In New York, the crime of conspiracy involves the planning of a crime with at least one other person. The offense is classified into degrees, from class B misdemeanor to class A-I felony, and it is determined by the elements, jurisdiction, and degree of the agreed upon or “object” crime. Conspiracy is relatively easy for prosecutors to prove as the law does not require exact proof of language used in an agreement to commit a crime.
There are six conspiracy crimes in the New York criminal code, including conspiracy. The elements of a conspiracy charge require four elements: 1) an agreement to commit a crime; 2) the agreement is between two or more people. A qualified drug attorney can build a solid defense for you and ensure that the many rights implicated by conspiracy prosecutions are protected along the way.
In the case of Mayor Eric Adams, the conspiracy was reported as a plot to take over the city government by White ringleaders, assisted by enslaved people who were promised their freedom. The details of the conspiracy are still coming into focus, but on Thursday, Mayor Eric Adams was indicted in New York on five counts, including bribery, wire fraud, and conspiracy to take over the city government.
In summary, conspiracy charges in New York involve at least two people acting with intent to commit a crime, and the law does not require exact proof of language used in an agreement to commit a crime. A qualified drug attorney can build a solid defense for you and protect your rights during conspiracy prosecutions.
📹 The Five BIGGEST 9/11 Conspiracy Theories DEBUNKED Forever | JOE Features
After twenty years, conspiracy theories about what happened on 9/11 are STILL running wild. So we’re attempted to take five of …
What is conspiracy 2 in NYS penal law?
Conspiracy is a crime that involves planning or agreeing to commit a crime with at least one other person. Under New York Penal Law § 105. 15, a person has committed conspiracy in the second degree if they plan to commit a Class A felony, such as murder, arson, kidnapping, or operating as a major drug trafficker. To be convicted of conspiracy in the second degree, there must be more than a conversation about committing a felony. Under New York Penal Law § 105. 20, one or another party to the conspiracy must commit at least one overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.
Walker, a drug trafficker, and his partner Donnie, a drug trafficker, conspired to kill Wesley, a drug thief. Walker and Donnie worked out a plan to take care of Wesley, and Donnie shot Wesley in the head. By killing Wesley, Donnie committed the first-degree murder crime. Walker could be prosecuted for conspiracy in the second degree, as he planned the murder of Wesley.
What is conspiracy 2nd degree in New York?
Conspiracy is a crime that involves planning or agreeing to commit a crime with at least one other person. Under New York Penal Law § 105. 15, a person has committed conspiracy in the second degree if they plan to commit a Class A felony, such as murder, arson, kidnapping, or operating as a major drug trafficker. To be convicted of conspiracy in the second degree, there must be more than a conversation about committing a felony. Under New York Penal Law § 105. 20, one or another party to the conspiracy must commit at least one overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.
Walker, a drug trafficker, and his partner Donnie, a drug trafficker, conspired to kill Wesley, a drug thief. Walker and Donnie worked out a plan to take care of Wesley, and Donnie shot Wesley in the head. By killing Wesley, Donnie committed the first-degree murder crime. Walker could be prosecuted for conspiracy in the second degree, as he planned the murder of Wesley.
What is conspiracy 5th in NYS penal law?
Conspiracy in the fifth degree is classified as a class A misdemeanor, which denotes a criminal act committed by an individual above the age of 18 who has agreed with one or more minors to engage in such conduct. It should be noted that the FindLaw Codes may not reflect the most recent version of the law in your jurisdiction. Therefore, it is recommended to verify the code’s status with the state legislature or Westlaw.
What is meant by overt act?
It is generally accepted that an overt act, where there is clear evidence of criminal intent, is more compelling than circumstantial evidence. Such actions are carried out in an overt manner and can be inferred, thereby rendering them more compelling than merely circumstantial evidence. It is essential to obtain feedback in order to enhance the BETA Dictionary service.
What are the justifying circumstances?
Justifying circumstances are defenses that provide for lawful justifications or reasons as to why the accused committed a crime, resulting in no criminal liability. An accused who pleads a justifying circumstance under Article 11 of the Revised Penal Code admits to the commission of acts that would otherwise engender criminal liability, but asserts that they are justified in committing the acts. Conviction follows if the evidence for the accused fails to prove the existence of justifying circumstances.
The following individuals do not incur any criminal liability:
Anyone who acts in defense of their person or rights, provided that the following circumstances concur:
Reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it;
Lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending himself.
Anyone who acts in defense of the person or rights of their spouse, ascendants, descendants, or legitimate, natural or adopted brothers or sisters, or their relatives by affinity in the same degrees and those consanguinity within the fourth civil degree.
Anyone who acts in defense of the person or rights of a stranger, provided that the first and second requisites mentioned in the first circumstance of this Article are present and that the person defending is not induced by revenge, resentment, or other evil motive.
Any person who acts in the fulfillment of a duty or in the lawful exercise of a right or office, or in obedience to an order issued by a superior for some lawful purpose.
What are the elements of conspiracy in New York State?
Conspiracy is a crime in New York that involves planning a crime with at least one other person. There are six conspiracy crimes in the criminal code, including specific offenses addressing adult conspiring with a minor to commit a felony. Under New York Penal Law § 105. 17, if an adult is over 18 years old and plans to commit a Class A felony with a minor, they have committed conspiracy in the first degree. Examples of Class A felonies include murder, arson, kidnapping, and operating as a major drug trafficker.
To be convicted of conspiracy, there must be more than casual conversations about committing a crime. Under New York Penal Law § 105. 20, one or another party to the plan must complete at least one overt act in furtherance of the plan. In this case, 21-year-old Haskell caught his girlfriend in bed with another man, threatened to kill both, and asked his 15-year-old brother, Tony, to help him kill his girlfriend. They discussed various ways to kill the girlfriend and get away with it, but neither party took any overt steps in furtherance of the plan.
Conspiracy in the sixth degree, fifth degree, third degree, and second degree are also punishable under New York Penal Law § 105. 15.
What is conspiracy in the 6th degree in NY?
A sixth-degree conspiracy is classified as a Class B misdemeanor, which is defined as an agreement between two or more individuals to commit a crime with the intention of facilitating its commission.
What is the conspiracy rule?
Conspiracy law typically doesn’t require proof of specific intent to injure someone, but rather a tacit agreement among group members to commit a crime. This allows the government to charge a defendant regardless of whether the planned criminal act has been committed or the possibility of the crime being carried out successfully. In most U. S. jurisdictions, a person must agree to commit a crime and at least one of the conspirators must commit an overt act in furtherance of the crime.
However, in United States v. Shabani, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that this element is not required under the federal drug conspiracy statute. Conspirators can be guilty even if they don’t know the identity of other members of the conspiracy.
What is conspiracy in the fourth degree in New York?
Conspiracy is a crime where one or more people plan to commit a crime, but there is no formal written agreement required. All that is required is an agreement and an overt act that is completed in furtherance of the plan to commit a crime. There are six criminal conspiracy crimes in the New York criminal code, and the specific charge is determined by the prosecutor based on age, the age of those with whom you conspire, and the crime involved.
In New York Penal Law § 105. 10, a conspiracy in the fourth degree is committed if you plan to commit a Class B or C felony with at least one other person, are over 18 and plan to commit a felony with someone under 16, or plan to commit money laundering. In a case like Justin’s, he knocks down a woman and tries to snatch her handbag, but she refuses. He then pulls a gun out of his pocket and points it at her, causing her serious injuries.
Conspiracy in the sixth degree is punishable by New York Penal Law § 105. 00, while in the fifth degree, it is punishable by New York Penal Law § 105. 05. In the third degree, it is punishable by New York Penal Law § 105. 13, and in the second degree by New York Penal Law § 105. 15.
What was the New York conspiracy summary?
The Conspiracy of 1741, also known as the Slave Insurrection of 1741, was a purported plot by slaves and poor whites in the British colony of New York in 1741 to revolt and level New York City with a series of fires. Historians disagree on the scale of the plot, with the prosecution linking it to a “Popish” plot by Spaniards and other Catholics. Manhattan had the second-largest slave population in the Thirteen Colonies after Charleston, South Carolina.
Rumors of a conspiracy arose amid economic competition, a severe winter, war between Britain and Spain, and recent slave revolts in South Carolina and Saint John in the Caribbean. In March and April 1741, a series of 13 fires erupted in Lower Manhattan, with the most significant one within the walls of Fort George, then the home of the governor. A 16-year-old Irish indentured servant, Mary Burton, testified against the others as participants in a supposedly growing conspiracy to burn the city, kill the white men, take the white women for themselves, and elect a new king and governor.
In the end, thirty-four people were executed, thirty of whom were black men. The bodies of two supposed ringleaders, Caesar and John Hughson, were gibbeted and left to rot in public. Another eighty-four men and women faced transportation to the brutal conditions of Caribbean slavery, while seven white men were pardoned on condition of entering permanent exile from New York.
What is conspiracy jurisdiction in NY?
Penal Law § 105. Twenty-five states permit the prosecution of individuals for conspiracy in the county where the conspiracy was formed or in any county where an overt act was committed.
📹 Shannon “THE SHAPESHIFTER” Sharpe WANTED ALL THE SMOKE off Steven Adams & Ja Morant’s Dad!👀 #shorts
So let’s see if he can debunk the one about the actual owner of the towers taking out a multi multi million dollar insurance policy against terrorism specifically and also that man used to have breakfast in the tower every morning but the day of the attacks he didn’t go he also told his daughter who worked in the towers not to go to work on the day of the attacks
You didn’t debunk anything you just disagreed with everything and just because somebody can show you something on a computer screen doesn’t mean it’s any more real than Mario brothers I still haven’t seen a single explanation as to how the damage to the top 15% of the building was able to cause the rest of the lower part of the building to suddenly disintegrate while the top part that was on fire stayed a solid piece as it fell through the building and I’m not a YouTube conspiracy junkie I used to be an ironworker I used to build those structures for a living I have knowledge and experience to back up what I’m saying you sound like another guy who’s just watched to many YouTube articles and suddenly thinks your opinion is valid
I guess construction and aeronautical facts are completely trustworthy when they come from ‘Sports Joe’. Although I would love to believe that writing DEBUNKED in capital letters is proof of the 100% authority of this article, I think I’ll stick to my own opinion which is that this debunks nothing and simply creates more inconsistencies.
#2 missing context. The reason architects and engineers for 9/11 truth say it’s a controlled demo isn’t just because of it failing into its own footprint (although in theory the top above impact would have likely toppled over) but the speed at which floors pancake on top of each other, as well as it’s ability to fall straight down
You can literally watch old articles where the news website of when they went and re-uploaded the “plane crash” they had to cover up the fact it shows the enitre nose of the plane going in one side of the building and coming out the backside completely in tact. First they added a fireball to cover the nose of the plane coming out and then they just literally decided to do a screen blackout. Why try and cover up these images?
This ” debunk” article is so easy to debunk its not even funny. It causes me physical pain in my stomach that people actually believe this article and refuse to watch a article that will debunk this crap and give insurmountable evidence to prove 9/11 was an inside job. I literally get sick to my stomach from the frustration
I used to be able to find articles of the firefighters who were in those towers that day. Many of them reported explosions going off near the foundations of the towers. Others reported molten steel flowing in the rubble of the collapsed towers. There was one article in particular where workers reported “elevator repairs” during late hours just weeks prior to the incident. Now; Jet fuel: Yes. It can weaken steel. No. It cannot melt steel into a molten liquid as firefighters reported seeing several days after the attack. Explosions: Firefighters. The only people that ran into those towers that day never expected a “high rise fire” to completely demolish a building. It’s never been done. As those firefighters were standing in the lobby the towers collapsed right on top of them. And guess what they reported “Explosions” like it was a “Controlled Demolition”. Now let’s talk about how they could get such explosives into the buildings without people really noticing. If I were them I think I’d disguise myself as an elevator repair man. And I think I would only come in between the hours of 2am and 4am to avoid any attention from the public. Strangely this is exactly what people reported. Huh. Sadly, basing my opinion on first-hand eye-witness reports that cant even be found anymore makes me the idiot. Meanwhile YouTube buries the great testimonies of people who nearly died that day while simultaneously spreading the misinformation known as the “official narrative.” Bravo…
I love you still show the articlegame collapse of bldg 7. Watch it. Then watch the ACTUAL COLLAPSE. Nothing matches! By the way did you computer break? Why cant we see the whole animation of bldg 7 collapse? The truth is IT DOESNT EXIST. Thats why we never see the whole animation. Because even in their articlegame world they couldnt get that building to collapse. So they stopped it after 3 sec or so. Keep up the good work debunking the accurate theories
Literally, to ‘debunk’ the theories would be to remove the ‘bunk’ or ‘false’ theories, leaving only the remaining solid concerns of, for example: 1) why the towers collapsed at a speed approaching that of free-fall, as if all of the joints from all of the floors were broken at the same moment (to the ‘coincidental’ tune of multiple consecutive explosions) 2) why so many direct winesses heard the sounds of multiple, consecutive explosions (the sounds of which were also captured on the soundtracks of article footage), which are normally heard when a building is intentionally demolished, resulting in a rate of collapse near free-fall rate of speed. (If some of the joints were broken through damage to the steel, while other remained intact, one can imagine the unsteady rate of the uneven collapse caused by the initial damage to the steel of those joints in the sections of the buildings first exposed the the heat of burning jet fuel.) 3) why explosions took place on floors away from the plane impact sites and away from the basement, which may have contained fuel from generators. 4) how the airline passengers were able to use their cell phones at such high altitudes, despite the fact that this was, apparently, technically impossible. 5) why the footage from other pentagon cameras was not realeased, despite the existence of so many article cameras operating on the exterior of the pentagon. 6) why the crash site in Shanksville, PA was so small and so little wreckage remained compared to other similar plane crash sites.
The problem with conspiracies is it’s all just a guess or a hunch…. It’s all “disprove this” and “disprove that” but never actually gives any evidence. It’s all a reach and an attempt to dispute the evidence rather than placing up its own that holds real actually merit. Facts are what can be proven not what can be assumed or suggested
Ok so steel softens at 600 degrees and collapses, all the steel below the impact site isn’t weakened yet it all collapsed perfectly. Don’t give me the weight makes it collapse cause that is BS! There was a team of engineers adamant the structure could take several impacts from a plane and still be standing.. The way it fell was planned demolition..
I grew up under communism in Poland. This article reminds me of the times there … The logic is, it is true or false, because the government said it is true or false. And here is little animated article with all the points gov said as a prove that it is so. How about for 5 for example tests from plane wreckage, independently (yes that means foreigners not Americans doing the investigation) looking for traces of bombs that fighters carry? Where is the audio, no not just transcripts. Telephone records, independently verified of course. No, instead is ‘I as a gov tell you it isn’t true and therefore it isn’t’ and that’s it. Nice.
1. Molten steel WAS OBSERVED on camera by firemen and witnesses. So you didn’t debunk jack. Also that silly id*** bending the steel rod applied a force that was not the direction of the collapse. Heat thst steel ip and apply a downward force. NOTHING HAPPENS. And you conspiracy nuts are tje ones saying gravity was the only applied force.
Could someone perhaps explain to me, why there were explosions on the floors under the plane, before the collapse got there? I am not a conspiracy theorist, but rather interested in an actual explanation for this. However, no article I was able to find, delivered logical reasons or – like this article – ignores this fact (“fact” because it is in fact visible in some recordings) altogether. The only explanation for the rapid ejection of the dirt and debris I was able to find basically proofed, that the collapse couldn’t have caused that, because the pressure wave would have gone through the staircases and elevator-shafts. Do you know any real resources on this matter?
Funny how the pentagon you know, the building with the most security cameras in the world only releases a blurry article of two to three frames of an object hitting it.. How would they not have better footage? That’s ridiculous. That’s the type of stuff that makes people think they’re hiding something.
The desperation to prove, it was an attack and not an inside job is pretty obvious to me. Can you tell why the owner of the building just 6 months earlier from the ” attack ” change the insurance policy of the building from 1 billion l to 3billion ? Yes I know the answer is the inflation !. We live in a world that money have more value than humans. I should be an idiot to believe you didn’t receive any money to produce such a article aimed for the majority of humans who happens to have an IQ les than 120 . who can easily be manipulated with just an advertising in controlled media…nice try.
1) you are explaining BENDING steel. the theory doesnt deny steel BENDING. its the MELTING of steel we SAW on camera! MOLTEN metal was POURING from the building…LITERALLY POURRRRING. …next… 2) there arent just REPORTS of it LOOKING like a demolition. there are several pieces of footage where you can clearly hear a pattern of explosive BOOMS going off just before and during the collapse. …next… 3) that was clearly a demolition… you cannot watch that original footage of it’s “collapse” and say it wasnt a controlled demolition… ..next… 4) oh, so the wings can chop massive holes into the WTC, but it could barely scratch the Pentagon….mmk… …next… 5) so, they didnt take it down, but they were going to… does that not imply the same thing? they were going to kill civilians, but didnt get there soon enough. ok? mmk….so ppl are still dumb….
Nice try Joe! Ok let’s assume jet fuel caused the steel beams to weaken and bend. Scientifically, it is expected that the part of the tower above the impact point should’ve collapsed. But what we saw is the melting of steel beams from the top to the bottom of the entire building. Do you have any answers for that?
0:26 1) The jet fuel burnt for a few seconds, that was the fireball. The office fire may have weakened the steel. However, the manner in which the towers fell was not caused by weakened steel. 1:10 2) Complete nonsense. Study some 9th grade physics and hopefully you’re intelligent enough to see how a small part of a building the same weight as the rest of the building, cannot do this. 1:30 3) The NIST simulation was a complete farce. Even the simulation can’t show how the building actually fell because it cannot be explained without a controlled demolition. 2:04 4) The 75ft wide hole was actually the full building damage. Earlier photos show a small 8ft or so missile shaped hole. The wreckage on the lawn was that of a drone carrying the missile. 2:38 5) There was no plane. Look closely at all the photos and articles. The explanations about the debris being further away are ridiculous.
“All theories are completely ridiculous” – says he. I started off sceptical but once all the ‘anomalies’ start piling up, it’s not hard to see this as being something other than what it was reported to be. Start multiplying out the oddities in this adventure and the numbers of this being what it was purposed to be, are very many to one. Bad article JOE. Try harder next time.
Lies. The Pentagon’s impact hole was 15ft diameter and no damage to the wall was done by 2 x 6 ton titanium engines. The collapse may have been 125 ft wide but the impact hole was only 15ft diameter. There are many photos of the Pentagon wall showing the 15ft diameter before the collapse. Where were / are the engines? P.S. How much are they paying you?
A joke. The animated sequence showed the plane going into the tower and ALUMINUM wings (that are basically hollow) slicing thru steel support beams like a knife thru butter is laughable. Also, 95%+ of the jet fuel burned off in seconds, after the impact. Those were the giant fireballs that were seen. After that, the materials burning were office items, carpet, paper, desks etc. Not near the required temp to melt steel. And the military planes were going to RAM flight 93??? LOLOL. That would have caused them to crash too. (never heard that story before, btw). And there was NO sheared wing at the Pentagon, let alone the giant, titanium engines. No evidence of an actual plane hitting, let alone flying that low without ever hitting the ground. And the plane at Shanksville… NOTHING of the plane was found.. just some smoldering debris. No plane has EVER totally disintegrated when drashing to the ground… all except that one, of course. This article debunked NOTHING. Truly laughable.
The infamous phone calls from the plane passengers to their families could only have worked if they had been made on the ground yet they were miraculously made while radar had the hijacked planes recorded at about ten thousand feet and going approximately 500 miles per hour. The hijacked planes were on the ground and the passengers all murdered while radio controlled drones did all the carefully controlled murder and destruction.
There is no explanation for the SPEED at which the twin towers collapsed. Simple conservation of momentum calculations prove that it should have taken much longer than 10 seconds for them to collapse. 10 seconds is free fall speed. There is no way the upper sections of the towers could fall unhindered as fast as observed. The crash footage at the Pentagon does not show any severed aircraft wings. Where did they go? How the the aluminum fuselage penetrate NINE reinforced concrete walls? These questions have remained unanswered for over 20 years. This was an INSIDE JOB.
So, the biggest theory, which you did not address, is that the buildings were destroyed through a controlled demolition. some pointers towards that: – the smoke eminating from the roof of the north tower when the first plane hit. – the steel pillars stood in the wreckage burning like cigarettes. – something caused the north tower to ‘inhale’ the stacks of smoke, just as the second plane hit. – cars throughout the area had rusted, almost as if through chemical reaction – somewhat unverified evidence of thermitic materials in the WTC dust
I’m also encouraged that if I ever decide to become a criminal and want to break into the pentagon I’ll get in easy no cameras,I can’t get into poverty stricken counsel houses here because there’s at least 25 cameras surrounding these flats,there should be more footage of that incident than anything else
I still believe terrorists were involved in 9/11, but they were enabled by the US. The governments sketchy behavior behind all the security footage of the pentagon crash. The owner of the trade center cancelling a multi million dollar insurance contract just before the plane crash, and warning his daughter to stay away from the trade center. Let us not forge this wasn’t the first time something like this happened. The US government including that crippled bastard Roosevelt goddamn knew about the Japanese plans to attack Pearl Harbor. They purposely allowed it to happen so that America could join the war and send their pawns to die
I love how much bull 💩 this entire load of propaganda is… like the fact they knew and were warned before the attack it was going to happen even during the previous Clinton administration, days before the attack the owner doubled his insurance to included terrorism… he became a billionaire 4x over… George Bush was not only aware the attack was going to happen he just so happen to be conveniently reading to children when the attack occurred… a bomb went off in the base of the tower AND a different plane hit the building also before 9/11 the buildings survived both attacks.
Yeah these answers give absolutely no explanation and very weak reasons to debunk the conspiracy theories. I just cannot accept these it just doesn’t make sense. I cant accept the official story as it doesn’t add up and these reasons in the article dont make sense when thought about, it like hearing politicians give an answer to a question in the moment that sounds semi reasonable but completely falls apart with any critical thinking.
I’m always interested to hear debunking theories as I feel it’s good to listen to opposing arguments. It’s a pity that this one goes down the rather easy route of just saying what the theory is and then saying someone else has debunked it. I feel it would lead to more of a discussion if there was more science behind articles like this (as to be fair there very often is in ones that suggest more controversial theories) rather than just saying it’s not true because one other source said it isn’t true. This makes the argument seem weak and desperate in my opinion.
Thanks for debunking the fact that a nearly 50 storey building completely collapsed in on itself even though it wasn’t hit by anything, hey it was so obvious it was going to happen that outlets like the BBC where even reporting on it while it was still standing, BEFORE it completely collapsed in on itself, because hey, it was obviously going to happen . Thanks also for debunking the fact that a 757 hit the pentagon, one of the most surveilled buildings in the world with security cameras all over the place, yet none of them captured an image of a large passenger airplane slamming into it . Thanks for showing us the evidence of debris from said 757 which hit the pentagon, including the remnants of an engine about 8 feet high and 12 feet long and weighing about the same as a small car, which was left on the lawn after the wing of said 757 struck the lawn before crashing in to the building . Thanks once again for “debunking these conspiracy theories forever” . What would we do without esteemed outlets like yours educating the masses .
Did he just tell us: the jets were meant to ram the plane? :face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling::face-green-smiling:
I dont believe its possible for such strong buildings to just implode like a card house. How could fuel spread if it ignites on impact? The buildings went down way to fast on my opinion. I give you an other thing to think about, how could buildings implode exactly the same way when the planes crashed on different places off the towers? You would think they would have fallen differently.
One of the towers was hit lower down by one of the planes, yet the top section did not remain intact and crush the lower level. It should have fallen like a felled tree if the metal was weakened by the heat, yet somehow the zone above the impact seemed to disappear and fall at free fall speed. Those that believe the official explanation need to explain how that is possible (against all current known laws of physics)
“George W. Bush, U.S. president testified but not under oath in a session that was not officially transcribed because the White House considered it a “private meeting” in which highly classified information would be discussed. Bush asked that his testimony be limited to one hour.” Merica!!!!! Fuck yeah!!!!!
That Purdue university simulation is hilarious. Purdue only modeled the top 20 stories of the North Tower. The NIST used digital camera footage to analyze the South Tower impact at the 70th floor. The plane hit at the 80th floor. The analysis showed the building deflected 12 inches at the 70th and oscillated for 4 minutes. The South Tower must have deflected 14 to 15 inches where the plane hit. So the North Tower must have deflected below where Purdue simulated the building. Is there any horizontal deflection in their simulation? Wouldn’t that deflection have to absorb some of the plane’s kinetic energy? DUH!
The last building to fall on 9/11 fell a long time after all the other buildings had collapsed. Even people that went back inside that last building just before it collapsed said that the building was fine and it had survived the towers falling next to them and they were shocked how it suddenly dropped as if bombs had triggered the collapse from inside. How is it that ALL of the World Trade Center buildings (seven in total) no longer exist. Think about it.
Something I thought about was let’s say the towers were detonated. Where the towers began to collapse was right at the impact point, the first thing I think about is if that’s true do you know how crazy good of a pilot you’d have to be to even line up the plane perfectly at the spot where the bombs are? Secondly even after the plane or missile hits perfectly bullseye ON POINT of target, the shock wave would set off these bombs and the building would collapse right on impact
Each twin tower when viewed from above the tower was a perfect square comprised of 208 feet in width on each of its sides (each of the tower’s four sides was the equivalent of 2/3rds the length of a football field). The height of each twin tower was 1,368 feet above ground (1/4 mile high) atop an additional 6 stories located below ground (6 stories below ground is at least 60 feet or 1/5th the length of a football field). A 767 jetliner has a wingspan of 156 feet (75% the width of each 208 feet side of a twin tower). The height of the tip of the vertical tail wing of a 767 jetliner reaches 28 feet above the fuselage of the jetliner. For a 767 jetliner to remain intact while slicing through one of the sides of a twin tower it MUST leave a cut out on the entry side of the tower that not only accommodates the jet’s 156 feet wing span, cross-sectional area of the fuselage, and cross-sectional areas of the engines beneath the wings, but MUST ALSO ACCOMMODATE the jetliner’s vertical tail wing which peaks 28 feet above the top of the fuselage. Go back and look at the images. The cut out which represents the entry of the jetliner does not accommodate for the 156 feet wingspan of the jetliner. The CUT OUT MUST show a breach in 75% of the impacted side of the tower and must also allow for clearance of the tip of the vertical tail wing which peaks at 28 feet above the alleged fuselage cut out on the impacted side of the tower. The tip of the vertical tail wing of the 767 jetliner MUST clear nearly 2 and 1/2 stories above the fuselage in order to remain intact as it sliced through a side of the tower, i.
Joe reads off the teleprompter very well but I wouldn’t trust him to debunk a packet of crisps. His version of debunk is complete shite. ….its ok. They’ll keep doing shit like this and have done – the bewildered herd keep eating the lies. The designer of the twin tower complex designed the buildings to withstand MULTIPLE plane impacts – the ventilation shafts and elevators were hermetically sealed. Buildings don’t collapse at free fall speed; I could go on all night. This lad, Joe, knows less than a child’s worth of real world knowledge and it shows in his weak arguments and points. The guy who signed off on the steel was fired for questioning the narrative – then changed his story. The official reports and books had no substantive evidence – and what evidence there was, was promptly shipped out! Destroying any evidence asap. Put options were made in high volumes the day before on aircraft stock (inferring insider stock trading) and the FBI and CIA had thousands of investigations wiped away when building 7 came down. Millions of dollars of Gold was taken out days before with 18 wheel trucks and armed guards. I could literally fly a plane through simple Joes explanation! lol .try harder Joe.
I think someone also needs to point out to you that there was still molten metal found at the bottom with thermite present and I don’t give a shit how many so-called engineers who attempt to try to prove this could happen I’m here to tell you as a steel fabricating foreman that it’s impossible because the heat transfer in 3 to 4 inch steel beams will not reach temperature to cause such a freefall collapse! It’s impossible and just So you’re tuned in I used to operate a stress relief furnace and know how long it takes to achieve high temperature in a controlled furnace environment!
my mom and family members believe that the government b4 the current president that year had, had asked the terrorists to crash the planes into the WTC’s and they had also planted bombs to detonate once the planes crashed, so they could go to war with Iraq, and war means earning money. so in conclusion my mom thinks that the government b4 the incident set it all up and was willing to take thousands of lives just for piles of money. if it true, that is disgusting and sickening. most horror stories ive seen and heard dont phase me at all, but perusal the planes crash, the buildings collapse, people jump and fall from the WTC’s had me in tears of shock and sympathy. RIP to all the lives lost September 11th, 2001.
1. The jet fuel flashed over and exploded immediately igniting office fixtures and supplies that sustained the fire – 9/11 commission. 2. A vertical collapse still doesn’t happen at near free fall speed and this has been highly contested by groups of engineers to this 3. The NIST report claims that the building fell after a single column failed leading to an interior collapse followed by the exterior. They have never released this model for examination or peer review. It is classified. 4. That “hole” is misleading. The article of the “hole” in the example collapsed DURING a news broadcast while they watched the building burn. It was not caused by an airplane. Furthermore all 80 article camera tapes have been confiscated including gas stations from across the street. The only frames are three of which even Bill o Reilly said “that doesn’t look like a plane to me” 5. Not sure about this. Do t know enough. But the first four arguments here are total BS
JOE your a fed just come out and say furthermore how about you debunk operation north woods and tell me how not a single qualified pilot could fly the flight path of the plane that hit the pentagon but a terrorist who was reported to not even being able to fly a Cessna could fly into the pentagon also explain to me joe why over 2 trillion dollars went missing from the pentagon day before 9/11 also joe explain to why there was reported explosions in the towers way before they collapsed especially in the below ground floors also explain to me why so much of Americas air force just happened to be on training missions that day.
Did he use jet fuel to heat that little piece of metal ? The giant steel beams of the WTC were heated in an oxygen starved fire, which can diffuse heat energy to other steel beams, in a building required by code to contain fire redundant material is not an adequate or accurate comparison. Most jet fuel was gone in minutes. Black smoke = low temp fire.
So i dont have any evidence but im pretty sure that the average person or somebody on that flight that crashed in the field had some idea of how a plane worked and could have tried to control it. It really doesnt make much sence to say that the passengers attained control of the aircraft and then just crashed it, or told the hijackers to crash it. Also i dont remember the times exactly but i dont belive that the passengers on bourd knew that the two towers had been hit and therefor would most likly not know that the aircraft was headed for the WashingtonD.C. (allegedly). This means that they would have virtually no reason to try to crash the plane to save the people at the capital because they wouldnt have known about the Washington D.C. being a target.
Are there any articles on the aftermath of the 4th plane crash? What I saw was little to no plane debris. No luggage, no large pieces of plane parts, no human remains. And also, I saw with my own eyes what the debris from both towers hit and didn’t hit (building 7) on that day, I live in NYC and was looking for a relative in that area after the smoke cleared. The temperature in the building from the fires needs to be fed that fuel constantly to keep it super hot. So that crap about steel melting in this article is BS, the crap about building 7 catching fire for no reason is BS, and lastly this article is pure BS.
I saw molten steel and boiled iron spill from the sides of the buckets of excavators digging in the pile. my argument is not that jet fuel cant bend it, but that it cant MELT it to a virtual LIQUID… ya know Like LAVA? Can you do that with jet fuel and office furniture? NO. Check out the older footage you can see it clear as day!
A Boeing 767 is 156 feet wide. The width of the hole in the South Tower was 106 feet wide and the width of the hole in the North Tower was 125 feet wide. 50 feet of the Boeing 767 that allegedly struck the South Tower cannot fit into the size of the hole that is in the North Tower…a hole that was supposedly created by a Boeing 767 with a wingspan of 156 feet. 31 feet of the Boeing 767 that is said to have hit the North Tower cannot fit into the size of the hole that is in the North Tower…a hole that was supposedly created by a Boeing 767 with a wingspan of 156 feet. Some people may say that the wings of the Boeings merely folded back as the aluminum portion of the wings came in contact with the exterior steel columns. However we can see this is not what happens in the articles. Even so the aluminum wings would not neatly fold back they would be torn off.
So im trying to understand about this, If this were an inside job – who are the hijackers? Are we saying US hired hijackers to do this to their own country? Why would US risk 93 countries coming against it since the people in the airplanes were people of 93 different nationalities. If this were to be an inside job, isnt there a lot more at stake than just covering up iraq and afg? Someone help me understand.
Guys this is really stupid, in his last “debunk” he was talking about the U.S. fighter jets that were sent to ram the aircraft. Why the hell would you ever try and ram another aircraft midflight unless you wanted to take down the plane as well as yourself. Also, forgive me if ramming an aircraft is a technique that the U.S. Air Force Uses.
We gotta stop letting kooks come up with their stupid ideas that make conspiracies look even worse! That’s what the government wants you to do, so u don’t know. We all know it was Al-Queda, but Saudi nationals (in govt) funded the hijackers, Israel is also complicit, by sending mossad aka (dancing Israelis) workin at “moving systems” as a front to help move the hijackers around. “Moles” and they just let it happen. – making us join the war on terror.
They had footage of the buildings the night before.. Where is the footage from ALL of those same cams?? Do not get me started on what they can see from space and just how detailed those images are… But…ONE guy just happened to, by chance catch a glimpse of the 1st plane. Why only release that one article? They can put it on repeat showing the planes hitting but they can’t show the news station cams footage from the night before all the way up to the first plane hitting?! THE NEWS STATIONS THEMSELVES HAVE SHOWN US THAT THEY HAD CAMS FIXED ONTO THE WTC THE NIGHT BEFORE… WEEKS BEFORE… MONTHS BEFORE.. YEARS BEFORE! But… somehow the ONLY FOOTAGE OF THE FIRST PLANE is from grainy amature article. 😂 They think we are THAT stupid, THAT naive.. Sadly, many ARE that naive.
So guys, luckily for all of us, especially for me, the time has come for my farewell letter, which is simultaneously a love letter to all my dear scientists and experts aka TWF Good luck with your continued search and never having to clean up in Greenfields! – and never forget to behave like a Troll! And please don’t cry, the following true words could possibly hurt to deep, huh! ————————————————————————————– SCIENCE! What is science? But the more important question is, what is a SCIENTIST? Part 1/2 A scientist is a SUPPOSED expert in a certain field. He may have more knowledge than the common people, but at the end of the day he is just another ordinary person who also leaves a “beguiling scent” when he leaves the toilet seat. 1. a so-called SCIENTIST merely gives HIS OPINION on a certain subject, in which the HUMAN IMAGINATION also unconsciously and unavoidably plays its part. 2. just because a SCIENTIST calls himself an “EXPERT” does not necessarily mean that he is intellectually superior to every “non-scientists”. 3. it should be known to everyone that SCIENTISTS OFTEN DISAGREE WITH EACH OTHER on certain things for the sole reason that every expert has HIS OWN OPINION – or scientifically speaking: his own THEORY!!!. This means nothing other than that SCIENCE consists of nothing other than a mishmash of THEORIES. 4. SCIENCE is NOT MATHEMATICS and NOT PHYSICS, but often just a simple THEORY !! or in other words: If a certain thing is analyzed and judged by a SINGLE EXPERT, then it is NOT SCIENCE as a WHOLE that confirms the result, but is still a PERSONAL SCIENTIFIC OPINION – given by one “stinker” out of millions.
That is the real point! —————————————————————— The different way each of us approaches an issue: Some of us usually rely only on outside “sources” – Others usually rely on what they have experienced themselves and / or common sense – they are their own best source! In other words: The latter have an OWN opinion, the former have NOT! They just have ANYONEs opinion! ————————————————————— Quite simply! ———————