Good Omens is a teen-friendly fantasy/sci-fi series created by Neil Gaiman, featuring David Tennant, Michael Sheen, Miranda Richardson, and Jon Hamm. The show follows the unlikely duo of fussy angel Aziraphale and loose-living demon Crowley, who have become overly fond of life on Earth. The show is rated PG-rated for its content, with a rating of 5 out of 5 stars. The first series has received positive reviews from critics, with an approval rating of 84 on Rotten Tomatoes and an average score of 7.3. The show has three seasons and is rated TV-MA. The show is sure to be enjoyable for a wide age range, with some violent and dark scenes but no blood or gore. Despite its positive reviews, Good Omens seems to need to be carried away in its own handbasket for its spiritual content.
📹 Top 10 Differences Between the Good Omens Book and TV Show
When fans heard that Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman’s “Good Omens” was being adapted for TV, “excited!” was an …
Is it OK for a 14 year old to watch Stranger Things?
The content of the show is deemed unsuitable for children under the age of 14 due to its violent and mature nature. However, individual preferences may vary, and thus it is advisable to seek guidance from a healthcare professional.
Does Good Omens have LGBT characters?
Good Omens season two is a refreshing departure from the usual LGBTQ+ show, with the cast’s support for the LGBTQ+ community. Tennant, Sheen, and Gaiman have all shown their commitment to queer characters and actors, not only in Good Omens but also in other shows like The Sandman and American Gods. This allyship is heartwarming and necessary, especially in light of JK Rowling’s hateful comments towards the trans community. Gaiman has never tried to retcon queerness into his work, unlike Rowling who admitted to thinking of Dumbledore as gay in Harry Potter books.
The show’s second season is praised for its increased queerness, and if Prime Video orders a third season, fans can expect more queerness and joy for the protagonists. Gaiman has promised to write another Good Omens novel if the show isn’t renewed, but the lesson is to avoid ending a beloved queer show on a cliffhanger before it’s confirmed for another season.
Is Good Omens okay for 13 year olds?
The show is a quirky, entertaining show suitable for a wide age range, featuring great acting, an interesting storyline, and hilarious scenes. While there are some violent scenes, no blood or gore, and a brief sex scene, the language is infrequent but strong. The show is influenced by prostitution and pornography, and Common Sense Media’s unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers, not influenced by the product’s creators or any of its funders, affiliates, or partners.
Is Good Omen a good show?
Good Omens is a compelling fantasy series that features an intriguing cast of characters, a style that transcends the boundaries of time, and a narrative that is simultaneously both timeless and contemporary. The series incorporates elements of satire, which contributes to its overall entertainment value and unexpected nature. The series’ engaging narrative and compelling cast are likely to captivate audiences, fostering a strong likelihood of them developing an affinity for Good Omens.
Should I let my 13 year old watch Breaking Bad?
Breaking Bad is a groundbreaking television series that explores dark issues such as drug dealing, addiction, and murder. The show is a masterpiece that uses realistic and quality techniques to engage audiences and build a world of its own. However, the dark content of Breaking Bad is not lost, as it shows that anyone can be evil. The violence is strong at times, but it isn’t on the level of brutality like other shows like Game of Thrones and The Wire.
The drug content is pervasive, though the use of drugs isn’t as frequent as you might think. The entire show revolves around drugs, but as long as your kid knows the consequences of drug use, this should be fine. The sex and nudity are also very tame compared to other TV-MA shows, with no nudity in the entire series and sexual content mostly implied. The language is frequent, but children start to hear pervasive coarse language as they grow older.
Breaking Bad tells the story of Walter White, a high school chemistry teacher who becomes obsessed with methamphetamine after being diagnosed with lung cancer in his 50s. The show has intense violence at certain parts, a lot of illegal drug use, moderate sexual content with some nudity in the pilot episode, and a good amount of swearing throughout the show.
However, the show has some graphic and intense scenes, such as Walter trying to rape his wife, sex scenes with his wife, nude women in strip clubs, and glorified prostituting. The show also has a high level of violence, with scenes of people overdosing, being high on meth and heroin, and drug cooking and selling.
In conclusion, Breaking Bad is an amazing must-watch for adults, but it may not be suitable for small kids.
Is Crowley a boy?
Crowley is a male character with red hair and a black snake mark on his face. He wears black and dark colors and has yellow eyes with slit pupils that can change depending on his mood. Crowley started wearing sunglasses to hide them from humans after Noah’s Ark. He has black wings but keeps them hidden. As an Angel, Crowley had brown eyes without slit pupils and white wings. He wore white robes with a gold collar and a silver and white suit with a gold tie.
He also used a headband to push his hair back. Crowley can transform into a snake, with fully yellow eyes, black body scales, and a red underbelly. He can also partially summon snake features like his forked tongue and make his entire head like a snake to scare people paintballing.
Did Crowley and Aziraphale kiss?
Good Omens Season 2 introduces a long-awaited kiss between Aziraphale and Crowley, but it doesn’t solve their problems. Crowley tries to express his feelings for Aziraphale, but Aziraphale chooses to return to heaven. Despite the kiss, they struggle to communicate and understand each other, leaving room for growth in Season 3.
The first season of Good Omens took viewers on a 6, 000-year journey of Crowley and Aziraphale’s relationship. However, the relationship seemed obvious to everyone except the two characters. In Season 2, Aziraphale and Crowley finally fight on the same side, but their former opponent, Gabriel, arrives in Aziraphale’s bookshop with no clothing or memory. Aziraphale helps and hides Gabriel from both Heaven and Hell, causing the forces of Heaven and Hell to hunt for the missing archangel, threatening their “precious, peaceful, fragile” existence.
In summary, Good Omens Season 2 introduces a kiss between Aziraphale and Crowley, but it doesn’t solve their problems or resolve their relationship. The show’s second season offers a deeper understanding of the characters’ relationship and their struggles, allowing for growth and development in Season 3.
Is Good Omens a horror?
Good Omens is a fantasy comedy television series created by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett, based on their 1990 novel. The series, co-produced by Amazon MGM Studios and BBC Studios, is directed by Douglas Mackinnon and features a large ensemble cast including Michael Sheen and David Tennant. The show follows characters trying to prevent or encourage an imminent Armageddon, with the angel Aziraphale and the demon Crowley as their guides. The first series was released on Amazon Prime Video in May 2019, and aired weekly on BBC Two in the UK between January and February 2020.
The series was renewed for a second series in June 2021, with Sheen and Tennant returning, and the second series was released in its entirety on Amazon Prime Video in July 2023. The series was renewed for its third and final series in December 2023.
Why is Good Omens so good?
Good Omens is a comic book series based on Neil Gaiman’s novel and Terry Pratchett’s The Book of Revelation. The show follows an angel and a demon who team up to prevent the end of the world, with Michael Sheen and David Tennant playing the angel Aziraphale and the demon Crowley respectively. The show explores themes of friendship, loyalty, and redemption, as well as finding common ground in unlikely places and learning to embrace one’s inner demons.
The pacing can be uneven at times, and the plot may require leaps of faith. However, if you’re in the mood for a wickedly funny, devilishly clever romp through the end times, Good Omens is a binge-worthy series. Neil Gaiman, who wrote the book with Pratchett, described it as “an apocalyptic story with comedic overtones”. The author, who read the book multiple times, was hesitant to make a film, but after watching all six episodes, they can say that the decision to make it a six-part series was the best decision ever made.
Is Stranger Things 18+?
It should be noted that in some countries, Netflix may display season-level ratings, which may differ from the overall rating or mature content themes of the show. “Stranger Things” is one of a small number of Netflix original series to be rated TV-14, with 61 other series being rated TV-MA.
Does Good Omens have gore?
The second season of the program contains violent content, including a scene in which a demon is depicted as melting into the floor after being poured with holy water. In the fourth episode, zombies consume human brains, resulting in one zombie losing an arm. Additionally, the series incorporates intense scenes involving Adam and his hellhound, particularly when Adam attains greater strength.
📹 Good Omens | Official Trailer | Amazon Original
With Armageddon just days away, the armies of Heaven and Hell are amassing and The Four Horsemen are ready to ride.
I didn’t interpret Crowley’s shoving Aziraphale against the wall as anger so much as fear. Unlike in the church scene, where there’s no way to pass that action off as demonic, in the modern day Aziraphale labeling his actions as ‘nice’ means he loses all demonic credit in the eyes of anyone perusal, because an angel approves of what he’s done. The violence is to put him back in ‘demonic’ territory, assuring anyone perusal that he’s not having a tender moment with the angel, nope, nothing to see here. It also gets Aziraphale to shut the hell up and watch what he says in public. You’ll note Aziraphale is startled, but not at all afraid of Crowley, because despite the surface violence of the action Crowley isn’t hurting him, the ‘slam’ is gentle enough that his head doesn’t hit the wall. Contrast Uriel doing the same thing later on. Context and trust is everything. They’ve been around each other long enough for Aziraphale to instinctively know that Crowley isn’t going for the throat, he’s quite relaxed even if he’s taken off guard. He’s not even trying to get away, which means it really doesn’t occur to him that Crowley might discorporate him just to prove a point.
1. In the book, Crowley looks like a young man with dark hair who wears good suits. In the show he looks like a middle-aged man with red hair who wears whatever you wish to call that. 2. In the book, Crowley lives in a white flat, with a white leather sofa, plants throughout, and a computer that he upgrades every few months. In the show, he lives in a black flat filled with some kind of miasma, all the plants are in one room, and he owns a …throne… with a desk to match. In both, he owns the original sketch of the Mona Lisa. 3. In the book, he has a bookcase, and all his books are in alphabetical order. In the show, he doesn’t read books, though he has one on astronomy. 4. In the book, Adam has an older sibling. In the show, he is an only child. I think that most of the other major differences have been covered in the previous 400+ comments.
The greatest difference to me was the ending. Crowley figures out the actual plan (the immortals vs the mortals) as god, walking by, makes him forget because it’s too early. Of course they didn’t explore the Them as being the four horsemen either. The metaphysical stuff being left out really changes the feel of the book.
I didn’t really feel like the part where Satan really showed up really did much. He was so huge and scary and defeated in 5 seconds. I didn’t like how Satan was all father-figure like. It really felt like he was going to ground his kid. I liked it slightly better in the book where it was less ‘Adam defies his father by saying “You’re not my dad”‘ and more emphasis on Adam just changing all of existance. But I generally did like the series quite a lot.
I thought no. 1 would be the sort-of love story between the two, but yeah, I guess it’s open to interpretation. I liked the book a lot, loved the show, dare I say it, even more. When they have their dinner at the Ritz, it just gives me a brief warm and fuzzy tingle, believing for a moment that maybe all can be well and the world can be saved. And the work everyone put into this was just phenomenal.
Also the television show, (sadly I think,) didn’t have the “chalk pit.” In the late 90’s I met Terry Pratchett, and though I knew a few of his (Discworld) books I hadn’t learned to recognize the authors name, so didn’t realize who he was. (He was very nice!) As I do when meeting someone who’s obviously British, I commented that in my youth I’d spent a couple of years living in England (instead of America), in a little place called Peppard Common, north of Reading. Mr. Pratchett was the only person I’ve ever met who knew it. Years, and many readings of “Good Omens” later I came to imagine Lower Tadfield looked a lot like where I’d lived, especially the chalk pit. (And yes, Peppard Common is in Oxfordshire.)
I liked this! Some other significant changes, I think, are Adam’s involvement in stopping the end of the world. In the book, he realizes what everyone else fails to understand, which is that people should just be allowed to get on with things without being meddled with. The other big change is how we are introduced to War in the book versus the show.
Yall forgot to include the entirety of Crowley mourning his husband’s discorporation ’cause he thought Aziraphale died (maybe because he thought it was hellfire). Which includes the whole, “SOMEBODY KILLED MY BESTFRIEND!” line, and the whole “giving up and getting drunk at a local diner” scene. Loved that, thank God they scooted that into the mini-series…
While the nanny and the gardener were never EXPLICITLY called out as being A & C in disguise in the books, I always read it that way, even before the movie came out. The nanny and gardener were so comically good and evil, and so perfectly fashioned for their role that it was kind of hard to imagine that they were actual people. Most people in the book are a bit naff.
Great article! I mainly disagree with one point, though: Nanny Ashtoreth and Mr Francis, Mr. Harrison and Mr. Cortese ARE Aziraphale and Crowley in the book, too. It’s just not clearly explained because the narrator lets you know through the descriptions and some details; the presence of Rover though makes the only small difference. And the fact that we only see the nanny and the gardener in the show. I really wish we had Greasy Johnson and the four other horsemen in the adaptation, I really like their small but meaningful presence in the book! Also: to everyone saying the love story is/isn’t in the show/book: both stories feature many hints at them possibly being a couple, it just depends on how you interpret these hints, as simple jokes or as jokes that imply something more. Honestly It’s brilliant.
I discovered Good Omens this summer and watched both seasons of the show. I liked it a lot and later bought the book and read it in English. Since it’s not my first language, I recognize that my comprehension was sometimes limited, and I may not have fully appreciated some of the good parts. The descriptions of all the settings and actions were definitely on point, but overall, I would say that for once I prefer the show over the book. To me, the relationship between Crowley and Aziraphale is much more elaborated. Their flashbacks through the centuries were a delight. They really resonate with me. Overall, I would say that the show made me develop a stronger affection for the characters, especially Crowley and Aziraphale. The fact that they were played by the incredible David Tennant and Michael Sheen surely helped… PS : i loved equally the International Express Guy in the book and the show 🙂
Interesting fact: when you see the escalator scene, you can see both aziraphale and Crowley walking on water. They both have faith. Not only that, focus on how Crowley sinks in the water. Since he’s a demon he’s lost faith. But for aziraphale he’s always have faith. It’s just like how in the Bible Jesus is walking on water. Just thought that was interesting uwu Edit: 5:22 here’s what I’m talking about
Blink and you missed it reference to bring the series to more modern times. Earlier in the first episode the 2 demons and Crowley testify as to their recent temptations/ misdeeds. In the book Crowley brags about the creation of a terrible road meant to frustrate London commuters but in the series he brags that he shut down all wifi in London for hours. (honestly this was great, what better way to plague modern humans that take away their interwebs). The internet didn’t exist in 1990 when the book was written. The series mentions the highway system later as it catches fire during the start of the apocalypse.
Hey, aren’t they the nanny and the gardener in the audio drama too? Like I don’t think it’s UNIQUE to just the show? Like I had a headache yesterday and was listening to part of the audio drama here on YouTube to relax and either I was having a cooky fever dream or Crowley was definitely Warlock’s nanny in that.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but you won’t mention how in the book Crowley went to Tadfield because he read the notes in the propechy book in his car, on the way back from Aziraphel’s bookstore, instead of completely giving up, going to a bar, get drunk, and hearing Aziraphale’s instructions to go to Tadfield? Although it was mentioned in the book as one of possibilities Crowley considered. I also don’t remember Crowley to be so desperate to run away in the book. Sure, in the series he is also determined to save the world, but in the book he’s so determined that the previous difference I pointed out is limited to only as a possibility in Crowley’s mind. He is THAT optimistic, you can say he’s like Aziraphale himself in the series. I said all that, but I know they’re changed for the drama, and I’m not complaining at all. Even the encounter with Satan part has a lot more differences like Aziraphel and Crowley said their impression of each other (“there was goodness in you”; “just enough of a bastard to be worth liking”) here instead of after the Armageddon as kind of last words, etc. Hastur’s return and the trial also are additions for the series, so can’t really be called differences and included here. Also Anathema raised a gun at a soldier at some point in the book.
To all the peeps here that say: “wHy Do YaLl AlWaYs HaVe To ShIp EvErYoNe, ThEy ArE jUsT fRiEnDs” My dudes Neil Gaiman, Michael Sheen amd David Tennant ALL said that they are in love! They basicly confirmed it so I’m sorry but this is kinda cannon… I’m all for good frienships without shipping but…. There is nothing straight about the two of them…
God does not play dice with the Universe; He plays an ineffable game of His own devising, which might be compared, from the perspective of all the other players (i.e.- everybody), to being involved in an obscure and complex variant of poker in a pitch-dark room, with blank cards, for infinite stakes, with a Dealer who won’t tell you the rules and who smiles all the time.
I fucking love the angles name. Aziraphele is a fucking amazon name. So is Crowley but it really only works as a second or surname. As characters go, I am such a Crowley. Not by nature a nice person only choosing as such because it involves far less needless drama, I love my best friend and would do anything for her. She’s my Aziraphele. Also I’ve been told numerous times I resemble David tenant. Specs, hair n all. I love and almost died laugh at the way Crowley talks to and treats his plants. Reading that scene was a delight.
IIRC in the book Adam implied that he will make Heaven and Hell forget about Aziraphale’s and Crowley’s involvement. He says something like “Oh don’t worry I know everything about you two they will leave you alone.” But while that is great in a book, as a TV show it might be a little anticlimatic. Also it surprised pople who read the book (like me) and made us actually nervous.
Obviously this guy has never watched it, the way he pronounces things. Eg: – The Antichrist, pronounced properly as “anteechryst” but pronounced in the article as “antychryst” -Crowley, pronounced properly as “crowlee” but pronounced in the article as “crauwlee” I know the spelling for pronunciation is not actual English, but it’s how it sounds
You missed a one & made a mistake: Anathema is not AMERICAN! And in the book, Crowley was the Nanny & Azraphale was the gardener. They were playing off each other with their teaching of the boy Warlock until his eleventh birthday. They even left as the nanny and gardener when he got older and returned as tutors. It was when the hell hound didn’t show up they figured out Warlock was not HIM.
Since a book is important in this story I will differentiate between the novel and the book within the stories. The book is done much better in the tv show than the Novel. In the novel, Aziraphel let his cocoa congeal while he was reading, we leave him alone by focusing on other parts of the plot and when we come back to him, he knows where to call. There is no smart number of the beast/hogback lane. I was honestly disappointed with the novel for not showing Azarphel read it and his thought process. Also Anathema has speculation about Agnes Nutter’s power of precognition. The angel with cold cocoa shows her to be somewhat omniscient in the shoe. This is at odds with Anathema’s speculation that Agnes sees through the eyes of her descendents so she is able to do her best predictions with them. It is sort of like Assassin’s Creed with descendents instead of ancestors and the omniscience in the book of the show entirely contridicts that.
How to tell when the presenter of the segment hasn’t watched the show, or watched it intently at least – pronouncing Crowley as ‘Cr-oww-ley’ instead of how it is even said by the hell incarnate himself, ‘Cr-oh-ley’. Almost forgivable if you’d read the books, since I spent far too long thinking Anathema was ‘Ana-thee-mah’ instead of ‘Ah-nah-tha-ma’.
What I really hate – not about the series, I Love the series – is how the fans are turning this into a “gay or not gay, there is no in-between”-battle. No, they’re not openly gay on screen. Yes, you can interpret them as such, if you wanted. Everyone would be cool with that, from Gaiman to the actors. But if you don’t want to, it’s just as fine. Since – per the book – angels (and by default then demons as well) don’t have a gender if they don’t really want to have one, it doesn’t really matter, does it? Why not just leave this as it is, an asexual three-way love-story between an angel, a demon and humanity, with all their faults and wrinkles. How about those that can’t understand love without sex just stop being so damn loud and let everyone else enjoy this, too? Be happy in your imagination and let everyone ELSE have theirs.
The actual #1 and #2 differences: 1. In the book, Crowley, not Aziraphale, revives the dead dove, while Aziraphale has already forgotten about it even while trying to extricate it from his sleeve. 2. In the book, Aziraphale, not Crowley, considers murdering the child Antichrist. I hate to hit the dislike button but you really didn’t go in depth with this comparison. “They gave these side characters more onscreen time” should never rank up there in this list when there are blatant and ridiculous changes that completely flip the characterisation of those moments 180. What a terrible, stupid change, way to undermine the subtle way these characters are established as a subversion of the stereotypes they appear to be on the surface.
I was right in my predictions. This is just a blaspheme. I don’t understand why Niel write great books and let them turn in crap films. Did he need more money? I will never watch The Good Omens and American Gods because I love books and don’t want to see what is done to them. About top 10 – You left “diversity”. All characters in book are white and English and not-gay. Crowley is cool yuppie and Az is old gentleman, Pepper has freckles, Anathema is English girl etc.
Dear Amazon Prime. Micheal Sheen’s acting in just this trailer…as a trying to be tough Angel. But is still so cute…..got me to sign up to Prime. Simply this bit of amazing casting got you a customer and I am sure countless more. Amazing work. Also if you could release season 2 of Jack Ryan now…that be great…………….. 😀
Gotta say. Wathced the firs episode and it’s quite bad xD It looks like it was recorded with equipment from the 90s, that god awful voiceover is needed like a shark needs a towel and we spend like 5 minutes with it narrating shuffling cards instead of spending it with some characters with real potential.
To Miss Fernandez; Unless one has read the book… And who cares about those who haven’t read (or listened to) the book? P.S. Down with the suppurating traitor Gaiman’s so-called “sequel”. He could never have written “Good Omens” alone. He’s adequate as a quasi-Gothic writer, but the humour came from T.P. Read their separate oeuvres if you doubt me.
Haven’t seen the show but as a follower of Jesus Christ it seems like there is an attempt here to shift the mindsets of those who Honour and Respect the Lord and His Divine plan. Humble yourselves before the Lord and protect what you expose your mind and soul to. Any thoughts from those who have seen the show?