Is Rhonda Rory A Conspiracy Theorist For Sandy Hook?

Former UFC and WWE star Ronda Rousey has apologized for sharing a conspiracy video about the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary shooting. Eleven years ago, Rousey posted a YouTube video questioning the facts behind the massacre, which killed twenty students and six staff members. The former mixed martial arts superstar and professional wrestler apologized for reposting a video in 2013 that spread conspiracy theories about the Sandy Hook massacre.

Rousey admitted that it was “11 years too late” for her to share a conspiracy theory about the Sandy Hook massacre. She called the 2013 post boosting the Sandy Hook conspiracy theory video her “most regrettable decision”. Rousey apologized for sharing a conspiracy theory on social media, stating that it was the single most regrettable thing she had done 11 years ago.

Rousey’s memoir, “Our Fight”, publisher “begged” her not to share the video. She said she deserves to be hated and should have been canceled more than a decade ago for sharing such a conspiracy video.

Rousey’s apology comes after her 2013 tweet about the Sandy Hook massacre, which her memoir publisher “begged” her not to do. She believes that her actions were a veritable lifetime in this age of warp-speed news cycles fueled by constant news cycles. Some results may have been delisted consistent with local laws.


📹 Ronda Rousey Apologizes for Sharing Sandy Hook Shooting Conspiracy Video | THR News

Ronda Rousey is apologizing for her 2013 tweet about the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting saying it was the single most …


📹 Sandy Hook victims harassed by conspiracy theorists

People claiming the Sandy Hook shooting didn’t occur are harassing families who lost loved ones. Anderson Cooper reports.


Is Rhonda Rory A Conspiracy Theorist For Sandy Hook?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Pramod Shastri

I am Astrologer Pramod Shastri, dedicated to helping people unlock their potential through the ancient wisdom of astrology. Over the years, I have guided clients on career, relationships, and life paths, offering personalized solutions for each individual. With my expertise and profound knowledge, I provide unique insights to help you achieve harmony and success in life.

Address: Sector 8, Panchkula, Hryana, PIN - 134109, India.
Phone: +91 9988051848, +91 9988051818
Email: [email protected]

About me

14 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • They bring up Rob Parker but they don’t show the clip of him smiling and laughing which is the initial reason why people doubted his credibility in the first place. They bring up Chris Manfridonia(spelling?) but they don’t show the helicopter footage of him and another unidentified person sprinting away from cops in the woods behind the building?

  • 26 funerals and 26 burials with thousands of people being directly or indirectly involved in this horrific tragedy and there are people that think that this was a ” false flag event ” or a ” ho ax ” or a ” fraud!!!” I wonder what their motivation is to spread false information, outright lies and gossip?!?!?! I wonder if the answer is that they don’t want to give up their AR-15 weapons?!?!?!

  • Thanks to Wolfgang Halbig, a former a law enforcement officer (U.S. Customs inspector and Florida state trooper), educator (public school coach, teacher, assistant principal and principal), and nationally-recognized school safety consultant, we have documentary evidence that SHES had moved to Chalk Hill Middle School at least months before December 2012, including invoices for food deliveries to Chalk Hill but billed to SHES.

  • I’ve been doing a lot of research on the shooting, looking at conspiracy theorists articles, and articles against these theorists to get both sides of the story. I’m not trying to start an argument or anything. But there are very valid points on both sides, for instance Emily’s father was LAUGHING with his friends before his interview(that is on article). also the page on facebook for emily was actually made BEFORE the shooting, that’s why i believe they took it down. people saw the date it was made.

  • Austin Prouty I haven’t done much research… but I did see the article you where talking about. Emily’s father was in fact laughing before the interview, then he got into character, and you seen how he was then, lol. Emily’s facebook page was indeed created 3 days before the shooting took place. You got to love how CNN(The News) play this game they play. “He heard popping sounds and smelt sulfur”… trying to get people to imaging what happened CNN? for what? because you want them to believe you.

  • There is a time for everything under the sun. So many things GOD rolled down a big canvas revealing sin. He is sick of his creation disrespecting HIM . A government system that doesn’t honor Him and causing Chaos everywhere. Let those that choose HIM acknowledge HIM as LORD our GOD. Those that choose not HIM is HIS enemies.

  • As a country, we thrive when all voices are heard, regardless of their position or capacity, and we rely on the ability of all Americans, whatever their beliefs or values, to come to their own conclusions. This is why the brilliant founders of this nation dedicated the first amendment to the Bill of Rights to the defense of and institution of the right of free speech. As soon as we decide as a country that certain people have the right to prevent others from speaking, then the fight begins over who the people selected for those very powerful positions will be and how we will chose them and this would be impossible for a free country–not that we are truly free in the United States–to do to the extent that it would protect the rights of all its citizens and fulfill the expectations of a simple majority of its people. Furthermore, in a Republic, the form of political organization the United States was conceived to be by the founders, 50% plus one, or 51% was never supposed to determine the outcome for the other 49% or 50% minus one of the nation’s citizenry. Not a big fan of Alex Jones, but LOVE that he has the right to voice what’s on his mind, just like we all should be able to do. This is the preeminent basis for the maintenance of our nation, and the only way things can get better is if more people feel free to express their ideas, thoughts and opinions in public without fear of what might come from their efforts to share their honest perspectives.

  • Have you stopped to think of the possibility of Tracy, being a professor in Journalism and all, being…you know, right? That men did not go to the media with his concern, he did not campaign against the parents or any victims, he simply questioned in his personal blog whether the matter went down as reported by the media. The media is the one campaigning against him and talking about how tax payers money pay his salary. Does he not have a right to voice a concern because he’s a professor?

  • “You seem to prefer all of info to come from the gov’t or the gov’t controlled media” funny thing to say seeing how the rights you hold so dearly come from a government. by trampling your rights and the constitution i assume you mean the second amendment, probably about guns correct? what well regulated militia are you a part of? are you also concerned about the tenth amendment? because it is pretty much ignored.

  • We are not asking for “blood samples”. We are asking for true investigative reporting, such as who pretended to be the principal because it was reported that she reported gunfire, then reported she died. Also, so many different stories and accounts of Victoria Soto’s class, first they all survived, then it changed. What about the so called parent, looked more like he was running away than running to the school. I am not saying it did not happen. I want answers to the misinformation of media.

  • the whole point of asking question is to make an assessment and verifying facts, and to further get closer to the truth. When a nurse make assessment of patient they ask questions, when a cop interrogate suspects they ask questions. That’s part of the process of finding proof. There’s no such thing as lacking verifiable proof when there is no proof in the first place, that’s where the questioning takes place. Understand?

  • for aurora, it is an on-going court case that the judge closed to the public (media cameras are not even allowed in the courtroom) . for sandy hook, i imagine a) because the investigation is still on-going, and b) there may be a decision not to release them- it is little kids getting shot- the parents might not want that in the public, or the police may feel it might inspire others to try something similar. there were hours and hours of columbine article never released for this latter reason.

  • I live in ct and I can tell You one thing this situation didn’t seem right when it happened because the interviews we were perusal on tv I remember my mother & I were perusal the interview and we seen a neighbor say the kids got dropped off at his house by the bus driver and that they sat in the living room until there parents came let me tell you this if your a bus driver your not gonna drop kids off to a random neighbor & what do you know the article is no where to be found

  • Well you know, people do get suspicious when that dad is laughing and chatting happily before the interview. And the coroner was saying the were wearing kids clothes and saying I don’t know and pulling his shoulders up. And don’t forget the fb memorial page for the teacher that was made before the incident. Something that they also did with the Boston bombing. A incident where the head of the sandy hook school died….but she also already died at sandy hook??? Hmmmmm. So yeah..I’m extremely suspicious of these incidents.

Pin It on Pinterest

We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
Accept
Privacy Policy