Are Occurrences Of Lynchings Planned As An Attack On India?

The recent lynching of at least ten Muslim men in India has highlighted the issue of online misinformation and the potential for mob killings. WhatsApp, a major channel for false reporting and hate speech, has been a major factor in fueling mob violence and murders in India. The term “mob lynching” is often used to describe these incidents, but it misrepresents the reality. The lack of public outcry over the surge in lynchings suggests that India’s Hindu majority supports some discrimination against Muslims.

The Indian Supreme Court has laid down guidelines to address mob violence, including the concept of “Mob Lynching”, which is a form of punishment dictated by an unlawful assembly. Many accuse the Hindu nationalist government of failing to forcefully condemn the violence. Activists have launched a hate campaign against the Hindu nationalist government, claiming that lynching is a foreign concept and society should know where this comes from.

Congress has alleged a government conspiracy in recent mob lynching incidents, triggered by viral WhatsApp videos. Recordings of some attacks have been shared widely online, which analysts warn could aggravate violence against India’s minorities. Mob lynching incidents violate the Right to Equality and Prohibition of discrimination, which are enshrined in Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India.

The court cautioned against the “conspiracy” hatched against India in the name of hate crimes like lynching, pointing out that lynching undermines the legal institutions laid down by the Constitution of India.

What is the 76 law in India?

It is not considered an offense when an individual believes they are legally obligated to act in accordance with the law, despite a discrepancy in factual understanding rather than a discrepancy in legal interpretation. This is provided that the individual acts in good faith.

What is the 51 Act in India?

Section 51 of the Indian Constitution outlines the division of property among a male Parsi intestate, with each son’s share being doubled for each daughter. In cases of female Parsi property, section 52 ensures equal shares for the widower and each child, and for children if there is no widower. The father’s death grants the son double the share of each daughter, while the mother’s death grants equal shares for the children. However, this discrimination is not reasonable today.

Under the Hindu Succession Act, property of an intestate is divided among specified heirs, including surviving sons and daughters, with each heir taking one share, regardless of sex. In contrast, the Indian Succession Act appears to be discriminatory.

What was the biggest lynching in history?

The 1891 New Orleans lynchings were the murders of 11 Italian Americans, immigrants in New Orleans, by a mob for their alleged role in the murder of police chief David Hennessy. This was the largest single mass lynching in American history. Most of the victims were rounded up and charged due to their Italian ethnicity. The lynching occurred on March 14, the day after the trial of nine of the nineteen men indicted in Hennessy’s murder. Six of the defendants were acquitted, and a mistrial was declared for the remaining three.

There was widespread belief in the city that Italian-American organized crime was responsible for the killing, and Italian-American voters preferred the scandal-plagued city political machine over the new Reform Democrat mayor, whose role in inciting violence may have been an attempt to misuse government power for political repression.

How many people are hanged in India till now?

The official government statistics indicate that 57 individuals have been executed in India since its independence, with Ajmal Kasab being the last and Yakub Memon scheduled for execution on July 30th. However, some sources dispute this claim.

What is the law on lynching in India?

The BNS bill, as per clause 101, stipulates that a group of five or more individuals can be punished with death or imprisonment for life or a minimum of seven years for murder, based on various grounds such as race, caste, community, sex, language, or personal belief. The Supreme Court has directed the Union and state governments to implement measures to prevent mob lynching, requiring states to submit a status report to the home ministry and year-wise data on complaints and registered first information reports (FIRs). This move aims to combat the issue of mob lynching.

What is the meaning of lynching in India?

Mob lynching is defined as a form of violence whereby a mob executes an individual presumed to have committed a crime, frequently after subjecting them to torture. It is carried out under the pretext of administering justice without a trial and is conducted by an informal group with no legal authority.

How many people have been lynched in India?

The Central Secretariat of State (CSS) has reported that since January 2014 to July 2018, 109 incidents of mob lynching have occurred in India, including bovine-related vigilantism, “love jihad” vigilantism, rumours of child lifting, violence related to identity markers like skull caps, and forced chanting of Hindu supremacist slogans. The incidents were primarily reported in Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and Jharkhand, all BJP-ruled states. Among the 78 killed and 174 injured, 32 were Muslims, 21 Hindus, 6 were Dalits, and 2 STs, with the community of the deceased and injured not specified.

This indicates that Muslims and Dalits are targeted more than others in mob lynching violence. CSSS found a steady increase in mob lynching incidents since 2014, despite Prime Minister Modi’s mild disapproval of the violence. However, the disapproval was not followed up with adequate legal actions against those involved, particularly in BJP-ruled states. The community of the deceased and injured in these incidents remains unspecified.

What is 69 law in India?

The Indian Penal Code (BNS) has introduced Section 69, which targets instances where a person induces sexual intercourse through deceptive means or promises marriage without genuine intent. This provision, while not constituting rape under legal definitions, is punishable under the law. The Ministry of Law and Justice clarifies that deceitful means include false assurances regarding employment, promotion, or identity concealment aimed at misleading the victim.

The enactment of BNS marks a shift towards stricter regulations against sexual offences, aligning India’s legal framework with contemporary social norms and justice principles. The law also introduces amendments to existing laws concerning sexual offences against women and children, reclassifying these crimes under a dedicated chapter and standardizing the treatment of minor rape victims.

What is 203 law in India?

Providing false information about an alleged offense may result in imprisonment for a period of up to two years, a fine, or both, if the individual in question has knowledge or reasonable grounds to believe that the information is false.

What is the 103 law in India?

The section discusses the issue of house-breaking by night, but not lurking house-trespass by night, which is as severe as house-breaking by night. The authors propose to omit clause secondly, as house-breaking by night will cease to be a separate offense under certain amendments in Chapter 17. All aggravated forms of criminal trespass will be governed by clause fourthly, which broadly assesses whether death or grievous hurt is a likely consequence.

They also suggest adding mischief by explosive substance, mischief by fire or explosive substance committed on any vehicle, and places of worship along with dwellings. They also consider adding mischief in respect of public property, covering property used or intended for the purposes of the Government, local authority, corporation, or government company. However, they believe clause thirdly is adequate for the purpose and do not recommend any such addition.

What is 357 law in India?

The text states that any individual who engages in an act of assault or the use of criminal force to confine another person wrongfully may be subject to a sentence of imprisonment for a period of up to one year, a fine of up to one thousand rupees, or both. The severity of the punishment is contingent upon the identity of the victim or the individual who was subjected to the use of force, with the approval of the court.