Who Was The Second Person In The Crucible To Be Charged With Witchcraft?

In Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, the town of Salem is accused of witchcraft and mumbling curses. Key accusers include Abigail Williams, who is accused of trying to kill Abby through a voodoo doll. Mary, who was accused of saving Elizabeth’s life, claims she saw no sign of witchcraft in her time living with Proctor. Mercy Lewis, a young woman who accused others of witchcraft in the 17th century Salem Village, is portrayed as a scapegoat for Salem’s witchcraft fears.

The play follows the townspeople as hysteria and paranoia spread, ultimately leading to the execution of John Proctor, a successful farmer and tavern keeper in Salem, Massachusetts. Abigail, a 17-year-old girl, encourages these rumors to frame Elizabeth. John Proctor, a successful farmer and tavern keeper, was accused of witchcraft in 1692 but denied the charges and was executed.

Abigail’s niece Martha, who is heard offstage being questioned about witchcraft, falsely accuses countless citizens of witchcraft, becoming one of the most powerful people in Salem. Her reading habits lead to her arrest and conviction for witchcraft. Ezekiel Cheever, a man from Salem who acts as clerk of the court during the witch trials, is also mentioned.

In Act 2, Elizabeth Proctor is accused of witchcraft, leading to mass hysteria and witchcraft accusations among the townspeople. When John Proctor is arrested, the entire town suspects witchcraft and sends for a minister named Hale from a neighboring town. Many people were accused of being witches during the Salem Witch Trials, and the descendants of Salem’s “witches” are all around us.

Who is to blame in The Crucible Act 2?

In Act 2, Abigail is accused of Elizabeth Proctor’s arrest due to her knowledge of Elizabeth’s maid’s Poppet and her subsequent attempt to fake a needle stab wound.

How many people did Tituba accuse of witchcraft?

Tituba, an Indian woman, was enslaved by Samuel Parris, the minister of Salem Village in Massachusetts Bay. She was crucial in the Salem witch trials, confessing to witchcraft and accusing two other women, Sarah Good and Sarah Osborne, of the same crime. She was imprisoned for over a year but never tried. The only records of Tituba pertain to her central position in the trials.

Tituba’s birthplace is not known, but Thomas Hutchinson wrote in 1764 that she was brought into the Country from New Spain. Later historians have taken this to mean the Caribbean or Barbados, but this is speculation. Elaine G. Breslaw identified her with a “Tattuba” born circa 1662-1666, who was documented as enslaved to Samuel Thompson in Barbados in 1674. Other historians have suggested that Tituba was born in Africa.

Bernard Rosenthal objected to both lines of argument as compounded speculation, stating that Barbadian slaves were generally African, but Tituba was universally described as Indian in Puritan sources.

Who accused Martha of witchcraft?

Martha was accused of witchcraft in May 1692 by the Salem Girls, a group of young women who traveled through Essex County, Massachusetts, to root out suspected witches through theatrical displays. The girls accused Martha of leading a 300-strong witch army, using her occult powers to murder and afflict people with terrible diseases, and being promised the position of “Queen of Hell”. Martha vehemently denied these charges and charged her accusers with insanity.

Martha was arrested on 28 May 1692 along with her sister Mary, brother-in-law Roger Toothaker, and their daughter Margaret Toothaker. Her children were sent to prison with her, hoping that their confinement would cause her to confess. Martha was the first accused “witch” in Andover, and her neighbor Benjamin Abbot accused her of witchcraft after he fell sick and blamed his illness on her bewitching him. Martha was taken to jail and placed in chains to keep her spirit from roaming.

Martha’s trial began on 31 May 1692, and she was transported to the Salem Village Meeting House to face the accusing girls, overviewed by judges John Hathorne, Jonathan Corwin, and Bartholomew Gedney.

Who was blamed in the crucible?

In Arthur Miller’s “Abigail Williams In the Crucible”, Abigail Williams is blamed for the mass hysteria in Salem due to her desire for John Proctor, her attempts to kill Elizabeth, and her attempts to save her name. Abigail’s manipulation, using charm and deceit, caused fear and panic within the community. She worked as a maid in the Proctor home and had an affair with John, leading to her firing. Abigail’s obsession with Proctor led to her actions, including murdering innocent people. She also engaged in physical relations with John, causing her to fall in love with him.

Who were the first 3 accused witches in the Salem witch trials?

“A Quest for Security” is a book-length biography of Samuel Parris, the 1692 pastor of Salem Village church who led the witchcraft trials. Parris was a driving force behind the accusations, leading to the deaths of Elizabeth “Betty” Parris and Abigail Williams, who began having unexplained fits in January of 1692 after experimenting with fortune-telling. Tituba, a female slave likely of Native South American ancestry owned by Parris, was the first to be accused of witchcraft by Betty and Abigail. She also confessed and accused others, first naming Sarah Good and Sarah Osborne.

The book covers Parris’s early years, his time in Boston as a merchant and starting a family, and his eight years as the divided community’s pastor in Salem Village. The book examines his life as a Puritan pastor and the conflict within his congregation. In the spring of 1692, Parris’s actions led to an escalation of accusations, ultimately leading to his removal from the pulpit.

Parris’s last years were marked by moving from one small Massachusetts community to another, and he died in obscurity in 1720. The biography serves as a reminder of the concern of early Americans to sustain economic independence for their families and highlights the importance of providing material security for his children.

How many people were accused of witchcraft in Crucible?

The Crucible is an adaptation of Arthur Miller’s 1953 play, The Crucible, which tells the story of the Salem witch trials in 1692 and 1693. The witch hunts took place in Europe and America between the fourteenth and eighteenth centuries, with over 200 people accused of witchcraft in just over one year. The trials began when two young girls accused three townswomen of using witchcraft on them. Miller used the actual names of the people involved in the witch trials for his characters, but made some changes to better fit the story he wanted to tell.

The most important change is adding a cause for the events, something which has never been clear from historical sources. In Miller’s play, one of the two young girls that started the accusations, Abigail Williams, used to have an affair with a married man, John Proctor, and tries to get revenge on his wife Elizabeth.

Director Nicholas Hytner has insisted on taking a naturalistic approach to the film, filming much of The Crucible on location. The village of Salem was meticulously reconstructed on uninhabited Hog Island, off the coast of Massachusetts, to faithfully recreate the surroundings of seventeenth-century Salem. Filming close to the site of the historical events provided the film with added credibility. The film also pays great attention to historical detail in its use of period-appropriate costumes and artefacts.

How many people were accused in Act 2 of The Crucible?

Mary returns from Salem feeling drained from the proceedings and gives Elizabeth a poppet she made in court. She tells the Proctors that 39 people have been arrested, and she breaks down and starts crying. Mary reveals that Goody Osburn is set to hang, but Sarah Good confessed, so she will live. Mary is convinced that Sarah Good tried to kill her by sending out her spirit and is genuinely convinced that she was bewitched by Sarah Good.

Mary insists on going back to court the next day, believing she is doing God’s work. John Proctor tries to whip Mary for her insolence, but Mary interjects that she saved Elizabeth’s life by defending her against accusations in court. Proctor dismisses Mary. Elizabeth is convinced that Abigail wants her dead and will continue to accuse her until she is arrested. Proctor tries to allay these suspicions, but Elizabeth insists on telling Abigail explicitly that they will never be together.

Reverend Hale arrives to speak with the Proctors about the accusations made against Elizabeth. He questions John’s lack of church attendance due to his wife’s illness and dislike of Parris’ materialism. Hale asks Proctor to say his commandments, and ironically, he forgets adultery.

Who were the first two accusers in the Salem witch trials?

The Salem witch trials began when several young girls fell ill with a mysterious disease, believed to be witchcraft. Elizabeth “Betty” Parris and her cousin Abigail Williams were the first to experience this hell-born disease, believed to be prime targets for the Devil. Parris and Williams were the daughter and niece of Puritan Reverend Samuel Parris, who was unbreakable in faith and masculinity. The girls, who were nine and eleven years old respectively, succumbed to the evil forces of witchcraft, experiencing incessant seizures and freakish contortions. They believed their disease was a punishment from God and often asked their slave Tituba to recount Caribbean voodoo stories.

As Betty and Abigail’s friends began experiencing the same symptoms, they claimed they too were bewitched. These young girls became the main accusers during the Salem witch trials, instigating the execution of nineteen people.

Who did Tituba accuse?

Tituba, an Indian woman, was enslaved by Samuel Parris, the minister of Salem Village in Massachusetts Bay. She was crucial in the Salem witch trials, confessing to witchcraft and accusing two other women, Sarah Good and Sarah Osborne, of the same crime. She was imprisoned for over a year but never tried. The only records of Tituba pertain to her central position in the trials.

Tituba’s birthplace is not known, but Thomas Hutchinson wrote in 1764 that she was brought into the Country from New Spain. Later historians have taken this to mean the Caribbean or Barbados, but this is speculation. Elaine G. Breslaw identified her with a “Tattuba” born circa 1662-1666, who was documented as enslaved to Samuel Thompson in Barbados in 1674. Other historians have suggested that Tituba was born in Africa.

Bernard Rosenthal objected to both lines of argument as compounded speculation, stating that Barbadian slaves were generally African, but Tituba was universally described as Indian in Puritan sources.

Who accused who of witchcraft in The Crucible?

Elizabeth Proctor is accused of witchcraft by Abigail Williams, who wants to marry her husband John, whom she had an affair with while serving in the Proctor household. Abigail makes it look like Elizabeth is practicing witchcraft by claiming that Elizabeth sticks needles in a poppet to cause Abigail pain. However, readers know that Abigail sticks herself with needles to provide evidence of Elizabeth’s “crime”.

John Proctor rarely attends church due to his dissatisfaction with Reverend Parris, who he believes is too concerned with his own wealth and preaching only golden candlesticks. John also explains to Reverend Hale that he stayed home on Sundays during the winter due to his wife’s illness. Mary Warren tells the court the truth about the girls acting bewitched.

Who was accused of witchcraft in Salem?

Three women were arrested on March 1 for witchcraft, including Sarah Good, Sarah Osborne, and Tituba, Parris’s Indian slave. Tituba confessed and identified more witches from Salem. The suspects were marked for class and race, and local magistrates John Hathorne and Jonathan Corwin coerced a false confession from Tituba. The next two defendants were Rebecca Nurse and Martha Cory, both fully covenanted church members and of high social standing. They were accused of witchcraft based on “spectral evidence”, which meant disembodied spirits were sent through dreams or visions with the help of Satan to harm victims.

The accused were interrogated in public, and during questioning, the purported victims exhibited dramatic reactions while townspeople watched. The case highlights the difficulty in defending individuals accused of witchcraft and the potential consequences of such accusations.