Dick Turpin is Newton Pulsifer’s car, named after a 17th-century British highwayman. Newt named the car in the hope that someone would ask him why. When Anathema eventually asks him, Newt mumbles that the car is named “because everywhere I”. The car is an unreliable Wasabi model, constructed on the fateful day when the Japanese switched from becoming “fiendish automaton who copied”.
Newt hopes that someone will ask him why he named his car that way, but nobody ever has. In the finale, the flaming sword, the Thunder Gun, and the revelation of why Pulsifer calls his car “Dick Turpin” are revealed. The car is a 1934 Bentley 3 1/2 litre Coupé by Thrupp and Maberly, called “Mary”.
In the TV series, Dick Turpin was a Reliant Robin, a Japanese Wasabi model, which was constructed on that fateful day when the Japanese switched from becoming “fiendish automaton who copied”. On the way there, Newton sees a flying saucer land next to him with aliens who come bearing a message. The car referred to as “Dick Turpin” is believed to be a 1990 Reliant Robin Lx.
The PO-01 Pointer – Ultraseven, car type: a Second Gen. Imperial; Party. Dick Turpin is no longer an Asian car with English voice warnings. For the unfamiliar, his car is named Dick Turpin, after the famous highwayman.
📹 Good Omens vines that Dick Turpin stole from me
Hello! Don’t mind me, I’m just throwing another vine compilation at you guys. Hope you enjoy. I’ll definitely make more of these …
Is the Bentley in Good Omens real?
The production team employed a genuine Bentley, extensive computer-generated imagery (CGI), and a handmade “clone” as stand-ins to inflict damage upon the vehicle.
What is Crowley’s car called?
Crowley’s Bentley and personalized license plate “Niat Ruc” in Good Omens season 2 have a deeper meaning, referencing the suicidal leaves section in Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life. The license plate is a nod to Terry Gilliam, who worked on the animation of The Meaning of Life and was involved in a failed film adaptation of Good Omens. Crowley’s character takes on a darker outlook in season 3, and his Bentley is his only best friend outside of angel Aziraphale.
Good Omens season 2 tells a new story that goes beyond the source material, with many characters not returning. However, there are some overlaps and returning faces from season 1, along with well-known settings and objects like Crowley’s car. Crowley’s faithful black Bentley returns, and the unique license plate has caught the attention of viewers the most, as it holds a deeper meaning than it appears.
Why does Bentley look like Rolls-Royce?
Bentley and Rolls-Royce are two of Britain’s most well-known luxury car producers, both of which were created by motoring pioneers driven by passion for cars and engineering. Bentley was founded in 1919 by W. O. Bentley and his brother H. M. Bentley, and their first sports vehicle, the Bentley 3 Litre, was introduced in 1921. The Bentley 3 Litre revolutionized racing with its innovative technology, attracting attention from wealthy British car enthusiasts who formed the Bentley Boys. Woolf Barnato, one of the Bentley Boys, helped the company during financial hardship, and under Barnato, Bentley produced five more models, including the famous Speed Six.
Rolls-Royce, created by Sir Henry Royce and Charles Rolls in 1904, focused on pure luxury, especially after the introduction of the iconic Silver Ghost with its own aluminium trims. Despite Bentley’s financial struggles, Rolls-Royce successfully withstood the 1929 Stock Market Crash and closed its factory in the United States. However, Charles Rolls was prematurely killed in a plain crash in 1910, aged only 32. Both Bentley and Rolls-Royce are known for their unique blend of luxury and engineering.
Why was the Good Omens Cancelled?
The production of the graveyard was temporarily halted by Disney due to a lack of complete viewing equivalents, although the rationale behind this decision remains uncertain.
Why does Crowley drive a Bentley?
The Bentley, often referred to as “the Bentley”, is a significant part of Crowley’s life, as he can operate it without physically driving it and has kept it scratch-free for over sixty years. The Bentley has developed a unique personality, with any tape left in it turning into a Best of Queen tape, despite not having the necessary electronics for a tapedeck. Crowley assumes all vehicles he drives would have cassette players, and this Bentley does.
The car has adapted to speeds and maneuvers that would be impossible for a car of its age, as Crowley has grown accustomed to taking corners on two wheels and driving down Oxford Street at 90 miles an hour. Crowley is sensitive to the appearance of his car, mending any bumps or nicks with a glare. He shows particular irritation when Aziraphale puts a luggage rack on the car without asking, but his frustration stems from the tartan straps on the luggage rack.
What kind of car is in Good Omens?
In Good Omens, the demon Crowley is depicted as driving a black 1926 Bentley, which serves as a symbol of his pride and joy throughout the novel.
What is a wasabi car?
It seems plausible to suggest that the Japanese car brand Wasabi is based on Mazda, Acura, and Honda. The brand was referenced in the 1990 work of fiction “Good Omens,” written by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman. It seems probable that Wasabi is an Asian car and motorcycle brand within the Saints Row universe, potentially owned by an individual. The primary logo is composed of three chrome bars. It seems plausible to suggest that Wasabi may be related to the MotorStorm series.
What model is the Bentley from Good Omens?
The second season of Good Omens on Prime features Crowley’s Demonic Bentley, a 1926 Bentley that takes center stage on the series. The car, described as a two-door coupe with an elongated bonnet, upright windscreen, and flawless black paint job, represents the era in which Crowley obtained his obsession. The car also features modern-day upgrades, such as an elongated bonnet, upright windscreen, and flawless black paint job. Crowley’s love for this Bentley is evident in the car’s appearance on the screen.
What kind of car is Zenvo?
The Zenvo ST1 is a high-performance sports car by Danish company Zenvo Automotive, manufactured almost entirely by hand using a CNC router. It is powered by a twincharged 7, 011 cc General Motors LS7 V8 engine, generating 1, 104 PS at 6, 900 rpm and 1, 430 N⋅m of torque at 4, 500 rpm. The car has a top speed of 375 km/h and a 0–100 km/h time of 3. 0 seconds. The ST1 is handcrafted using a high-performance, five-axis CNC router and comes with keyless entry, satellite navigation, telescopic steering wheel adjustment, and electrically adjustable leather racing seats.
What is a cringe car in Japanese?
In Japan, an itasha is a car decorated with images of characters from anime, manga, or video games, often featuring paint schemes and stickers. These cars are prominently displayed in places like Akihabara, Nipponbashi, Ōsu, and Itasha-based events like Odaiba Itasha Tengoku.
Itasha only applies to cars, but there are other names for vehicles with similar features, such as itansha for motorcycles, itachari for bicycles, itabasu for buses, itatorakku for trucks, itadensha for trains, and itahikouki for airplanes. In the 1980s, the “itasha” was the most desired luxury import car in Tokyo. The name “itasha” was derived from combining the Japanese words for “itai” (painful, cringe, embarrassing) and “sha” (vehicle).
Itai means “painful”, with additional senses of “painfully embarrassing” → “cringeworthy”, “painful for the wallet” due to high costs, or “painful to look at”. The name is also a pun for Italian cars, truncated in Japanese slang as Itasha (イタ車).
Is a car JDM?
JDM stands for Japanese Domestic Market, referring to Japan’s home market for vehicles and parts. It is generally only applicable to cars made specifically for the Japanese market. While many Japanese cars are produced for countries outside of Japan, not all are considered JDM. JDM cars are generally legal in the UK, but they must pass the individual vehicle approval (IVA) test before being road-legal.
If the vehicle doesn’t pass, it may need to be modified before driving on UK roads. Dealers in the UK that specialize in used Japanese imports include Jap Import Cars in High Wycombe, All Japanese Motors in 7 and 8-seater Japanese vehicles, and Torque GT on their website.
📹 Good Omens Has a WEIRD Ending
Good Omens Episode 6 Blind Reaction Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4bPAFvozkiEM6SGzDc1eyQ …
In the book when Adam faced Satan, all he could think of was how badly he wanted his dad to be there. His love for the dad that was there was stronger than his fear of Satan. Mr Young is his real dad and that’s all that matters. So reality shaped around that love. The whole point of Good Omens is love. Love for friends, love for family, love for a romantic partner, love for the world… we see every kind of love depicted and it’s love that saves the world.
Danny, the point is not that children are somehow stronger than the four horsemen of the apocalypse, it’s that the “Them” ARE a version of the horsemen that Adam chooses, just like he chose Dog to be his bestie over a demonic beast to serve his whims. Look at the kids- War vs. Pepper: Pepper is the spicy, antagonistic kid who exemplifies the Angry Feminist. Except not really, bc her best friends are boys, she thinks War is fucking sexist, and she chooses peace as her goal. Pollution vs Brian: Brian is basically the Pigpen of the group. He’s dirty, he’s always making a mess, and he’s got wrappers everywhere. But he genuinely loves the woods they play in. He chooses a “clean world.” Famine vs Wensleydale: Wensleydale is the wholesome kid with “a very nutritious lunch” to Famine’s fashionable starvation diet. Adam himself takes the place of Death. He chooses life, to bring back those who have died during this nonsense, to spare everyone from the apocalypse. Rather than commanding the horsemen, he chooses to be one of them, to ride with them (bikes vs motorcycles) and be their friend. It’s the natural vs. the supernatural, human vs inhuman, childish hope vs. adult cynicism. And Adam chooses to be a friend, love the world (Aziraphale first notices the aura of love around the whole area where Adam lives, bc he loves his home so much), love humanity, be one of them (he chooses his human father), and that happened not bc of the forces of heaven and hell (Crowley and Aziraphale influencing him like they did Warlock), but because of a normal human upbringing.
I feel like the show’s biggest narrative flaw compared to the books is under-developing the kids and not building the kids up properly as the alternate riders of the apocalypse. Because they ride with Adam, they ARE the Riders, but at the end they decide what they are riding for. Adam chose Life over Death, Pepper chose Peace over War, etc. Everything Crowley and Aziraphale did just positioned them ineffably to be the angel and demon at Adam’s shoulder when it was time to make a decision.
The idea behind the ending is that Adam (the antichrist) has all the power during the apocalypse right? We’ve seen that anything he thinks or imagines is manifested into reality. He has all the power and anything he says is real turns real, so when he says “your not my dad” its literal, he is manifesting into reality that satan is not his dad, therefore he is not the antichrist, and apocalypse can’t happen. Its the same with the kids, its not that they are strong enough to defeat the 4 horseman, its that Adam controls everything in the apocalypse, so he can stop the horseman through his friends. His friends are just vessels to his own power.
IMPORTANT BACKGROUND: Good Omens was created as a parody of the movie The Omen, which was incredibly popular at the time. In that movie, the antichrist is given to a politician and his wife to raise after their child dies during birth. Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett wanted to explore what would happen if that child had gone to the wrong parents and had a totally normal upbringing. That’s why the nuns suggest the name Damien to all the parents – that was the name of the antichrist in The Omen. Also, yes, Aziraphale and Crowley are entirely useless to the plot. They have a much smaller role in the book, but even so they were still fans’ favorite part of the book. If you really like the show, I HIGHLY suggest reading the book. If audiobooks are more your thing, there’s an excellent edition with a full cast including David Tennant and Michael Sheen. Keep in mind it was written in the late 80s/early 90s, because it has some very dated language
You’re not alone, I also felt underwhelmed by the way the seperate groups came together at the end, it all resolves so quickly. However I think the show knew that and that’s why this episode is framed, not by the suspense of “will-they-stop-the-apocalypse?”, but with “why-is-Crowley-on-trial?” The real victory is Aziraphale and Crowley trusting the only person on their side and triumphing over Heaven and Hell together. It shows growth in their relationship, especially with Aziraphale, that he doesn’t object or pretend that they aren’t friends and allies, like he did at the beginning, but accepts Crowley’s help in order to hoodwink Gabriel and Heaven, so they can both continue enjoying thr life on Earth they love so much. It also speaks to how well they know each other, that they were able to impersonate the other perfectly, fooling their respective colleagues and bosses Season 2 I think does a good job of focusing on the main reason Season 1 was successful. Without spoilers, but suffice to say we get to see quite a bit of our favorite etheral-occult couple! I’m excited for the reactions!
Michael Sheen was doing the voice. In fact, Neil Gaiman told a story about how they were getting distance shots of Crowley and Aziraphale walking in the park, and he heard David Tennant on a walkie-talkie talking shit about Michael Sheen and calling him fat and stuff, then looked at them, and it was Michael talking the entire time.
A lot of people agree with you about the anticlimatic ending. I am a fan of the book and think the same anticlimatic events works much better in written form but I still like the show’s rendition of them. The vibe I always got from Good Omens is that it’s a modern comedy of errors/farce and things are supposed to be heightened, absurd, silly and many characters are supposed to be indeed quite ineffectual. It’s about the beauty but also the silliness and absurdities of existence, and it is also full of hope – the good nature within us simbolized by the power of childen’s imagination, vanquishing the monsters created by mankinds actions. War, famine and pollution are portrayed here are negative forces of our own making, not real in themselves, which is why the children conjuring up their opposites neutralize them… in that moment. Of course they are not truly gone.
1. The soldier was sent home where his mum made him an apple pie. 2. The kids could only defeat the horsemen (temporarily) because Adam believed they could. Yeah, I agree the standoff looked lacking. 3. The kraken + Atlantis being hallucinations is the official version the governments decided. 4. Nobody in heave has talked to God for a while. In the book, Satan never surfaces but the situation “feels” more dramatic.
It’s a humanist story at its core, so Aziraphale and Crowley being useless is basically the point. It’s because Adam was raised in a normal way with normal friends and family (and not using goofy divine/demonic moral influence) that he was able to stop the apocalypse. The metaphorical (and in this case literal) angel and demon on his shoulder are ones that, like him, have human interests and a love for the world as their moral priorities. It’s also important to remember that Terry Pratchett co-wrote this book. He tended to write stories focused on the inherent magic of childhood and children’s imagination so that’s an important element in this story. Season 2 was written by Neil Gaiman alone, so it doesn’t really contain the same themes.
The horsemen were able to be taken down by Adam’s friend because his 12 year old brain 100% believes his friends would win against the bad guys in any situation. As for the ending not really coming together I feel like that’s a very Terry Pratchett influence. (The Co Author of Good Omens) He tends to build stories within worlds and most of his plots are written as a way of showing off his characters dealing with situations. People read Terry P. to see what his Characters are up to, not necessarily to see how it ends. A very I’ll have a bit of coffee with my cream situation.
I actually love how it all tied together at the end and think Adam needed to be told those things to face Satan. All of the different kinds of love came together to save the world. Also, beautiful ending with Crowley (like a crow) and Aziraphale at the Ritz. Be sure to listen to the song over the credits if you haven’t yet.
Season 2 will bring you to tears how wonderful it is! That comment at the end of the reaction, though 😂 Also, when Crowly says “all of us”, he means him and Aziraphale. That’s the Us, while Them is Heaven and Hell, even if they are warring, too. Also, also, I don’t think the plotlines were supposed to weave together so tightly. After all, the connection between all these groups of characters is circumstencial, so they each have their own storyline that’s independent of the others and there was only this one week where their worlds clashed into one big hot mess. And when that mess was resolved, they just went back on their own way. We see none of these human characters again after this, after all, because everything around Aziraphale and Crowly is passing down here on Earth and these people were just like every other human they’ve interacted with over the centuries. Can’t wait to see the season 2 reaction when it comes out!
In the book the fight between the kids and the Horsemen is slightly different with Adam making a sword, scales and crown out of sticks and twigs for the kids to use on the horsemen, they are sort of enchanted and discorporate them, the horsemen are anthropomorphic personifications so they can’t be fought in a typical way. The horsemen also start looking more like their aspects with War having bullet teeth and pollution melting into a blob of toxic looking goo that tries to run but one of the kids frisbees the crown at it. Azirophale mentioned that the holy water he gave Crowley would destroy a demon completely as in cease to exist. Which is why the other demon didn’t come back but Hastur did as he was just discorporated sending him back to hell.
I find it funny how we all recognize that the show is unusually stitched together and isn’t satisfying in the way we expect, but we incredibly love the show anyway because it wasn’t made that way out of incompetence or a lack of understanding of filmmaking techniques; the show was made that way on purpose, and it’s refreshing.
Have you ever read a book or watched a movie where there were those side characters who were just so much more interesting than the main characters and you wanted the story about them instead? That’s basically what Season 1 is. Crowley and Aziraphale are technically the side characters, but they’re our main characters
The ending is a bit anticlimactic, but I also think thats the point. They spend a lot of it thinking they messed up big time and it was going to impossible to stop this kid, when in reality Adam being raised in an average family as a normal kid is what saved the day and made the big bads kind of easy to deal with. Like a massive metaphor for how anxiety can make a problem worse than it actually is.
7:30 Yeah, having Adam’s friends beat the horsemen does seem like poor writing compared to the rest of the show. Kinda like it was written by a kid, someone with the mind of a… I don’t know, how old’s Adam? Yeah, it feels a lot like someone with the same emotional maturity and interest in making Adam’s friends cool as Adam himself wrote it. I wonder who…
So I totally get it if it’s not the greatest time to do a reaction series for season 2, but… my dude… I am LITERALLY BEGGING YOU: PLEASE DO SEASON 2. PLEASE. I’ve so thoroughly enjoyed perusal you become a Good Omens fan; we all have. It’s because of the beautiful relationship between Zira & Crowley, and S2 is about exactly that. You’ve GOT to finish this wild ride, and we want to be there when you do…
This may or may not be canon but I always thought that the reason the Them are able to beat the horsemen seemingly so easily is because of how much Adam believes in his friends. If he can take away their mouths with a thought he can also with the same amount of effort make them as powerful as the horsemen. Idk that’s just what I think happened.
To be honest I think that Azi and Crowley not contributing to the plot in any major way was kinda the point. Not to spoil S2 but it does show just how bad they actually are at… you know… dealing with things. So them just kinda chancing into the correct outcome feels on brand for them! Can’t wait to see you react to Season two…..
You’re absolutely right about the ending, but it’s worth noting that it does come together much more cohesively in the show than in the book. The story also has heavy parody elements from “The Omen,” a classic horror movie, and a lot of the parodic elements are actually about nationality. Pratchett and Gaiman wanted to write about how quentessentially English characters would react to the apocalypse, rather than the stereotypical American Hollywood hero.
Thought about Anathema: she said she was going to England to stop the apocalypse, but I’m pretty sure that unbeknownst to her, she was actually there to start it. She’s the one who gave Adam all these ideas about how the world is a terrible place and deserves to be burned down so the Them can build it anew. She did it by accident! She didn’t mean to! She was just following the Prophecies! It’s sort of thanks to her that the whole mess started, but because she worked together with her “hereditary enemy,” it’s also thanks to her that the whole mess ended. “I just feel like they (Aziraphale and Crowley) didn’t do anyth–” Hulk smashes through your wall RAAAARGH YES! WELL. Maybe not exactly. But you are noticing, I am pretty sure, what you’re supposed to notice. Everything in “the final showdown” happens thanks to Adam and, ultimately, humanity (Adam was raised by humans, so he thinks and understands things like a human, so even though he’s got Powers, he’s a human). Good Omens the novel first came out around the end of the Cold War, and it was very much about how human beings have the power to both kick off and to stop the apocalypse. The point was that it was wrong for Heaven and Hell to interfere in human affairs at all. Aziraphale and Crowley are sympathetic characters not because of their jobs, but because they are caught up in the same awful machine we humans are. “Just imagine how terrible it might have been if we’d been at all competent.” That isn’t just a throwaway funny line.
I kinda agree with you on the Horsemen, it is something that worked so much better in the novel, and I just think it’s perhaps the problem of a tv series and a novel being so different mediums. And yeah in a way Crowley and Aziraphale had little to do with the overall big plot – because as they said, imagine if they were competent at being a demon and an angel, the outcome would have been very different if they had had a bigger effect.
In the book it’s more obvious why the kids were able to defeat the horsemen so “easily”— the Them were Adam’s horsemen, each with their own counterpart that they faced. As Crowley says, reality is listening to Adam’s beliefs. He believed his friends were a match for the horsemen, but better, so they had the power to defeat them and/or the horsemen were made vulnerable specifically to Them. I do agree the way it was filmed and framed here felt a little underwhelming; the value of the horsemen in the book is undercut in the series for time and budget, as they got most of their screen time with hilarious human bikers that rode with them that had to be cut from the show. I think if they’d kept the Hell’s Angels scenes it would’ve framed the characters of the horsemen differently so they’re more familiar and character like and less of a mysterious omnipresent threat vibe we got, making the defeat feel half baked and stilted.
In writing there is a basic set up of: something is happening, climax of the thing happening, and then result. Getting that result, that satisfying ending, is like getting a cookie. Neil Gaiman is really good at making us wait for our cookies. He often will set a thing up, enact the thing, and then not give us our cookie. Leaving us wanting. However in this set up, more and more things get added on~ more and more we have to wait for our delicious cookie. And eventually it all adds up~ it all concludes in the most delicious cookie we have ever dreamed of. So yes the end of this season left much to be desired~ but the wait for the cookie often makes the cookie even tastier.
Also, aziraphale and Crowley didn’t have as much protagonist time in the book as they had in the series, the writter had to give them a separate plot to convert them as protagonists and continue with the wtory him and Terry had planned out, maybe that is why it feels a bit off but also the show wouldn’t be the same without them
I definitely felt the same way you did about the satisfaction levels of this ep. and how it felt like Crowley and Aziraphale didn’t really DO anything, lmaoo. I think that’s part of the Gaimanverse’s thing, though, the supernatural beings who should have all the answers have none of the answers, and humanity finds a way in the most absurd and accidental ways possible—and it all is solved in a way that feels like a shrug. the main meal for me is always Aziraphale and Crowley and some other characters, so idrc lol
so after the first book was published, the two authors were at the beginnings of their careers and sharing a hotel room for a convention in seattle because they didnt have a lot of money and they plotted out book two. but after that their careers took off and they stayed good friends but never had time to sit down and write a book together. when Sir Terry Pratchett passed away, he made Neil Gaiman promise that if the book was adapted, he had to tell the whole story they had plotted, not just the book that was written. season two is the bridge between Good Omens and the unwritten book two which will be Season 3.
In the books, Aziraphale and Crowley being useless was the point. The story is from their POV but they functionally do nothing to mitigate the situation. Heck, I’m pretty sure the ending scene when Crowley stops time for them to give Adam a pep talk was made up for the live action. In the end, Adam is the real main character and has to choose to reject divinity/damnation and choose humanity.
i think the whole thing about aziracrow not being actually useful for the apocalypse’s ending was the entire point of them, like that was the joke JSKSDFL at first i felt like it was a not-that-satisfactory way to end the show but when you think about it with that in mind its kind of hilarious. ALSO the 2nd season its like of a brigde for the 3rd season and im sure you will enjoy it!! it was personally my favorite im so excited for you to watch the 2nd season!! cant wait!!
I think it’s important for Danny to know that there is only one book, and the other author of the book passed before the show was done airing, so season two isn’t based on a book, and It is only Neil as a consultant. It is still a great season, it is just not as epic or polished as the first because there is no source material to base the story off of. I think they do well with the challenge but it’s important to keep in mind I think
DANNY DANNY DANNY- Please, you said you love how power structures function in different worlds, and they explained it in British humor terms. Basically, most of Terry Pratchetts’ (co-author) work has a system of ‘magic’ where belief is how the magic functions. Kind of Sophie Hatter-esque, but on a cosmic level. So because Crowley believed his car wouldn’t explode- it had the strength not to; because Adam set the world back by claiming the father who raised him is his dad, he averted the apocalypse and made it believable the Kracken was a mass hallucination (which by the reality warping, it was). All of this is the central function of Good Omens, including the very anticlimactic subversion of the antichrist, because it’s something the angels and demons could never predict! For extra nerd points, the scene you loved with Crowley asking God from his chair- it echoes Christian philosophy about the existence of suffering and builds on the ‘flashbacks’ other point: Aziraphale (about Job being talked to by God): I don’t suppose he’s getting any answers. Crowley: No. But just to be able to ask the question.
Danny I highly recommend you watch “Staged” (not as a reaction seties but like in your free time) I think you would like it a lot, it is mostly David Tennant and Michael Sheen interactions and it’s fun and silly Edit: I can’t believe next week you start both seasons 2 of toh and good omens. It’s unbelievable how excited I am, it will be fun…
In the original book Terry Pratchet wrote most of the content about Adam and the Them and Neil Gaiman wrote the bits about Crowley and Aziraphale, so since Neil Gaiman created the show it makes sense that those parts play stronger. There wasn’t as much of heaven and hell in the book. Gabriel isn’t even a character in it.
Nah I agree with Danny with most things regarding the ending of what is otherwise a spectacular show. I can’t really take the ending to seriously at all and felt incredibly anticlimactic and I struggled seeing the point of most of the different plot lines if they all came together just for their roles being rather small in comparison to Adam & co
Season 2 was so much better in my opinion. I’m a little worried because the writer said season 3 would be more like season 1 and….. uhg. Yeah, no, you’ll enjoy season 2 much more. You felt the same way I did. I LOVED the show, but it was…. I didn’t care. I just came for the angel and demon. All that other mish mosh was getting in the way of the angel and demon story. SO season 2 is almost exclusively about them. There is still a B plot but its SO much more enjoyable and unobtrusive.
It’s the same problem I have with the book, and I think the show actually handles it better! It doesn’t ever take itself seriously, even when characters are in danger, and so everything gets resolved thru puns or something “witty”. Idk, there were just a lot of moments toward the end where I bounce between, “huh, I guess that was kind of funny” to “do you even want me to care about this story?”
In answer to your question about what happens when demons and angels “die”, firstly Hastur when he was set on fire on discorporated. As in his human corporation was destroyed, but when he went to Hell he was given a new one. Ligur on the other hand was destroyed by holy water which destroys your entire being completely. Meaning you cease to exist. It’s why Aziraphale is so upset that Crowley would ask for holy water. Hellfire would do the same thing to angels. There’s more description in the books about this.
I think Good Omens is a show you have to rewatch with the ending in mind in order to not feel like the ending is a let down. The first time I watched it I had a similar reaction to Danny like, “wtf, that’s it?” but if you rewatch while considering how much power humanity is ultimately shown to have at the end it makes more sense. Also, Danny, if you like Aziraphale and Crowley’s dynamic season 2 is going to be a lot for you to handle. lol
Huge Good Omens fan here and fun fact: you are entirely correct that none of the plots come together great! I always have to remind people that this was written by two people whose ONLY goal was to make each other laugh as hard as humanly possible. They weren’t necessarily going for the tightest plot. 😂
My brother in ineffability, Aziraphale and Crowley did even LESS in the book xD The thing is – the story is actually about falling in love with what you’re supposed to hate. Witchhunter Pulsifer ends up with the witch Anathema. Witchhunter Sergeant Shadwell ends up with a retired prostitute whom he had scorned. ADAM FALLS IN LOVE WITH THE WORLD AND CHOOSES TO SAVE IT. Even Dog ends up loving his life as a common pooch rather than a hellhound. Each and every one of them defies what they were supposed to be. And now comes the important bit: all of these plotlines are actually parallels for that one story that doesn’t explicitly get told – a certain demon and a certain angel who chose their own side 🙂 PS. I wasn’t too keen on the Horsepersons of the Apocalypse either. They felt really cliche, both in the show and in the novel.
You actually said something that made me think of a theme here. Aziraphael and crowly where the one of the 3 stories that tangented the plot only in one spot, talking to Adam. Which made the entire apocalypse thing reset. Adams story was the main part and Anathema made it worse. JUST as there was unexplainably 3 babies: one set the apocalypse in motion, one was the false route and one didnt tangent the story at all but one point: the swapping!
I enjoy seeing a blind reaction to this series. I’m late, so i’m sure most things have been explained, but i’ll touch on one thing you mentioned. Both Heaven and Hell are meant to look like office work places, but Heaven is supposed to look like a fancy rich one, and Hell is supposed to look like a sketchy cheap one, so you hit the nail on the head with the comparison of Gabriel and Beelzebub’s outfits.
Perhaps this was more apparent in the book, but I always thought the Them were able to do what they did because they were, well, Them. They were the best friends of the antichrist, his unknowingly chosen personal guard. They essentially were symbolically a mirror to the horsemen, and due to the incredible amount of power involved, the symbolic was literal. So, yeah, she puffed war by saying she doesn’t believe in it because she was specifically that girl in that moment, and it would not have worked otherwise. Might be coping tho, since it really was not much of a satisfying ending
In the grand scheme of the plot if Crowley was a competent demon everything would have lead to the apocalypse. The demons would have corrupted the right child. I don’t see Aziraphale importance other than a foil to Crowley and the other angels, a truly good angel. The best i can say is that he motivates Crowley to influence Adam in the end. There is also Aziraphale being the needed plot device to shine a light on the character of the other angels.
i remember thinking when i watched this show that the writers must have only cared about crowley and aziraphel like i did because it genuinely felt like they asked a middle schooler to wrap up the plot. That ending made me so mad like why even bother if youre just gonna wrap up all the big bad villains with a kick to the shin from a child
Rewatch this episode and see how well they play each other! David Tennant is playing Aziraphale acting like Crowley and Michael Sheen is playing Crowley acting like Aziraphale. It’s so masterfully done! Amazing actors! Plus we kind of get to see what A and C think of each other. A plays Crowley being cool, funny and suave and Crowley plays Aziraphale being strong and brave.
As for death for demons and angels in Good Omens, it seems to come in two flavours: Mere discorporation only affects their earthly vessel, but leaves their angelic/demonic self intact. One assumes they can get a new body issued. Obliteration with holy water or hellfire utterly destroys their demonic/angelic self.
4:21 I think the idea is Adam’s mind was being influenced by hell and then he overcome it out of love for his friends (not wanting them to leave/not wanting to hurt him)-that’s the him screaming at the sky bit)- he’s fighting off the hellish mind influence. His love for humanity beats hells influence. It’s a little more obvious in the novel 7:07 I do agree that the face off with the 4 horsemen is anticlimactic. It’s also kinda anticlimactic in the book. Sometimes books have these no violence everybody talks showdowns that actually kinda suck. The climax of the first Welcome to Night vale novel is also kinda like that. Not every talky showdown sucks but I think there’s a real art to making it not suck