Why Do People Not Take Conspiracy Theories Seriously?

A new study in Applied Cognitive Psychology by Jan-Willem Van Prooijen at VU Amsterdam has found that conspiracy theories can be grouped into three categories: the desire for understanding and certainty, the desire to counter conspiracy theories without challenging a person’s identity, and encouraging analytic thinking. The research suggests that while many scholars dismiss conspiracy theorists as paranoid and delusional, psychological data supports their case. People who harbor conspiracist thoughts are also more likely to share false information online.

The psychological (dark triad, propensity to share false information online) and non-partisan/ideological political (populism, Manicheanism, etc.) factors contribute to an individual’s belief in conspiracy theories. Politicians use conspiracy theories to mock and dismiss allegations against them, while philosophers and political scientists warn that it could be used as a rhetorical weapon.

The study also examines whether people’s perception of randomness is related to conspiracy theory beliefs. Conspiracy theories explain events as the existence of a conspiracy by powerful and sinister groups, often political. Rational arguments and myth busting may not help change the mind of a conspiracy theorist, but there are other ways to identify, debunk, and counter them.

In conclusion, understanding the psychology behind conspiracy theories is crucial for identifying, debunking, and countering them. While many people dismiss conspiracy theories as unhinged beliefs, it is important to consider the real danger of influencing people’s beliefs and actions.