“Sharp Objects”, a 2018 mini-series by Amy Adams, follows a reporter investigating a series of murders in her rural Missouri hometown. Eddie Qavvik finds his SpongeBob toothbrush left outside his house, but where did she go? The series was shot in Iceland due to the danger of filming in Alaska. True Detective: Night Country, the finale of the HBO series, wrapped with a supersized sixth episode where detectives Liz Danvers (Jodie Foster) and Evangeline Navarro (Kali Reis) finally descend into the haunted town.
The show features clues pointing to food magnate Edward Hoyt (Michael Rooker), a pedophile ring conspiracy, and religious corruption. In the third season, creator Issa López explains whodunit, where Danvers and Navarro end up, and its Season 1 references. The show is a Southern Gothic with a deeply damaged protagonist working out her psychological and existential issues.
The show treats its pagan forces with a wary respect, unlike the eldritch horror of Season 1. The episodes were directed by Cary Joji Fukunaga and were filmed in Louisiana over a three-month period. The series was widely acclaimed by critics and cited as one of the best television series of the era.
In 1995, Martin Hart (Woody Harrelson) and Rustin Cohle (Matthew McConaughey) were assigned to the case of a murdered prostitute, Dora Lang. Detectives Liz Danvers (Jodie Foster) and Evangeline Navarro (Kali Reis) must confront the darkness they carry in themselves and dig into the haunted town. True Detective is exceptional and worth a second look.
📹 True Detective Season 1 Episode 4 “Who Goes There” 4K HDR
True Detective is an American anthology crime drama television series created and written by Nic Pizzolatto. The series …
Did True Detective go supernatural?
True Detective: Night Country is a supernatural anthology that explores the spooky pasts of Detectives Liz Danvers (Jodie Foster) and Evangeline Navarro (Kali Reis). The fourth season of HBO’s anthology follows the team’s efforts to unravel a cold case, with ghosts from their pasts surfacing. The show follows their efforts to uncover the case, and the fourth season is similar to past seasons in exploring characters’ trauma. As the season continues, the show continues to explore supernatural and paranormal happenings, with some revealing their meanings.
Is there a supernatural element to True Detective season 4?
True Detective has introduced some supernatural elements in the first season, such as Rust’s hallucinations. However, the heavy supernatural element this season is confusing and unsettling. While supernatural elements are not entirely opposed in a mystery like True Detective, it feels strange for the show’s roots in reality. The main killer could be a mystical spirit rising in the night for revenge, which is not the main reason to watch a show like True Detective. While this is only the first episode, critics have seen more to issue high scores, and it’s unclear how heavily the show will continue to lean on the supernatural from here.
What is the meaning of carcosa in True Detective?
In True Detective, a man-made temple in Louisiana is depicted as a place of ritualistic sexual abuse and child murder, organized by wealthy Louisiana politicians and church leaders. The series’ main characters, Rust Cohle and Marty Hart, confront a serial killer in the final episode, who is the most active member of the cult. The cult worships the “Yellow King”, to whom an effigy is dedicated in the main chamber of ‘Carcosa.’ The series suggests a larger conspiracy beyond the show, in line with Lovecraftian horror.
In Part 3 of the Chilling Adventures of Sabrina, the barker of a traveling amusement park and carnival is named Carcosa, and the carnival is named after him. The workers at the carnival are mythological beings, with Carcosa being the god Pan, the god of madness. The arc of the season revolves around the workers’ attempts to resurrect an older deity, The Green Man. The themes of madness, death, and resurrection parallel the works of Robert W. Chambers et al.
What mental illness does Rust Cohle have?
In True Detective, Rustin Cohle (Matthew McConaughey) is depicted as having symptoms similar to HPPD, such as light tracers, due to neurological damage from substance use. Andrew Callaghan, former All Gas No Brakes host and current Channel 5 host, revealed that he experienced HPPD symptoms due to psilocybin use at a young age, including persistent visual snow and palinopsia. Matt Watson, cohost of YouTube channel SuperMega, also revealed that he acquired HPPD due to LSD use at the age of 22, experiencing persistent floaters in his vision and constant visual static. These individuals have shared their experiences with HPPD and its associated symptoms.
Why is every season of True Detective different?
True Detective, originally intended as Galveston’s follow-up, was adapted into a film by David Pizzolatto. After securing a deal with TV executives, Pizzolatto drafted six screenplays, including the pilot episode “The Long Bright Dark”. After leaving The Killing’s writing staff in 2011, he devoted another script to the series, which was completed in 500 pages. Pizzolatto secured a development deal with HBO, and the network commissioned True Detective on an order of eight episodes in 2012.
The series, set up as an anthology series, features a different cast of characters and self-contained narratives in various time periods and locations. In season 4, subtitled Night Country, director and writer Issa López created a “dark mirror” of the first season, focusing on female characters. HBO renewed the series for a fifth season in February 2024, with López returning in her roles.
Is Travis Rust’s dad?
True Detective: Night Country season 4 introduced Rust Cohle’s father, Travis Cohle, who lived in Alaska and died by suicide. Travis played a key role in the mystery, as his ghost guided Rose Aguineau to the researchers. The reveal of Travis’s identity in season 4 was supported by references and callbacks, such as the Tuttles and the reappearance of the spiral pattern in the first season.
Travis Cohle’s appearance in episode 1 suggested bigger things to come in the next five episodes, but he hasn’t appeared since helping Rose find the bodies and hasn’t been shown or mentioned at all since episode 2. There’s no explanation for why Travis hasn’t appeared since, and the closest thing to one comes from Rose, who said that some of the dead visit because they miss Rust, need to tell something, or just want to take him with them.
How are season 1 and 3 of True Detective connected?
In True Detective season 3, Wayne meets journalist Elisa Montgomery, who shares information about the Purcell case and the connection between the season 1 conspiracy and the Purcell case. Elisa also reveals a newspaper clipping of Rust Cohle and Marty Hart, suggesting that the Purcell kids were sold to pedophile rings by their parents. Junius Watts, a black man with one eye, reveals the truth about Isabel Hoyt’s relationship with Julie, who was forced to go with her after Isabel stopped taking her lithium pills.
Watts helped Julie escape, but she eventually went missing and contracted HIV. Wayne tracks down Julie through her daughter, Lucy, and eventually arrives at their home to learn about her fate. However, his neurological disorder makes him forget his visit.
Does True Detective have magic?
The text does not posit a vast mythology; rather, it is hallucinatory but not supernatural. Instead, it focuses on a domestic conspiracy rather than a political one.
Does True Detective season 1 have supernatural elements?
True Detective, a popular TV series, has been rooted in Lovecraftian horror, a form of supernatural horror that emphasizes the unknowable or incomprehensible. The show’s plot is driven by investigative work, but the foreshadowing of potential otherworldly events sets it apart from other shows. The first season’s central crime involved Dora Lange, a woman left for dead, bound, naked, and adorned with antlers and a crooked spiral.
This ebb and flow of supernatural elements has been evident in the show’s ten episodes, where the supernatural has made its presence heard the loudest. The show’s use of these elements has ebbed and flowed over the years, making it a unique and captivating show.
Are True Detective seasons 1 and 4 connected?
“True Detective: Night Country” Season 4 is a unique adaptation of the HBO anthology series, focusing on the themes of justice, vengeance, and civility. The references to Season 1 are not meant to prop up Season 4, but to demonstrate that stories don’t have to be told the same way from the same perspectives to achieve the same effect. The show also assesses what “True Detective” was, is, and could be.
The first season was unique and memorable due to the feeling of being trapped in a world that was so ugly it wouldn’t be shown to the audience. The sense of place, which is a foundational element of “True Detective”, is what Jodie Foster wanted to preserve in “Night Country”. The sense of place in Americana, such as the Bayou in Louisiana or Ennis, Alaska, has a primordial, timeless, and supernatural quality that is so important. The show aims to capture the feeling of a hidden world behind our own, allowing viewers to experience the unique and memorable moments of the first season.
What was the point of True Detective season 3?
The season revolves around a missing persons case in 1980, involving Will and Julie Purcell, two children in a small Arkansas town who were never seen again. Detectives Roland West and Wayne Hays are put on the case, but they struggle to solve it. Evidence was found at the house of a scrap collector named Brett Woodard, and the town panicked, leading to Woodard being pinned as the culprit. Hays, who was removed from the Major Crimes department, was brought back into the fold after Julie’s fingerprints were found at a pharmacy.
However, things go poorly for the two former partners, and they fail to solve the case again. In 2015, Hays is interviewed by a news crew for a 60 Minutes-like show about the case, and his sharper memory leads him to chase down more clues and solve the case. He also reunites with his old partner, though it took some convincing due to their relationship ending in the ’90s. West struggled to turn down his old partner due to his inability to remember everything that transpired between them.
📹 The Inevitable Downfall Of True Detective
When Season 1 first hit the airwaves, True Detective was a force to be reckoned with. With an cast starring Matthew …
So glad everyone in the comment section feels the exact same as i do about this scene! ABSOLUTE MASTERPIECE…when i first watched this episode i was digging my nails into the couch while gritting my teeth! Haha. Insane INTENSITY, very realistic..and the way it was shot like some endlessly intertwined nightmare is BEAUTIFUL❤
Despite being high, Cohle was able handling the situation accordingly at first, but when he saw the tension between the member and the rival gang member, he knew it was about to blow up, his constant expression of saying, “Do not fire, don’t fucking fire, do not-.”, cracked me up a little. It was over after that, they wasn’t playing at 1:47
Just finished rewatching this Masterpiece..hands down my favorite scene in a TV show of all time. And all around amazing eoisode.Thing about perusal things a second time. I just realized my guy, Joseph Sikora (Tommy from Power) is who played Ginger. He’s still doing his thing. Looking forward to Night Country. I know it won’t be anything like this. Just hope it doesn’t disappoint.
One of the most impressive scenes in any show ever filmed easily but even though he had years of experience in drug use and hostile situations the way he pulls off this eacape with such composure and perfection is ridiculous. There’s no way any guy no matter how skilled could do this while high on a combo of LSD, Meth and Cocaine. The way he avoids those swings of the baseball bat and the punches with complete ease lol. Would never happen in real life. Still a masterpiece of a show regardless. Phenomenal.
I can tell that a specific scene in MR. Robot was inspired by the ending to this scene. Rust tells Marty to be in a certain location in 90 seconds, like how Elliott texts Darlene a location in 4×05 when he’s on the run from the police. Just a simple observation of how this great show did something that inspired another scene in another great show.
I used to serve Woody in Atlanta, well I was one of his guys. He would call me or his assistant would call me every time they came to Atlanta, which was fairly frequently. He would usually get blow, but sometimes other stuff. I still have his number and his assistants number. I haven’t spoken to them since 2017 lol I’ve known them for years, I also have J Lewis’s number, I’ve actually F her, but this was in line 2003 – 2005, towards end of her “touring” days, if you know her, you’ll know what I mean
A big difference between season 1 and 2 was that S1 had Rust with his abstract and bleak ideas, but it also had Marty to be the balancing act everyman who’d give him a tired look and tell him “Stop saying odd shit/I’m begging you to shut the fuck up.” Rust was an anomaly in that world, where the other characters didn’t know how to handle him. Where in S2 it felt like every character was trying to be Rust. They all talked depressing & weird about life and they all had endless “odd shit” conversations with each other. Vince Vaughn straight-up talked like an alien. It didn’t have the regular human element that made season 1 feel real. And on top of that, Rust was actually FUNNY. Barely anybody in season 2 was ever funny.
One of the things I most liked about the first season is that it had a hint–a suggestion–that something supernatural might be going on. That possible presence is so subtle that it can be as easily explained–perhaps more easily explained–as mere natural goings-on. And yet the show left me with the feeling that there was something supernatural underlying everything. This was done so masterfully and nothing in the subsequent two seasons approached it. The new season… I’ve only seen two episodes, I’ll see where it’s going. But nothing will top that first season, it’s perfection.
One thing that the first season did was subvert the “Breaking Bad” trope which was popular at the time. I.e, take a relatable and likeable character, and gradually have them get more and more evil, until eventually the audience WANTS them to fail. True Detective did the opposite: it took two hard-to-like characters and gradually made you understand and care for them, before finally giving them an amazing redemption arc. That’s what was so special to me about the first season.
I think people don’t emphasize enough that Season 1, while not technically supernatural, had a creepy atmosphere where you couldn’t shake the feeling that the cult MIGHT not be totally full of $hit at times. The ambiguity made it unique and deeper than most cop dramas. The next two seasons totally lacked that. Season 4 looks to have it back, but hopefully not too far in the other (overtly supernatural) direction.
I actually just binged all 3 seasons. I rewatch the 1st season every couple years. It’s no question a masterpiece. I think season 2 is underrated. It’s actually the first season I saw. 3 isn’t bad at all. But you can feel them trying to hit a formula. I’ll be on the couch ready for season 4 come Sunday.
This reminds me of the musical equivalent: An artist has a lifetime to make their first album and two years to make their second. Nic Pizzolatto is on record saying that True Detective is something he’s always wanted to make and spent years writing and rewriting. Inevitably, the follow up was never going to have the depth and subtlety as the first season.
I always thought that every season should’ve involved the yellow king in some way, just like the original anthology by Robert w Chambers did, it would’ve been a cool way to link everything together while still keeping it an anthology show. I’d prefer that over just having Cole and Hart’s pictures show up randomly in Season 3
For me season 1 worked because it felt very dark and sinister with it’s almost hidden underlying narrative. I think the setting helped a lot with that, just creepy locations. Season 2 just didn’t pull me in. It wasn’t the acting or the directing, it was the narrative and locations. It was a very different story.
The ‘newness’ of season one can never be repeated. HBO had become a place where creators could go to produce great TV. Count off all the great shows from the previous decade: The Sopranos, The Wire, Boardwalk Empire, True Blood. True Detective was different in almost every way, telling the story of a murder investigation inside the story of the relationship between the detectives. No matter how much Pizzolato took from his influences, it was mesmerizing TV. That is hard to duplicate.
I think even if season 2 was about Rust and Marty, it wouldn’t have landed. I think what made the story great was all of it’s themes, actors, crew, plot and setting working together in that moment and by the end of the show it started to feel exhausted. There really was no where else for the show to go afterwards that wouldn’t have been disappointing. I tend to think of the show as an 8 hour movie. It’s self contained and nearly perfect.
The 4th season is absolutely nothing like the first 3 seasons. Which is not a good thing. There is no recollection or retelling of the case, everything is happening in the here and now, characters are unlikeable, the atmosphere of the town and location is great tho but that’s it. It’s really trying to be badass female everything. I haven’t watched the show in years, but I can tell you season 4 isn’t true detective, only in name, not spirit.
While I more or less wrote off TD halfway through season 2, a friend recently convinced me to watch season 3, and I’ve got to say I kind of loved it. Yes, a lot of the weirdness of season 1 was sanded down, and the story is a somewhat more straightforward police procedural. But all things considered, still an amazing season of television. Highly recommended.
rust had such a good backstory as well. being forced to do undercover work with some drug gang which in turn fried his brain which in turn let the show writers put a lot of weird visual stuff into the story. all that tied in nicely with the satanic/cult storyline while still remaining grounded in reality. i think another key thing about season 1 is how the story is told in flashbacks. it allows the characters in the flashbacks to act more normal and not have to explain everything in detail to each other. all i remember from season 2 was the characters talking about stuff for the first 4 episodes and mentioning so many names . it didnt help there were 4 different main characters to keep track of as well
True Detective season 1 was written by a novelist (not a sitcom writer) and it was damn good. A year after Hemingway wrote The Old Man and the Sea, there wasn’t a horde of nerds and executives pressuring him with chants of “DO IT AGAIN, DO IT AGAIN.” Enjoy the 1st season for what it is, you won’t get it again.
Season 1 was fantastic. Season 2 was a major letdown, dark without any intrigue. Season 3 was a decent return to form. Season 4 so far has been disappointing. Without the original creative direction, HBO hopes they can bait people with a big name like Jodie Foster. The problem is tv and movies these days are trying to incorporate social politics so much so that it often feels forced and distracts from the storytelling.
I have personally liked each season. Not as much as season one. But I enjoy them all. I am beyond hype for this new season. The people I respect who have seen it and hold in high regard say it rivals that of season one. I believe McCaughey is producing this new season as well. And its Jody Foster. Shes incredible. Point is, I hope this new season is as great as some are saying. Obviously I’ll judge it for myself when I see it. Edit: Fargo has nothing to do with the article outside of anthology. This current season has been incredible. Hype for this seaon finale.
It’s a shame the quality dropped but I’m happy they decided not to stick with Rust and Marty, I think less is more with that story. They would’ve had to add in new characters to create more conflict or have the characters evolve and honestly the way season 1 ends off is perfect. If you want a show that has similar elements I would recommend Fargo. The first season is based off the original movie but then each subsequent season follows a different cast, I’ve seen 3 and all of them have elements that are great and interesting.
Season 1 is one of the greatest television shows ever created. That something so dark and bleak can be so rewatchable is remarkable. I watch it from time to time and delving into that twisted and haunted world of rural Louisiana with those two true detectives still feels special. Season 2 tried really hard to recreate that magic but the spell broke for me. All I could see was lesser actors running around “acting” their hearts out while trying to tell a confusing story. If anything it made me appreciate even more how special the first season was, how so many things had had to come together to create that “lightning in a bottle” and that it might very well never happen again. Season 3 was decent. Mahershala Ali is a really good actor and felt right for the series. But whatever qualities it had – I have just never felt the urge to rewatch it. Season 4 is where the series implodes. I watched the first episode in disbelief and not being into hate-watching, that was it for me. It’s made by people who’s clearly not very good at their jobs and – as is usual today – more concerned about pushing their world view and agenda rather than crafting a good story. And the attempts to try and tie the story to season 1 is just pathetic. As is the director Issa López’ response to poor reviews. Reviewer Eric Kain remarked that TD season 4 is to TD season 1 what Rings of Power is to Lord of the Rings. That sums it up nicely. It’s just hard to imagine this series ever being brought back on track again – this was most likely the end of the series and that’s probably the right and merciful decision.
In the first season you have the character Cohle who was a handsome, bad ass fighter and investigator. He’s like a twisted version of James Bond. Audience gravitated towards him, he was exciting to watch. The other seasons the detectives are just normal by comparison. The closest was Velcoro in S2 but he very ordinary in comparison to Cohle.
Also what made the show was the characters and the dynamic. Rust was this philosophical speaking man with an insane amount of depth and it’s where you got most of that philosophical itch from. In season 2 all of these characters talk so deep and metaphorically that it doesn’t even feel like real conversations
I was really worried about Vince Vaughn’s inclusion, but he ended up being the character I liked the most in the entire season 2 and he gave a great performance. His last scenes walking in the desert were fantastic. I think one of the biggest flaws in Season 2 was that they would sometimes name-drop really minor characters that had only been shown for a few seconds episodes (i.e. weeks) earlier as ultimately being key players, and you as an audience member had no idea who they were talking about because you had no reason to remember them. It made it really difficult to follow. Season 3 was amazing and I loved just as much, if not more, than Season 1.
I loved the season 3 story and production more than S1. It’s great TV. Season 1 was well done and groundbreaking, but also pretty self-indulgent and has a lot of chewing the scenery where I rolled my eyes. I DO agree that the chemistry on the S1s team (director, writer, cast, and music) was memorable. I am excited about S4 so far because the chemistry is great there too.
Season One: Arguably the best limited series I’ve ever seen. Matthew and Woody are the perfect duo. Complex! Thrilling! Unbelievable! Season Two: Tried way too hard despite the good cast and some tense moments. Vince Vaughn as a mob boss should never be a thing that ever happens. Colin Farrell and Rachel McAdams were great! Season Three: This season started off great but after the first three episodes, the plot was too disjointed and the jumping back and forth between time periods made the story difficult to feel invested in. Season Four? You had me at JODIE FOSTER PLAYING A DETECTIVE! We’ll see! 🤞
I absolutely adored both season’s 1 and 3. I couldn’t make it past the second episode of season 2. There is a frequently commited, fatal error to MANY TV shows that just doesn’t get mentioned nearly enough when citing what’s wrong with the modern, long form TV: they absolutely destroy momentum that the show creates by allowing WAY too long to go between “seasons.” True Detective might well be the perfect example of this error. You simply cannot allow 2-4 years go to by without releasing a new “season.” With the sheer volume of things to watch being released on streaming platforms, it’s so, so easy to completely forget about a show. Frankly, HBO is probably the worst offender in doing this. They did it with the Sopranos, Westworld, Carnivale, Rome, etc.
The first episode of Season 4 feels like a return to form. It has a great setting (another isolated blue collar community) an intriguing mystery (the opening scenes in the science lab were terrific) and a tinge of gothic horror weirdness. Time will tell if our two leads are going to match season one, but fingers crossed, this is off to a good start.
Season 3 was actually pretty solid. I know its supposed to be an anthology series but considering each season has dealt with virtually the same thing, I’d love for them to tie it all up for the series finale. Like an overarching plot that connects each season. Wouldn’t be that far from the truth and real life anyway. Have it be some secret organization (the gov * cough cough *) involved in you know what.
I used to think Pizzolatto was the driving force behind it all. Having watched countless interviews w/ him and read about the projects he has been involved in then pulled-out of due to “creative differences” etc. I don’t quite see him in the same light. Of course, I’d never want someone to jeopardise their own creative vision, but it doesn’t seem right that Pizzolatto can’t quite… share the BTS limelight? I guess? Cary Joji Fukunaga got very little credit at the time and, quite frankly, season one would not have been half as good without him. He deserves the credit just as much as Pizzolatto.
Season 3 is genuinely fantastic. The problem is that season 2, rightfully so, left a bad taste in everyone’s mouth and tarnished the entire show’s reputation. So when season 3 comes along, people were going in with low expectations. I was personally surprised with how good it was. Despite it being really fucking good, and almost on the same level as season 1, the fact that it’s not quite as good as that first season just adds to the overall image of the show going downhill. I know we’re only one episode in, but so far Night Country is about the same level of quality as season 3, but only time will tell where it goes from here. I’m hoping it’s enough to redeem the show as a whole.
Season 1 used coastal Lousiana as an effective characther in it of itself. As someone who used to live near Houston and ended up living in southern California, I enjoyed that. But when Season 2 was released, I felt it as just another ole time detective show taking place in an all too familiar metropolitan to the point where I felt it had many elements of “L.A. Confidential” … so, yeah, it was a snoozer for me as well.
This series is definitely a ship of Thesius. I’m on season three now absolutely loving Mahersala’s performance. I do think people were too in love with season one and didn’t really give seasons 2 and 3 a chance. There are patterns and very artistic choices to find perusal the series. I do believe it was good at letting most of the Czechoffs guns to go off, but still a few pieces of story to speculate and theorize on. It does feel like season two could have been better fleshed out though. I still largely liked the story, perspectives, and characters. Each season so far has its detectives and complications to investigations. Each story has consistent themes of virtue, vice, time, cosmic horror, the macob, and spirituality. Each season has what feels like a planned unreliable narrator somewhere in it Chole, Frank, and Wayne. How much can you change from season to season and still be the ship of Thesius? It’s beautiful in the longer running story honestly.
What I would add to your analysis: In True detective we have some elements that make the series recognized for what it is: incredible and out-of-the-box performances; a murder shrouded in mystery, mysticism, supernatural elements; exuberant scenes; Monologues or deep and dense conversations; Criminal investigation; 2 timelines; A hero’s journey = murder, investigation, killer caught. Now if we analyze what the second season was, in addition to not having some of these elements, it belittles it, not to mention the murder that was swept under the rug. The third tried to use all these elements, but the story is very weak, dull, extremely lost and confusing. So the big problem here is the story, you can bring all these elements, have Scorcese direct and Di Caprio act, without a strong, precise, linear story, with a beginning, middle and end, we will continue to have these atrocities, I think it’s even That’s why they removed Nic from the script, either he realized it was a stroke of luck or HBO got fed up with his stories. I liked the 1st episode of the 4th season, now let’s see what will be, because the 1st episode of the 2nd and 3rd seasons were also good, as for the rest…..
I think the big problem with season 2 was that…1. I (at least) thought it would follow the two from the first season again. Tbh it is better that it didn’t so props there. But 2. While season 1 had this eerie quasi supernatural feel to it, season 2 was a flat out real estate (if I recall) scam plotline. It would be like following up a season of Supernatural with Chinatown. The vibe was way different. It reminded me of how the Star Wars prequels suddenly went from exciting space opera over to some kind of political thriller with stakes that nobody really understood or cared about. I legit don’t even remember season 3. Season 4 premier, however, has honestly given me hope for this season because it feels exciting the way the first season did.
It’s not rocket science. The first Season of True Detective is basically a Noir Cop Story, focusing on several high-philosophy concepts of life, death, existentialism, nihilism, you name it while throwing a bit of cosmic horror in there. The show-writer spend years getting this Script ready, had time to hone it, and flesh out everything. Season 2 was ordered and ‘shat out’ basically in half that time. Quality takes time.
I used to think True Detective was one of those generic cop TV shows where it’s the same episode over and over again, luckily i was wrong and S1 is one of my favorite medias out there. I haven’t seen such complex and interesting characters and i like how nothing really was predictable, i was expecting a dark ending for such a dark show, but i was pleasantly surprised.
The really great thing about an anthology is you really only need one great story for it to have a massive cultural impact without ruining the entire series. I don’t follow American Horror Story, but they’ve obviously nailed down the anthology formula, at least for the horror genera. I can’t believe how many seasons there have been.
I never finished the first season because I can’t stand Matthew McConaughey, and then I never went back to the series. But when I saw the trailer for the four season, I couldn’t help but tune in. Alaska’s days of night is terrifying already adding in a science research centre that gives off The Thing vibes. I’m sold
Nothing went wrong season 2 and 3 are also great and very well written just not masterpiece level like the 1. Many people call Season 3 boring,but it is only boring if you are tiktok brained zoomer with zero attention span. Season 3 is superbly written,has great characters and Mahershala Ali performance was emmy worthy. Season 2 is also underrated dark and complex and has great three dimensional characters like Ray and Frank and season 1 is a masterpiece. Season 4 is the worst so far by far mediocre writing,supernatural elements that make zero logical sense in realistic detective drama and characters that are one dimensional and unimpressive. I don’t understand how people hate an amazing season like 3 or 2,but like season 4 than even the original director and writer said some plot points like the ghost dancing and showing the bodies or a body that had no chance to survive in the snow waking up after two days in freezing temperate are beyond ridiculous season 4 is not a detective show anymore it’s sci-fi supernatural drama which is not what original director wanted.
Yup! Some of Matt and Woodies best work to date!. Also on the latest season with Jody Fosters best! I didn’t care for her character at 1st but quickly grew on me. Especially the scene when she’s pissed off by the mention of her dead son! As well some of Vince Vaughans best too! Can’t wait for the next season!
After re-watching them recently I would have to go with season 1 just being too perfect. If you go in there without the idea of a new season having to top it you will be much better off. Season 3 was defiantly better the next time round. Season just had a great mix of crime drama and horror/occult to hit on all cylinders. Season 2 could have been much better if they had time to develop the elites doing messed up stuff I think. Overall great review of the series though!
Ya know I’m currently perusal szn 2 and I thought it was gonna get good when Colin Farrell gets shot, but then they cop out with rubber BBS, I think the problem along with the characters not being as good, is that the murder doesn’t feel important at at, whereas with the first szn rust was obsessed with finding the killer
I actually thought Season 2 was on track to be a truly great season for True Detective. The way Velcoro and Bezeredes found eachother in the second last episode while Woodrugh is shot down was where i felt the whole season was coming together. For me the disappointment came from the Season Finale. I felt like the story just didnt go anywhere at that point. Imo they should have made the safe house the big shootout scene as one single take like in season one. Then figured out something else to do with the characters of Frank and Velcoro instead of just killing them off the way they did. Their deaths are exactly what make the season feel flat. Like imagine if they just killed of Rust and Cpme in the final episode of season 1. For season 3 i thought it was an interesting premise to have dimentia play a role in a detectives ability to solve the mystery. However, they didnt play into it enough. For me the mystery to begin with had a lackluster ending since no one was actually killed and the two kidbapped children just went off to start a life together anonymously. I think it could have also been a great series if they had made it so that even though he has dimentia, he still splves the mystery like a true detective. But because of his dimentia he immediately forgets and its tragic. But the mystery of what happened to the children had a substandard ending also. I think its clear that Pizzolato has many great ideas for stories and should be the inspiration for these stories. But yes he does need someone to reign him in and to also direct those ideas for the good of telling the story.
Just binged the first 3 seasons. I think all 3 seasons were great in their own way. Season 1 had an original storyline with two excellent characters to balance each others oddities and perspectives. Season 2 fell off a little. I felt that storyline had too many moving parts and not enough time to develop. There were strong elements in that season, but it didn’t recapture the aura season 1 had. Also, I didn’t feel there really was any closure to the overall story. Season 3 told the story in an interesting way and wrapped up nicely, though it was missing that same thing season 1 had. The story was definitely a lot tighter than S2’s though. I’m pumped to watch S4 and see what it offers. It seems to be trying to recapture what S1 originally brought to the table!
“There is a mark theme perceivable in the two works of philosophical negativity and powerful repulsiveness. It might be expressed hence: Behind the scenes of life prowls something poisonous that makes a bad dream of our reality.” – The Conspiracy Against the Human Race by Thomas Lagotti That’s why season 1 was good delving into various philosphies. Season 2 and 3 were from the great minds of Hollywood.
This latest season with Jodi Foster is one of the worst shows I have ever seen. Foster does what she can, but the script is awful. I could tell right away that it was someone who knew little to nothing about Alaska or how regular American act. So no big surprise that it was directed by a woman from Mexico City and filmed in Europe. Season 2 and 3 were flawed, but watchable and even had some good parts at least.
I think the quality is linear. I liked 2 better than 3. My favorite part of 1 was the grand conspiracy. The ‘villains’ were numerous, connected, in leadership positions in the community/state, so unraveling the mystery ends with the satisfaction of some form of justice. 2 did this halfway, but 3 did it worse. Hopefully Night Country can right the ship.
Season 1 was a masterpiece . Season 2 fell short ., Didn’t watch season 3 coz there wasn’t any substantial vibe behind it . Now True detective : Night country ….. This is something different, there’s a feel of a supernatural ailment lurking behind . Frosty and chilly backdrop of Alaska . I strongly feel Jodi Foster will pull this one off .
I think the main difference between the seasons is that people took more away from season 1 than 2 or 3. It showed us life as a whole of two completely different people connected by one event. The show wasn’t about the mystery. It was about Rust and Marty. The case was outside of them. It tortured them and scarred them, but also kept them going till it was solved. Season 2 and 3 are just some cop show that doesn’t amount to anything. (1/23/2024) The second episode of season 4 is out and I feel like it’s falling into the same formula where it’s about the mystery and not about the characters.
Any thoughts on the 4th season? It feels like a Fargo season than a True Detective one.. although the desolate and hopeless atmosphere still lingers in season 4 which is the only thing that binds them. In addition, the music was always similar and made it sound more True Detective-ish…but when I heard Bury a Friend… I was instantly taken out… I love the song on its own but it’s DOES NOT have the same vibes as True Detective
I’m excited for the new season. Season 1 was phenomenal and I hated season 2 at first but then I started looking at it as separate stories which they are and then I actually enjoyed season 2. It was still worse than season 1 but I enjoyed it. Then on to season 3 it was better than season 2 but not as good as season 1 but I still enjoyed it. I just look at them as single separate stories and try not to compare between seasons.
I saw season 1 first years and loved it. My husband watched season 3 first just recently. It was pretty good. We just finished season 2. I went into it thinking it would suck bc of what I’d always heard. When it began I was like wait a minute, this is pretty good, but nope, it did indeed suck. There was too much going on. Too many characters, most of whom were very flat and not particularly believable. I didn’t really care about any of them. The only character I ended up caring about was Frank, and I went into the season convinced Vince Vaughn must’ve ruined it. He was the best part imo. So now, I’ll rewatch season 1 and my husband will see it’s brilliance for the first time. Lucky him.
I’ve watched the first 3 seasons so far. Season 1 is awesome. Season 2 definitely fell flat, but I did really like some of the acting performances. Collin Farrell and Vince Vaughan did well I think. Season 3, in my opinion, was just as good as season one. Different for sure but I think it was just as good. I do wish that it got maybe a little darker, but it was really good.
I loved season 2, i’d say on par with season one, I would say somethings just didnt seem life like though thats artistc licesne though I also got a similar anexity from uncut gems. Its a very different story and I feel people are just wanting the same though it felt more like the wire. and faster paced. I think people are hoping for a better ending but I am not sure there could have been one. Looking forward to seaons 3
The problem with season 2 although beautifully acted, the plot was just super convoluted. I’ve watched it a few times over the years and on the most recent re-watch i think i finally understood MOST of what was going on. Sure S1 is a masterpiece, but it was also easy to follow, not that you need to be spoon fed exposition or anything but season 2 had me feeling like i need to do homework before starting the next episode.
I think the first season is a masterpiece, 8 perfect hour of beautiful cinema not tv, and what also contribute in that is the reel friendship between Matthew and Woody that create this kind of alchemy between them, and Rust character was planned for Woody Harrelson, but Matthew was in almost the same state of mind than the character Rust, so they exchange the roles, and the result was and still perfect, Waaaaaaawe, the other seasons were just, you know forgettable, nothing to do with the first, that i just saw for the third or the forth time, because i just love those characters and the cinematography and the atmosphere and the hole thing
I’ve actually liked all the seasons but season 4 feels forced. I’m only on episode 2 but there’s so much exposition and personal baggage crap that I’m finding myself bored. The show introduced like 10 characters in 30 minutes, then there are all kinds of odd choices (casting, situations, dialog). I find the whole thing painfully contrived. At least X Files just got on with the story, but this wallows in interpersonal backstory.
What went wrong was they made more seasons, and people keep comparing them to the first one. Stop it, first one is a stand alone and its arguably one of the best things made for tv in history, its up there with the Sopranos, Breaking bad and the wire, and its only 8 episodes! 8 episodes that rival entire shows of multiple seasons. Just take it as it is, one perfect stand alone season
sounds like the 4th season has got them back on track – and Jodie Foster is the biggest star to feature so far… so will presumably bring fans of hers to the series. But it seems like the Execs just did not realise what the real strength of the format was… a completely unique creative team for each series means that each season can hvae its own flavours and themes. Season 5 should go again… Christopher Nolan directing a Tarantino script with Christian Bale & Denzel Washington?
Season 1 was a masterpiece with incredible acting, great writing & stellar production Season 2 is brilliant in it’s own right The 1st time I watched season 2 it was disappointing & like most people I was expecting something even more intricate & captivating than season 1 However re-watching season 2 there is much to admire, enjoy & contemplate – the setting & characters have their own distinct elements that are intriguing & captivating once you emerse yourself in a very different place, time & conflicted characters living lives with different but sometimes overlapping values & motives It does seem that season 2 could have benefited from extra writing time & more episodes, but there’s still depth to many of the characters & many forces & people working against each of them – creating rivalry, conflict, lost love, crushed dreams, revenge & tragedy that prompts us to contemplate our own values & how our lives are linked to forces more powerful than individual will or desire Once you move beyond why isn’t season 2 as epic or layered as season 1, there are actually many great interweaving characters & storylines – it explores aspects of human tragedy & triumph & the struggle for a meaningful existence with purpose that looks different for each individual – creating a myriad of competing agendas, most of which can never be resolved but lock individuals into a particular mindset & focus sometimes aimed at distraction, sometimes greed, but mostly self interest Season 3 is also quite enjoyable & worth perusal with a return to the time splicing & recounting & reimagining crime investigations & lives surrounding rural USA tragedy amongst ordinary people struggling with life & each other – some of these elements feel familiar & revisit season 1 elements I actually found Season 3 to be less intriguing than Season 2 in many ways – because it moved back to relying on a format closer to Season 1 & it took a rewatch for me to appreciate it as a standalone story & microcosm of it’s own period & setting Each season offers compelling viewing, characters & stories that outshine most other TV shows & most movies Always going to be near impossible to top season 1, most things came together & worked so well & the datk layers overlapped beautifully with Rust as one of the darkest & smartest examples of a character looking into the abyss, teetering on the brink & finding ways to keep moving forward through personal & social challenges without completely giving in to despair & self destruction – & actually being capable of using insights into the darker elements of human nature to try not to perpetuate increasing evil & seek out justice & hope in a universe where natural law creates the best & worst opportunities for human behaviours to unfold & warp & regress but also grow & with determination flourish & create conditions slightly less shit for everyone, even if only for a brief time before the inevitable pull of the abyss overwhelms most people again.
i seriously wished true detective was just that one season,..,the story was sot of finished there in 1 the cast was just flawless in 1 the atmosphere was so dark and beautiful in 1 the music the thriller the anticipations was just too amazing in 1,, but they just had to do it and fuck it all up for more money and shit but still season one will be perfect forever,,,,
Downfall means a steep graph. Although the second season was terrible without a doubt and it would be tough to surpass the praise season 1 received, it is also true that the third season was a significant improvement from the second one. Hence, it is not a downfall. While Fargo, a similar styled series is doing quite better. Still Fargo faltered in season 4 but picked up sharp in season 5.
Dude, do your research. “All right, all right, all right” is from Dazed and Confused, it’s not off screen. McConaughey became recognized from Dazed and was on track as a new star, it wasn’t off screen. He tried for some serious roles but did get sucked into the Hollywood typecast of good looking; pay him money. But it wasn’t until his kids were growing that he realized he wanted them to be proud of his works when he revamped his image and agreed to Dallas Buyers Club and True Detective. The talent was always there.
I think Season 2 and 3 weren’t bad by any stretch of the imagination as a stand alone product. They just aren’t as good as season 1. I think this is why they don’t have as much love. Season one knocked it out the park and audiences were expecting it to be followed up by even better installments. Now Season 2 I think suffered from too many main characters, although it still had some cool ideas and strong female characters without jamming it down your throat or make you question their abilities. Season 3 returned to a more traditional format and I actually enjoyed this almost as much as season one. Ali and Dorff were perfect as the leads and I did find the multiple timelines rewarding. I just watched season 4 episode one and well it is a preachy dumpster fire that just doesn’t understand what made the first 3 seasons so much better.
Season 1 is good because of technicalities, it is special, though, because they anchored it in Lovecraft. The other seasons are neither particularly good, nor special. It is very common seeing this in the market, a writer will meddle with symbols they do not understand so well and get something amazing by accident, crazy, I know, but there are examples aplenty. How can you tell it happened? When the writer tries to replicate their success, and fails.
Season 1 is an arguably perfect season of television. So, yeah, it’s going to be hard to recreate perfection. It is also a case of high expectations and subpar delivery. Season 2 by itself is not a 40% rotten tomato season of TV. Compared to season 1 it is. After the dynamic of the first two seasons there will always be fans that will just hate anything that is not season 1, which I think is at least part of the reason why we have the big rifts between critic and audience scores on seasons 3 and 4. Season 3 was fine, but it is still NOT season 1, and nothing ever will be. It is the writer director combo, yeah, and the acting of Matthew and Woody, sure, and the timing and novelty of it, absolutely. That is why it was “lightning in a bottle” and it won’t happen like that again. Not for this series. For something else in another time, maybe.
Season two is good I’m still perusal I’ve seen one. Of course that’s lightning in a bottle I’ve seen three which I absolutely loved and I’m in the middle of night surgery which is totally mind-boggling and I love it but you gotta rewatch it a few times because it’s very deep, but season two shouldn’t be called true Detective, it should stand on its own, it’s very good but it doesn’t belong with true Detective
Your initial question is WRONG. You stated: “Why it is impossible to make another good season of TD?”. The fact is that there has never been another season of TD, because we do not know what happeneed to Marty and Rust. The story does not continue. It is a different story with the same name, but with a Season 2 attached. FACT IS: if season 2 and 3 would have been called Detectives in real Life or Memories of a Detective, those shows would have been well received by the audience. They just had to bear a cross of the weight of being sequels of the best show ever. They are doomed to fail. The only way to make a new great hit in another season of TD, is bringing back Rust and Marty.
i mean, season 1 was cosmic horror. was lovecraftian with out lovecraft. was something that ambroce bierce would be proud off. Season 2 sort of wanted to be dante’s inferno by the end but was too little too late. season 3 was good, but didnt wanted to stand on the shoulders of giants. and Night Country Sort of wanted to be The Thing but the problem was the weirdness was too blunt, too obvious. I feel like in order to go back to form is to explore the existencial horror of lovecraft while keeping it ambiguous at the same time
I read an article not long before season 2 came out, and it talked about how Nic had worked on season 1’s script for a really long time and had thought about it for years. I’m fine if you open with your magnum opus, but you’re setting yourself up for an unsustainable product. This never should have been an anthology, but I understand HBO saw they had a hit and wanted more
My favorite review of season 1 goes a little something like this: (In Spanish) “Season 1 is like going out of 8 amazing dates with a chick/guy that you really like. You know they are leaving soon and chances are you’ll never see them again. So you make the most out of the dates. Only to realize by the end of the last date, you (kind of) forgot to have xes with them”
I never really bought the fact that the same person who wrote TD1, was capable to come up with S2 and S3. S2 being a total clusterfuck and S3 being just a “regular” pale and ordinary tv show. My theory has always been that something got in the way of Nic’s creative freedom after S1. Whether is production or whatever else. I just can’t believe it’s the same person. If you’re Maradona, you stay Maradona in whatever team you play, unless someone forces you to play as a goal keeper. The gap between S1 and S2 and S3 is just way too big.
A brother and I discussed “Who goes there,” and he felt it was a lame gimmick in the series. I was shocked. That sequence for me was totally unexpected and gratefully appreciated by me as a great shake up for the entire show. He felt it was a pile of wank. I try to imagine his perspective and even in my most cynical of minds I just can not relate. Let bygones be bygones I suppose.
Everyone craps all over the 2nd Season but I enjoy the hell out of it. I don’t compare it to Season 1 or even Season 3 (which has a lot to like but feels rather tame compared to the first two series.) But the 4th Season is just awful. I stopped perusal halfway through and deleted it after purchasing the season via Amazon. Based on what I’ve read in honest reviews I won’t be missing a damned thing: confusing and disjointed and BORING and do they EVER investigate the catalyst mystery or just go around screwing people while I wonder who in the hell’s related to who?
S1 and S2 aren’t even the same genre. I always thought it was dumb to compare the two. I honestly really enjoyed S2. Once I accepted that it was something different than S1 and I adjusted my expectations to not expect just more of S1 I was able to really appreciate it for what it is. S3 was a little mid to me but I also still enjoyed it.