Astrology and quantum physics are two fields that have been exploring the relationship between the two. Astrology, rooted in ancient beliefs about celestial influences on human life, and quantum physics, a cutting-edge field of science dealing with particle behavior at the quantum level, have been integrating quantum principles into their practice. By incorporating concepts of quantum entanglement and superposition, astrologers aim to enhance their interpretations and offer alternative perspectives.
In this article, we explore the intricate relationship between quantum physics and astrology, exploring how the principles of quantum physics can potentially shed light on the connection between the cosmos and the universe. Quantum mechanics, with its potential to reshape understanding of neural processes and cognition, could benefit from insights derived from astrological traditions.
Quantum astrology suggests that the quantum entanglement of particles in the universe is connected to the movements of celestial bodies, and those who practice astrology honestly realize what force moves the celestial bodies also moves us. Astrology is a belief system that posits a connection between the positions and movements of celestial bodies, and we are all connected to the universe.
In this article, the author argues that astrology is no more inexplicable than quantum mechanics, one of the two crown jewels of 20th century science. Einstein had shown that quantum mechanics predicted this, and rejected it on that basis, insisting that all phenomena are local in nature. Astrology and quantum physics challenge the sciences by posing perplexing quandaries about how interactions between things can occur without apparent evidence.
📹 Brian Cox explains quantum mechanics in 60 seconds – BBC News
Subscribe to BBC News www.youtube.com/bbcnews British physicist Brian Cox is challenged by the presenter of Radio 4’s ‘Life …
What does the Bible say about astrology?
In Matthew 28:18, Jesus asserts that all authority in heaven and on earth has been given to him. This contradicts biblical wisdom, as chasing after false gods is a sin. There is no biblical evidence that God has given authority to stars or astrologists. Pursuing predictions about our destiny or personality is biblically sinful, as it takes power from God and gives it to something other than God. A horoscope cannot change what God has already ordained before we were even created.
Is astrology related to quantum physics?
This book posits that astrology is more closely aligned with quantum mechanical principles than any other field of physics.
Why is astrology considered witchcraft?
The conviction in malevolent spiritual entities gave rise to a dual condemnation of magical practices that sought to benefit humanity rather than cause harm, as well as divination techniques of all kinds. This was largely due to the fact that the ability to foresee and predict future events was often perceived as being closely associated with witchcraft.
Did Einstein believe astrology?
Einstein’s sole known commentary on astrology is a 1943 epistle to Eugene Simon, wherein he concurs with Simon regarding the pseudoscientific nature of astrology, emphasizing its resilience and longevity over centuries.
What is quantum mechanics really trying to tell us about reality?
The tenets of quantum mechanics posit that our perception of reality is constrained to a narrow band of possibilities.
Is there any evidence that astrology is real?
Astrology is a belief system that suggests a connection between astronomical phenomena and human events or personality descriptions. However, it has been criticized by the scientific community for lacking explanatory power and lack of scientific validity. Scientific testing has found no evidence to support the premises or effects outlined in astrological traditions. The most famous test, led by Shawn Carlson, concluded that natal astrology performed no better than chance.
Astrology has not demonstrated its effectiveness in controlled studies and has no scientific validity, making it regarded as pseudoscience. There is no proposed mechanism by which stars and planets affect people and events on Earth in the way astrologers claim, which contradicts well-understood aspects of biology and physics.
Can quantum physics disprove God?
The concept of quantum information, which is a faster form of energy than light, can assist us in understanding the nature of God in a more tangible manner. It may be conceived of as a cascade of entangled particles, engaged in the transfer of quantum information in a process of mutual interaction, occupying multiple locations simultaneously.
How is quantum mechanics used in astronomy?
This work explores the application of quantum mechanics in astrophysics, focusing on the use of submm recombination lines of H, He, and He+ to probe the extreme ultraviolet luminosity of starbursts and Active Galactic Nuclei. It also examines the accretion zone of the Milky Way’s Galactic Center black hole using the hydrogen recombination line H30α. The disk properties of an accretion disk of radius 4 K gas are discussed, as well as the importance of accretion on the black hole.
The study also compares M1 closure schemes for neutrino radiation transport using the protoneutron star interior. The first-order hydrodynamics of a chiral fluid on a vortex background and in an external magnetic field is studied, revealing two previously undiscovered modes describing heat waves propagating along the vortex and magnetic field.
Did Einstein support quantum mechanics?
Einstein, a renowned physicist, rejected quantum mechanics due to its uncertainty factor. He believed that everything is certain and we can calculate everything, which led him to reject quantum mechanics. This disagreement was a significant part of the Bohr-Einstein debates, which he described as a metaphorical “God doesn’t play dice with the world”. He believed that physics must provide a deterministic and observer-free description of reality. Although he accepted that quantum mechanics was an experimentally confirmed empirical theory, he believed that some of its structural features made it inherently incomplete.
He compared it to thermodynamics vs. statistical mechanics, arguing that uncertainty was an artifact of description rather than fundamental. He believed that a more fundamental account of reality was in order. Although we are now looking for quantum gravity, it is unlikely that it will eliminate the indeterminism he detested. Natarajan’s note, “What Einstein Meant When He Said “God Does Not Play Dice.”, provides additional reasons for his opposition to quantum mechanics.
What is quantum mechanics used for in real life?
Quantum technologies, such as the transistor, have become the foundation of modern computers and digital communication. Other technologies powered by quantum mechanics include MRI scanners for medical imaging, lasers, solar cells, electron microscopes, and atomic clocks used for GPS. These technologies rely on quantum effects that require limited control. Quantum information technologies aim to fully control individual quantum systems, promising new capabilities for computation, digital communication, sensor technology, and other applications.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized disease diagnosis by providing a non-invasive method to generate images inside human bodies. By exciting magnets with radio-frequency light, 3D maps of objects can be created.
Why is quantum mechanics controversial?
Despite the success of quantum physics, scientists and philosophers still disagree on its interpretation of reality. The main issue is whether the theory accurately describes the world or is merely a mathematical model. Attempts to reconcile the theory with reality have led physicists to strange places, forcing scientists to grapple with philosophical matters. This is the tenth and final article in a series exploring the birth of quantum physics.
📹 How to use Quantum Physics to Make Your Dreams Your Reality | Suzanne Adams | TEDxUNO
NOTE FROM TED: We’ve flagged this talk, which was filmed at a TEDx event, because it appears to fall outside TEDx’s curatorial …
That was great. Quantum Physics is really weird. It takes a lot of math. I went from knowing no physics and very little math, all the way through my bachelor’s and master’s, just so I could understand Quantum. Part of my study focused just on the giants of physics, in general, and quantum specifically. Brian Cox mentioned Richard Feynman. There are lots of great quotes by the big names in Quantum, but this one from Feynman is one of my favorites: “If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don’t understand quantum mechanics.” Here’s another good one. I could go on and on, but this is the last one: “If quantum mechanics hasn’t profoundly shocked you, you haven’t understood it yet.” Niels Bohr. Okay one more, because I have so many in my head. This one is from Erwin Schrodinger (of the infamous cat thought experiment): “I don’t like it, and I’m sorry I ever had anything to do with it.” That one always cracks me up. He did the cat thought experiment because he wanted to show how absurd Quantum Physics is. But Heisenberg and all of them applauded him, and went wild for it, saying, That’s it exactly! Poor Schrodinger. hehe!
Brian Cox has done something that most people can never do. He has managed to hold onto that child enthusiasm we all had. Look at him. He’s explained what’s beyond most people’s imagination or ability to comprehend and he did with the same look an excited child explains things to a parent or sibling.
if i had a teacher who could explain in simple terms the meaning and functions of certain principles of physics and math just the way brian cox did for quantum mechanics, I would have been an enthusiasts of deep learning a long time since childhood days. brian is a very good example of a very good teacher.
There is a nonzero probability that you can walk through a wall. The particles that constitute the atoms that make up the wall, would have to move in just the right way and you could try from now until the end of the universe and never succeed. But the probability is not zero. That’s quantum mechanics.
This is what is so compelling about physics in general. We start with fundamentally basic principles of things like mass, energy, inertia and build ever more complex relationships between them to explain the universe. Quantum mechanics is still elusive to me, but I appreciate an expert starting with a singular concept of the Path Integral.
So, if my cat’s asleep on the couch and I get up from my reclining chair to get another beer, there’s a probability that my cat will sit where I was (because it’s warm from my ass) before I get back. I’m no expert in quantum mechanics but I can tell you that, that probability is right around 98%…ain’t that right mittens?
Here’s my slightly longer explanation: Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle states that we cannot simultaneously measure both the position AND the velocity of a particle. All we can measure are ranges of probabilities. The probability of measuring a particle at a particular position at a later point in time is governed by the Schrödinger Equation, which calculates the time-evolution of the “probability wave”, aka, the distribution of probabilities at all possible locations at later points in time. Another way of calculating the probability of finding a particle at a certain position at a later point in time is using Path Integrals (this formalism was created by Richard Feynman), and adding up the quantum “Action” for every possible path the particle could have taken to get to that specific position. The Path Integral formalism is also used in Classical Mechanics, but is updated in Quantum Mechanics to use an Imaginary term in the Action quantity. Lastly, I will clarify that the uncertainty in the particles position is not due to a measurement limitation or a lack of knowledge, it is true indeterminism.
Path integral formulation uses Lagrangian to describe quantum mechanics (you can notice that when he said ‘action’). The easier version of quantum mechanics is to use Hamiltonian, involved when you describe quantum mechanics with the Schrodinger Equation. Path integral formulation is more difficult since you have to know field theory, whereas solving the Schrodinger Equation is equivalent of solving a linear algebra problem.
Brian Cox and Alexei Filippenko seem to be two of the nicest people you would ever want to meet. They always smile and just seem to be jovial all the time. Being happy is infectious. Unfortunately so is sadness and anger. perusal Brian and Alexei smile all the time during an interview always gives me a reset of some sort.
brian is sooo good at explaining stuff. makes science exciting and cool. i listened to him on joe rogan for what i thought was 20 minutes, i was 2 hours in lol. i studied the universe,spacetime,time dilation, thinking about our origin, how life started etc for a long time nowfell deep into the rabbit hole, and he went i to depths on all subjecta during that podcast. recommended!!!
Love Brian Cox, he just explains things in a way that’s not overly complicated so you can understand it but he actually makes it fun to learn science. Really liked his series he did which was 7 wonders of the solar system or universe but it was factual and I actually learned a lot just from perusal him, plus if you actually have an interest in that stuff it helps as well 😂
I love Brian Cox – I think his explanations a easy to understand- and staggering to contemplate. It amazes me every time just how remarkable some people are in trying to understand the very fabric of physics and science It also strikes me – how I am nowhere in their league when it comes to brain power
For the benefit of anyone wanting a “proper” short explanation and confused by this, all Brian explained here is that QM is probabilistic. If you want a bit more, here’s my best effort: The thing that really makes QM quantum is that those probabilities are calculated by adding up lots of wavelike amplitudes, which can reinforce or cancel each other. In “classic” QM we add up a finite number of special amplitudes, or “wavefunctions”*. The other key feature is how physical measurements are derived from these amplitudes — making a measurement breaks the wavefunctions into components (called “eigenfunctions”) specific to the quantity being observed, each one of which has a special value, the “eigenvalue”. Each time the measurement is made, the observed value will be randomly chosen from the discrete set of eigenvalues, according to how much their eigenfunction overlaps with the total wavefunction. Since the eigenfunctions are specific to the thing being measured, not all observables can be measured at the same time: this gives the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. * The Feynman path integral and action mentioned by Brian are actually a step up from this, which say that the number of such amplitudes is infinite: this is key to the more advanced Quantum Field Theory.
In a nutshell, General Relativity is the theory of the big. Planets, stars, galaxies and gravitational effects therein. The Macro. Quantum Mechanics is the theory and study of the small. Atoms, electrons, etc…The Micro A Unified Field Theory would successfully combine the two into a single theory that explains both without contradictions.
I was having a drink with some other grad students at a conference about ten years ago and he was there, leaning up against the table. I did not recognize him and stupidly asked “so where do you go to school?” He was incredibly chill about it, “I’m actually one of the keynote speakers”. I’d give anything to be back there and actually have a real chat with him. How embarrassing.
Brian explained the ‘tip of a very big iceberg’ of Quantum Mechanics. What he didn’t mention was that electrons, photons, etc. can appear as waves or particles depending on how you observe or measure them and they have a probability of being most anywhere, like waves on an ocean. There is also the problem of the measurement changing the probability distribution of the particles/waves as described by Heisenberg. Then there is the ‘spooky action at a distance’ as described by Einstein, that seems to defy information moving faster than the speed of light, which would also break a few laws of physics. As Richard Feynman said: “If you think you understand Quantum Mechanics, then you really don’t understand Quantum Mechanics”.
I actually hate this kind of mentality. Explaining complex things in a very short time, all you get is a sense that you know something without actually knowing anything, you want the reward without doing the work. “Isis explained in 2minutes””ww2 explained in 30 seconds” etc. complex issues have complex explanations and need complex solutions, simplifying things too much creates a false sense of knowledge and you come up with simple solutions that are wrong, immigrant problem=build a wall, drug problem=kill all the drug users. The next most dangerous thing after ignorance is the illusion of knowledge!
In quantum mechanics the physical system is described through a wave function whose evolution over time is determined by the Schrodinger equation. The wave function represents infinite different possible results for the physical quantities related to the system, but when we take a measurement, only one of these infinite possibilities becomes real; after the measurement, we must therefore modify the wave function “by hand” to eliminate all other possible results, and this modification is called the “collapse” of the wave function. The fundamental problem with quantum mechanics is that interactions among particles are already included in the Schrodinger equation and such equation does not predict any collapse. The collapse of the wave function is a violation of the Schrodinger equation, i.e. a violation of the most fundamental laws of physics and therefore the cause of the collapse cannot be determined by the same laws of physics, in particular, it cannot be determined by the interactions already included in the Schrodinger equation. The Schrodinger equation is what allows us to make quantitative predictions about the outcomes of future measurements; everytime we make a measurement, we receive new information about the system, and we need to “update” our wave function, i.e. to collapse it, otherwise the Schrodinger equation would provides wrong predictions relative to successive measurements. After one century of debates, the problem of measurement in quantum mechanics is still open and still represents the crucial problem for all interpretations of quantum mechanics.
I would say that with every particle of mass in this universe there can be associated a wave, the mathematical description of which, when squared, gives you the distribution of the particle’s momentum and spatial location to a degree of accuracy reciprocably determined and limited by the specific uncertainty in the values of these variables.
so basically all things “are” and “are not” at the same time. Or as schrodinger put it a cat that you cant observe is dead, alive, eating, sleeping, chasing mice, and every other possible combination relevant to a cat until you observe it and see which combination applies at the time you observe it. wow thats cool, Lol.
Ok I had to replay the clip several times to catch this while rereading the title to see what was going on because something wasn’t adding up. I was initially confused why he would answer it in this way and then when I replayed it back a third time or so, I then actually registered what the interview REALLY asked him. He asked Cox; to explain “as distinctly as possible, the rules of quantum mechanics”. So the title of this article was just wrong. He didn’t actually ask him to “explain quantum mechanics”, but rather just about any ‘rules’ or implicit mathematical formalisms that underline it. That made Cox’s answer make way more sense because yes, for calculating probability this is a fundamental aspect of and is also a great answer as to why we often utilize quantum mechanics and its calculations in mathematics and formal methodological science. If he was actually just plainly asked by the interviewer to “explain quantum mechanics” as concisely as possible or w/e like the title suggests, he would almost certainly just have said something along the lines of; “Well, in relation to particle and atomic physics (so ignoring quantization of linear algebraic abstraction, etc.) quantum mechanics is a system that (at least for now) is in scientific theory; commingling with Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, classical field theory to result in Quantum field theory. Quantum Mechanics mathematically describes, predicts and calculates with unusual precision, the fundamental interactions and behaviors of particles at the subatomic or subnuclear scale.
Only he didn’t actually even begin to explain QM. He forgot to mention that those particles react differently depending on an “observer” or something to measure. How particles can entangle with one another and create polar opposite effects. How a particle can be a particle and a wave at the same time. So no, he didn’t actually explain much.
a fun thing to do with quantum computing is related to spin, and angular momentum, I’ve read its kind of math metaphorical to compare newtonian spinning bike wheels to quantum spin, I saw a article where a guy had two bike wheels on an axle, on a rope, where he could spin them same direction or opposite directions, spinning same direction they turned horizontal and had precession, they had a particular spin, when the two were spinning same direction they omitted going horizontal and just went vertical, now with quantum entanglement or linkage of 18 photons to one other photon, or one electron, you can have all of them spin up, and the main one actualizes nonfractional spin up, then if you you have 9 spin up, and 9 opposite spin up they balance bigly, and perhaps the quantum actualized state of the photon is durably undecided or indeterminate (longer compute interval! Less unwanted environmental disruptability/stabler quantum computers!) along with perhaps causing increased compute time or computation resolution, “cylesishness” this could be a new third quantum bit besides up and opposite of up spin, so you get 3 factorial states, making quantum computing more effective per module. also, if fractional ratios like like 4:14 are resolvable or 7:9 then you can get like 2^18 bits, or something, per quantum superposition compute element, really heightening quantum computer capability. tell me what you think of this quantum computing idea/note, if you think it has merit pass it along to engineers and scientists.
Ultimately, it’s much less glamorous than people think — but also at the same time more surreal, just not in the way people expect. They (well, some folks, particularly to charlatans) expect something surreal in the sense of consciousness, the power of your mind, etc, etc. In reality, the surreal part has to do with how particle move in some very peculiar ways, i.e., not akin to anything that most people would picture from their everyday experience. And ultimately all effects can in principle be derived from these new ways to move from A to B. Example in the context of atoms. Electrons orbit around protons. In normal physics, the electron can sort of be anywhere around the proton, kind how planets can be anywhere around the sun. But these different movement laws in the quantum version of mechanics put constraints on locations at which an electron can be found. So when it gains or lose energy, it has to respect these constraints, meaning it can only lose or gain energy in specific ways. The analogous of this would be a car whose speed has to drop in steps, like going from 30 to 20 to 10, etc. And roughly, roughly speaking that’s how you can get a laser: you have a bunch of atoms all changing from some configuration B to configuration A (again, because of the constraints of this new mechanics), so all of them emit the same color (the energy is determined by the color). That synchronous release of the same energy is a laser.
Very interesting choice of Brian Cox, the action path. Was also my beginning to quantum mechanics, first Hamilton-Jacobi principal function in classical mechanics and after quantum action. Paradoxically it was more difficult for me to understand H-J formulation of Newton laws, than understanding quantum physics 😅 But once you got that action, you got everything you need to a system, maybe the actual reformulation of Archimedes statement: “give me a Hamiltonian, an action and I move the world”
Consciousness is simply result from (knowledge) If there is no knowledge associated with mental images There will be no awareness Example – when we go to the search engine on Google, if you write words that are not previously available from anyone, you will not find a complementary appearance in the search, but when you write the words in the search the second time You will find that it has appeared in the search engine This is due to the inclusion of search engine awareness by registering the search again This is where awareness is formed.
Ok. Let me sinplify it further what he said, even further. Imagine a sub atomic particle. Now, why does Cox say, its position is not fixed but a matter of probability? Because to know its position you have to use Photons, emitted within light and then capture that reflection to form an image of its position. However, when a photon strikes such Sub atomic particle of such infinitesimal mass, they inadvertently move them. Hence, its position cant be fixed. ( Read Schrodinger uncertainty principle). Thus, begins the basics of Quamtum Mechanics. An electron ( which is one of the 6 leptons) has a probability function associated with it because of what I explained earlier. You can never be hubdred sure that like appreciably massed object, its position is constant. Its probability at any one point is drfined by various factors that affect the motion of such sub atomic particles.
Physists say that observation changes quantum mechanics. The effect of light energy required to observe forms the fabric in which the quantum particles move. Infra red is also light. Does cern have a quantum template of less energy than the quantum particles observed in which to measure their behaviour?
The ‘action’ is equal the path integral of momentum of a moving object (unit: Joule second), like ‘energy’ is equal to the path integral of force exerted on a moving object (so the gradient of the particle ‘action’ is equal to particle momentum). I have no idea why Feynman’s ‘action path integral’ explains QM much better. Louis De Broglie also used the ‘action’ concept in order to describe a guidance equation: a pilot wave guides a particle’s motion. Without knowledge about the (classical statistical) nature of pilot waves, nobody can explain quantum mechanics, not in 60 seconds, not in 60 days.
Our recognitions to synchronicity and meaningful coincidences that appear to guide our paths lead me to believe that our soul is a higher state of probability. Quantum entanglement, quantum jumping, and the entire holographic principle offer a scientific context to these mysterious experiences that reveal a deep interconnected universe which every event is not always as random, causally present, or isolated as one may seem to believe
I wonder if Brian Cox can also explain the first cause of the universe in 60 seconds. Or what the singularity truly is or was. How something ultimately came from nothing. He will most likely say…. Gravity gave way and ultimately created everything along with very small particles of matter. Then I would like him to explain how that happened in 60 seconds as well.
Alien technology is not easy to explain. But if you break it into pieces, the building blocks of spacetime the agent that generates the building blocks of spacetime, a computer directed version of the agent that generates the blocks of spacetime, then it is possible to understand alien technology. It is a fact that theoretical physicists focus on all the wrong things. What they should be focusing on is (a) what is spacetime made of and (b) how are physics constants stored/expressed. If you look at (i) the two slit interference pattern wave function, (ii) the big bang expansion, (iii) Huygens Principle, and (iv) light cones, you get the intuitive impression that the building blocks must be something that expands because the whole universe is expanding. Not only are the building blocks of spacetime expanding, but they must be expand at the speed of light. That is why special relativity is true: because the agents that enforce physics, including relativity and quantum mechanics, have the speed of light built into them. One can then infer that if these agents that enforce speed of light, or you can think of it as the building blocks of spacetime, not only express the speed of light, but then they probably express ALL of the physics constants: Planck constant h, gravitational constant of the universe, G, etc, etc. So if you look at certain experiments, there does seem to be an expanding sphere that expands like a water ripple at the speed of light, the two slit experiment has a wave function that behaves like an expanding ripple.
I read a series of lectures, “Einstein’s Relativity and the Quantum Revolution, by Richard Wolfson. Starts at pretty simple basic stuff, and walks you thru. I actually didn’t read it, I listened to it on an audio book. GREAT. I think I understood pretty much all thru Chapter 22 or so. But I’ll be damned if afterwards I could have explained it. Still fun. Always good to stretch the brain…
The thing is quantum mechanics isn’t necessarily “hard.” Yeah, you need to know a certain level of math, and need to understand a certain level of chemistry/atoms. But it’s essentially probabilities (like he said) with their corresponding equations. The “hard” part of quantum mechanics is that it gives you answers to situations that are not readily conceptualized by people because they don’t track with what we see on a day to day basis. That is, these equations lead to things like superposition, wave/particle duality, entanglement, etc. that “violate” common sense as we know it.
So, If I’ve understood it correctly, and I probably havent, the probability surely decreases the longer the distance is from the initial point? I mean obviously for any specific point this has to be true (there are more possible “landing” points in a 1km radius sphere than a 1cm sphere) but also just generally? IE over distance..
do you happen to know if my theory that we are the black hole, the zero with no inverse, has validity? Im just a 39yr old mental health therapist and came across this during meditation. Would love to open healing centers at my family’s lake property in montana. Would be lovely to touch base with you at some point in life. Best, Adrienne Lamb, AZ
13:18 To say that today, 3 years in, TikTok has this viral audio “Things are always working out for me no matter how it is at any given point in time…”. It is just enough reason to believe in it, believe in the power of our minds, it has been said and done by others so many times and it is just about time those who doubt it start believing how lucky we are NO MATTER WHAT. So blessed to encounter this talk. Hope it reaches more beyond 2.8M views and people.
These are powerful insights. I think it would be helpful to give a basic quick summary what is quantum physics. Why we are using this study to explain our energy. Doesn’t have to be for physicists or scientists but for the average person. Not all us remember what we studied in school. For me, physics was an optional study in science and I studied a different science field. Thinking physics was hard with the math.
The speed with which time appears to flow today makes this an ancient communication from Suzanne. No matter, it is timeless material. On June 1st of 2022…and across time and space, THANK YOU, SUZANNE! Speaking of higher vibrations, consider tuning into the Abraham Hicks material, readily available here on YouTube. With my naive understanding of quantum physics/mechanics, and Mr. Einstein and Mr. Bohr, and from the Abraham materials, I’d like to add: hail to the Law of Attraction!
I’m so happy I was connected since the day I was born..and always knew there was more to the reality …since childhood. It’s kind of strange that some people realise this only later in life. Everyone has a different path in life and different goals to achieve. Our society is too materialistic and that is the root of the disconnection from our souls. Luckily, times are changing ❤️🥰😍
I really appreciate Suzanne giving this Ted talk. Quantum Physics has brought us the breakthrough we all need to bring Religion and Science together. However I can’t help but feel something about Suzanne. It’s the way she walks, her body language, something about her voice. Do you hear it? I hear remnants of something in her voice. It’s that hurt little girl in her. It’s being expressed as a valley girl way of speaking. And that’s fine. I don’t like to be one who judges. There’s something about her that I really love and appreciate but I can’t help but be painfully aware of a lot of hurt she’s presently experiencing yet still avoiding. Despite all her success something’s not right within her. Perhaps some of you can help me nail this down if you don’t think I’m being out of line here. I won’t ignore what I’m feeling about her. She’s my sister…..she’s our dear beloved sister and we owe it to her to help her. I’m not sure what it is that I can do for her but I just wanted to bring this up. I owe it to her to be truthful and honest as I only know how. I hope you’ll join me in recognizing this. Nevertheless, I hope the best for her and all of those who can learn and gain as much as they can from her knowledge and wisdom.
Repeat those thoughts and feelings of prosperity, youll begin to see it blossom on ALL aspects of life not just monetary values. Yet money has an energetic code. Its not about tapping into money …more so the frequency that generates it . The circuit it flows through becoming a circuit your tapped into
Wow……..as a student of science and logic, i have never been able to implement the law of attraction in a positive way into my life although i have been struggling for the last 10 odd years…..but this is it. I now know that i can manifest my dream life by applying quantum physics laws. Thanks a million times
Excellent. Thank You. Love everything about this talk. Where I get stuck at times is pushing away the drama around a sick parent and then a friend who just lost the pregnancy, and then my husband keep turning the TV on to hear all the bad news, then the neighbor’s dog is sick and so on. I know, you may be thinking why am I attracting all these energies. Yet I am constantly pushing them away therefore pushing away a lot of people around me!!!!
Take good care of yourself – loving yourself. When you love yourself, your focus starts to shift from yourself to loving other people. When you love other people, you are starting to think about what you can do for them, for humanity. If you figure out a big enough thing you can do for humanity, you will be rewarded for it, both financially, emotionally and spiritually. There is no need to complicate this with quantum physics, it’s very basic stuff.