Did Ptolemy Hold Astrological Beliefs?

Ptolemy’s mathematical model of the universe had a profound influence on medieval astronomy in the Islamic world and Europe. The Ptolemaic system was a geocentric system that postulated that the approximation of the sun and planets revolved around a spherical Earth. Ptolemy wrote the fundamental principles of astrology, such as the nature and movements of the planets and the relationships between the planets and the zodiac signs. He wrote his book Tetrabiblos in the 2nd century CE, which remains a testament to the enduring influence of ancient astrological knowledge.

Ptolemy was respected as a pathfinder of astrology and as a careful researcher. Although his Tetrabiblos, virtually the Bible of astrology, was copied, he was concerned to defend astrology by defining its limits, compiling reliable astrological data, and dismissing practices such as considering the numerological significance of names.

A significant role in the development of Western horoscopic astrology was played by Greek mathematician, astrologer, and astronomer Ptolemy, whose work Tetrabiblos laid the foundations of the subject. Ptolemy attempted to place astrology on a sound basis in Apotelesmatika (“Astrological Influences”), later known as the Tetrabiblos for its four volumes. He believed that astrology is a legitimate, though inexact, science that describes the physical effects of the heavens on terrestrial life.

Ptolemy’s philosophical defense of the subject as a natural, beneficial study helped secure acceptance of astrology. He framed astrology as a natural extension of his astronomy, framing it as a natural extension of his geography. Ptolemy accepted Aristotle’s idea that the Sun and planets revolve around a spherical Earth, a geocentric view.


📹 Heliocentrism and Geocentrism

A simple animation at which is easily to observe how different and difficult is to describe a planetary motion according to …


Did the ancient Egyptians believe in astrology?

Babylonian astrology and astronomy spread to Egypt in the early second century BC, and Egyptian astrologers began producing horoscopes to determine newborns’ fates. These horoscopes required computing the zodiacal positions of the Moon, Sun, and five known ancient planets: Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. Both Demotic and Greek horoscopes have been found in Egypt, and in 1999, American historian Alexander Jones proved that some Egyptian astrologers writing in Greek were using Babylonian methods.

However, little is known about the computational methods of native Egyptian astrologers writing in Demotic. Two newly identified Demotic texts with computational instructions shed new light on the mathematical skills of native Egyptian astrologers. Both ostraca contain instructions regarding three distinct Babylonian algorithms, each focusing on a particular phenomenon of Mercury. The inscriptions offer the first unequivocal proof that native Egyptian astrologers, like their Greek colleagues, were capable of computing positions of Mercury using Babylonian methods.

The instructions suggest that the native Egyptian scholars adapted these methods before their Greek colleagues and independently of them. They also use a Babylonian loanword for ‘degree’, unlike the Greek word used by the astrologers writing in Greek.

A surprising aspect of the instructions is that they employ a mathematical formulation unknown from Babylonia. Instead of directly computing the variable distance travelled by Mercury along the zodiac, Egyptian scholars first divided the zodiac into tiny steps of variable length. This formulation has not yet been identified in any Babylonian text, but it is now found in these two Demotic texts written by native Egyptian scholars.

Did ancient Greeks believe in astrology?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Did ancient Greeks believe in astrology?

Astrology in Rome was influenced by Greeks and Romans, with Babylonia or Chaldea being associated with it. Astrologers became popular in Imperial Rome, with emperor Tiberius being predicted by astrologers like Thrasyllus of Mendes. Ammianus Marcellinus describes people who would not appear in public or eat until they critically examined the calendar. Claudius, on the other hand, favored augury and banned astrologers from Rome. Being known as a “Chaldaean” carried suspicion of charlatanry and deception.

Hellenistic astrology was practiced from the 2nd century BCE until around the 7th century CE when Europe entered the Middle Ages. Astrology was passed on and further developed by individuals working within the Islamic Empire from the 7th to the 13th century.

Babylonian astrology was practiced by various scholars, including Critodemus, Dorotheus of Sidon, Epigenes of Byzantium, Hephaistio of Thebes, Julius Firmicus Maternus, Marcus Manilius, Paulus Alexandrinus, Ptolemy, Petosiris to Nechepo, Rhetorius, Tetrabiblos, and Vettius Valens. Worship of heavenly bodies was also a significant aspect of astrology.

What is the Ptolemaic astronomical system?

Ptolemy’s works established the Ptolemaic System, a geocentric model of the universe where everything revolves around Earth in complex patterns. This model had been formulated by Aristotle several hundred years prior.

What was Ptolemy's theory of planetary motion?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What was Ptolemy’s theory of planetary motion?

Ptolemy’s theory of planetary motion involved combining eccentricity with an epicyclic model. Each planet revolves uniformly along a circular path (epicycle), with the center around Earth along a larger circular path (deferent). This model explained the phenomenon of planets retrograding when at perigee. Ptolemy enhanced the effect of eccentricity by making the epicycle’s center sweep out equal angles along the deferent in equal times, known as the equant.

However, Ptolemy’s equant point was controversial, with some Islamic astronomers and Nicolaus Copernicus objecting to the idea that an elementary rotation in the heavens could have a varying speed. Johannes Kepler eventually led to the correct elliptical model as expressed by his laws of planetary motion.

Ptolemy believed that heavenly bodies’ circular motions were caused by their attachment to unseen revolving solid spheres. He discovered that if he represented the motions of the Sun, Moon, and five known planets with spheres, he could nest them inside one another with no empty space left over, ensuring that the solar and lunar distances agreed with his calculations. The largest sphere, known as the celestial sphere, contained the stars and formed the limit of Ptolemy’s universe at a distance of 20, 000 times Earth’s radius.

What did Ptolemy do for mathematics?

Ptolemy, an Egyptian astronomer, mathematician, and geographer of Greek descent, was born around 100 CE and died around 170 CE. He was the most famous astronomer of Classical antiquity and is known for his geocentric model of the universe, the Ptolemaic system. Ptolemy’s writings, including his first major astronomical work, the Almagest, were the culmination of Greco-Roman science. His writings, which included reports of observations made over the preceding quarter of a century, suggest that he lived until around 170 CE. His writings represent the culmination of Greco-Roman science and are considered the most famous astronomer of Classical antiquity.

Did Aristotle believe in astrology?

Harvey and Aristotle, in contrast to Ptolemy and subsequent astrological traditions, did not address the zodiac, the timing of births and conceptions, or the influence of fate and character on human destiny. This stands in contrast to later forms of astrology, including medical astrology, which incorporated elements similar to those found in Ptolemy’s work.

Who first believed in astrology?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Who first believed in astrology?

Astrology has been a significant cultural tradition for centuries, with various cultures including the Indians, Chinese, and Maya developing elaborate systems for predicting terrestrial events from celestial observations. The Old Babylonian period of Mesopotamia saw the practice of astrology, with Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa being one of the earliest known Hindu texts on astronomy and astrology. Chinese astrology was elaborated in the Zhou dynasty, and Hellenistic astrology after 332 BCE mixed Babylonian astrology with Egyptian Decanic astrology in Alexandria. Alexander the Great’s conquest of Asia allowed astrology to spread to Ancient Greece and Rome, where it was associated with “Challean wisdom”.

After the conquest of Alexandria in the 7th century, astrology was taken up by Islamic scholars, and Hellenistic texts were translated into Arabic and Persian. In the 12th century, Arabic texts were imported to Europe and translated into Latin. Major astronomers like Tycho Brahe, Johannes Kepler, and Galileo practiced as court astrologers. Astrological references also appear in literature, with poets like Dante Alighieri and Geoffrey Chaucer and playwrights like Christopher Marlowe and William Shakespeare.

Astrology was considered a scholarly tradition, accepted in political and academic contexts, and connected with other studies such as astronomy, alchemy, meteorology, and medicine. However, new scientific concepts in astronomy and physics called astrology into question, leading to its decline in academic and theoretical standing.

Did Einstein believe astrology?

Einstein’s sole known commentary on astrology is a 1943 epistle to Eugene Simon, wherein he concurs with Simon regarding the pseudoscientific nature of astrology, emphasizing its resilience and longevity over centuries.

Did Sumerians study astrology?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Did Sumerians study astrology?

Babylonian astrology is the earliest organized system of astrology, originating in the 2nd millennium BC. It is believed to have originated in the Sumerian period in the 3rd millennium BC, but the evidence of ancient celestial omens is insufficient to establish an integrated theory. The history of scholarly celestial divination is generally reported to begin with late Old Babylonian texts (c. 1800 BC) and continue through the Middle Babylonian and Middle Assyrian periods (c. 1200 BC).

By the 16th century BC, Babylonian astrology was primarily focused on weather and political matters, with astronomical symbols likely representing seasonal tasks. Astrological symbols were used as a yearly almanac of listed activities to remind communities to perform tasks appropriate to the season or weather. By the 4th century, mathematical methods had progressed enough to calculate future planetary positions with reasonable accuracy, leading to the emergence of extensive ephemerides.

Babylonian astrology developed within the context of divination, with the oldest known detailed texts of Babylonian divination dating back to around 1875 BC. These texts demonstrate the same interpretational format as celestial omen analysis, with blemishes and marks found on the liver of sacrificial animals being interpreted as symbolic signs presenting messages from the gods to the king.

What did Plato say about astrology?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What did Plato say about astrology?

In the Republic, Book X, Plato posits that the individual soul originates above the planets and stars, guided by a guardian spirit, and descends via the planetary spheres to incarnate in the body at birth. This process takes place within a geometrically ordered, Pythagorean cosmos, where the priority of social and political organization is to harmonize terrestrial society with celestial spheres. Plato emphasized the importance of assessing the significance of planetary motions without models, arguing that progress through time can be managed by paying attention to celestial motions.

The notion of the soul’s descent through the planetary spheres at birth supported the belief that individual destiny can be identified in planetary positions at birth. However, the soul originates from beyond the planets, and it is not necessarily bound by them. Plato’s emphasis on correct education and lifestyle can be applied to the belief that one should better harmonize with one’s planetary destiny or justify the liberationist view that one can completely transcend it.

A Platonic astrology can be identified rooted in Plato’s texts and has characteristics such as being acausal, assuming that astrology can be effective due to the synchronous movements of events on Earth and in the celestial spheres.

What does Ptolemy believe in?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What does Ptolemy believe in?

Ptolemy, utilizing his unaided visual observations, perceived the cosmos as a configuration of transparent spheres, with Earth situated at their focal point. He further discerned that the Moon, Mercury, Venus, and Sun all orbited Earth.


📹 ASTROLOGY: An Excuse for Stupid Behavior

Astrology is just an excuse for people to avoid being accountable when they say or do something stupid. Whether you’re a Cancer …


Did Ptolemy Hold Astrological Beliefs?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Pramod Shastri

I am Astrologer Pramod Shastri, dedicated to helping people unlock their potential through the ancient wisdom of astrology. Over the years, I have guided clients on career, relationships, and life paths, offering personalized solutions for each individual. With my expertise and profound knowledge, I provide unique insights to help you achieve harmony and success in life.

Address: Sector 8, Panchkula, Hryana, PIN - 134109, India.
Phone: +91 9988051848, +91 9988051818
Email: [email protected]

About me

27 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Big thing missing here is the orbits being elliptical. Until rules for elliptical orbits were discovered both used a pair of circular motions to describe the orbits of the planets. So, with both requiring a pair of circles to describe the motion of any one planet, the geocentric view arguably wasn’t any simpler, at least until Kepler came up with his laws describing planetary motion.

  • We still use both models in astronomy. The Earth observational Ptolemy model tells us where Jupiter, the Sun, Mars, etc will be any given observational moment. Both models are correct from different chosen centers. Our sun is not the center of our universe either….but it is from our observations. Nothing is the center of anything as what we observed isn’t where it was where we now observe it. With hand calculations the heleocentric model of Copurnicus was much easier for Kepler to plot for his planetary movement laws. Physics is often about picking the best mathematical point and relating vectors and curved formulas to it. Kepler found that the planets orbit in an ellipse, so the sun is not the center either…but one of two foci….a center point is between the sun and that other foci…in empty space.

  • Unpredictable hyperbolical motions of the planets as they are visible from Earth is the reason why the planets in the ancientry were depicted as horses, randomly throwing itself forward and then coming to a dead stop. In 1907 Nikolai Morozov, understanding this symbolism, used it for astronomical interpretation of the Book of Revelation.

  • However, both models are correct in a way. For example: the Sun and the Earth both revolve around one another but we say the Earth orbits the Sun because the Sun is far more massive and play a much bigger role in that interaction than Earth does. And, as this article shows, it makes predicting orbits of other objects in the solar system much easier (though not as simple as this article makes it seem).

  • But planetary orbits can be appreciably elliptical, there is no obvious parallax of the fixed stars, we didn’t have spectroscopes, no theory of gravity, no concept of inertial frames, and so on. Even today many people believe that the motion of a Trojan round a Lagrangian point L4 or L5 is an orbit, so this is unfinished business. It’s actually a nutation like a spinning top. I’ve written the computer simulations and I can see the similarity.

  • (I am not a geocentrist) But fun fact: the reason culture was uneasy to switch to heliocentricity was not because ‘they thought they were the center of the universe’ (I mean, literally they did, but not in a prideful way) in fact, quite the opposite. They believed anything higher than the moon to be divine/eternal, and thus placing the earth as ‘just another planet’ basically defiled that divinity.

  • Helio soyjaks: “Your eyes are lying to you, don’t believe them!!! The mathematics of your model don’t add up, chud!!”🤓 Geo chads: “The wonder of the heavens is astonishing. God’s power can make even the most complex systems work perfectly, and his most beautiful creation is at the center of it all.”🗿

  • What’s neat here is that the sun is seen to follow a perfect orbit around the earth if the geocentric model is to be believed, but every other celestial body must make wild deviations to fit the retrogrades. In the mind of an empirically-focused geocentrist, this should propose the suspicion that, since the only two possibilities to explain it are that the earth is in orbit around the sun or the sun is in orbit around the earth, and since the latter explanation produces a far sloppier system, the earth might orbit the Sun. They would do the math and realize their explanation doesn’t make nearly as much sense as the heliocentric model. The point being that there are not really any empirically-minded geocentrists.

  • Tycho Brahe was a Danish man whose family was extremely wealthy. He built an island observatory and kept very detailed records of the positions of the planets in the sky over time. He wasn’t quite sure how to interpret the data himself, but he was dedicated to making accurate records in case they could someday advance our understanding of the cosmos. In the final year of his life, he was assisted in his work by Germany’s Johannes Kepler. Kepler eventually interpreted Tycho Brahe’s data to develop his three laws of planetary motion. These laws recognized that the planets move in elliptical paths with Earth as one of the foci, changes in the planets’ speed along this ellipse have a consistent mathematical relationship to changes in their distance from the Sun, and the time it takes for a planet to complete a single orbit has a mathematical relationship to the semi-major axis of the path. This was all accurate enough for its time, but the scientific community still didn’t know why the planets move in this way. England’s Isaac Newton then developed his theory of gravity to explain the basis for Kepler’s laws. All of these advancements happened over the course of about 110 years, from the time that Brahe was given the island and the research money to the time Newton published his theory.

  • Hold up though, the left model isn’t one anyone ever used since a heliocentric model with circular orbits doesn’t work. To make circular orbits work the center of the system has to actually be near the sun not inside it. Copernicus also used epicycles (causing weird orbits like the one on the right) to make circular orbits work.

  • How in the Ancient Humans Hell did Ancient Humans accurately guess that there were other planets in the Solar System, especially without modern technology like telescopes like Hubble and James Webb? Did Ancient James just look up at the night sky, see a weirdly bright star and go “That must be a planet. We’ll call it Mars.”

  • It’s a really cool graph but one thing has to be pointed out: it has been known for centuries that the planets do not move in a circular motion around the sun. Rather, they move in ellipses, a shape that hadn’t been discovered at the time. Therefore, when the heliocentric model was first presented by Copernicus and later argued for by Galileo, it was full of its own, new problems which made the model just as hard to explain and just as clumsy as the geocentric one. It wasn’t until the discoveries of Kepler, Newton and Léon Foucault and his pendulum (which demonstrated that the Earth rotates around an axis) that the theory could be proven. Great article nontheless.

  • This is a false representation! The Heliocentric models orbits are nothing near perfect either, for example the earth’s orbit is so called “elliptical” and have the earth 3% closer to the sun in January when the earth is the coldest and further from the sun in July when the earth is the hottest… this just dosent make any since. Also, the orbits of the stars don’t form perfect circles with heliocentric model either, however on the Geo, the stars actually form perfect circles around the earth depending on your location… I truly beleive the Heliocentric model is flawed… it’s still a theory to this day and NASA is the only reason people still believe in it.. but it still has many flaws, for example, water cannot curve and always remain level yet they want us to think we live on a giant pear shaped sphere when in reality curvature has never been seen or proven and the rotation of the earth also cannot be tested… the Geocentric theory actually holds up closer to reality than most of you think because we were taught heliocentricm as “fact” growing up but it’s just not holding up to reality. Don’t be blind and also question everything. There’s a reason for thousands of years all our intelligent ancestors going back as far has history can “knew” the earth to be motionless and a flat plane… fun fact, the word “planet” comes from the word “plane”.. go figure. The only footage we get of this theory is CGI images all proven to be composites and all created by NASA. ALL IMAGES of earth from space are “cgi” this is a fact and you can easily prove this by googling it and comparing the size of the continents.

  • One of the conclusions of the Theory of Relativity is that when there are two systems, or planets, in motion relative to each other – such as the sun and the earth in our case – either view, (the sun rotating around the earth, or the earth rotating around the sun), has equal validity. So if there are phenomena that cant be adequately explained on the basis of one of these views, such difficulties have their counterpart also if the opposite view is accepted. Secondly, the scientific conclusion that both views have equal validity is the result not of any inadequacy of available scientific data, or of technological development (measuring instruments, etc.), in which case it could be expected that further scientific or technological advancement might clear up the matter eventually and decide in favor of one or the other view. On the contrary, the conclusion of contemporary science is that regardless of any future scientific advancement, the question as to which is our planetary center, the sun or the earth, must forever remain unresolved, since both view(s) will always have the same scientific validity, as stated. Thirdly, it follows that anyone declaring that a person who chooses to accept one of these systems in preference to the other is a fool, while one who accepts the other is a wise man-such a judgment shows that the person making it is ignorant of the conclusions of modern science, or that he has not advanced beyond the science of Ptolemy and Copernicus…

  • We’re on a spinning ball traveling faster than light, yet it slows down and speeds up at fixed times, without causing any liquefaction of skin. Not to mention how the moon has to keep up by slowing down closer to the sun then rapidly speeding up to so that its obit can make it around the earth. Not to mention that if we are endlessly barreling through the infinite, how have we not collided with anything? How old do the $cientist think this ball is again? A billion years old

  • perfect way to show why we are justified in going with a model that makes fewer assumptions to fit the observation. also, why do we waste time trying to reconcile evil with god’s plan, supposed free will but also predestination of our birth by our parents, why do we twist ourselves into pretzels to justify increasingly nonsensical contradictory models of reality?

  • My last girlfriend was a mess, she literally had 777 and libra tattoos and is self diagnosed with adhs and uses this for every excuse and when i tried to talk about it and show her my point of view she literally startes crying and says things like how could someone who loves her not believe in what she believes. She literally questioned our relationship in 2am in the morning after she swallowed me just because her app told her that our sodiac signs dont fit together. It’s a plague, and some people get infested with the pores of stupidity

  • Joseph Stalin is a Sagittarius and according to astrology he loves freedom, is generous and has a great sense of humor. Stalin took millions of people’s freedoms buy putting them into gulags. Stalin was also a terrible and boring speaker but people only listened because he would kill them if they didn’t. He also died on a Thursday which is supposedly Sagittarius lucky day.

  • BRO, I couldn’t get the trolling in the street interviewing people because I won’t have time this week 😭 I have to work on a whole bunch of other stuff and I HATE that I didn’t plan this well enough for that, but I got you guys next time. P.S. “So why didn’t you take more time?” Because I’m not gonna sleep on the balcony a second time bro lol.

  • Oh boy, the only thing i want to say is that people are so hyper focussed on their astrology sign that they forget they have an own personality. I’ve recently encountered someone who is heavy into astrology and the moment i told him/her about my sign i got the instant impression of “Oh, we’re not compatible so why bother talking to you anymore” while we COULD be a perfect match. Now THAT bothers me about the whole thing. Like he said, everyone can believe in something but don’t get too caught up into it.

  • I get the idea of people enjoying it and seeing it as a fun side thing to do like a Ouija board for example (let’s not get into debating spirits or what not, not the place). It’s when people use it as an excuse for their shitty behavior or personality that it becomes a problem. I also find it really hard to go on throughout my day after hearing someone explain how they live their life according to the stars.

  • Yes. I absolutely hate people who take zodiac signs too literally. For example, they spill water and is like “Hehe oopsies I’m such an aquarius, UwU! 🤭” Or they find out that their partner is of a certain zodiac sign. And so they are like “We are breaking up, i’m a libra and ur a leo! 😡Libras and Leos are not compatible signs, UwU”

  • What I dislike the most about astrology is that people who believe in it will treat others or judge them based on it without knowing them. Like do they think there’s 12 different kind of people out of 8 billion? and if they’re really into it and have even more categories to fit the bullshit at what point does people just being who they are based on environment and genetics come to play? Like I don’t even understand where or why would you want to fit celestial body movement into it when other stuff will affect your personality and circumstances and how you get along with other people more than what “sign” you are…

  • Astrology can destroy an otherwise stable relationship if it’s introduced after the two people get together. I’m living this. Also, I believe,and its only my belief, but I bet it’s factual in some strange way, that landlords check your sign because they know that a lot of dumb people will act in a way that typecasts them to their sign. For instance, nine times out of 10 a person who is a Pisces will exhibit an addictive personality. It’s not because of Any astrological thing, it’s because they use that as an excuse to be that way. If you’re a landlord you don’t want to rent to those people because they’re going to value the things that serve them rather than taking the responsibility of paying the rent on time. They’re out partying or some other b******. It’s kind of like oh you’re a Scorpio that means you’re a sex fiend. You don’t know how many times I’ve heard that s** I’m a Scorpio and I’m an upstanding member of society. More so than not. But if I was a dumbass I would be typecasting myself and my behavior into that sign. There’s a lot of things that go on that are not necessarily astrological in knowing a person’s sign.

  • Slight correction: stars do move, as they orbit their galaxy. However this movement is very difficult to perceive as for instance it takes the Sun 230 million years to complete one orbit around the Milky Way, and humans have only been around for like 0.13% of that time, and also since we orbit the Sun we are following its movement relative to the Milky Way and wouldn’t be able to perceive the Sun moving in our frame of reference regardless. I agree with everything else you said though

  • Why did JP Morgan say, „Astrology is not for millionaires but for billionaires.” ? My IQ is in fact high, very likely higher than yours, and indeed, i do stupid stuff but people love me. The song in my website – I cannot even play piano 🤷 I painted this one picture. There is some potential within me I guess, also my girlfriend is 10/10. 😀

  • There is only one word that I think of when I think about stupidity: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

Pin It on Pinterest

We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
Accept
Privacy Policy