Carl Jung, a prominent figure in the field of psychology, was known for his theories that were deeply opposed to Christianity. He proposed a “Quaternity” with Satan as one of the four Persons of the Godhead, which challenged the traditional Christian belief system. Despite his sometimes unorthodox views, Jung’s deepest convictions are firmly rooted in his beliefs.
Jung has been referred to as the psychiatrist of Christianity, as he put Christianity on the couch and worked through to an authentic Christian reality. He criticized Christianity for its failures in religious education, fostering in too few people the experience of the divine image and innermost possession. Jung’s passion focused on the rediscovery of ancient mystery religions that emphasized occultic practices.
Jung’s theories have penetrated more deeply into the Catholic church than any other therapist, and there is an apparent mystical aura surrounding his work. His Jungian interpretation of religion, pioneered by him and advanced by his followers, attempts to interpret religion in the light of Jungian principles.
Recent years have seen a renewed interest in mysticism, including the mystical tradition within Christianity. Stung by his lack of acceptance as a scientist, Jung hated being called a mystic, a label that clung to him throughout his life and beyond. Many current attempts to revitalize the life of prayer are inspired by the writings of St. John of the Cross or the psychology of Dr. C.G. Jung.
📹 Jung’s REVELATORY version of Christianity (don’t be a tradcel)
Learn to Storytell | https://uberboyo.com/program/ Twitter | https://twitter.com/uberboyo Instagram …
How does Jung define God?
This dissertation explores Carl Gustav Jung’s theories and findings on man’s concept of God, comparing them with a Christian concept by Emil Brunner. Jung’s theory of the collective unconscious and its archetypes is the basis for the concept of God in analytical psychology. He believes that the spiritual content of the human psyche is a God archetype, which expresses itself regularly in archetypal images or symbols.
Jung believes that revelation is the manifestation of the God archetype from deep within the collective unconscious. He asserts that God is relative, dependent on man as much as man is dependent on God. The essential aspect of the God concept is “wholeness”, meaning He is both good and evil, darkness and light. Jung also contends that the Godhead is composed of a quaternity rather than a trinity.
The dissertation is not openly accessible at Boston University Libraries, but can be requested by the author or principal advisor.
Was Carl Jung a spiritualist?
This essay explores the similarities between Carl Gustav Jung’s psychology and Quantum ontology, highlighting their shared spirituality and the interconnectedness of all things and beings. Jung’s Analytical Psychology, embodied in the archetype structure, suggests that there is a realm of reality that is not material but non-material forms. These forms are real even though they are invisible, as they have the potential to appear in our minds and act in it. This view is identical with the ontology of Quantum Physics, as seen in Schrödinger’s quantum mechanics, which explains the properties of atoms and molecules.
The basis of the material world is non-material, which contrasts with our experience of the world. This view is based on Schrödinger’s quantum mechanics, which states that electrons in atoms and molecules are standing waves or forms, rather than tiny material particles. This view of the world is similar to the spiritual foundation of the empirical world, which is based on the non-material nature of the material world.
Is Jungian psychology compatible with Catholicism?
Jungians, who believe their methods and understandings are incompatible with authentic Catholic teachings, view orthodox Catholics as threats to their sexual “enlightenment” ideas. They believe that a truly Jungian person must have an enlightened view of sexuality, which they claim is necessary for being fully alive. Jungians believe that sex education is crucial to introducing children to their views on enlightened sexuality. They also embrace contraception, homosexuality, and abortion, as they believe they are part of people’s “lived experiences” and enable them to explore their sexuality uninhibited.
The Church’s ills over the past 30 years, including sex education, abused liturgy, faulty theology, degenerative sexual morality, mainstreaming of homosexuality, contraception, abortion, and euthanasia, can be traced back to Jungianism. The damaging effects of Jungianism are manifest in Catholic schools, universities, seminaries, parishes, and Catholic media. To rid the Church of this heresy, proper catechetical instruction and awareness of those who seek to undermine the true teaching of the Church are necessary.
What did Carl Jung believe?
Jung’s theory of the human psyche is comprised of three parts: the ego, the personal unconscious, and the collective unconscious. Additionally, his approach to dream analysis was more expansive than Freud’s, as he posited that symbols could have multiple meanings.
What did Sigmund Freud think of Carl Jung?
In 1906, Freud began a correspondence with Carl Jung, who later became close friends. Freud considered Jung his peer and considered him the heir to his psychoanalytic process. However, their friendship deteriorated when Freud dismissed Jung’s dismissal of some of his basic psychoanalytic tenets. Jung believed Freud’s concept of the unconscious was limited and that the unconscious could also be a source of creativity. Despite their theoretical differences, both acknowledged that the other man’s theories influenced their own ideas.
Jung formed his own influential psychology school of thought, analytical psychology, while Freudian psychoanalytic concepts grew out of his work with his patients. As Freud sought to understand and explain patients’ symptoms, he became increasingly interested in the role of the unconscious mind in the development of mental illness.
What was Carl Jung’s view on religion?
Margaret Clark’s book, “Spirituality and Religion”, explores the concept of spiritual needs and their impact on our lives. Jung, a prominent figure in the field, emphasized the importance of spirituality in our lives, stating that they are a powerful yet unacknowledged factor. He compared our spiritual needs to basic, profound, and essential patterns, such as hunger and fear of death. These longings often stem from a desire for meaning and purpose in our lives, which can manifest in various ways, such as the success of a football team, the pursuit of a perfect body or relationship, or wealth and possessions.
Did Carl Jung believe in a soul?
In modern psychiatry, the concept of “loss of soul” may not fully capture the psychospiritual depth of despair and collapse. Jung believes that the soul carries creativity, grants meaning, links us to the divine, and represents all we could be if wholeness were possible. To be abandoned by one’s soul is devastating, but to be reunited is the greatest gift.
In The Red Book: Liber Novus, Jung recounts his journey to find his long-lost soul, learning that one must live this life and continue their journey. He shares his experiences and the strange journey he has taken, including trying to save a younger girl or woman, fighting an evil man, and volunteering for roles in a theater performance. He realizes that the girl he cares for can give a voice to those who cannot speak for themselves.
During their journey, they break down a wall, and wild horses run everywhere. They climb a school structure to try to get to safety, but they lose the girl in the struggle to climb higher. A bull with horns attacks them, and they fall down. As they climb, they encounter a creature that feels like an old friend, a black dragon with spikes everywhere.
The dragon binds with the soul, and they bond as they take a break for snacks. People stare at them, and they seem scared or in awe or respect. One day, the dragon eats chocolate, and the soul wakes up.
In summary, Jung’s story highlights the profound impact of loss of soul on individuals and the importance of living life with purpose and connection. Through his experiences, Jung demonstrates the power of the soul and the importance of living life with purpose and connection.
What does Carl Jung say about Jesus?
Jung argues that Jesus Christ is not a symbol of the Self, as the New Testament figure of Jesus of Nazareth is a myth that replaces the historical Jesus. He believes that any image of a greater totality than oneself can become a symbol of the Self. However, not every image is fully adequate, and the figure of Jesus Christ is not a symbol of totality because it lacks evil and sin. Instead, it represents the suffering that the ego must go through at the expense of the unconscious in the process of individuation.
The image of Christ suspended on the cross between two thieves expresses the tension between good and evil and between consciousness and the unconscious. This paradox represents something indescribable and transcendental, and the realization of the Self, which would logically follow from recognition of its supremacy, leads to a.
What did Carl Jung disagree with?
Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud were two of the most influential figures in the field of psychology. They believed that behavior is influenced by a psychic energy or life force, with sexuality being just one potential manifestation. Jung also disagreed with Oedipal impulses and believed that one should not only be a pupil but also seek themselves. Their theories have significantly impacted our understanding of the human mind and have led to the development of successful psychological treatments for various human distresses.
However, their paths were not always so different. At the beginning of their careers, they formed a friendship based on intellectual prowess and a desire to further study the unconscious psyche. Jung saw Freud as an esteemed colleague and a father figure, while Freud saw Jung as an energetic and exciting new prospect in the psychoanalytical movement. Their contributions to the field have had a profound impact on our understanding of the human mind and the development of successful treatments for various human distresses.
What jungian archetype is Jesus?
Jung’s view on Christ as the archetype of the Self is revolutionary, as he sees Christ as the central source in phrases like “I am the vine, you are the branches” and as a union of opposites. The archetype of the Self can also be seen as the image of God in the human psyche, the imago dei. This archetypical theme is important to Jungian analysts because analysis is a deliberate, orderly process of anamnesis, starting with a recollection of personal life and going deeper.
Lonergan Resources notes that theologians have a strong affinity for Jung, with over 400 theology books written about his contribution to theology. However, the main issue with Jung is his view of the symbolic significance of Jesus Christ.
Did Jung believe in the soul?
The soul, experienced through the body, often brings imbalances into consciousness. Jung believed that the soul and psyche are visible in the body, and symptomatic body expressions are a natural attempt at healing. However, contemporary Western psychology treats the psyche only, ignoring the physical symptoms resulting from trauma or inner conflict. Even in Jungian psychology, the body is believed to respond to psychological transformation, but the body is still under the influence of the psyche. This imbalance can be life-threatening or profoundly traumatic.
📹 Carl Jung’s View On God (EXPLAINED)
“I don’t need to believe, I know” When Carl Jung made this claim about God there was a lot of obvious controversy over what he …
Ecclesiastes 1:13-14 NKJV And I set my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all that is done under heaven; this burdensome task God has given to the sons of man, by which they may be exercised. I have seen all the works that are done under the sun; and indeed, all is vanity and grasping for the wind
To those who are seeking gnosis, and finding true self, I commend you with the highest compassion, as I know how hard this journey is. Recently, I’ve felt like my ego is a wounded animal, desperate to self preserve by identifying with my highest self. Sometimes it feels like I’m going insane, trying to outwit my ego, but through meditation, I can reach this peace of true self, as I become cellularly one with the Source. And I’m happy for everyone else on this path with me. Jung is such an inspiration.
This is crazy, and super synchronistic. Like two weeks ago i watched that same interview and had to rewind on that same specific segment, and i was surprised the interviewer just brushed off that answer like it was nothing !!! I know EXACTLY what he means. In that same interview he talks about an experience he had when he was 11, where he said something along the lines of “I came out of the fog”. He experienced God in his own consciousness. This is what I experienced about two months ago, for 5 minutes my ego construct was gone, and I experienced the beauty that lies behind this construct. It came in combination with a kundalini awakening over a longer period of time and I even had a psychotic breakdown lol, but it was the best experience I’ve had in my entire life. Synchronicities became clear as day, I saw meaning and symbolism in everything, the universe was sort of like speaking to me, I felt connected to everything, I felt enormous energy, purpose, clarity and creativity. When you experience this you just KNOW what God is. And it became even more clear to me how the current society and way of thinking about the world leads you in the complete other direction. Every human has the ability to experience this. Every, single, one, of, us. “I am in the father and the father is in me” = “My individual consciousness is in the universal consciousness, and the universal consciousness is in me.”
I am part Lakota, the wicasa wakan (shamans) of the Lakota used to speak of Wakan Tanka, the “Great Mystery” similarly: “Then I was standing on the highest mountain of them all, and round about beneath me was the whole hoop of the world. And while I stood there I saw more than I can tell and I understood more than I saw; for I was seeing in a sacred manner the shapes of all things in the spirit, and the shape of all shapes as they must live together like one being. And I saw that the sacred hoop of my people was one of many hoops that made one circle, wide as daylight and as starlight, and in the center grew one mighty flowering tree to shelter all the children of one mother and one father. And I saw that it was holy. This center which is here, but which we know is really everywhere, is Wakan Tanka” -Nicholas Black Elk
God is a word with a meaning moving towards “Absolute”. God to science is absolute knowledge, but science does not call absolute knowledge God. People say God is “Absolute Love” or that God is “Absolute Answer” or God is ”Absolute Peace” or God is “Absolute Power” or God is “Absolute Passion” or God is “Absolute Principle”. This is peoples attempt to reach the “Absolute” of an idea then attempting to define this idea into a meaning that is understandable. Then when you finally understand you get to understand beauty, but beauty was always there in the stories you just didn’t understand why this was God. You’re a child in a story who is trying to remember why, who, when, what and how.
4:00 reminded me of a poem by ibn arabi Listen, O dearly beloved! I am the reality of the world, the centre of the circumference, I am the parts and the whole. I am the will established between Heaven and Earth, I have created perception in you only in order to be the object of My Perception. If then you perceive Me, you perceive yourself. But you cannot perceive Me through yourself. It is through My Eyes that you see Me and see yourself, Through your eyes you cannot see Me. Dearly beloved! I have called you so often and you have not heard Me. I have shown Myself to you so often and you have not seen Me. I have made Myself fragrance so often, and you have not smelled Me, Savorous food, and you have not tasted Me. Why can you not reach Me through the object you touch Or breathe Me through sweet perfumes? Why do you not see Me? Why do you not hear Me? Why? Why? Why? For you My delights surpass all other delights, And the pleasure I procure you surpasses all other pleasures. For you I am preferable to all other good things, I am Beauty, I am Grace. Love Me, love Me alone. Love yourself in Me, in Me alone. Attach yourself to Me, No one is more inward than I. Others love you for their own sakes, I love you for yourself. And you, you flee from Me. Dearly beloved! You cannot treat Me fairly, For if you approach Me, It is because I have approached you. I am nearer to you than yourself, Than your soul, than your breath. Who among creatures Would treat you as I do? I am jealous of you, over you, I want you to belong to no other, Not even to yourself.
Thank you for reading this, I appreciated listening to it and it confirms an assumption I had made when I saw this interview a couple of years ago. I had an experience in my teenage years and a number since and Jung’s views resonate with my own. You mention Jordan Petersen’s views are similar and that this because of the influence on him from reading Jung, possibly true, though I’m sure many share these thoughts simply out of experience too.
In an interview on his 80th birthday, Jung said: “But do you know who anticipated my entire psychology in the eighteenth century? The Hassidic Rabbi Baer from Meseritz, whom they called the Great Maggid. He was a most impressive man.” What’s interesting is that when Rabbi Dov Ber’s disciple Rabbi Levi Yitzchak of Berditchev returned from visiting him, he was asked what he gained. “You believe in God, but I know.” Knowledge means an intimate connection and sense of other, as we see when Adam was intimate with Eve, the Torah’s language is: “And Adam knew Eve.”
Awesome man, I’ve never really been religious but I’ve always been spiritual and curious. Jung’s work into our psyche is as, if not more, vital than Einstein’s work on our understanding of the nature of space. We should continue to strive forth on both fronts. I would love to see the similarities on Peterson’s and Jung’s views.
I use to wonder if there was a God then I saved a drowning child, now I know with absolute certainty that there is a force, which cares about drowning children, that I choose to call God. (7/26) Seems to me people assign their own belief of what God is to everyone else then hate them for believing it. Why I was guided to that lake that day and given the strength to help that child I can only wonder, and often do, but it was a blessing for everyone involved and certainly changed my life because after that.. “I knew”. I don’t try to describe it but I like how Einstein did: “My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds.” If you’re not open to learning something I can promise you will never know.
Believing to belief must go thru transformations (IMHO). 1. hope, there is/there isn’t, for the same reason – I hope either one will work, but hope is not knowing. 2. faith based upon trusting, doing, it (seems to), works & faith is built but faith is still not knowing. 3. fact/knowing becuz something has been proven to YOU. Something you cannot prove to others, don’t need to, but trust because transformation has brought one to this “fact”, a knowing, & a fact is something one “knows” because it has been proven to them.
If you say like Jung “I know”, people get upset because they have never had a direct encounter with the Divine. But these encounters do exist and many Self Realized people have had direct experiences. The majority do not know G-d or their own Soul. They may have heard of G-d in church and attended church themselves …but they do not know. Only having the direct experience of the Divine causes one to know without doubt.
In Vedic philosophy, “Atman is Brahman.” This means the inner “I am,” the inner witness, inner pure consciousness, is transcendently one with the all. Or as Carl Sagan says “we are the universe witnessing itself. Behind all form is matter (eg. A pot which becomes the schema of a clay pot, made of clay; the clay is made of molecules, now molecules are the form, the abstraction, and so on to atoms, to particles, to subatomic particles, and ultimately to the unknown life essence, to an unknown fabric of unity. Another perspective is per Alfred Korzybski, his structural differential and his saying “the symbol is not the thing, the map is not the territory;” which is consistent with the Vedic “the word is not that.” So the word God, is JUST a word pointing to a realization, to an inner experience of oneness, with an often personification or anthropomorphic existence reflecting the higher self. Even Judaism has the 100 names of God, including Ein Sof the ultimate unknowable existence. And there is validity to the experience of inner energies of qualities, even archetypal energies. Quantum Gravity Research in California has posited a theory of existence as a multi-dimensional quasi-crystal, with consciousness as a dimension of this quasi-crystal. This is supports “Atman is Brahma;” and this how many know there is God, it’s an enlightenment, an inner experience of unity consciousness, a unity of the inner and outer worlds. Dogan (the 13th century zen monk) said “There is no disclosing without nature, there is no mind without disclosing.
Carl Jung’s letter to you… the difference between believing and knowing. Sir, – So many letters I have received have emphasized my statement about ‘knowing’ (of God) (in ‘Face to Face’, THE LISTENER, October 29). My opinion about ‘knowledge of God’ is an unconventional way of thinking, and I quite understand if it should be suggested that I am no Christian. Yet I think of myself as a Christian since I am entirely based upon Christian concepts. I only try to escape their internal contradictions by introducing a more modest attitude, which takes into consideration the immense darkness of the human mind. The Christian idea proves its vitality by a continuous evolution, just like Buddhism. Our time certainly demands some new thought in this respect, as we cannot continue to think in an antique or medieval way, when we enter the sphere of religious experience. I did not say in the broadcast, ‘There is a God’, I said ‘I do not need to believe in God; I know’. Which does not mean: I do know a certain God (Zeus, Jahwe, Allah, the Trinitarian God, etc.) but rather: I do know that I am obviously confronted with a factor unknown in itself, which I call ‘God’ in consensu omnium (‘quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus creditur’). I remember Him, I evoke Him, whenever I use His name overcome by anger or by fear, whenever I involuntarily say: ‘Oh God’. That happens when I meet somebody or something stronger than myself. It is an apt name given to all overpowering emotions in my own psychical system subduing my conscious will and usurping control over myself.
carl jung heavily influenced AA, which has the phrases “god as you understand him” or “higher power”. 14 years ago I turned myself over to a power greater than myself. I became sober, undepressed, and had a great life. about 7-8 years later I became a science teacher and then started to identify as agnostic/atheist. I became physically disabled. I live with chronic pain. I thought very seriously about trying to pursue assisted suicide in a legal manner in a different country. I finally decided again to try the “God delusion” as Hawkins would call it. I started reading spiritual books again. I start praying and meditating again. some minutes I am a believer in the sublime. in other minutes, I cannot wait for my stardust to return to the universe and begin their long decay into nothingness. However, I am happiest when I am working towards some goal to help others with a steady belief that my higher power is using me in some small way for the good of all. you can call me a fool, you can call me whatever, I don’t care anymore what people think of me for the most part. I once had dream that went roughly as so. it was a surreal dream. I woke up in my childhood room, but things were slightly different. I was sleeping on my cot from daycare. I heard God’s voice call to me in a low yet still thunderous rumble. I crawled out my window, saying “God is that you”? to which he replied “yes!!!”. I then said “prove it” and I saw the largest shooting star I had ever seen. to which I responded, “well that could be a coincidence”.
Carl Jung sure is a friendly chap; prob easier to have a beer with than most. Thumbs up #913 i think carl jung tackled every possible angle humanly possible in his written letter-response. We have to remember, we have common experiences as humans but there is no common way of retelling, nor sharing them; the best we can do is to acknowledge the uniqueness of each contribution, and highlight those that encourage a similar journey. Very inspiring. Thumbs up again (if possible) END
He uses a large vocabulary to abstractly describe already understood basic concepts of ‘God’ in a very elaborate fashion. He also said ‘I know’ to peak peoples interest in his views not as he further explained. I really believe if you are not pretending and can follow and grasp everything he rattles of it isn’t very insightful or inspiring at all.
There are several kinds of “God” one can refer to. 1. The hypothetical being who created the universe (derived from the Kalam Cosmological Argument) 2. The laws/forces governing the material world 3. The being described in scriptures who appeared in specific events to specific people 4. The universal experience that one has of God, which could be described as something like a projection of one’s highest values, or one’s conscience. I believe this is what people are talking to when they believe that they are praying (based on my experience and the testimony of people who describe their prayer life) IMO, there is very good reason to believe in #1. It seems to me that if the cosmological argument is not valid, then the beginning of existence is totally outside the bounds of human understanding. If we trust our senses and our reason, then we KNOW that #2 exists. #4 comes from our own personal experience, so we KNOW that there is something in us that can be communicated with, and seems to have a will separate from our conscious will. If #1 exists, it seems reasonable to conclude that #1 and #2 could likely be the same thing (or at least related somehow). I see no evidence that 3 and 4 are connected with any of the others, however. They could be entirely different things (in which case, the testimony in scriptures is a combination of good psychology, false anthropomorphizing of natural phenomena, confusion, and wishful thinking). Given that I think Christianity is the most profound of all the religions in principle, but that there is immense confusion within the churches, I believe this is the most-likely scenario.
I studied Jung for 10+ years. I know what he meant when he said those words. There is a thread running through all ‘religions’ which is the same, same, same. The task for those who want to know is to be able to transcend all opposites. And as that is usually a spontaneous experience even the ‘task’ is probably meaningless. There are few people who ‘know’, millions who believe irrationally, and those who want to know, but to ‘want to know’ will mean abandoning all materialism, but as we have been conditioned otherwise, it is virtually impossible. I would say watch the progress of quantum theory and read ‘The Tao of Physics’ by Fritjof Capra. It was written in the 1970s but certainly relevant to this discussion. ☮
“…he comes to the realization that all of creation is substantially nothing but a mere idea-play of God’s own nature, and that NOTHING IN THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE EXISTS BESIDES HIS OWN SELF.” ~The Holy Science “I am the light that is over All. I am The All. The All comes FROM me and unfolds TOWARD me. Split a piece of wood, there I am. Lift up the stone, you have found me there.” ~Jesus “He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own recognized him not.” ~Jesus “When you come to know yourselves, you will be known…” ~Jesus
“We” are all prisoners born of “God’s” conception, therefore “God” has yet to be born. Try and think of what happens in the split-second an egg becomes fertilized., now imagine on a god-scale from within higher intra-dimensional levels that “we”, along with nature/physical reality, are the byproduct of that process unfolding. So there’s no reason whatsoever to fear or worship., THAT which “we” all are already a part of. The Shiva Linga is the precursor of the Holy Trinity in describing what is taking place across intra-dimensional levels of existence of a singular being’s metamorphosis into…, a God? Just as the physical universes experience multiple crunches and expansions like a heartbeat., this being “we” are all part of, will eventually reach a stage in its progress where it will withdraw into itself all of the knowledge or data acquired through experiences from those separate individual consciousnesses whose Souls were able to make it through and beyond the life stages of Mineral, Vegetable and Animal. That’s all “we” are., packets of information whose ego-identity becomes sacrificed upon subsumption into the One. Do any of you know what you’re really asking for in seeking ultimate liberation? If you enjoy inhabiting a human or any other form capable of expressing your individual character and Will., you’re not ready for mergence. With that said., Who are my parents?
His letter is awfully convoluted to say the least. I don’t think he knew what he thought he knew. They say true experts explain their subject matter such that laymen can understand. I add, “in a sentence of 10 words or less.” That Perteson was heavily influenced by Jung comes as no suprise. He’s equally convoluted at times.
i got into jung some time ago. it’s weird because I arrived on the same conclusion from another angle (to me god was Chaos), but i see a commonality and a bridge between his and mine interpretation: the Self is all the possibilities of what i could become from birth. at that moment it was pure chaos, or it would have been determined to be something else (still, in the limits given by being a human). knowing yourself, your mind, is the same as meeting the personal god he talks about, in which they’re both pure chaos. only chaos can have an essence: the other things are structured and formed in an orderly way by things around them, by laws of physics or our interpretation of them. your Self then gets formed by your experiences and actions, what you’ve perceived and what you’ve produced, narrowing down a path of habit and identification to external things to itSelf, creating your personality, a mask that covers your essence. uncovering that mask is caused by a psychedelic experience (like schizophrenia, where you don’t have to make an effort to discover your mind, because you project it on the external world. other kinds of psychosis lock you in into the chain, diverting it from going in a straight line to going in a loop. you then see your mind not because of a projection, but because of habit) or thought (like jung’s realization that you’re both a subject and an object. this happens early in childhood and could explain why everybody has believed in a god, unconsciously, until they decided they didn’t, because they couldn’t experience it nor think about it.
Theta (θ)4–8 HzDeeply relaxed, inward focused is 1 of the 5 brain states highly associated with Vivid day dreaming, hypnosis, and childlike imagination. I would bet money that Carl Jungs brain was in Theta ALOT MORE than the average person or at the very least he can access it fairly easily Which gives him insights into all kinds of things that normal humans would never think of or put together. A vivid daydreamer as well which studies show activates problem solving parts of the brain while allowing you to vividly see what you are thinking about as if you are there. I believe Jung had these quirks in spades and It highly contributed to his personality and works. Brilliant man.
When as a young person you believe in a fulfilment to be wholesome as a person and the journey in life that is yours to choose (whatever comes along the way) to believe in God to be of completion of oneself, is to be as good as one can be upon realisation of the past mistakes that are almost inevitable in whatever road life takes you down. From a man’s point of view his utmost goal allegedly is to be of his own making of fulfilment as said to know his own God.
Well jung as he wrote in his red book he had deep insights into the subconcious one thing i can say from hundred of lsd trips is yes i know and there are ways of knowing a deeper level of human existence. Of course i dont want to glorify lsd but the substance just invokes someting that is shared in all our brains. This deeper level can also be acessed by a lot of difference practices. Meditation for example
I think this statement is so complex it’s not a simple as saying he’s a pantheist or a Christian or an atheist. It’s like saying God is something that you cannot even comprehend, but at the same time it’s so simple. Like he was a Christian and pantheist I feel like he was also like CS Lewistown so I wouldn’t consider him too materialistic though
I think we need to question “faith” itself. I see people always demanding to see God, to hear God, criticize religion for believing in the non sense. Emphasis on “sense”. God here isn’t just Jesus, or any particular god. What they’re trying to do is to make sense out of the universe. They try to bring logic into faith and therefore try to destroy faith, claiming it is irrational. And it is irrational. But that is exactly the reason it’s called “faith”. If you believe in God because you can see him, what makes “God” different than just a man of higher position (pardon my poor English vocabulary)? In that scenario you don’t actually believe in god, you believe in your logical world where god is just another logical subject. Hence Kierkegaards words “Leap of Faith”, to have faith in something that requires no explanation, no logical reason, to do something without excuse. It’s faith for one authentic self, not some kind of oppressing order in the disguise of religion. Now the problem lies in wether you want to settle down with the answer of faith, or you discard it and wander into the free and meaningless dark, which is where the line between monotheistic and atheistic existentialism. I think that’s why Carl Jung “knows”, yet he can’t explain it. Because it will no longer be “faith” if he explain it.
It is interesting to note how psychiatry circles always incline towards pagan concepts of god. And that is easy to understand… if they were Christians, psychiatry would not be needed. Living God is true nourishment and a beacon to the soul. Without God it easily gets lost. Jung was one of the lost souls as he was in his psychotic phases talking to the spirits, demons, etc. He was saying himself that his house was full of spirits and his whole family was trembling with fear.
Thanks to Paul Chek I’ve trained my senses to sense things that I suppose most people haven’t opened up to much yet. Maybe they have, but probably not consciously. I can sense things like the spirit in birds and maybe even trees. In people, too. It’s not too keen, my sense on that, yet, but I can sense it. And it’s not overly hard to do it once you follow some simple things. But… the point was, immediately when Jung started speaking on this article, I sensed a very “holy” spirit in him, in absence of a better one-word description. Like his soul had… clarity, and connection to where it came from even, perhaps. We all do have a soul, or at least us humans and animals do. And plants. Sorry. I tend to make too long comments and speak in a way that some people don’t understand a word, even though to me it’s plain english and plain real things. Nothing out of the ordinary really. So this was just my take on why I think Jung was totally honest and on point about whatever he knew about God.
If God is a concept then what is God? If God is in everything, it is worth thinking, what else is? Life. Life, for sure, is within everything. That being so, either God is equal to Life or God is under the umbrella and dominion of Life. What Law governs Life? None other than the inescapable Law of Cause and Effect. This Law governs all life’s functions from the tiniest particles to the furthest reaches of the Universe. It is life that must be cherished above all; first and foremost.
Believing, similar to thinking can be faulted and wrong. If you know, it means one has had undeniable conscious experiences so thinking and believing are unnecessary and lesser forms of human functioning. Most people would say thinking and sometimes believing are impossible to stop or not have. Truth is beyond which nullifies the usefulness of thinking or believing… Yes, one can go beyond the use of these two faculties.s
Carl Jung posits in Aion(and probably other works as well) that God is within us. So, to know God is to know yourself. And to know yourself is to find paradise on Earth. Dostoevsky claimed similarly that if we all knew ourselves (took all the sins of mankind upon ourselves, which is to become truly self-conscious), then mankind would produce heaven on earth in one day. So, you could say that before you can know God, you must first (and it must happen in that order) meet Satan, who also lies within. On a side note, it is interesting that “Carl Jung” means “Free young man” when you join the two, and he spent most of his life trying to throw light on the unconscious contents that, in many instances, can imprison our conscious desires. It was if he was fated for the life he lived, and the miracle was that he voluntarily chose to be led by his fate.
The “vesica piscies” (or fish bladder) is drawn by describing the area of overlap contained by two intersecting identically sized circles set as far apart as their radii. The circle is a diagram of a field of influence of a single point – equal in all directions on a plane. This perfection is the embodiment of the Creator. The Creator’s influence upon mankind is described by the vesica piscies because man (the second circle) is made in the image of god, but is only given form where he intersects with his Creator. Hence the Christ figure is commonly depicted as occupying the vesica piscies in mediævil art. This defining of a separate realm in which the Creator and its creation can be said to exist together is the primary form of the objective world. Before the formation of the vessica piscies all was undefined and without a boundary. Consciousness requires an observer who is separated from that which it is observing. This is objectified or objective reality. In this sense objective reality can only exist where the hearts and minds of all is aligned with its Creator – all else is subjective and prone to corruption. Science can therefore said to be objective and true in the aspects of reality it is investigating. Anyone of good faith must reach the same conclusions the scientific method arrives at. This is not to say there is no objective reality outside of the material world. But we must be aware to remain objective about the non material world we must retain the integrity of our faculties.
Funny how people think one can see God. Jung’s knowledge of God isn’t a matter of intellect, that is, it isn’t quantifiable. “Truth is irrational”. X said Einstein explained, “time is matter moving through space”. Y replied, “..then, space is the mind and everything else is matter and time or ‘present’ consciousness is the nexus of the two.” This interaction IS life and mirrors the ‘external’ universe, “in the image of”. The external universe is ‘space which contains matter’, while the inner universe is ‘matter which contains space’, (This being metaphor, not ‘theoretical physics’). Angelus Selesius: ~ Ich bin wie Gott, und Gott wie ich. Ich bin so groß als Gott, er ist als ich so klein: Er kann nicht über mich, ich unter ihm nicht sein. I am like God and God like me. I am as Large as God, He is as small as I. He cannot above me, nor I beneath him be. The mind, spirit, soul, ‘nous’ are synonymous and do not exist in any physical sense. The mind (space) is unbounded emptiness. All ‘matter’ exists within it and it exists within, or permeates, all matter. The symbolic and the material are linked. While awake we see things as symbols. In dreams we see symbols as things. Good (love) is a direction ‘towards’ and evil (hate) a direction, ‘away-from’. One attracts and creates (brings together), the other repulses and destructs (forces apart) yet one cannot exist without the other. When we mistakenly rationalize what we believe to be the truth we deceive ourselves. Truth cannot be rationalized.
Jesus Christ! I said this to my therapist a month ago after experiencing a series of traumatic events and having been an atheist all my life… After these events unfolded I finally understood what God was. I still consider myself an atheist — but with an atheism, in the name of God. I don’t even like using the word, God, if I’m being honest. The word God, especially as a noun, already says too much. I go to church amongst the Christians in my community, simply because I enjoy scripture and deep discussions around it. I find the one thing that tends to separate me from them, is that they still will tell you they “believe” that God exists because they have “Faith”; on the contrary, I do not need to believe nor have Faith, at least not in regards to whether or not “God” exists. I believe in him and have Faith, insofar as I trust in him. I have faith and believe that what God is telling me is the right thing to do, even if it can be hard to see at first and/or requires great sacrifice.
God is very very real! He send us signs that we can only see if we constantly have God on our mind. Like for example they say “your life flashes before your eyes” before you pass. If you pay attention to Jesus/God the answers to life flash before your eyes. It all clicks in together! The biggest realization I had was listening to the Devil vs Angle on the two shoulders. The Devil on our shoulder tells us things like “it’s ok to eat junk/fake food” … then when we do it the same dark sneery voice shames us for doing it. Both the Devil and God is within us. This is why we need to repent and be honest with ourselves to see how much that dark voice played us out of fear and greed. The devil tricks us into thinking “I want to be happy” so people fall for the “happily ever after” curse. They get get something then onto the next thing. It’s the cycle of insanity. This is why Jesus wore a plain old robe and sandals. “Enough is enough” … what is enough? A roof over our head, a warm meal from the garden/farm and a loving family to share it with. We don’t need flashy homes, cards or stupid hook-up culture. It’s all greed and insanity that causes more problems in the long run.
I know that no god has visited, contacted or mind-travelled to this planet. That doesn’t mean it can’t happen but the likelihood is now sub zero. Too much time has elapsed. The amazing likelihood that we are the aware, sensate, intelligent and imaginative product of the three base elements (space, energy, Laws that govern their interactions) is, to an Atheist, freakishly awesome and at the same time humbling. The Universe could not care less about this upstart sapiens thing, only we can: Post Nihilist Atheism Rocks.
The philosophies of limited men mingled with scripture. Men have, since the beginning, sought to reduce God to something indefinable and unknowable (It’s easy to remain unaccountable to an unknown God!). The first principle of revealed religion is, and has always been, to know for a SURETY the personality and character of God. What power has your faith if you do not know Him? If you do not have a correct and certain understanding of His attributes, how will you ever take advantage of the tender mercies He has made freely available to the children of men? Do not bind God with all these specious and invalid platitudes regarding His personality and character. Go find Him for yourself. Humble yourself before Him. Pray. Ask in faith. Ask with sincerity. He will make himself known to you by the power of the Holy Ghost.
I would have answered this question the exact same way that Jung did. And I am the prophesied return of the biblical prophet Elijah. Here is what I mean when I say “I don’t have to believe, I know.” And this may be precisely what Jung meant. But I am a man of fewer words: I know that there is an absolute Reality that one can call “GOD,” which is in total control of absolutely everything because it IS absolutely everything. GOD is the Mind that is ALL. And I know this because I have found this Truth through Reason and Revelation, such that I cannot possibly believe otherwise. See “The Book of GOD,” which can be read in 5 minutes online at no cost. Click and ye shall find.
Isn’t this an obsolete outlook? Today we’ve learned that we humans are the product of hundreds of millions of years of evolution unfolding upon this Earth. Earth’s processes created our bodies, our physical body/brain produces our consciousness. Then mind is most fundamentally the inside reflection of our body interacting with itself and its environment. (see: Solms, Damasio) Our consciousness is the wellspring of all our thoughts, our gods and science and music and arts and learning, etc..
Some have suggested that we are biologically wired to the concept of God. As though it fills some gap in our conciousness that keeps us balanced. But that also means that God does not literally exist. Believers will argue ‘Oh I feel God, therefore he must exist’. Well you would say that because your brain is telling you he does. It’s hard if not totally impossible to disconnect what you ‘feel’ from what you ‘know’. No amount of intellectual analysis can without a doubt eliminate God if he is so deeply fixed within us.
To mention Jordan Peterson’s name with any connection to Jung would be a blemish on Jung and rather insulting. as Jordan has a misconceived soul who is yet to be conscious. In regards to what Jung said about knowing, I believe that this free audio book explains it fully – Riddle of the sages the book of answers – youtu.be/STvg8ris-mY
Jung had great contributions to psychology but much of his lecturing and writing seems incoherent and/or inconsistent. The longer he speaks the more confusing he gets. Brilliant or im lanced? He thought he may have psychosis at one point in his life. He married both of the influences of his father,( a Christian pastor) and his mother (a psychic who delved into occult practices) to form his worldview. More like a Hindu, Buddhist, and Aristotle than Jesus and Christianity. Christianity proclaims God is knowable because He revealed Himself in His Son. As Paul said to the Greek philosophers, ” He is not far from each of us” (Acts 17) God is beyond total human comprehension in this life but Christ has made him known for all. Jung would not have proclaimed such. He’d rather have kept God in the unknowable category yet say he knew He existed.
Actually, I have that philosophy about knowing, it’s kind of stepping forward much more in believing, when you believe of something you don’t care if there is proof or not, you just have faith on it ….but when you know about something means you have a proof about it and you don’t care if others consider that proof or not ….so I feel of God, I know He is everywhere, I have my own proof…
He stopped just short of declaring God is Good all the time, God must still hold his integrity together when integris peiple are stoned and turn to Stone This world and your brain are in trouble,your sould in danger of eternity in fire. God wants to Love and Forgive .. it’s his nature. But if denied and no responsabilty taken by your ass,you’ll find yourself in Hell forever..
God as explained by Paul Chek Is puré potentiality, point zero as Stephen Hawkins theorized. This means God allays says YES. Even “good” or “bad” and he let the superior will imposes himself. Evil, Satan in the Bible is a son of God that he could easily destroy but he didn’t he was compassionate to the disgust of him for the creation. To me that’s the deepest concept of God
It is very simple. In Kantian terms, Dr. Jung’s knowledge is based on what his senses can perceive. Dr. Jung does not believe because believing, for him, implies not knowing. He somehow perceives God in his mind. He cannot explain this knowledge. Dr. Jung is very confused here. First, he cannot know God unless God reveals himself to Dr. Jung. We cannot know God by our senses, only by faith. He is therefore a human being like all of us. On the other hand, God reveals himself through his creation, and probably Dr. Jung’s knowledge is limited to this knowledge, but it is not enough. He needs a personal relationship with God to really know him, and really to know him for his salvation. This is why God sent his only son Jesus in the form of a human being to redeem us all from our sins. I hope Dr. Jung got to know Jesus in a very personal and intimate way.
You can go around it all you want he said it best himself he believed in God and now he doesn’t. Everyone that’s a true followers of christ knows he has interfaith teachings that conflict with the word of God. He did not speak the real truth in his life. He denied what we must confess. Everyone of you that looks to this man as a prophet/great speaker. You will be barred from life for seeing what it really is for you are being entertained with a false prophet with a false spirit. Take it from an ex atheist that used to believe carls words then felt the power of the real Jesus christ and knew he did not compare. Nothing compares. All that seeking in which you trouble over is only but a short journey, but the Love of the heart,fleshly things will deny what is good and send you astray. Truth isn’t subjective as we witness from murders and rapists that their truth doesn’t hold up. But the word of God is forever neverchanging.
Not everyone has the spiritual genetics to know God the way Jung does. Most will live their existence thinking they have, but it won’t even be revealed that they had no clue even after they pass. I understand Jung (and God) as we are of the same ilk. Until a being makes it to our level, they will be reincarnating over and over until their soul develops the wisdom to reach ascension. If you don’t understand what he means, you’re ass needs to come back to earth a few (or million) more times before you’ll ever.
There is no doubt that there is an amazing creation and there is no doubt that none of us could have ever achieved such an accomplishment…thats all we know and to that creation,gratitute is the least we can show.All the rest about Gods,religions,sins,heaven and hell,deviL,antichrist is pure nonsense based on stories,prejudices,ignorance and the insufficiency of the human mind
100% I’m here. I do believe there’s a higher being ( if we name him god so be it) he is known by many names but he is the great architect regardless. His blood runs through our vains and his name found in our dna, Our father was that missing link that scientists can’t find? We now have access to what ever you wish to learn or seek! Take the jump down the rabbit hole and you too will also be more in lighted. The words written in the bible are truly our blue print and the same in any faith, we as humans ( kings. leaders. People who wanted to be seen higher than he would change the wording only to there benefit or to rule a place that was unruly ie no policing. Hope this makes sense. ❤️
Atheists cringe when someone says “I belive in God”, because they automatically picture some hairy dude from non-sensical stories from bible. What if god is something completely else? Just some power in the universe you don’t need to praise at all? What is to “a god” if you go to a pointy building every Sunday? What is to “a god” whether you eat pork or chicken? It’s not about whether there is or isn’t god, it is more about whether people made up stuff to worship or whether people just want to find real answers.