November 5 marks the moment when history will decide whether Kamala Harris or Donald Trump will be the 47th president. Astrologers are building their audiences by predicting twists and turns in the US presidential race, with Harris winning the election by a narrow margin based on the planets and signs in her natal chart. An astrologer, who accurately predicted the exact day Joe Biden would end his re-election campaign, has identified Trump as the probable winner in the US Presidential race.
Dozens of astrologers are coming together to predict who will be president, anticipating a potentially explosive October surprise that could shape the result. From the point of view of Chinese astrology, 2020 will be the year of the Metal Rat. The answer may emerge during a meeting this week of celestial bodies aligned in favor of Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump. Trump is a Gemini, while Clinton is a Scorpio.
The International Society for Astrological Research meets this week to discuss the compatibility of Trump’s Gemini and Clinton’s Scorpio signs. Hillary Clinton, who was “peaking” in 2016, actually got more people’s votes than Donald Trump. The planets would align Nov. 8 in favor of Scorpio Hillary Clinton or Gemini Donald Trump.
In summary, November 5 is a crucial moment in the US presidential race, with astrologists predicting the outcome based on the birth charts of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. Astrology plays a significant role in shaping the outcome of the election, with predictions and predictions being made by various astrologers.
📹 Sanders, Trump, Clinton ~ Part II of II ~ ASTROLOGY ~ Who Can Win? ~ Presidential Election 2016
A look at Presidential Election 2016 ~ Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton for the coming months ~ Astrology …
📹 He Predicted Trump in 2016, Biden in 2020 and Now… | NYT Opinion
Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are scheduled to debate on Sept. 10, but the 2024 presidential election is already in the bag …
I enjoyed the talk. Also glad you just looked at the planetary aspects rather than adding potentially off calculations on the zodiac placements. I use Sidereal time for my forecasts which have made better sense. Keep up the good work. But how did you decide on the birth time? I had run into some inconsistencies with the actual time.
Bernie the only one with heart… which is the only source of real solutions… without heart… Hillary has implemented many things that have harmed millions… and the environment… one joytish chart said the Hillary’s chart never won a presidency… but that both Trump & Bernie have very strong charts… it will be close and Bernie will prevail… #FeelTheBern
Wonderful presentation, coupled with Part I paralleling our time to the American Revolution. The extremes of the candidates represent all of the facets of the original America ideals. Everything is in play and up for collective examination….. The Constitution, Bill of Rights, right to bear arms, ..all men created equal, freedom of religion, speech etc etc etc…. So incredibly interesting. Cant wait to see how this all plays out…..( also hope to make it to the country’s Pluto return!!!!! Im so curious now)
very intuitive. i think your points hit key aspects of each of the candidates. HILLARY’s chat was fascinating, in that it affirms the doubts of her ideological convictions, and supports the notion she is an idealist when addressing a collective strategy to the collective need. for me, that is a key element of a president, leader, mover and shaker. TRUMP’chart reaffirms, for me, the notion i have always felt, that he seeks approval, affirmation, adulation, to feel validated. in that, his career, television show, his getting attention for things he says, is his attempt to feel relevant and influential, and that motivation to do so, makes him seek an easy target to pander to, to get that validation his character so innately craves. to me, that is a troubling leadership agenda, and one that i could never support. SANDERS chart, much as i believed prior, is that of a man of principled ideals, an ideas man, a motivator, but not that of an actual leader on one’s own turf. he would be a great adviser, cabinet member, political guru, but i do not see him as an independent leader. i admire people of conviction and ideological purpose for the collective, but i do not see him as more than that. that is not a bad thing, but a more common idealist mentality. cause for purpose, visions of justice and fairness, equality, but not leaders of many, but motivational ideas man for a common cause, led by another. fascinating…i will subscribe to your page…you are an intelligent intuitive astrologist.
It’s sounds so much better when you say it, Susan. I look behind the scenes and it’s not so nice. Because of that I started emphatically telling everyone that Hillary is the next President 3 years ago, maybe it was closer to 2 years ago. It’s not because I’m a fan or even a democrat, I just tell people what is going to happen (to me it’s neither good nor bad, it just is). The last time we were in this place was the American Revolution and this time will be just as volatile. And that’s not based on astrology, it’s just historical cycles that will be repeating themselves (history rhymes). I will be as shocked as if I just saw rain fall from the ground to the sky if anyone but Hillary is in the White house next January. She’s actually the brains of the outfit anyway. Unfortunately, between now and 2025 it really doesn’t matter who is in the white house – we’re still heading for a revolution and worse. AFTER THAT IT WILL MATTER. But in the long run, it’s for the best as America rebuilds itself and the selfish corruption is burned out of the system for a long, long time.
Answers to the keys are dodgy. Not having RFK as 3rd party candidate benefits Trump. Trump is charismatic. Most think the Dems are institutionally corrupt. The economy is an utter disaster. Need I go on? This is a desperate puff piece for the democrats. I say this as an undecided voter that’s pretty neutral on this election, and that think Harris has closed the gap big time. It was looking a foregone conclusion that Trump would win until quite recently.