Does General Mike Flynn Think That Conspiracies Exist?

What the GOP either doesn’t understand, or, more likely, is pretending not to understand, is that when a foreign nation (Ukraine, for example) appears to prefer one U.S. Presidential candidate over another and perhaps even criticizes one candidate, that is NOT the same thing as a large scale concerted effort to actively influence the outcome of a U.S. election… Criticizing one candidate and/or voicing concerns regarding how the outcome might potentially effect a foreign nation in no way implies a campaign to influence the outcome such as Russia has been shown to have perpetrated. Many GOP members are attempting to muddy this distinction, and the American people need to understand this… It is the single point that needs to be hammered home clearly, and should be a primary focus for all who would oppose the GOP in their efforts to sway public opinion regarding the impeachment proceedings. One must also understand that there is no single unified voice of Ukraine representing the nation as a whole. They are divided, with many Russian loyalists who would obviously support Russian agendas conflicting with U.S. national interests. When we talk about Ukraine, it should be with an understanding of the different factions and their opposing agendas. Put simply, part of the country is “on our side,” or perhaps more accurately, we are “on their side,” while the rest are, for all practical purposes, agents of Russia… We can not discuss Ukraine in any context as if they are all of one mind, either with us or against us.

That reading of the report sounds brilliant it’s amazingly different to what AG Barr is stating about the report just as he did with the Mueller investigation. It’s so much nicer to see the report being looked at the word for word content over well I looked at it read disagree with and now I’ll twist it into something the report never said that comes from out of Barr’s mouth.

Try to read the conclusions with the eyes of Donald Trump and crazies like Steve Miller or phonies like Jim Jordan and Ted Cruz. Then it reads like a propaganda pamphlet of the deep state. E.g. if you presume Russian interference in the 2016 election did not occur and was a hoax by Democrats to delegitimize Trump’s election, the report reads quite differently.

BREAKING: US Attorney John Durham Releases Statement Disputing IG Report Conclusions Cristina Laila by Cristina Laila December 9, 2019 1152 Comments 9.8KShare562TweetEmail John Durham The DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz finally released his report on FISA abuses on Monday. The report revealed what we knew to be true all along — the FBI defrauded the FISA court and purposely omitted exculpatory information from the FISA judges in order to obtain FOUR FISA warrants on Trump campaign advisor Carter Page. Read more Horowitz, however concluded that the FBI investigation into Trump was not politically motivated — and John Durham hit back. US Attorney from Connecticut John Durham immediately released a statement following the release of the FISA report and disputed Horowitz’s findings and conclusions. “I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened,” John Durham said in a rare statement.

Scarborough Virtually Admits: I Aim to Destroy Trump Cause He Mocked Mika Listen to the Article! 2495 Shares Tweet 111 By Mark Finkelstein | December 9, 2019 10:50 AM EST We’ve long suspected that Joe Scarborough’s rhetorical jihad on President Trump was fueled by Trump’s tweet in which he wrote that Mika Brzezinski, Scarborough’s wife-to-be, was “bleeding badly from a facelift.” And now we have confirmation. This morning, Scarborough virtually admitted that the insult does indeed lie at the heart of his anti-Trump vendetta. Much of the opening segment of today’s Morning Joe was devoted to tearing into Ted Cruz for defending President Trump, despite Trump, during the 2016 campaign, having said unflattering things about Cruz, his wife, and father. Donny Deutsch was attacking “the pathetic wienieness” of Cruz for allying with Trump after Cruz attacked his family, and suggested to Scarborough that a real man never does that: DONNY DEUTSCH: I want to just go back to Ted Cruz as a man for a second. Joe, you grew up in Pensacola, I grew up in Queens. What would your reaction be if somebody came after your father, if somebody came after your wife? You know, the pathetic wienieness of him. I couldn’t wait to run against a guy like that and say, what kind of man not only lets it happen, but then gets on the bandwagon of somebody who went after their dad, who went after their wife, called their wife ugly. Joe, I know you’re a very genteel man, in Pensacola they just debate things in a very nice way.

Attorney General William Barr said, “From day one — remember, they said, okay, we’re not going to talk to the campaign. We’re going to put people in there, rile them up and have conversations with people involved in the campaign because that way, we’ll get the truth. From the very first day of this investigation, which is July 31st, 2016, all the way to its end, September 2017, there was not one incriminatory bit of evidence to come in. It was all exculpatory. The people with the tapings denied it with Russia, denied the specific facts that the FBI was relying on. So what happens? The FBI ignores it, presses ahead, withholds that information from the court, withholds critical exculpatory information from the court while it gets an electronic surveillance warrant. It also withholds from the court clear cut evidence that the dossier that they ultimately relied on to get the FISA warrant was a complete sham.” “They hid information about the lack of the liability, even when they went the first time for the warrant. But in January, after the election, the entire case collapsed when the principal source says I never told this. I never told Steele this stuff. And this was also speculation. And I have zero information to support this stuff. At that point, when their entire case collapsed, what do they do? They kept on investigating the president well into his administration after the case collapsed. But here to me is the damning thing: They not only didn’t tell the court that what they had been relying on was completely, you know, rubbish, they actually started putting in things to bolster this Steele report by saying we talked to the sources and they appeared to be truthful.