The court has ruled that Tennessee recognizes the tort of false light invasion of privacy, which is similar to defamation. The elements for civil conspiracy under Tennessee common law include a common design between two or more persons and the intent to accomplish by concerted action an unlawful purpose. Sections 652F and 652G apply absolute and conditional privileges to invasion of privacy torts, which are previously recognized in tress, civil conspiracy, violations of the Tennessee Personal Rights Protection Act, and false advertising. In addition to monetary damages and other relief, the court has adopted the tort of false light invasion of privacy.
Conspiration crimes in Tennessee are defined by Tennessee code 39-12-103, which requires mutual agreement between two or more parties. No person can be convicted of conspiracy to commit an offense unless an overt act in pursuance of the conspiracy is alleged and proved to have been done by the person or entity. The elements of a cause of action for civil conspiracy include a common design between two or more persons, the intent to accomplish an unlawful purpose by concerted action, and the intention to compensate for hurt feelings.
The court also noted that Tennessee does not recognize any freestanding tort for civil conspiracy, but rather, a claim for civil conspiracy can be maintained if the underlying predicate torts, such as deception-based claims, are actionable. This decision supports the recognition of the tort of false light invasion of privacy under Tennessee law.
📹 A Different Angle That We Didnt See Will Smith And Chris Rock At The Oscars
Does Tennessee have tort reform?
In 2011, Tennessee passed tort reform legislation, which categorized compensatory damages into economic and non-economic categories. Economic damages, such as medical bills and lost wages, can be easily ascertained, while non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering, are left to the discretion of a jury or judge. The new legislation limits the amount of non-economic damages that can be awarded, with most cases capped at $750, 000, and in rare cases at $1, 000, 000.
While tort reform may seem unfair to injury victims, it is the law of Tennessee. It is crucial for injury victims to present evidence of all their economic damages, such as medical providers’ testimony about future medical needs or employer’s evidence about lost wages or promotion opportunities. In complex cases, an economist or life care planner can be hired to fully explain how the accident and injuries have impacted the individual economically. This includes presenting an itemized report of all future medical care and equipment needed, and researching the cost of each item to ensure full compensation.
Can the truth be considered defamation?
Truth is generally a defense to defamation claims in most jurisdictions, provided it can be proven. However, in some jurisdictions, public interest in the publication must be established. The ACHPR states that no one shall be found liable for true statements, expressions of opinions, or statements reasonable to make in the circumstances. Courts in some jurisdictions, like South Africa, have even found that false statements may still not constitute defamation, as demonstrated in National Media Ltd and Others v Bogoshi.
Can I sue someone for recording me without my permission in Tennessee?
Tennessee wiretapping law is a felony if a conversation is recorded without one party’s consent or disclosed illegally. Violations can lead to civil liability and damages for injured parties. Federal law requires one party’s consent for recording conversations, punishable by up to five years in prison and a $250, 000 fine. Individuals found guilty of illegal wiretapping may be held liable in civil court for damages and attorney’s fees.
In interstate telephone conversations, determining which state law controls and who needs consent is complex. If there is a conflict between state laws, a court will decide, while if parties in multiple states are involved, federal law is likely applied.
What are 5 torts?
Torts are civil wrongs that can result in damages in the form of monetary compensation or an injunction. Injured parties can seek these damages, which can be in the form of an injunction to cease an activity. Courts may award punitive damages in some cases to deter further misconduct. In most tort cases, compensatory damages are awarded to the injured party who has successfully proven their case. Other areas of tort law include nuisance, defamation, invasion of privacy, and economic torts.
What are Tennessee tort laws?
A tort is an act that causes harm to someone’s person, property, or reputation. In Tennessee law, a plaintiff can sue a defendant for committing a tort, and successful plaintiffs can receive compensation in the form of damages. Torts can be categorized into intentional torts, negligence torts, and strict liability torts. Intentional torts, such as assault, battery, trespass, and defamation, occur when harm is committed on purpose, such as knowing or should have known that the defendant would have caused harm due to their actions or inactions.
What is the tort of invasion of privacy in Tennessee?
In accordance with the legislation of the state of Tennessee, the term “unreasonable intrusion upon seclusion” is defined as the intentional invading of another’s solitude or private affairs. In such cases, liability is incurred if the intrusion in question would be deemed highly offensive by a reasonable individual.
Can defamation be defined as a false statement?
Defamation is a false statement that damages someone’s reputation. Libel is written or spoken, while slander is oral or spoken. Truth is a complete defense to defamation, and even if the communication is true, you cannot collect money if it was true. Other defenses include statements made in jest or opinions that are not actionable. Privilege is another defense, which allows certain people to say certain things in certain places without fear of defamation.
Public officials, city council members, and people making statements in judicial or legislative proceedings may be protected by this privilege. However, the rules are complex and too numerous to be stated in a short amount of time, so an attorney can help with your specific case.
What is the tort of conversion in Tennessee?
Conversion is the wrongful act of dominion over another’s personal property, denial of the rightful owner’s rights. To prove conversion, the plaintiff must have a greater right to the property than the defendant, the defendant’s wrongful taking without consent, the defendant’s inconsistent possession, damage to the plaintiff, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Intentional infliction of emotional distress is subject to laws determining the extent to which a perpetrator may be liable. Factors such as extreme and outrageous behavior, intentional intent to cause emotional distress, and non-emotional damages, such as loss of gainful employment, can determine the extent to which a perpetrator may be liable. An example of intentional inflection of emotional distress is an aide in a nursing home telling an aged resident that her family has died, when they had not, just to disturb the resident.
Is conversion a type of tort?
Conversion is an intentional tort where a party takes another’s chattel property with the intent to deprive them, but it is not applicable to real property. The intent is to possess or exert property rights over the property, making the party liable regardless of their knowledge of its ownership status. The standard remedy for conversion is the return of the property or damages for the fair market value. This law was last updated in July 2022 by the Wex Definitions Team.
What is the tort cap in Tennessee?
Tennessee personal injury claims typically have a non-economic damages cap of $750, 000 per person, with the court reducing it if a higher amount is awarded. Catastrophic injuries, such as severe spinal cord injuries, burns, traumatic brain injuries, amputation, or wrongful death, are considered life-altering and permanent. Punitive damages are also capped at $500, 000 or two times compensatory damages, whichever is lower. However, the cap may be lifted when the defendant’s behavior was particularly egregious.
Hiring a personal injury lawyer is beneficial as they have an in-depth understanding of complex legal frameworks, such as the Tennessee non-economic damages cap. They can interpret statutes relevant to your situation, ensuring you fully understand your rights and the compensation you are entitled to.
How is false light different than defamation?
Defamation and false light are two distinct legal concepts that protect individuals from harm related to their reputation. Defamation safeguards a person’s reputation from harm caused by a defamatory statement, while false light protects them from offense or embarrassment resulting from a misleading or untrue implied statement. The distinction between the two is practical, with defamatory statements only affecting one person, while false light disclosures must be made to a large enough group for public consideration. Defamation does not require offensive or embarrassing statements, while false light requires offensive or embarrassing implication.
📹 These States Were Designed to be Sacrificed in Case of World War 3
There are several U.S. states that still house a large number of nuclear missile silos in a concentrated area. These states are what …
“Nuclear Sponge” was never meant to be the main point. And it had nothing to do with landscape. It had to do with time. Russia always had a a large land based nukes, because they had no other real choice. And the same thing applies for sub launched nukes too. They take time to get here. Placing the land based deterrent inland gives the us TIME to decide if this is just an off course rocket, meteorites etc. And the idea that people like Russia and China are somehow going to give up their nukes, if we just put ours down- is utterly hilarious. Not based in reality in the least. You are being dishonest and you know it. You might as well say that if the police would just put down their guns, the criminals would too. Human nature is what it is- we have not changed in 10,000 years. Learn from history gentlemen.
i worked on the Minuteman III weapon system (Wing 3, based out of Malmstrom AFB) back in the 80’s. the silos are spaced miles apart and you never know which silos are decoys or contain assets. their positioning (depth and landscape) would force any aggressor to use at least one warhead per silo if they wanted even a minimal hope of taking out silo prior to a retaliatory strike. all in all, anyone that tries any monkey business wouldn’t be able to stop a full scale launch. also, i would never want to see them used, let alone be on the receiving end of those bad boys.
The US has always relied on a three-pronged deterrent of bombers, land-based missiles and submarines simply because of the idea that the diverse array would be more difficult to attack or defend against. It is true that it probably does not matter at this point where to put the silos, but I think land-based missiles are still an essential part of the deterrent.
While in the Air Force, I would sometimes be tasked with shoveling snow from around Minuteman missile silos. This was done by hand so that there would not be heavy equipment blocking the cap on the silo in the event of war. We were told that the Missiles could be launched so quickly that we would not have time to get out of the way if the concrete cap was rapidly moved off. So I think those land based missiles would still have time to be launched even if Hypersonics were used. (that is assuming the president gave the launch order quickly enough).
Honestly I can’t say I fully agree with this one. Yes, we should live in a world where there are no nuclear weapons and no dictators that might use them in a first-strike capacity, but that’s not reality. The whole reason why MAD works is because it is literally what it means — Mutually Assured Destruction. If a nation knows they can nuke another with no risk to themselves, they might be crazy enough to actually do it. Knowing that doing so will mean their own country turns to glass, hopefully means they’ll never “push the button”.
It’s a valuable part of the nuclear triad that acts as an exceptional form of deterrence. They are cheaper and more numerous than stealth bombers and more accurate and easier to keep secure than submarine launched missiles. As for hackers gaining access to the missiles, that’s purely Hollywood fantasy. The computers and communication systems are stand-alone systems that are impossible to hack. The missiles themselves can only be launched by two missileers turning their keys simultaneously after receiving an authenticated launch order. As for spending money updating these systems, all advanced weapons systems need to be updated and refurbished from time to time. If they don’t work, then they aren’t much of a deterrent. Nobody really likes nuclear weapons. But,we haven’t had a world war in almost 78 years thanks to them.
The missile silos were put in the middle of nowhere because that’s where land was available. Large cities and military bases are still at the top of the target lists of enemy countries and always have been. I went to school less than 20 miles from the largest marine airbase in the country, and we never did any of those “duck and cover” drills, as it would be a waste of time.
When I was in Jr. High school (Early 1980’s) we were looking at the history of the 1950’s. They were talking about the “duck and cover” drills my parents went through and I asked the teacher why we didn’t do those drills. She said, “You live within 100 miles of several hundred primary targets and less than 10 miles from Travis Airforce Base (an important hub for MAC) if there is a nuclear war, ducking and covering won’t really help. Oddly, I took comfort in this. Even when I was 12 and 13 I knew the best way to survive a nuclear way is, you don’t. Survival is not possible, it’s only a matter of how you die, and how much suffering you experience in the end. The spectrum is from dying as your body is vaporized even before the sensation of light from the explosion is register in your brain to suffering the long term effects of radiation and starvation, trying, and certainly failing, to survive in the radioactive wasteland that would be left after the war. If you are going to die anyway, minimize suffering, I say.
Many Christians have been getting visions and dreams of civil war breaking out as a result of a all out attack from world war 3 on America. I’m Canadian in 2016 God gave me a very strong desire to seek his face so I did what Isaiah recommended which is being still and knowing that he is God. Many call this practicing the presence of God. So I did this daily for over an hour a day for almost five wks then all of a sudden while i was waiting on him I felt this heavy heavy thick presence come into the room. The atmosphere changed bigtime, I felt what is known in the Bible as the Kabod of God or his weighty presence. It felt like something had come into my room and placed a heavy heavy blanket upon me and I felt extreme peace of God evelope me, And my body began to tremble it was like my bones were shaking. I ‘ve experience this before but it was accompanied with great terror …it was the fear of God. But this time the fear did not accompany the encounter. Then the Lord or the holy ghost spoke these Works very loudly to my spirit and he said, ” War is Coming To America. ” I was shocked at these words. The reason for this is because I’ve had God speak to me often in my life and when his presence ever becomes this strong and he spoken a word of prophecy to my heart whatever he spoken i’ve seen it come to pass. That’s why I began to tremble and I was greatly troubled over these words and for three days straight I couldn’t even sleep, it troubled me so greatly. After this took place I was curious if others have had similar experiences so I went on line looking for articles and I found many many people who have had similar experiences.
Missle tech here. even if it doesnt look like it, ever since nuclear era its been the most “peaceful” era with less death on average compared to any age. Though not wrong with the missle sponge being strategicly obselete, the us military focuses in having a nuclear triad. The Missle Silos to be ready to shoot in short notice, the Airforce Bombers and their onboard nukes for a seconday threat and first strike capability with their range. And finally Ballistic Submarines. Deployable everywhere and hidden to have an assured second strike. They work in tandem to provide nuclear deterence and safety (mostly to our allies since we’re the big target lol).
The main counterargument seems to be “Russia has almost 6k warheads, enough to hit all military sites and major cities many times over”. There are some crucial implicit assumptions here. First, that all of those are actually operational and don’t suffer from the same lack of maintenance as their tanks and other equipment. Second, that they are successfully going to manage to launch all of their operational warheads. Third, that all of the successfully launched ones will successfully hit their targets without malfunctioning in the middle of their trajectory or without being intercepted. Not to mention, the yields of those 6k warheads vary widely and only a limited percentage of them are suitable for particular targets. Not to mention, the Russians will also have to worry about launching sites in places other than US territory. All of that is to say that Russians still need to carefully prioritize their targets if they decide to go down this road and won’t be able to afford to fire their nuclear arsenal wherever they please willy-nilly.
Yes they have almost 6,000 nukes. What was failed to be mentioned the types of nukes and how many launchers are available. This 6,000 figure accounts for tactical, strategic, ready for dismantled, and reserves. So yes in theory they have enough. But not all will be used because it just isn’t possible.
We were working right across the road from one of these unmanned sites in South Dakota. Every 15 minutes a Jeep would pull in the roadway to the site sit about 1 minute and then drive away. I figured being in the military before I deserve a look so when the Jeep left me and my buddy went across the street slept through the loosely change fence and stood on the hatch above the nuclear warhead. We looked around a bit and got out of there before the 15 minutes was up before they came back. When they came back they knew someone had been there they got out opened the fence and looked all around the site. We were across the street working and perusal needless to say I was sweating big time worrying about if we were on camera but apparently we weren’t!
here’s a thing to think about: the US spend a LOT of money on maintenance of it’s nuclear stockpile, and Russia have even more of these on Paper, but they spend on them only a fraction of that the us spend each year, given the extend of corruption in Russia, (and nuclear weapons aren’t maintenance free weapons at all), so, how many of these Russian nuclear stockpile would actually be still operational in a nuclear war? hopefully we don’t have to find out
Whoever wrote this has to live in one of the states that these silos are in… I mean, even if the concept doesn’t make sense today, it would absolutely be the right thing to do to divert as many warheads as possible to the least populated parts of the country. It’s not about valuing one life more than the other, it’s about saving as many lives as possible in the event of a full-scale nuclear exchange. As for why we’re updating our silos, it’s not so much about maintaining the “nuclear sponge as it is making sure the ground based leg of the nuclear triad is up to date. Submarines can be sunk and bombers shot down. In a full-blown exchange, we’ll need our ground-based missiles to ensure a successful retaliatory strike… maintaining and updating them is a major part of our deterrence.
Nuclear Weapons are on a Closed Network, so it’s 100% Impossible that some hacker could launch a Nuclear Warhead over an internet connection. The only way that this could ever happen, is if they somehow gained access to the control terminal (you’d probably have better luck accessing Fort Knox) and then they would probably need to be fluent in an old/outdated programming language, such as Cobol, Fortran, Pascal, etc. since we’re talking IBM Series/1, here.
Yep, irradiating the USA’s major food growing areas is a really smart strategy. Followed by the meltdown of all the Fukishima type boiling water reactors that should have been closed years ago, it would insure almost everyone died of starvation or radiation poisoning within a month or two of the war. But then, the strategy was undoubtedly developed by the urban braniacs who also believe food grows on grocery store shelves.
I live down the street from a decommissioned nuclear silo in Missouri. I am quite offended that I didn’t die in this article animation >:( No one ever kills us Missourians in newer nuclear articles. Just kidding of course. Just if there is a nuclear war, I’ll want to die in the first round, and with Whiteman AFB just down the highway I’m pretty sure I will. Love your articles.
No mention of the 4 Titan II silos in Arkansas that began construction in the early 60s, as well as the 18 in Arizona. (I’ve been to two in AZ, one of which is open to literally everyone. I recommend visiting.) I thought there were some early silos around Kingston, WA, too. I’m sure there are many more that I’ve not researched, built and refitted for various generations of missiles. Oh well, it won’t be the last time the “Info”graphic show hides (very) large parts of the truth or presents competing versions of the “truth” across multiple articles. There’s no “journalistic integrity” here. It’s like learning current affairs from opinion pieces in Fox, Vanity Fair, or Buzzfeed. Or your history from the ancient aliens website 😆
Hackers trying to access an ICBM system is literally impossible since NONE of the computer systems have any form of connection to “the internet”. The systems are all hard wired with enough RF shielding that would make even trying to pick up on a tiny signal impractical. Never mind the sheer amount of failsafes that are impenetrable because a person physically has to activate the devices and turnkeys.
Russia is placing missle defense systems all over Moscow and updating and repairing their nuclear bunkers and the subway system under Moscow (which also doubles as the world’s largest nuclear bunker) meanwhile we’re just left fend for ourselves for the most part. We got no problems making new nukes, but tell our government we need shelters and they’ll call you crazy.
In my case, Warren AFB in Cheyenne is 59 miles North of me. There are silos all over the place!! I’m gone in a blink of an eye which is fine with me. Surviving would be worse than death. Not far to the East of me are more silos. To the South is NORAD and Peterson AFB. If I knew it was coming and choose to ride it out, I’d go West and get over as many mountain ranges as I could from cities along the front range. I’d at least survive the first strikes, but in the end fall out would do me in.
Since this would be “national security”, we have no way to know if the deactivation of the silos already took place. And that’s how it should be. If we knew where all the nukes were, then so would any enemy. It is confidential information, and it’s important that it doesn’t get out to the public, especially not to the “hackers”
I worked on up keeping and clearing land for ICBM silos in Kansas years ago. 1994 to be exact. Did it for years. I can’t say much about what I saw, but they were and are, fully functioning powerhouses of defense. And rightly so. Useless Minutemen silos? Hardly. And this article never mentions Kansas. Interesting. 🤔
Born in ’57, I’ve lived under the threat of nuclear annihilation since birth. How many times has the world turned hot since then? Therein may be the issue as to why the sponge is being maintained. The fear of nuclear animation brings up a cold feeling, unemotional reaction. It is the world we’ve lived in all our lives.
I live in Maine, and we also used to have a SAC base in the northern part of the state. Its strategic value was largely from the fact that it was located hundreds of miles closer to Europe than any other base in the US. When the Soviet Union collapsed though and places like East Germany, the Baltic States and Poland were no longer in the “Communist Bloc”, this strategic value was gone and the base closed down in 1994. The economy in the local area was devastated, and the population of the nearby town of Limestone dropped by over 75% in the next few years. Seeing this, I can see why, rightly or wrongly, people around military bases strongly object to having them closed down. They’re much more willing to face the prospect of a nuclear war that may never come at all to the certainty of immediate economic destruction. The closure of a Naval Air Base in Brunswick brought similar problems, but these were fortunately reduced because – unlike Loring – the Naval Air base has been repurposed for widespread civilian use. Still, it’s another example of why people fight to keep such bases open. The closure of some military bases overseas likely would cause similar problems for the local economies as well.
Our ICBM complexes were not put in the central US to save lives in coastal areas. They were placed there because they are the farthest & therefore hardest to reach point by any foreign power. Haven’t you noticed there are zero ICBM complexes in Alaska? The “nuclear sponge” is tantamount to J.J.Abrams retconning Star Trek.
The scenario of hackers exploding the nukes on site is ridiculous: the nukes can only be activated on the descending phase of the trajectory. The nukes are not projected by Toys are us designers, besides permissive action links are not software devices, they are complex electromechanical devices. Theoretically, they could trigger a launch request. But it is not just one website that is used to confirm a launch but this is not a probable scenario: the nukes are not connected to the Internet or to a modem backdoor like in the Wargames (despite being a great movie) movie.
Couple of points I’d like to make, during a time where the potential for nuclear conflict is high, that’s a bad time time to start overhauling systems. Also, I’m pretty confident there would be physical inputs required to launch ICBMs, steps that require a human being to complete the process. I highly doubt they could be armed and launched by some hacker in another country.
All about redundancies if one system falls there are 2 other methods as backups. Also unless it changed the nuclear systems are place on a standalone server with no access from outside. hence why they can’t be hacked. Maybe a group take over of a silo, but considering the security and fail safes that unlikely as well.
This is crazy I was born in Rapid City and grew up there. We had hundreds of missile silos all over the state plus we also had a strategic Air Force Base Ellsworth AFB now we don’t have any silos with over 5,000 nuclear warheads that are being held now by Russia they would not have a problem hitting everywhere in the United States
I know exactly why an outdated program is still being up kept. Because it’s the “all hands lost” best solution we have for the problem. Needs of the many and all, the rock bottom hard calculus of an entire planet suddenly at war. I’m hearing a lot of “I don’t like this” with not a lot of “here’s an alternative solution.” I’d rather we have more redundancies than seem needed in the event humanity decides to slit it own throat. This breakdown nearly has me convinced me to directly donate money to the program itself!
The Infographic website…brought to you by Lockheed Martin Anyway, I think the one thing youre missing is that these missiles are still useful and they are designed to be launched from stationary silos. I guess maybe you could build some sort of mobile launcher, but I’m pretty sure the missiles are designed with that in mind.
I currently live within 30 minutes of a major communications based city, 45 to 1 hour from 1 active Army base and 1 “decomissioned” Army base, 1 hour (depending on traffic) from an active B-2 base, and less than 5 miles from an Army ran munitions factory in a non sponge state. Tell me my actual chances of survival. I can use a good laugh…
The problem though is that if the USA used diplomacy instead a nuclear sponge is that even Putin was willing to negotiate to not escalate the war Putins stipulation would basically be end all sanctions as well as let him have his empire to rule over Lithuania, Estonia, Ukraine and possibly Finland as well as a chunk of Romania to.😅😓😑🙄
I take this article as websiteing only one certain point of view with regards to the land based ICBM capabilities. I an based out of one of these Nuclear Bases and it would be great if international relations where at a point that the existence of these weapons was not a necessity, but it is an unfortunate reality. They are part of our deterrence and an important piece that maintains an imperfect peace – not peace from war entirely but from all out nuclear exchange. It is valuable to look at alternate perspectives. I acknowledge them and their validity. I think there is a lot of work to be done to ensure these weapons are never used. We also need to be certain that they are ready, reliable, and powerful enough to make any adversary balk at our strength and resolve.
Depending on which RELIABLE estimate you choose to believe, somewhere between 50,000 and 76,000 nuclear warheads were stockpiled at the peak of the Cold War. Current accepted figures are 5977 for Russia and 54028 for the US. Also since most missiles are MIRVd the individual warheads are typically lower yield and that many are just that, stockpiled not currently mated to delivery systems. Also consider probable failure rate, especially for Russian (if what we’ve learned in Ukaraine is any guide) weapons. Can we maybe dial back the the nightmare scenario just a little bit.
Well the thing is with the nuclear sponge it is still a Valid option with the ability to hit anywhere in the world from pretty much Anywhere It houses a lot of our nuclear capabilities sure they Have enough To destroy its and other stuff but they would also need to focus on trying to destroy the submarines which are evasive same with the ships not to mention there’s also the advantage of them firing fast
Maybe do a article how if in a nuclear war almost every leader of the world will be safe in bunker or in the air. And if that is so then it is easy to deduce that this is all happing as a way to inact moral policy change as mentioned in the 2013 by nato and the Rio accords. “Enact moral policy change to impose forced migration”. Rio accords set out as a sustainability issue by eradicating poverty for the betterment of the majority.
I don’t think Russia and China will skip over DC and Virginia area with the White House, capital, pentagon and many military bases in the area. Also NYC being the financial center. They’re going to also want to take out the leadership and major economic centers which are in large metropolitan areas along with as many military bases and facilities.
Having nukes potentially target lesser populated areas of the country because of our nuclear installations in those places at best diverts enemy resources away from other areas. Assuming these areas were the only ones to experience strikes, fallout would leave much of the food producing parts of the country out of production permanently, deprive a greater part of the country of safe drinking water, and divide the country into safe and unsafe areas which would increase transportation costs–not to mention lost tourism revenues. This model doesn’t take into account the targeting of infrastructure and weaponization of nuclear power plants. From what I understand, the lake supplying cooling water to the nuclear power plant in Ukraine is being drained which ultimately will cause a meltdown without the need for using more weapons to effect that result. Nukes need to be history. Period. But, as others have already stated, now is not the time for shedding them or overhauling the system.
“Diplomacy and de-escalation” haven’t you heard? Grovelling to warlords just makes them more confident. Diplomacy is built on the expectation that the person you’re talking to is sane and fully connected to reality. Warlords by definition are neither of those things, and will read your conflict-avoidance behaviour as a license to kick you in the face.
Nuclear Sponge is brilliant. You need two 1 megaton nukes per silo minimum. The area of Nuclear Sponge in the case of nuclear war causing nuclear winter would be too cold to survive. The coastal areas with more stable temperatures would have a better chance of allowing human life to continue. I agree that we must have nukes all over the USA, but concentrating most of them in the area of Nuclear Sponge was brilliant for another reason. Those are not targets closest to China or Russia. I like this movie for stirring great comments.
As someone who worked on the minuteman iii weapon system, it needs updated. It’s effective, but it’s not cost efficient, nor is it efficient for manpower to be allocated to constantly fixing it to stay on alert when the companies that made most of the parts for the system have long since shut down. Now you have to pay companies to reverse engineer parts (which costs even more money). It’s necessary to have these systems as deterrents in this day and time unfortunately.
No one would target New York, Washington, DC, Los Angeles, San Francisco or Chicago. Those cities are in the process of destroying themselves already. US missiles in the “Sponge States” will be long gone when, and if, the Russian missiles arrive. Five will get you ten that 90% of them will malfunction or be shot down.
I love when people bring up wanting free or inexpensive healthcare without realizing that paying what we pay for healthcare is a monstrous reason why our country has such a high military budget every year which in turn is what ultimately keeps us protected from other countries. Start giving nationwide free healthcare and watch our military budget tank.
Was a kid in the 1960’s and remember hearing the sirens (usually around 12 noon). In So. Calif (Los Angeles) there is a NIKI Base in Chatsworth (Tried to drive to it, but the signs of being arrested) so turned around. Back then was difficult to get out of the San Fernando Valley, so the Gov. decides to build the road to Armageddon known as Shoemaker Canyon Rd. about 5 miles east of Hwy. 39. 2 tunnels, 1 incredible concrete Bridge. Road still there (dirt never paved)
I’m an old, farty SAC warrior who remembers quite well that the ICBM portion of the Triad was highly improbable to get many quality shots off if we went full blown DEFCON 1. And the bombers were likely toast from sea based cruise missiles, but, but, but if we could take the heat off the Polaris and Trident boys in the boomers long enough, THEY could get the serious shots off the tubes to make Ivan or Xi regret his hubris for eternity. SAC always knew we would die in a millisecond, but if that is what it took for the US Navy to get the shots on goal that truly mattered, then we would and will all go down together. Peace Is Our Profession, War Is Our Hobby.
That’s why they have multiple sites for detection so that it couldn’t be brought on simply by a single malfunctioning computer. That may have happened previously, but it wouldn’t now. Also they’ve got multiple different methods of detection so that they don’t have a single point of failure when determining if there’s false alarms.
The CIA and our own government is so corrupt now that Its obvious the CIA has used tax payer money for bio weapons labs in the Ukraine so we are told the southern border is not important to secure but we must send hundreds of billions of dollars to ONLY protect the Ukraine’s border? This article is very flawed and edited for weaker minded people. Foreign aid has become a money laundering ‘method’ that now enriches our politicians who go into office and over a life time become extremely wealthy by kick backs with Hunter Biden appointed for millions of dollars to sit on an energy company board despite no education or experience or speaking the language. But our fake media refuses to do any investigative reporting of real truth so the American people are never told. See the youtube article by typing BIDEN bragging about threats to the UKRAINE. And see the short threats that were made demonstrating the absolute treason of Biden and our own government sending plane loads of cash to IRAN and our enemies!
Why would anyone target a missle silo that is going to be empty by the time their missle gets there? Early warning technology allows for plenty of time for us to react to a launch. The idea opposing countries are targeting each others weapons is a poor assessment of strategy. Big cities would absolutely be the target. Casualties create a huge burden on the inflicted side and would consume large amounts of resources that would be needed in a global conflict.
To think that large populace center aren’t targets is ignorant. There are many different nuclear options and maneuvers. All of which involve targeting densely populated areas. Sure the silos and military installations are first targets, but with 500 plus missiles, it is total destruction. Plus the nuclear fallout entering into the jet stream and spreading all over the world. We are all toast.
First you cover why the silos are staying in place due to perpetual greed and corporate corruption. Then you suggest that removing them could divert funds to humanitarian programs like healthcare and education, completely dismissing the first point. Sadly, we live in a world where greed, money, and power come first, and nothing else matters, no matter what country you live in.
There’s some very specious arguments here: 1. “Russia has a zillion nukes.” The Russians used to have a lot more. So did the U.S. The Titan bases in Kansas and Arkansas were dismantled in the 1980’s (partially to make way for the proposed MX missile, which was largely neutered); the Minuteman missles around Whiteman AFB in Missouri were all dismantled after the Cold War. 2. Submarines. Nuclear-armed submarines have been around for generations. The nuclear triad is a fundamental belief within both American and Russian nuclear doctrine. In the 1965 British short film “The War Game,” the narrator pointed out that if an intermediate-range missile was fired at Britain from eastern Europe, the amount of warning time would be around 2.5 to 3 minutes. If the missile was fired from a sub near the British coast, that warning time could be less than 30 seconds. That was 60 years ago and there’s no more nukes in eastern Europe (for now), but submarines have always been a factor in nuclear planning. 3. “World leaders should sit down and talk about eliminating nukes.” Wouldn’t that be nice? Wouldn’t it be nice if everyone could look past their own mind games long enough to sit down and do something for the common good of the planet. That would be a perfect world. Unfortunately, we do not live in such a world. Mssrs. Putin and Xi have NO! interest in nuclear arms control, and neither does the Republican Party here in the U.S. At least during the Cold War, the Russians were willing to talk about it.
You need to do your homework. Most have been decommissioned under Reagan. “Arkansas had 18 active Titan II intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) silos from 1964 to 1984. The silos were part of the United States’ Cold War weapons system, the Titan II Missile program, which also included 54 launch complexes in two other states. The silos were located in the following Arkansas counties: Faulkner, Conway, White, Van Buren, and Cleburne. The Titan II was the first missile that could be launched from an underground silo, and its payload was 30 times more powerful than the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The missiles carried nine-megaton nuclear warheads and could strike targets up to 5,500 miles away, including China and the Soviet Union. From 1963 to 1987, crews maintained the missiles on 24-hour alert and were ready to launch within minutes of receiving orders from the National Command Authorities. In 1981, President Reagan announced a policy to decommission the Titan II missiles as part of a weapon systems modernization program. All operational Titan II silos were demolished, including 17 sites near Little Rock Air Force Base in Arkansas. One former missile silo in Arkansas has been renovated into a luxury rental property called Titan Ranch, located northeast of Conway. The rental space is in what was once the crew quarters and missile launch control center.”
I’m just going through this in my mind and I don’t think it would work quite the way they want it to. Lets say they fire their missiles first, knowing we would counter launch prior to their missles striking their targets….Why would they target empty silos? Of course if we launched then they launched, again why target empty silos?