Mystic Diner and Restaurant in Mystic, Connecticut, offers a family-friendly atmosphere and delicious food. With 1,324 unbiased reviews on Tripadvisor, the restaurant is ranked 18 out of 78 restaurants in Mystic. The menu is massive and offers everything from burgers to seafood. The restaurant is open from 7:00 AM to 11:00 PM and has 3 stars.
The Mystic Diner and Restaurant is a lovely retro-looking establishment with a counter, booths, and tables. The menu is massive, offering a comfortable dining experience without waiting. The service is excellent, and the food is very good. The staff is friendly and helpful, even refilling coffee in a to-go cup for customers.
Despite the slow and unprofessional staff, the food is good, portions are large, and pricing is reasonable. The staff is also nice, and the food is good, with portions large and reasonable prices. The restaurant has lower prices, greater local appeal, and more emphasis on customer service than the previous Equinox Diner.
The Blarney Stones with their chips is a popular choice, with a good dip. Other popular restaurants in Mystic include Howard Johnson’s, Via Emilia, The Irons Restaurant and Bar, The Shipwright’s Daughter, Trattoria Amalfi, and The Port of Call. The restaurant is a great place to eat while staying at Howard Johnson’s and offers delivery and pickup options.
📹 Ed Harris’ Meltdown
While promoting “History of Violence” at the 2004 Toronto International Film Festival, costar Ed Harris caused some tension when …
Why is Mystic CT so popular?
Mystic, a premier vacation destination in Connecticut, was founded in 1654 and subsequently became a prominent shipbuilding center during the clipper ship era. In the present era, the city is renowned for its exemplification of the quintessential New England charm and is the site of two of Connecticut’s most visited attractions: the Mystic Seaport and the Mystic Aquarium.
Is Mystic Connecticut wealthy?
Mystic, CT, with a population of 4. 42k in 2022, experienced a 1. 45 increase in population from 4, 354 to 4, 417 between 2021 and 2022, and a 10. 2 increase in median household income from $115, 065 to $126, 854. The largest ethnic groups in Mystic are White (Non-Hispanic), Two+ (Non-Hispanic), Asian (Non-Hispanic), American Indian and Alaska Native (Non-Hispanic), and Black or African American (Non-Hispanic). None of the households in Mystic, CT reported speaking a non-English language at home as their primary shared language.
What movie is being filmed in Mystic CT?
The Hallmark Christmas movie “Mystic Christmas” is a “love letter to Mystic”, filmed in the Connecticut village of Mystic Seaport Village. The movie features a love story about rescuing and rehabilitating stranded and sick marine mammals at the Connecticut aquarium. The story follows aquarium higher-up Candice, who calls on her best friend, a traveling marine veterinarian Juniper, to help a seal recuperate for Christmas.
Juniper had a whirlwind romance with Candice’s brother Sawyer ten years ago, which ended in a miscommunication and lingering awkward feelings. The movie serves as a reminder of the importance of the holiday season.
Why is Mystic famous?
Mystic, a significant Connecticut seaport, was built over 135 years starting in 1784 and is now home to the largest maritime museum in the United States. The village is located on the Mystic River, which flows into Fishers Island Sound, and is home to the Mystic River Bascule Bridge. The name “Mystic” is derived from the Pequot term “missi-tuk”, which describes a large river whose waters are driven into waves by tides or wind. The population was 4, 348 at the 2020 census.
Before the 17th century, the Pequot people lived in southeastern Connecticut, controlling a considerable amount of territory. The Five Nations of the Iroquois dominated the land linked by the Great Lakes and the Hudson River, allowing trading between the Iroquois and the Dutch. The Pequots were settled just distant enough to be secure from any danger.
The Pequot War, which occurred between 1636 and 1638, profoundly affected the Mystic area. In May 1637, captains John Underhill and John Mason led a mission through Narragansett land, striking the Pequot Indian settlement in Mystic, known as the Mystic massacre. On September 21, 1638, the colonists signed the Treaty of Hartford, officially ending the Pequot War.
Is mystic CT worth seeing?
Mystic is a popular destination for leisure activities, offering a variety of attractions such as the Mystic Seaport Museum, historical wooden boat cruises on the Sabino, and a diverse selection of restaurants, including Via Emilia, Oyster Club, Shipwrights Daughter, and Red 36.
Is Mystic Pizza worth it?
Mystic Pizza is a charming coming-of-age movie featuring a charming cast and excellent performances by Roberts, Gish, and Taylor. The movie explores themes of family embarrassment, roots, and the impact of family on friendships and relationships. Despite its dated clothing, hairstyles, and music, the movie remains enjoyable for audiences. It encourages discussions about family values and the importance of roots in forming strong relationships.
Is Mystic CT a tourist trap?
Mystic Pizza, a quirky storefront opened by the Zelepos family in 1976, is located at the top of a hill in New Haven. The storefront has been slightly renovated, but the mahogany wooden tables and dim overhead lighting transport visitors back to the early days. The thick crust and cheese-first pizza is not expected at Mystic Pizza, which softens the heart to tourist traps.
The end of the street leads to a harbor tucked into a quiet canal, populated by rich people’s sailboats. The water reflects the area, creating paintings on a canvas of rippling blackness. The Mystic River Bascule Bridge, where Kat drives her moped to work at the family lobster business, is a famous landmark.
For more stimulation, visitors can visit the Mystic Aquarium and Institute for Exploration, known for its beluga whales, or Mystic Seaport, one of the premier maritime museums in the world. The public beach with a shoreline of 100 meters straight is a popular spot for swimming and watching the sun set behind a jagged line of trees.
Is downtown Mystic walkable?
Downtown Mystic offers a variety of attractions, shops, and restaurants, making it an ideal destination for walking and exploring the historic district. Activities include exploring the Mystic River and enjoying delicious meals. Parking options are plentiful, with 15-minute and two-hour free designated spaces available on residential side streets and paid lots, including one at the Mystic Museum of Art. For more information on parking and prices, visit the Mystic Museum of Art website.
Is Mystic a good place to live?
Mystic, a densely populated suburb in New London County, Connecticut, is a highly sought-after residential area for its suburban ambience, high proportion of homeowners, and its reputation as a haven for retirees with a penchant for liberalism.
📹 Roger Ebert yelling at Sundance
Here is Roger Ebert doing what he does best, responding to another person’s review of Better Luck Tomorrow. This is Ebert in top …
Schneider got into a vocal feud with film critic Patrick Goldstein for his derisive opinion of his films by questioning his fitness to comment because he didn’t win any journalistic awards. Another film critic, Roger Ebert, entered the argument by noting that he himself won a Pulitizer Prize for his film criticism and thus felt entitled to say to Schneider, “Your film sucks.” Despite the conflict, when Ebert fell seriously ill, Schneider sent a large bouquet of flowers with a note saying “Your least favorite actor, Rob Schneider.” Ebert was deeply moved by his gesture and noted that Schneider was a good man despite the quality of his films and hoped to see him in a good film he could praise.
The fact that the man before Roger described Asian Americans as though they’re another species, an idea, not allowed to simply be people, was disgusting. I agree with Roger wholeheartedly. How demeaning to suggest that Asian Americans are obligated to present people with their ethnicity in a certain way.
Film criticism will never be the same without Roger Ebert. He was a unique talent — a genius, really — who invested his reviews with passion, enthusiasm, condemnation, and humor. He told it like it was, from his point of view, and never sold out to Hollywood interests. Movie reviews are poorer for his absence.
The film they’re talking about is “Better Luck Tomorrow.” It’s about a group of high-performing Asian-American high school students who undertake to corner the drug trade at their school, figuring correctly that as long they keep their grades up no one will suspect them and their parents won’t notice their odd behavior. It’s quite good.
Over the years, I’ve always had this clip at the back of my mind when creating my own art. I often struggle with whether to ‘represent’ my own people, when what I really want to represent is myself. Having someone as respected as Roger Ebert literally stand up and say “You have the right to be whoever the hell you want to be!” is damn affirming stuff.
One of Roger’s greatest legacies was in showing HOW to have an informed perspective, a clear point of view, and not apologize for it. He would always state plainly that his opinion was just that, an opinion and you could share it with him or not. The point wasn’t having an opinion or not, it was being able to DEFEND your opinion with passion, vigor and love.
Roger Ebert was not only my favorite critic of any form of entertainment ever, but also just one of my favorite writers. This was a man who knew exactly HOW to speak his mind, and exactly how to say why he did or didn’t like something. Even when I didn’t agree with him, I loved hearing what he had to say.
People saying that Ebert didn’t have any right to critique movies because he couldn’t write them need to have their fucking heads checked. The fact that I can’t make article games doesn’t mean I can’t have an opinion on them. To those saying he set himself up as the “master critic” who dictated what opinions people had, the reason he became such a popular film critic is because he was, quite simply, very good at writing about movies. I don’t agree with all of his reviews of course, but the fact is he was a very talented film critic and he got where he was because he was talented. I guess now I have to read a bunch of replies calling him fat and not making any points of their own.
Holy fuck, this comment section is disgusting. So many people saying shit like “he’s in hell now” “fatso is dead” (random comments about his appearance). Who the fuck are you to judge? Yeah he was a film critic, big fucking deal. It was his job to review films. You may not have agreed with some or many of his reviews, but that doesn’t give you any right to make meaningless and heartless insults, especially after his death. I also see comments implying he has no right to critique movies, because he wrote a film that turned out to be bad. That seems really fucking hypocritical if you ask me. I’m sure many of you have said you hated a film, and haven’t even attempted to make one yourself. It’s disgusting to see so many people act like this, especially towards someone they barely knew.
You don’t get it. The *other guy* in the audience was being condescending to Asian-American filmmakers, saying they couldn’t make a gangster film because they were Asian Americans. Ebert stood up and told him that the filmmakers had a right to make whatever kind of movie they wanted to make. Ebert was standing up against racial stereotypes of Asian-Americans. If somebody else is being condescending of Asian-Americans, that’s the EXACT time and place to stand up and shove it back in their faces!
It’s hard to tell with the article quality, but the guy talking crap before Ebert gets up kinda looks like the guy that was filmed yelling shit at Lucky McKee after the screening of The Woman at Sundance. Again, poor footage quality makes it hard to really tell, but from what I can make out of his face it does look like him. Not to mention the remarks he spouts being equally idiotic. May not be, but I get that vibe.
That was the whole point of the film, to point out that Asian Americans are not just a cookie cutter, model minority, that we can be smart, hard working, studious, model citizens but can also be bored, rebellious, and criminal at the same time. God Bless Roger for pointing out the hypocracy and for standing up for a great film and the people who made it. P.S. I don’t what race you are, everybody wants to be like Han.
If you check out Siskel and Ebert’s reviews even in their very early days in the 1970s, they express this same sentiment. To me, it’s disappointing that today more than ever the PC police force the kind of conformity he’s protesting here. If Do the Right Thing were made today, it would get a huge backlash for not showing Black Americans in a purely flattering light, or with their flaws being a direct consequence of some form of victimhood. Real equality is when people can make the art they want to make regardless of expected societal representations. People who argue film has to show xyz race or culture in a certain way aren’t interested in artistic freedom or even artistic expression, just in “good-sounding” propaganda.
And what’s especially sad is that kind of Identity Politics has completely overtaken the Internet and, increasingly the wider world, disguised as “Political Correctness”. ” I’m Not Going To Spend My Life Being A Color” but the sad thing is, anymore, your color is all you are. Same with your gender (Be it the same as your biological sex or not), economic standing, voting record, etc. All you are is the identities chance assigned to you, and if you try to disagree with that, you are part of the problem. I found this article linked to a review on Ebert’s site that basically said just that, criticizing the film “The Tribe” for daring to show a bunch of deaf teens engaged in antisocial behavior. The very thing Ebert was decrying is now found on his site, and that is a damn shame.
One of the best paragraphs I’ve read anywhere is from Ebert’s review of the human centipede: “I am required to award stars to movies I review. This time, I refuse to do it. The star rating system is unsuited to this film. Is the movie good? Is it bad? Does it matter? It is what it is and occupies a world where the stars don’t shine.”
His reasons for getting up and speaking are his, but what he did speak was simple logic. What’s scary is how many people are cheering and championing this because it shows how far away this kind of approach – logical thinking – is from the norm of the masses. He smiles as he sits down at the end because he knows, with full confidence, that he’s won this argument because he knows, with full confidence, he spoke pure logic.
way to go Roger Ebert! he’s absolutely right of course. no film has to represent any group of people in any particular way( except in a way that is racist and offensive) unless it is intended to be that way from the filmmakers from the start. again except racist or offensive. a film should tell whatever story the filmmakers want to tell within reason. and as long as it is true the to the source material if there is any. movies are a story telling medium. one that like all story telling mediums should be about the storytellers having fun with an idea or being creative about one or sometimes both. as long as we all can enjoy the end result that’s all that matters.
Check out some of the comments on this article with one dude using the same accounts to come back after YEARS and say the same thing. It’s the ones that keep referring to Ebert as “it”, his bad screenplays and something about alcoholism. The accounts almost always post right after eachother in agreement using the exact same words and grammar. I think ZarahLean is the main account, it’s the oldest and looks like the most used. Either way its hard to interpret but it’s truly bizarre, anybody know the story here?
Roger is 100% right and this is the absolute worst part about the left in the last couple of years. Largely white, well educated, relatively wealthy strata of society has been going around telling everyone, including minorities, how they should feel, act, and be portrayed. In my experience, not one of them has actually talked to minorities – because when I do – they all say the same thing: that these rich, white social justice warriors aren’t speaking for them – nor elevating actual minority voices. They are elevating their own – witness by every time they do screaming matches, try to yell over and disrupt presentations, JUST LIKE THIS GUY DID.
Nicely said. That applies to a lot of different groups as well. Especially with women. So many “feminist” get up in arms if a woman in fiction is portrayed as weak or cowardly, saying that such depictions are an “attack on women”, as if the character has to represent all of women. That sound like a pretty boring character to me.
He didn’t apologize, and he didn’t have to. It was his opinion and he kept it. He said that he was not an authority on the matter, so people that really think otherwise shouldn’t bother with his opinion. I don’t agree whith that, or with some of his movie reviews for that matter, but I considered him a highly respectable man, just because of that. No matter how unpopular his opinion sometimes was, he never gave in. He never changed his speech just because it wasn’t what people expecet of him.
He did 180 turn on many films. He didnt even say anything like oh this one grew on me, hated it first 3 times and now after 6th viewing i love it. No. He just started his 2nd review: absolute masterpiece. Genre defininf film. He just pretended that the first review didnt happen. And its funny he only changed his mind on films that flopped or bombed on their original theater release, but became to be considered as classics as years passed on. Like Carpenters the thing. He never did 180 on a film that bombed and wasnt liked 10y after. Only the ones that became to be appreciated and he never said i was wrong on 1st time, he just pretended that his new review was the first review.
All generations have positives and negatives. The boomers excelled at free individual self expression and building a human-centric “governing hierarchy” in the culture and humanities. Ebert was atop one of the pillars of that hierarchy, and he did his job very well IMO. These human-centric hierarchies have been stripped of individuals and replaced with “data” and mandatory inclusiveness. The problem with this is that they are closed systems built upon existing ideas about right and wrong, making them very inflexible and ultimately shallow.