what aftercare regime they are following and whether they stuck to it. I’m also getting increasingly sceptical about any and all links to cancer claims because I don’t see how any study can control properly for all other factors that may also have been the cause of the cancer (or that we have decided have “links to cancer”). It’s not like the tumour is going to have a label saying “made by tattoo ink” “made by smoking” “made by the stress of living under capitalism”. If everything has the potential to cause cancer then nothing can really be pointed to as THE cause of cancer, and the banning of some chemicals over others becomes more and more arbitrary and therefore more and more open to political or social motivation over scientific evidence based policy.
damn pencilpushers in suits, i would say under-the-table/underground, but obviously no highly talented, respectable artist that you would actually want to get tattooed by would want to risk that. So its a shit situation. I been actually pondering a massive back tattoo with alot of green.. but now eeeeeeh
Really informative, thankyou. The diabetic tattoo was so useful can you do a article on that so that diabetics like myself can get clear information on this potentially habit changing simple device. What a help, one can’t loose or forget it, once installed it keeps going cost free. It updates constantly so anyone diabetic, prediabetic or non-diabetic can at a glance work out what does and doesnt spike sugar levels for them. Wonderful! Thankyou so much for taking the time to explain tattoos in a simple to understand scientific way👍👍👍😁😁😁👏👏
As a type 1 diabetic, I would rather the money they spend on researching glucose color changing tattoos went to finding actual replacements for real tattoo inks, lol. Things like color changing chemicals for diabetics is ancient technology, and isn’t used to regulate blood sugars anymore; at least not in countries with modern healthcare systems. Urine test strips were used before blood finger pricks, and are used as a quick quantitative test in hospitals and clinics now. This is because they are too imprecise, and often are pretty slow to react to changes in blood sugar. Regular finger pricks are currently the gold standard, and continuous blood glucose monitors (CGMs) are quickly catching up to replacing finger pricks. Not completely yet, as finger pricks are still needed occasionally when using CGMs, but it greatly reduces the frequency needed.
i think it’s great that we’re learning about how these inks could affect our health. as someone who is passionate about tattoos, with many tattoos myself, im kind of on the fence about this topic tho. it seems like it only becomes harmful once it’s blasted by a powerful laser, when someone wants to get their tattoo removed… rather than completely ban the pigments, why can’t there be a disclaimer for when people are first getting their tattoo? i agree that it’s important to know whether or not what we’re putting in our body is safe, but i think in this case the decision should be for the consumer to decide, with proper warnings and knowedlge. especially considering it doesnt seem to be harmful for it’s intended purpose, getting a permanent pigment implanted into their skin. only once it’s been altered by an expensive and painful process, that often you need multiple treatments to completely remove the tattoo, does it become chemically altered and then cause harm. just one example, what about cigarettes? they’re proven to cause cancer but they’re still perfectly legal, with a big ol surgeon general warning slapped across each pack… its possible this could cause artists to become more creative and hone their skill to work around this ban, but imo i think an all out ban is unnecessary
Well, great. I’ve got some large, colorful tattoos on multiple areas of my body-and when I had them done years ago, I believed all these inks to be 100% safe. I now have an autoimmune disorder, so that’s a bit of a worry. Of course, Canada will most likely NOT follow the EUs lead for safety-we are still using many banned pesticides, medicines, and food additives in Canada. 😑
And if the EU are going to do really silly things like ban certain tattoo colours of ink because of health concerns but people who have the colours of these tattoos and want to get the tattoos topped up, now have to get it done illegally get their tattoo spoiled, how much rather just get my tattoos done illegally.
I’m working in the textile industry, and we are highly effected by REACh regulations since a few years because textile is such a chemical intensive industry. And I think, at least here in Germany I know, the industry always keeps an eye on new regulations and tries its best to follow it without making a drama out of it. Maybe a side note: New regulations are not get released and has to be followed in a couple month.; it’s a years long process with REACh being really open about what kind of chemicals they are looking at right now, and why and have lists of chemicals they recommend not to use even tho they are not banned yet. The upcoming PFAS ban will have an huge impact, also a lot of chemicals used to fixate dye one polyamide/nylon fabric are going to be banned in a couple of years. The list of dye stuffs also gets smaller really fast, and one coworker and I just joked this week that in a couple of years we all will wear only light colored cloths, because everything will be banned soon😅 Btw, there are way less sorts of pigments than you might think, a lot of pigments are use in paints, inks, on clothes and even in food are just the same thing. To find new and save coloring methods is a big deal in a lot of industries, and would be a Nobel Prize worthy invention, for sure.
Tatts have been around for ages and tattooed people don’t die more or get sicker because of them. I’m surrounded by heavily tattooed people and they are all doing great. Maybe it has to do the amount of ink? It would’ve be the same to have a small blue rose tattooed, than a huge blue flag. They would have to check how much of that chemical can the body tolerate. I’m removing my tattoos (mostly all black with an itsy bitsy little tiny bit of purple), and they are a medium size, but from what I understand, you can’t laser all at once if your tattoo is huge, because it over works your body while it’s trying to get rid of the ink.
Oh, cyanide. Lovely, we love hearing that word xD Came into this expecting to dunk on the EU with a comment prepared about how ‘this is why the UK left y’all’ but health concerns are valid reason to ban something. I’m not somebody who’s into tattoos, I only considered it once as a way to remember my pet who passed away from an incurable virus (FIP, there is a very expensive black market cure now but at the time such a thing didn’t exist). Unfortunately I wasn’t able to get one because I keloid so badly there was no way I could’ve gotten one without it scarring up. Still, I can get why people are sad to see these inks go but if there’s a risk these are harmful to your health you have to understand there is a reason behind it. If it’s only harmful after laser removal though maybe there is another way, like just having people sign a form like we do with surgeries or something informing them of the risks if they ever want to get it removed (and probably again before they proceed with removal just in case they forgot?)
I really wanted to get an ultraviolet tattoo as a prank for my senior year in highschool. My plan was to sneak off during summer break, get a faint red (UV) “666” tattooed on my forehead and then hide from my friends while it healed. Then in the fall, I’d go to the most popular haunted house to make sure my classmates “accidentally” saw it and pretend I didn’t know what they were talking about and didn’t believe them. Would have been a great laugh. Always figured UV inks couldn’t possibly be good for you but the lengths I’d go through for a good gag.
the levels of PFAS in our food wrappers, cookware, skin creams, tampons, dental floss,and contact lenses when none have been proven safe, and many know endocrine disruptors, seems like a major oversight by regulatory agencies. requiring tattoo inks to be proven safe before being removed from the blanket bans (as described) seems like they’re targeting a specific industry while allowing another (chemical manufacturers) enormous freedoms (especially for the levels of exposure)
Actually… Backwards Engineer the support data!!! Collecting the data needed to protect both colors simply requires direct support from the Producers! Using sales records to identify the vendors, then the vendors to compile the usage and end results from all of the past tattoo’s with those colors. So many tattoos have already been done that back tracking the data collection should provide more than enough evidence to protect or support letting them go!
I am curious as to why this is now brought to the attention of the pigments toxicity, I was a professional tattooist in the 90’s, there has been so much nonsense about pigments, both synthetics and oxide based pigments, bacteria that occurs in some pigments ect, I am now a chemist and have a knowledge base in toxicity, my thesis was done respectfully on toxic chemicals, I found the industry primarily in undated on a biased level by who knows who, and how much money is contributed to the ” I deserve to be believed Fund”, lol, sure there are latex based pigments that are bright, plastic based pigments that are intense, and metal oxide pigments that are safe lol, generally as we are made up of different metals so its is a given that oxide is not going to be as toxic on a physical level, though not as bright, but safer, organic pigments from plant extracts, like reds yellow and green are probably in need of review, at the end of the day introducing foreign bodies to our autoimmune system is not good science lol, I am also covered in tattoo’s. what was I thinking lol, I would not change a thing how ever
I would love to see how the color changing tattoos look on more pigmented skins. It’s cool that some people would have that as useful indicator. I’m not that surprised of the inks not been studied that much before. Usually studies are only focused on things that aren’t as taboo natured or floods cash later on to a company that could provide for a research benefitting them. Research and studies should really take more in account for what their studies can change in their environment in more boarder view. I’m not against science and I also love that people do studies to get knowledge on things. We just live in a society where research isn’t done in a separate vacuum of reality. It’s hard to predict things beforehand and getting some knowledge from the people on the field is a good idea. Though sometimes views and thoughts there can be aged and a little out of touch. Good article. Lots of thought put into it and well formatted. Found it easy to follow. The chemical details and picturing of them were amazing and sufficient in my view. I really enjoy how it enriched my view on world we live in
Many cases of lymph node cancer are known but have long been hidden from the public. Tattoo industry makes money and that matters more than people’s health. Cancer patients also bring in money. Still not figured out what “Corona” was supposed to show us? I know someone who had lymph node cancer because he has a lot of tattoos, and I’ve long wondered how long people will continue to go along with it so blindly.
This is nuts! Tats are not exactly good for you. Sorry they are not! But I do agree that inks should be safe if injected but people inking will not care. Tats will just be made using scamp or illegal inks and applied outside the “system”. People who like tats have a penchant for being outlandish and defying convention. That’s why they tat! I would have regulated the inks but much more subtle. I would have made sure there was a replacement ink for the shoved out one.
In other words . Tattoos can be permanent again if these inks are used. It’s only when you hit a tattoo with lasers that it causes problems . Which should mean that people should be more clear about Thier aesthetic choices rather than the new status quo of “I can always get it lazered ” Well now you can’t. That’s a good thing. This also makes me think of people with blue and green scleral tattoos who may ot may not eventually opt in for Lazic eye surgery . They will have to think about this.
I find it rather absurd that they would do this because they are worried about possible carcinogen effects. TBH if I was concerned in the least with getting cancer I wouldn’t have gotten any tattoos in the first place. Frankly I am happy to live a shorter life but one that I enjoy, rather than a longer life under the thumb of some bureaucrat.
That cartoon was a poor example of getting a tattoo. They don’t poke ink in a body like that. It’s a steady line and the part that you showed going in the skin doesn’t the needles shoot out of that part insanely fast. It’s dope. Educational articles should do their homework on at-least how tattoos are done.
I’m a proponent of personal responsibility over group responsibility. While I understand the need for safety, it would have been enough to just make it mandatory to inform customers of the risk. I should probably also mention that I don’t have a stake in this. No tattoos, don’t intend to get any. I just don’t like the hand holding. What we do to our bodies / get done to our bodies MUST be 100% up to us. Yes, even harmful things. EDIT: as long as it involves us alone and doesn’t harm any unwilling party.
The fact people just assume injecting ink must be safe, aside from the risk of potentially fatal infections, is insane. Most inks are made with nasty chemicals. It’s like no one knows what cancer is or how government doesn’t care to tell them lol. Most of the chemicals she mentioned are heavily restricted on their own because they are very powerful carcinogens.
Maybe now girls in the E.U won’t be able to wake up on their 18th birthday and the first thing they do is jump out of bed & run to the closest tattoo studio. And a serious question, if kids can’t get tattooed until they’re 18, and no one would dream of letting their pre-pubescent child get a tattoo, why can they get so called “gender affirming care” when tattoos are far less permanent & permanently destructive? At least if a 12 year old got a tattoo they’d still be able to have kids. Hell, letting kids drink is far less destructive FFS.
I’m perfectly fine with the FDA oversight and slow response. I prefer the gridlock, though I’m glad the FDA’s taking a step towards providing better oversight for cosmetics. It’s been a long time coming and, at the very least, helping consumers make informed and accurate decisions about what’s in their ink is nice. Europe’s known for the big government and sudden changes with little accountability, so it’s no surprise they’re taking the leap!