The article discusses the conspiracy between Saddam Hussein and Usama bin Laden, which was announced at a press conference by Karl Rove. The mainstay of Afghanistan’s economy is the bombing of the USS Cole in 2001. The Bush administration misled the American public into believing Iraq was connected to the Sept. 11 attacks, leading to the killing of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan on May 2, 2011. The bipartisan commission reported that Saddam rebuffed bin Laden when the al-Qaeda leader sought Iraqi help.
The Iraq war was based on false claims by the US government alleging a secretive relationship between Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. The Servicemen’s Readjustment Act provided generous funds to veterans to help them establish businesses, buy homes, and attend college. The unpopular war of attrition (1954-1975) between the communist armies of the US and Iraq was shot down and the conspiracy was exposed (1985-1986).
The Saddam-al-Qaeda conspiracy theory was based on false claims by the United States government alleging that a secretive relationship existed between Iraqi dictators. The 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq was based on the allegation that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Al Qaeda, an Islamic terrorist group led by Saudi Arabian Osama Bin Laden, is responsible for the 9/11 attacks.
📹 The Middle East’s cold war, explained
How two feuding countries are tearing apart the Middle East. Help us make more ambitious videos by joining the Vox Video Lab: …
Who does the Patriot Act apply to?
In accordance with federal legislation, financial institutions are obliged to obtain, verify, and record information pertaining to each customer opening an account. This is done in order to combat the activities of terrorist organisations and those engaged in money laundering. Such inquiries may also encompass the solicitation of personal data, including but not limited to the individual’s name, residential address, date of birth, and driver’s license number. The opening of a legal entity account necessitates the utilization of the aforementioned details for the purpose of combating these activities.
What is the Patriot Act in simple terms?
The Patriot Act modernized the monitoring of criminal and terrorist communications by applying wiretap laws to new technologies like cell phones and email without modifying or reducing the legal and constitutional restraints applicable to those tools. Wiretap orders must still be reviewed, approved, and monitored by a federal court to prevent abuse of this power. America’s national security investigators work to prevent terrorists’ communication and freeze their assets, making it difficult for them to hide, plan, and coordinate.
As we move into the 21st century, we face a wide-ranging and complex system of spylike terrorists who act covertly and are ready to give up their lives to kill. The Patriot Act provides federal investigators with tools to track down terrorists within our borders, making it essential to winning the war on terror. Section 215, which critics call “the library provision”, is the most critical part of the Patriot Act, as it does not include the word “library” but instead uses terms like “records” or “things”.
Why is Afghanistan called the Graveyard of Empires quora?
Afghanistan, often referred to as the “graveyard of empires,” has been the site of numerous instances where empires, including those of the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union, have experienced a decline in their global influence as a result of its strategic location.
What does the Patriot Act violate?
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) claims that the Patriot Act violates American citizens’ civil liberties in several ways. The ACLU claims the act violates the Fourth Amendment, which requires probable cause before obtaining a search warrant, and the First Amendment by imposing a gag order on public employees. The act also authorizes the FBI to investigate American citizens for exercising their freedom of speech. It eliminates the requirement for the government to provide notice to individuals whose privacy has been compromised by a government investigation.
The ACLU argues that the Patriot Act only intrudes on an individual’s right to privacy in cases where the government suspects the individual is involved in terrorist-related activity. However, the ACLU contends that the Patriot Act relies on trusting investigators not to intrude upon these rights, making it a strong argument against the act.
What caused conflict between US and Afghanistan?
The Afghanistan War, triggered by the September 11 attacks, was an international conflict in Afghanistan that began in 2001 and consisted of three phases. The first phase, which lasted just two months, focused on toppling the Taliban, an ultraconservative political and religious faction that ruled Afghanistan and provided sanctuary for al-Qaeda. The second phase, from 2002 until 2008, was marked by a U. S. strategy of defeating the Taliban militarily and rebuilding core institutions of the Afghan state.
The third phase, a turn to classic counterinsurgency doctrine, began in 2008 and accelerated with U. S. President Barack Obama’s 2009 decision to temporarily increase the U. S. troop presence in Afghanistan. This strategy aimed to protect the population from Taliban attacks and support efforts to reintegrate insurgents into Afghan society. However, this approach failed to achieve its aims, as insurgent attacks and civilian casualties remained high.
The joint U. S. and British invasion of Afghanistan in late 2001 was preceded by over two decades of war in Afghanistan. In 1979, Soviet tanks invaded Afghanistan to restore stability following a coup that brought Marxist-Leninist political groups to power. However, the Soviet presence led to a nationwide rebellion by mujahideen fighters who drew upon Islam as a uniting source of inspiration. The guerrilla war against the Soviet forces led to their departure in 1989, and the mujahideen ousted Afghanistan’s Soviet-backed government and established a transitional government.
In 1994, armed conflict escalated, leading to the Taliban’s rise and the assassination of mujahideen leader Ahmad Shah Masoud. The 13-year Afghanistan War became the longest war ever fought by the United States, with American military casualties including 2, 400 service members killed and 20, 700 others wounded.
What is a real life example of terrorism?
The September 11 attacks in 2001 were the deadliest terrorist attacks to date, as suicide terrorists linked to al-Qaeda hijacked four commercial airplanes, crashing two into the World Trade Center complex and the third into the Pentagon building. Terrorism is the calculated use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and bring about a particular political objective. It has been practiced by political organizations with both rightist and leftist objectives, nationalistic and religious groups, revolutionaries, and even state institutions such as armies, intelligence services, and police.
Definitions of terrorism are complex and controversial, with the term having developed an intense stigma due to its inherent ferocity and violence. It was first coined in the 1790s to refer to the terror used during the French Revolution by revolutionaries against their opponents. Since the 20th century, the term has been applied most frequently to violence aimed at governments in an effort to influence policy or topple an existing regime.
Terrorism is not legally defined in all jurisdictions, but statutes that do exist generally share some common elements. It involves the use or threat of violence and seeks to create fear, not just within the direct victims but among a wide audience. Terrorism proper is the calculated use of violence to generate fear and achieve political goals when direct military victory is not possible.
What is the main reason for terrorism?
Terrorist acts are frequently driven by a constellation of factors, including economic deprivation, persecution, the absence of human rights, oppression, occupation, and ideologies such as secular beliefs and religious and ethnic discrimination.
What are 5 examples of terrorism?
Terrorists use dramatic, violent, and high-profile attacks to generate widespread fear and attract publicity. These attacks often target familiar locations such as schools, shopping centers, bus and train stations, restaurants, and nightclubs, as they attract large crowds and feel at ease. The goal is to destroy the public’s sense of security in these familiar places. Major targets may also include important economic or political symbols, such as embassies or military installations. The terrorist hopes that the fear these acts engender will induce the population to pressure political leaders towards a specific political end.
Some definitions of terrorism treat all acts of terrorism as simple criminal activity, but this element of criminality is problematic as it does not distinguish among different political and legal systems. Examples include the African National Congress (ANC) of South Africa and the Resistance movement against the Nazi occupation of France during World War II. Since the 20th century, ideology and political opportunism have led many countries to engage in international terrorism, often under the guise of supporting movements of national liberation. The distinction between terrorism and other forms of political violence has become blurred, and issues of jurisdiction and legality have been obscured.
Why is Afghanistan known as the graveyard of empires quizlet?
The term “graveyard of empires” refers to the historical instances where foreign powers have failed to achieve military victory in Afghanistan, such as the British Empire, the Soviet Union, and the United States. These examples include the First, Second, and Third Anglo-Afghan Wars (1839-1842), the Soviet-Afghan War (1979-1989), and the War in Afghanistan (2001-2021). The difficulty of conquering Afghanistan is attributed to its hazardous terrain, desert conditions, severe winters, guerilla warfare, fortress-like qalats, enduring clan loyalties, conflicts between empires, and complications caused by interactions with neighboring countries, such as Pakistan.
The term was first used in 2001 by Milton Bearden in Foreign Affairs and has also been applied to Mesopotamia and the Old Testament’s Book of Isaiah. The phrase “graveyard of nations and empires” has been used in a figurative sense to describe the complex relationship between nations and their respective territories.
What was the root cause of the Afghanistan crisis?
The confluence of natural disasters and economic instability has exacerbated Afghanistan’s vulnerabilities, resulting in millions of Afghans facing malnutrition and starvation due to the challenging economic circumstances.
What two reasons has Afghanistan earned the nickname graveyard of empires?
Afghanistan, colloquially known as the “Graveyard of Empires,” is distinguished by its formidable terrain and profound skepticism of external influences. This has historically rendered the region a formidable challenge for invading empires seeking to conquer and maintain control.
📹
Only 1 error about this article I’d like to point out. Iran did actually favor the US overthrowing Saddam. In fact, after September 11, Iran offered the US intelligence on key military Taliban targets which the US reluctantly accepted but never formally acknowledged. Iran was hoping to restore diplomatic ties with the US again but immediately after Afghanistan the US labeled Iran one of the 3 axis of evil. Despite the US backstabbing, Iran again offered intelligence to the US for the Iraq war. This time the US rejected. The moderates in Iran were humiliated for trying to restore diplomacy with the US and hardliners went on a very aggressive strategy to influence Iraqi Shias to gain power. Since then, Iran has not showed any interest in diplomacy. Personally, I think that’s what US wants. Keeping Iran an enemy gives the US justification to have a permanent military presence in the region.
Lebanon is also a failing state, over the recent years the country has been plagued with corruption and poverty. Especially in 2019- early 2021, there are a lot of protests, and the explosion didn’t help with that either, causing its main economic source, off shore imports to be cut off. I would know this, since I a, Lebanese.
هذا التقرير ناقص وكاذب ويهمل عن عمد أشياء كثيرة جدا منها تدخل الغرب وأمريكا في شؤون المنطقة ودفعها الدائم عن إبنتها اسرائيل المولود الغير الشرعي الذي تم زراعته في الشرق الأوسط لتقسيم العرب أمريكا هي من دعمت ثورة الخميني ضدا الشاه الذي كان بالمناسبة من أصل كردي سني لزرع الفتن والشقاق والحروب في كامل منطقة الشرق الأوسط من يضن أن أمريكا وإيران أعداء فهو واهم الحقيقة هي أنهم حلفاء في الخفاء وتحت الطاولة هناك تعاون كبير جدا بينهم الشيء الذي لا يعلمه أغلب الناس أنه توجد علاقات وطيدة بين الفرس واليهود تعود الى أيام قورش ملك فارس ولا تزال حتى يوم هذا هذا الوثائقي ناقص وسطحي للغاية
The USA supporting Sadam ..? where is that bit? The USA overthrowing Gadaffi…? Where is that Bit? Involvement of Israel ….? Involvement of Russia in Syria ..? Turkey’s support and involvement ….? Qatar’s Support of the Sunni Rebel groups, including ISIS …? Where is the oil part of the narrative ..? And much more….? and you call this explained?
This article dramatically underplays the conflict between Sunni and Shia, its importance in regional disputes, and the violence entangled in that conflict. It also largely ignores the brutal and authoritarian nature of the governments that are Saudi Arabia and Iran, as well as many of the other countries in the region, and how this played a role in the power politics of the middle east. Overall if you knew nothing about the middle east and then watched this article, you would walk away understanding the region less.
Saudi Arabia and Iran: having a lot of oil America: asalamalama guys wanna give me the oil? Iran: no America: wanna start ww3? Saudi Arabia:OH NO Iran: sure I’ll fight u and Saudi Arabia and nato Russia got my back xd: Saudi Arabia: well I got usa nato China Pakistan and turkey and other countries: Iran: well I got. The houthis Saudi Arabia: Nah fam I’m out
one important thing that wasn’t mentionned here is that early in the 20th century when the saudi were at tribal war, iran had a constitutional revolution (before oil was found) and so it has a history of secualirsm and social progress attempts. That’s why the shah was not able to have the same kind of power over the population. Also the shah was already “king” in 1942 and just gained full control in 1953.
I feel like the Shia – Sunni divide was bigger than what Vox was saying it was before the Arabic proxy wars. Throughout history arabic states and empires such as the Safavid and Ottomans empire have fought rigorously based on territorial expansion and religious divide as rulers of both empires had incredibly low religious tolerance and forced mass conversion of Shia and sunni islam on to people.
Speaking from someone who experienced the war first hand, I was there for Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2005-2006 as a combat Corpsman with The 2-7 Marines. We set up the election polls and provided security. There were 11 grenade attacks that day which were all thrown by children. Because they knew we might have second thoughts about shooting children. Whenever we asked about the details of whos running or who their voting for (or anything important for that matter) we were always told “Don’t worry about it. It’s above your paygrade. The more you worry about it, the more you get complacent. And complacency gets you killed.” Eventually being told this over and over again, I felt like a dog being told to fetch over and over again.
Iraq was doing great until 2003 we all know what happened. Libyans were living a wealthy lifestyle until the west screwed them over. Syria 90% of its population are educated and it had over 100 universities. Yemen a country known for its historical architecture its one of a few countries that lies on two continents it haves natural resources such as oil,gas,gold, its known for its sea exports and agricultural production we all know its wealthy neighbors and their allies deprived Yemen from developing from exporting its goods from importing anything cratered a siege that caused a famine. When you say failed states tell us why what caused it.
Great article. As a history buff, I love the obscure stuff you’re educating about in this article. Nearly no one knows about the Iran-Iraq War, which was one of the deadliest since WW2, and the effects of the Great Game between Britain and Russia, one of the most interesting rivalries pre-Cold War. Many props, this is super informative and also really important for people to understand exactly why the Middle East is and has been such an area of conflict.
“Saudis want the region to be stable” Ironic, considering their bff is the one constantly destabilizing Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Palestine(through the support of Israel), Libya… Really shows you that “middle eastern cold war” isn’t a necessarily an independent event and is lead and fueled(intended pun) by the US(sometimes Western European nations as well)
I was a scout in Desert Storm. The Army held educational classes to teach us about the history and culture differences in the middle east to help us understand the political views, how history molded the current middle east, and why they don’t want western cultures there. I remember when the US embassy in Iran was taken for a full year during the Carter Administration, and the US embassy in Beirut was bombed, as well as the year prior to 9/11, among many other incidents. Throughout the last 1500 years the middle eastern countries have made a very clear message, and repeated it clearly and consistently: They do not want their culture influenced by the west, they are willing to partake in trade and allow tourism, but no occupation by any foreigners.
This article is very realistic and most of it’s information is right. It is sad when the people dream of democracy and a great country and lose their lives for those dreams and in the end they find alot of death, dictatorship, tourrist groups, dark politics, other countries involved,etc and in the end they wish that they didn’t dream of anything.
I think we all have an agreement on the big chaos USA did in Iraq, Saddam Hussien was a dictator for sure but they took the leadership off the dictator and give it to extremist militias and ISIS is just a “consequence”. I am very disappointed about the humanity in USA responds for this matter, the US says that Iraq’s invasion was a mistake and we’ve lost soldiers and troupes… Ohh really?? just that! well, what about the country and lives you’ve ruined? economically, the country is completely destroyed. the effects and results of the militias expanded and created the whole unstable situation in the Middle East, as I said ISIS was a seed among the other militias the US watered and created the fertile environment for them to grow big… and where is the payoff?? where is the aid for the troubles you did there? when US speaks about the invasion and the American army, their Patriotism is pushed to the boundaries of racism and beyond, and they are completely ignorant for that. But like we used to. The US is like a baby who does the damage and can’t be judged to fix it. THANK you the GREAT USA, we’re living in the shadows of your American dream for more than 13 years.
it’ll be Christianity vs Islam soon. Isreal gonna fight Iran in coming days and world will be divided in two sides, WW3 will be (Isreal, USA, Europe, western countries, Japan ) VS (Iran, Islamic countries, China, Russia, North Korea) meanwhile, countries like India will be neutral at this stage in 2025. It’ll be chaos in the world but less chances of nukes. By the end of 2033 world will see peace and many people gonna turn into atheist, agnostic etc.
False explanation: The Cold War in the Middle East is between functional entities that are remnants of colonialism, such as Jordan and the Emirates, and do not deviate from the circle that America draws for them, such as not creating a nuclear program, and between powers liberated from colonialism, such as Iran, Yemen, Iraq, and Lebanon, and want independence from Wall Street and achieving self-sufficiency
I am highly against many of the US Government’s foreign policy and international relations, actions, and agreements over the years. The case with the middle east is difficulty in understanding the region and failures are results of that lack of understanding. However in 2001 Americans were angry due to the attack on the world trade center and deaths of many. I can understand the reason for wanting to respond to this kind of act which can be seen as a attack on the country. the manner the operation was conducted was poorly done and caused a unique situation that not even our government can handle. I would mention a abrupt departure is not good look and suggest weakness and encourage more aggression from rebels groups. either way there is no sure thing that our assistance can be effective without taking steps similar to the enemy.
you barely mentioned the share of U.S and Israeli in this conflicts. You know that both Iran And Israel want each other destroyed, so they do anything to get close. And about U.S you should have said their share on the Iran and Iraq war and all the support U.S gave to iraq. (And the war was 8 years long and much more bloody than you explained) Overall the conflict is much more complex and what you said couldn’t cover it mostly. You also said so many thing as if they were facts, But if they were, things would be more simple. (BTW It’s interesting how u used the psychological effects of colors to project your side of this war on to the audience’s minds!)
some notable facts about the region: – a massive economic and politic crisis invading Egypt 4 years after the military coup. – a lot of evidence supports an upcoming normalization in politic ties between Saudi Arabia and Israel. – there were some tensions between Sudan and Egypt, Algeria and Morroco in the past 2 months. – the tension between the Israelis and Palestinians had a quantum leap through several individual attacks against Israelis using knives which was known as “knives uprising” 2015 -now. – a complicated conflict between Saudi Arabia, UAE, bahrain, and Egypt vs Qatar led to a cut in political and economic ties between them, because of differences in policies about supporting: groups like Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood, Al-Jazeera website, and the Arabic spring. – there are 2 governments and 2 parliaments and 2 armies in libya. -Cholera is spreading in Yemen due to the war, more than 1300 had died after being infected. – here in Jordan, the national dept is rising, prices and bills are rising, the economy is dying along with enduring the burden of hosting more than 1M Syrian brothers and sisters.
as an Egyptian Muslim perusal many YouTube websites and reading many western articles, i have so much respect for VOX, because they have proved to be really honest when delivering any news related to the middle-east, on the opposite most of the other news outlets in the us and Europe don’t get it and just tell you what you want to hear, and deliver pure bullshit, SO thanks you everyone at Vox working on these articles for you great work.
I really wish we could have a secular regime in all of the Middle East. The effects of too many religious ideologies are tearing down the whole region. People don’t understand that religion would only make people feel entitled to changing others’ beliefs. It would only serve as a cover. Mixing religion with politics is a bad idea.
الحوثي يسيطر على ما يعرف تاريخيا باليمن الشمالي وهو لا يمثل الجمهورية اليمنية أو اليمنيين، استطاع الجنوبيين تحرير كل التراب الجنوبية في خلال أسابيع وكنا قاب قوسين أو أدنى من تحرير محافظة الحديدة ومنع الحوثي من الوصول للبحر، لكن المجتمع الدولي والولايات المتحدة الأمريكية منع قواتنا من التقدم وفرض عليهم توقيع معاهدة ستكهولم! معظم اليمن الجنوبي محرر ويقاتل الحوثي ونحن في طريقنا نحو استقلالنا الثاني، ندرك ونعي أن الغرب ما يزالوا متخوف منا بإعتبارنا دولة اشتراكية سابقة، لكن الاشتراكية والنظام السابق مات، اليوم نسعى لبناء دولة حديثة لديها علاقات جيدة مع الغرب والشرق ونتمنى من المجتمع الدولي أن يدعم مسعانا. دولة اليمن الجنوبي هي الحل الوحيد لردع الميليشات الحوثية الإرهابية❤
Man i’m Saudi and half of what you’re saying is just WRONG first you don’t understand the real conflict between Sunnah and Shia and secondly you saying Iran and Saudi don’t want any war is completely wrong 😂😂 If Saudi Arabia wasn’t that OIL country that the whole world depend on and is protected by, Iran would’ve died for any chance to start a war and attack and don’t you dare call khumaini and his people muslims cause Islam has nothing to do with them and by the way it’s muslims s and not z i’m sick of those americans saying zzz like can’t you see there’s an s right there
The sunni-shia split is more similar to the catholic-orthodox split. It wasn’t an instant and violent split, more like a slow-paced drift apart of two branches separated by geography and theology. The catholic and orthodox worlds were mostly peaceful throughout history, as much as European history was peaceful, at least.
Don’t forget this. Arabs are individually very intelligent. They can learn easily, their potential is very good. They are individually brave and never back down when challenged. In terms of acting together and ensuring unity coordination, they only need a command structure that will discipline them, bring them together in a wise and just manner, not in a despotic manner, and lead them. This happened twice in history. 1- During the time of Prophet Muhammad and 2- Under the leadership of the Turks… What I really think about is this: What kind of leadership spirit do the Turks have that brought the Arabs together. They were able to create a miracle by building a barrier to the West for about 1000 years while together with the Arabs. Everything that is said about the Arabs, and even more, is also valid for the Kurds. In other words, when Arabs and Kurds come together, the result does not change much. But when we add the Turks to this equation, incredible results emerge. I don’t know what this thing is. But the Turks have something that can eliminate the negative aspects and disadvantages of the Arabs and Kurds and turn these aspects into advantages. (Seljuk + Ottoman Empires = 1000 years) In the past, for 1000 years, the Turkish-Arab-Kurdish alliance always prevailed over its enemies. They lived in happiness, prosperity and peace. Remember, in the past, no power was able to defeat the Turkish-Arab-Kurdish alliance for 1000 years until the alliance was broken.
@4:48 “Westerners always make the mistake in drawing an analogy between the Sunni-Shia split and the Catholic-Protestant split…” also, the same guy @6:54 “the United States has no idea what it’s doing in Iraq after 2003 and makes one mistake after another” — sums up the misunderstanding of westerners about the Middle East and goes to show the CIA expert himself is not sure what he’s talking about. The Shia-Sunni conflict is in fact far more bitter than what portrayed in the article: Sunnis usually consider Shias as heretics, since Shiasm is more of an Iranian construct to oppose (and differentiate Iranians from) the rest of the Islamic world. It’s true that the conflict shouldn’t be compared to Catholic-Protestant, but not because it wasn’t violent enough; rather because it resembles more of the Catholic-Orthodox division (with Shias being the former and Sunnis the latter), both harbored by geopolitics/language rather than a reformist movement like Protestantism (which has yet to happen in Islam), except that, unlike Catholicism, only one country has ever embraced Shiaism and that’s Iran.
HI good morning Iran and Iraq your wor end Sriya TO TURCKY Laban Jordan Madkshar TO Sharjah 🎏 your MAP of MEDEIST GCC avabal LOW Saudi Arabia United Arab Emirates 112 UAE 600 Sharjah 900 Dubai 900 Abu Dhabi? Ajman 600 CODE 600 Sharjah muncepal cowinsal to Sharjah chimbar of chibar Simrt education please
False explanation: The Cold War in the Middle East is between functional entities that are remnants of colonialism, such as Jordan and the Emirates, and do not deviate from the circle that America draws for them, such as not creating a nuclear program, and between powers liberated from colonialism, such as Iran, Yemen, Iraq, and Lebanon, and want independence from Wall Street، achieving self-sufficiency
Im live in suadi and i can say there has never been a war in bahrain (its a beautiful country that i vist at least once every 2 months) and that Saudi is not threatning quatar (in fact we are very close alliences) this article is spreading some miss harmful information misinformation about the entire middle east and unfortunately im not surprised
If an Arab leader, an Arab commander or an Arab politician watched this article, they would see how successful it was for their own purposes. They would probably even be proud of themselves. Because for Arab leaders, commanders and politicians, the army is not for defeating the enemy. On the contrary, for Arab leaders, commanders and politicians, the army is a tool to keep the people in their own countries under control.
The only way to help peace in the Middle East and prevent third world war is that world leaders have to help Iranian people get rid of the Islamic terrorist regime in Iran . We have King Pahlavi the third, he is a human being, and he knows that his people suffered 45 years and are still suffering under the brutal Islamic terrorist regime in Iran. King Pahlavi is very intelligent and knowledgeable. We Iranian people love Reza Pahlavi. we want him to take over the country to clear the terrorist from Iran and help people of Iran build up their life again and to stand together for democracy . king Reza Pahlavi is the only and the best solution for the Middle East current conflict . For 45 years, the disaster Western created in Iran that they removed our King mohamad Reza from his country Iran to the exile and put Western servant Molla Khomeini, the brutal Islamic regime leader in place in Iran. It was wrong, very wrong decision Western did in 1979, 45 years and still continue they brought disaester for Iran and in Middle East. Now, the only way peace for middle East and Iran is that, They have to remove their servant Islamic terrorist regime from Iran and support Iranian people to get their king Reza Pahlavi back to his therone in Iran .
Those photos and articles of Iran with a progressive constitutional monarchy. Women getting an education, non Muslims enjoying the same rights as Muslims and foreign investment helping develop Iran into a place of learning and tranquility. Then religion gets involved and the country goes crashing back to the 13th century with ritual executions and repressive attitudes towards women. One looks at the USSR and the work they did to undermine the US backed regime. So much evil in this world caused by the USSR and the USA underminng efforts to progress third world countries into the 20th century. The legacy of that conflict lives with us today in Vietnam, Korea, South America and the Middle East.
Most of the words are lying in Saudi Arabia, a very weak country that cannot fight a country that tried to control Yemen, but it failed, Iraq has entered its occupation, even if America did not protect them, it would not survive. Donal Trabes, the previous American opinion, it would fall within two weeks, if we did not protect Saudi Arabia, it is very weak, only have money and support the terrorist groups, not the people, of course, but the rulers of Saudi Arabia are slaves of America, they are slaves, so that America, so we deny it, Iran, despite the siege and everything that happens except that it did not submit to anyone, even Iraq resisted the American invasion and forced the withdrawal from Iraq in the beginning, the people did not resisted, they were upset with Saddam and hatred because of the many wars he enters and preventing religious
Mmm you did not mention that Saudi Arabia supported Da😮esh The terrorist, and you did not mention the role of America, perhaps if I were not from the Middle East and knew the situation, I would have believed indeed that it is a war between Saudi Arabia and Iran, not a war between Iran and America, and Saudi Arabia is just an assistant to America, and any opinion of Saudi Arabia is an opinion of America
Khomeini was not a Muslim, but rather an extremist, and he was inventing a new doctrine from his mind and calling it true Islam, but he was a liar. This is the real reason for the division in the Middle East and the differences among them. Each of them believes that his belief is correct, and the correct belief of Islam is where it originally existed in Mecca and Medina, and most people in the world do not know which is correct, and here the complexity begins.
2:52 Dear friends, unfortunately, this article is not correct. I am from Iran, I say as an Iranian, Mohammad Reza Shah was a good king, he was not a dictator, he was a super man, when ignorant people wanted the king during the period (our fathers and grandmothers) he Our country is a dictatorial country. If you don’t believe what I say, come to Iran and ask people about Shah Shahan Mohammad Reza and they will say that he is a super man. Now another revolution is taking shape in Iran. . I am and I am waiting to meet Tom Bashahzadeh Paholi