Nebula is a popular app for psychic readings, offering over 93.4 prediction accuracy and rated by real users. It features everything from relationship advice to tarot and palm readings, with over 500+ expert advisors available to help users navigate their astrological outlook. The app’s intuitive interface makes navigation seamless and enlightening.
Nebula is an astrology app available for iPhone and Android, running in six languages and downloaded more than eight million times. It is the No. 1 astrology app in the United States and offers personalized horoscopes, compatibility tools, astrology consultations, and a community for astrology lovers. Users can access daily predictions, chat with astrologers, and learn about their Sun.
Founded by a Ukrainian startup, Nebula is a free app and website that offers personalized astrology content and psychic readings based on users’ birth charts and lunar phases. The app has been rated 7 out of 8 best companies in the category Astrologer on Trustpilot and 7 out of 7 best companies in the category Fortune Telling Service on Trustpilot.
Nebula is a great tool for beginners who want to learn more about astrology and has earned the title of the top lifestyle app on both the Apple App Store and Google. If you are looking for the best overall astrology app, Astrology Zone can be your prime choice.
Over 151,830 user reviews have been run through our NLP system, indicating that Nebula is a legit app. The app is a great tool for beginners who want to learn more about astrology and provides all the information they need.
📹 Nebula App Review
Nebula astrology app, was a highly requested review. @nebulahoroscope On IG &TIKTOK On IG & TIKTOK: @queerstrology …
Is the Nebula astrology app free?
Nebula, a free astrology app founded by Ukrainian startup OBRIO CEO Alex Fedorov, is available on iOS, Android, and the Web. The first version was released for iOS in May 2019, followed by the Android version in July 2020. Nebula expanded to the Web in January 2021, focusing on personalized astrology content and psychic readings, after gaining demand for mobile applications. The app’s MVP was unveiled in January 2021.
How trustworthy is Nebula?
Nebula Genomics company reputation. Nebula Genomics is accredited by the Better Business Bureau and boasts an A rating on the BBB website. There are only six customer reviews, and they’re all 1-star, with most comments being about extended results wait times past the suggested 12-14 week period. The company’s team does respond to customers in an attempt to clear up any misunderstandings, which we can appreciate.
Under the customer complaints section, most of the 58 comments read the same as in the reviews — issues with the wait times for results. There are also a handful of complaints about how complex the results are compared to tests from other companies.
On its verified Trustpilot page, Nebula Genomics is rated “Average” with a score of 3. 1 out of 5 stars from 769 total reviews. As with the BBB comments and complaints, many of the reviewers on Trustpilot are expressing frustration with the wait time for their results. There are also a fair amount of complaints surrounding customer service and pricing.
Which astrology app is more accurate?
Astro Mukti is a comprehensive astrology app launched by Acharya Mukti Bhurtel, a globally acclaimed astrologer in India. The app offers various features such as chat, call with astrologers, tarot reading, face reading, palm reading, numerology, Vastu, and Western astrology services. It caters to global customers interested in astrology and provides in-depth personalized readings and accurate predictions for various life facets.
The app combines ancient Vedic astrology and spirituality with modern technology, allowing users to access seasoned and certified astrologers from the comfort of their homes. With just one click, individuals can receive personal guidance and insights from a variety of seasoned and certified astrologers.
Is Nebula good or bad?
Nebula is a Marvel Comics character created by Roger Stern and John Buscema. Initially a supervillain, Nebula later became an antihero and member of the Guardians of the Galaxy. She has been adapted into various media, including animated television series and video games. Karen Gillan has portrayed Nebula in various Marvel Cinematic Universe films, including Guardians of the Galaxy, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2,, Avengers: Infinity War, Avengers: Endgame, Thor: Love and Thunder, The Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special, and Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3.
Who is the best astrologer with accurate predictions?
Pradip Verma, a distinguished Vedic astrologer in India, provides consultations to elucidate the cosmic forces that shape one’s life. His innovative approach and unparalleled expertise in Vedic science make him the most qualified astrologer in India.
Does Nebula cost money?
The subscription provides access to Nebula Originals, Nebula Plus content, Nebula First early releases, and Nebula Classes for a fee of $6 per month or $60 per year, with the option to cancel at any time.
Which astrology site is more accurate?
Astrodienst, also known as Astro. com, is a popular site for free natal chart readings. It offers horoscopes written by human astrologers and computer-generated into a holistic birth chart for each individual. The site offers 16 different types of horoscopes, including Psychological, Money and Success, Career and Vocation, and The Child’s Horoscope, with free previews of buyable content. The horoscopes are written by various astrologers who view the chart through different lenses. The Personal Portrait is the most complete horoscope, but the Psychological Horoscope by Liz Greene is highly recommended.
Cafe Astrology is another site that offers horoscopes and astrological information about zodiac signs and planets since 2022. It is an encyclopedia of beginner astrology with numerous types of reports, both free and paid, as well as “cookbook astrology” such as descriptions of each planet in each sign viewed through the lens of a natal chart, love, or how the latest retrograde planet will affect your sign. Both sites provide valuable insights into astrology and provide a comprehensive understanding of one’s natal chart.
How accurate is nebula genomics?
Nebula Genomics is a reliable DNA company that offers accurate DNA tests, which are crucial for individuals to understand themselves and their ancestry. These tests help in various aspects of life, such as health testing, paternity disputes, and ancestry. However, the accuracy of these tests is crucial, as errors can lead to misinformation and improper steps. To ensure the accuracy of DNA tests, it is essential to patronize reliable companies with the required expertise, facilities, and approval.
Over the years, DNA sequencing has become more accessible and can be performed at home. The process of reading genetic markers is highly accurate if performed in a reputable laboratory by well-trained scientists. Most labs are CLIA-accredited and CAP-approved, indicating that the results obtained by the lab can be interpreted by any medical professional.
In summary, Nebula Genomics is a reliable DNA company that offers accurate DNA tests, ensuring that individuals receive accurate results.
How do I stop paying for Nebula?
Nebula allows customers to cancel an ongoing membership at any time, but it does not issue refunds for partial term cancellations. To cancel a membership, users must access their user account and click on the Edit Profile section. If a membership is not canceled within 7 days of renewal, Nebula may renew the membership for the next period, and the user is responsible for paying the applicable charges.
Nebula is not responsible for any failure to cancel membership or any credit card charges or fees incurred as a result. At the end of the paid membership period, Nebula may permanently delete and destroy the information stored or maintained as part of the membership. After the membership ends, customers cannot restart their membership but can start a new one.
UK and European Union customers have the right to change their mind before the purchase is dispatched or shipped. If a customer changes their mind and decides to cancel the contract before the order is shipped, they must notify Nebula immediately to reject the order.
In summary, Nebula allows customers to cancel their membership at any time, but they are not responsible for any refunds or credit card charges incurred as a result of non-compliance.
How do I stop the Nebula from charging me?
Nebula allows customers to cancel an ongoing membership at any time, but it does not issue refunds for partial term cancellations. To cancel a membership, users must access their user account and click on the Edit Profile section. If a membership is not canceled within 7 days of renewal, Nebula may renew the membership for the next period, and the user is responsible for paying the applicable charges.
Nebula is not responsible for any failure to cancel membership or any credit card charges or fees incurred as a result. At the end of the paid membership period, Nebula may permanently delete and destroy the information stored or maintained as part of the membership. After the membership ends, customers cannot restart their membership but can start a new one.
UK and European Union customers have the right to change their mind before the purchase is dispatched or shipped. If a customer changes their mind and decides to cancel the contract before the order is shipped, they must notify Nebula immediately to reject the order.
In summary, Nebula allows customers to cancel their membership at any time, but they are not responsible for any refunds or credit card charges incurred as a result of non-compliance.
Is there a free version of Nebula?
Nebula is frequently included as a complimentary component of select creators’ Patreon memberships. This allows users to gain access to the platform at no additional cost as a result of their support for a participating creator.
📹 What Linus Thinks of Nebula
Blurb: Why is Nebula offering a $250 lifetime membership? Watch the full WAN Show: …
So, according to Nebula’s blog post, they got more than 1,500 lifetime subscribers during the campaign. Meaning that they raised somewhere in the neighborhood of $375,000. In the grand scheme of things, not that much, but that’s cash that they have right now to fund big interesting projects that their creators want to do. I for one am excited to see what they do with the money.
The creators on Nebula like LegalEagle, Adam Neely and Not Just Bikes don’t strike me as being there for the big cash out. Being a corporate lawyer of electrical engineer probably pays better (jazz musician not so much…) The goal seems to be more like being a sort of streaming version of a independent quality magazine, not beholden to the whims of Google. I may be a minority, but I often use their app. I like the minimalist clean design and stringent content curation. There are some very major creators that would fit them that are missing, like Veritassium and ContraPoints.
Nebula is great imo. I joined it to watch Jet Lag the Game and have enjoyed it very much since. The website never lags and I’ve never had any issues with it technically. Although I would like to add a comment section. There’s a better sense of community when you’re using the creators subreddit and discord to communicate in tandem with the nebula article. I do think Linus has it wrong saying they’re just using this to get a better position to sell. I do believe this is just to help fund projects.
It doesn’t seem like they are hurting for money or anything. From what I’ve heard they make more per view on Nebula than they do on Youtube, it’s just they have way less viewers on the platform. Nebula is funding original content as well. For instance, Jessie Gender was going to kickstart a film project, and when Nebula found out they were like “We’ll just fund it.” Additionally, Jet Lag has said a few times now that their show is funded fully through Nebula subscriptions, and that’s the sort of show that costs a quite a bit to make in just travel costs, so it doesn’t seem like the platform is at all hurting for money. All that said, the cost of that lifetime membership is about the same as 8 years of being subscribed. Will Nebula still be here 8 years from now? No clue. It’s not something I’d like to place a $250 bet on at this moment. But while it lasts I’ll keep using the platform.
I think Linus is way off track here. I think the purpose of Nebula is that the subscription revenue from it is spent on big projects made by the creators on the platform, for example Jet Lag the Game. I honestly think that it makes enough to sustain those endeavors, and that’s all they really care about.
So, I’ve talked to the CTO, and there’s not an exit strategy or plan to IPO. Part of there money comes from subscribers, but a big part of Standard’s business is services for content creators, like studio space, branding, editing, thumbnail creation, transcode services, merch management, etc. Creator-owned content streaming is just one piece of that. And those services aren’t intended to be limited to creators invited to their platform, but to any YouTuber, podcaster, whatever. Sadly, I didn’t get the role I was interviewing for, and that did sting a bit. But I still like the company.
It seems like LTT/LMG is throwing a bunch of shade at Nebula most likely because LMG’s Floatplane project is not doing as well. I haven’t heard or seen many YT creators talking about Floatplane, but several have take about Nebula. One major thing that I enjoy about Nebula over YT… no ads or long sponsor reads, on some websites, it could be minutes long. The other issues that creators are facing is YouTube itself and the monetization guidelines that suddenly affect at this point for some years of article. Others complain of the spam in comments or the sudden deluge of random non-existent copyright issues from unknown sources. I read that even Nintendo has been throwing a bunch of copyright claims on people showing their games. Floatplane just seems to be mostly LMG employees, while Nebula has many YouTube creators that produce meaningful and extra content for Nebula.
The point, I believe, is that it’s (roughly speaking) a worker owned co op. So rather than Linus getting a big house and everyone else getting sponsored gaming rigs while being (at least somewhat) beholden to sponsors and vested interests, everyone gets less but they’re free to do what they like and the money is distributed more equitably. Big love to Linus still, although he’s a business owner he at least tries to make good shit, treat his customers with respect and to spread some of the wealth around to his workers. Bigger love to Luke tho, he gets it 😉.
According to Wendover Productions, their Jet Lag series is mainly (entirely?) funded by Nebula subscribers. For what it is, that must be a very expensive show to produce (it’s also awesome and I highly recommend it), so Nebula must be doing something right if revenue from it can fund a show of that scale.
I have both nebula and YouTube premium. I like perusal content on nebula but normally choose YouTube because nebula still does not have comments. I think a lifetime for $250 makes sense considering the price a lot if people pay for the service is close to $1-2 per month so the lifetime is basically paying for 10-20 years of that
I don’t think you guys realize the number of people that subscribe to Nebula. The quality of exclusive content is better than the YouTube article’s some of the content creators upload and the price makes it so many people just subscribe to watch the exclusive content that is uploaded. I have no inside knowledge of viewership or subscriber figures but I would not be surprised if the active monthly users are 100k or even much more. The best way I can put is they value the content that goes on there as much as if not more than what they publish to YouTube. For example, WAN show or live streams a few months ago Linus mentioned that they won’t do a floatplane exclusive article on how much all the computer gear at the studio cost because it would take up too much time if it did not go up on YouTube. I FEEL like if this was Nebula creators would bite the bullet and make that content anyway. I don’t know how the ROI works on it but seems like it does since many creators still constantly upload exclusive content to Nebula. Taren (yes the one who gave Linus toilet paper a few months ago) did a article explaining all the benefits of Nebula for the viewers and the creators which for a large website like yourselves it may not matter but for smaller ones could help like freelancing editors and being able to take on roles like that with people you can trust. If you still have contact with him I would see if you can get more info on how Nebula works since the assumption that they are just partnered with Curiosity stream does not seem like like it is as strong as it used to be since I have not seen that many sponsorships from Curiosity stream lately.
I’m a nebula subscriber, I really only go there fo a few series and to get an early peak at a few of my favorite creators’ vids. It’s good enough for what it is. I may do a lifetime subscription if I ever were to have a few extra couple hundred dollars lying around. I will pay a premium to support businesses with worker democracy and I wish more workers had a real stake in their workplaces more generally.
Nebula is fantastic. I personally use it mostly for the Wendover Productions perks (early access to Jet Lag: The Game, The Layover podcast, and other Wendover / HAI nebula exclusives), but the money is totally worth is for the extra content. I honestly wish they added “tipping” like YouTube has. It would be nice to support the creators / platform in a more direct way.
I first subscribed to Nebula through Curiosity Stream, and at least in my experience, nothing in Curiosity Stream actually warranted for me to watch the documentaries…but I kept on perusal the nebula articles of creators I follow. True, my main go-to is still youtube, but when nothing interesting shows up, I do go to nebula and see what my followed creators did. Though more and more I’m switching over to Nebula for content first, instead of youtube.
I watch on Nebula because of some extra content and being able to watch some before it’s on YouTube. The iPhone app is extremely buggy and you can see that they really didn’t put much love into it. Sometimes, full-screen player doesn’t want to close and I have to restart the app, or the audio keeps playing when I go back to menu from the article player. But some creators really put a lot of work into the exclusive content on the site and I’d say it’s been definitely worth the price for me (I mean yearly price haha)
I joined Nebula to watch “The logistics of D-day.” It’s a deep dive into the preparations and execution of one of the greatest logistical feats of any war. I enjoyed it a lot and people should check it out if they’re interested in that kind of thing. Also content creators regularly post articles there that can’t go on YouTube. Legal Eagle will typically shoot a different conclusion for Nebula where his ad read would go for YouTube. I’m going to say that Linus maybe swayed because he has a conflict of interest. Since he owns the competing platform Floatplane.
As I commented on the full podcast, this sadly shows that linus hasn’t actually been following the trends in nebula promotion (direct rather than curiosity stream), nor who is involved with it (mostly very leftist content creators). Be interested to hear his thoughts after catching up on developments!
I feel like part of the appeal of Nebula for creators would also be having a second platform established if anything should happen to YouTube. Especially with what’s happening on Twitter or with people’s websites getting hacked and deleted, I feel like people are seeing the benefit in having a second basket to put a few eggs in, vs being all in on 1 single point of failure. If anything did happen to change things on YouTube having a platform you’re already up and running on, especially one people will probably already have heard of could make in a less painful transition. Just like how you have Floatplane as a backup should YouTube go down (or be hacked again).
The fact that it’s even being talked about here is kind of the point too, it’d probably be more popular if more people knew about it in a more direct, discussed way instead of ‘oh a YouTube in-video ad… SKIP!’. It might also be to finance something major now for bigger returns later for the few thousand that might take the offer up.
“lifetime” only lasts until they: -force you to “upgrade” to a “better” plan. -change the terms such that the “lifetime” plan is downgraded to useless. -simply remove features that you paid for. -close that version of the software and release a 2.0 “new” version that isnt new and isnt covered under “lifetime”. companies always do scummy things with “lifetime” subs, just like with “unlimited”.
It is difficult to know the truth but the picture from the people creating for nebula is not the same narrative that Linus presents here, they apparently are profitable already, and the creators like being part of that, of course I am not naive enough to think they couldn’t be exaggerating for optics, but I personally really like using nebula, it’s content has a good curated feel and their site is nice and clean.
It’s obvious that Linus is missing a lot of publicly available info about nebula in this clip. That is fine, he was asked a question on a Livestream and answered with his honest thoughts. But redistributing it on lmg clips is a bad idea imo, it’s actively “uneducating” the viewer. The clip isn’t really funny or has done other reason to exist, so the point must be the info/opinion in the clip. And that is a misinformed opinion.
The main attraction for creators I think is funding for projects they couldn’t accomplish on their own. For example, as successful as the Wendover/HAI umbrella is, I doubt they could make Jet Lag without some sort of other monetary stream. From what they said, and what is apparent through viewing is that Jet Lag is an extremely expensive show to make. You might be right about how many people actually watch on platform, though. I watch the very, very occasional normal article on Nebula. The only consistent thing I come back for is Jet Lag because it airs on Nebula a week before YouTube.
The way I use Nebula is that soon as I seen one of the creators I like has uploaded on YT I go watch their articles on it. I like the lack of ads but also some creators get to use music when they do a article essay on a band and it doesn’t get blocked. Curiosity has a lot of education articles which are really cool. Also if you $70 you get both of them and if you do it using a creator thats on the platform it helps. Not sure if they do discount codes.
An airline tried this strategy once. American Airlines sold a lifetime plane ticket for $250k each for first class seating. They ended up selling like six of them. Later they realized this was losing them a lot of money and tried to either buy them back from their customers or trick them out of it. Today there is still at least one lifetime ticket still out there.
You got it totally wrong. I pay for nebula. Curiosity stream sucks. I do watch on the site because the app is much much better than YouTube. There is extra content not on youtube. The creators are not shit. All the content is quality content even though some of it doesnt interest me. The payment is very low. And I get to support a good platform with a good idea and the creators themselves.
I do wonder how the show is jetlag show is funded. If it is funded by jetlag revenue, then it seems financially stable. However if it is funded by nebula overall funds, then it means that very few creators get funding for big nebular projects, while everyone else does not get that funding. Though I don’t think that is a major issue, since these big projects do bring more people to nebula. I guess it’s like “YouTube premium originals”
Linus is right that the “point” of Nebula is that it’s creator owned, but that is more about control of the platform and long term income stability than some “payout” when they “exit”. Every smaller content creator I view on YouTube has had problems with how Google does business, from the copyright system to somewhat arbitrary demonetization. It’s no surprise that a large segment of the “educational” content creators, who are more interested in academic/intellectual freedom than most content creators are driving this platform. As for the lifetime subscriptions, it’s simply a way to raise revenue quickly and potentially increase market share.
Someone with a stake in a competing platform (floatplane) should really not be seen to be making comments like this. The commens seem biased, as though Linus wants to diminish the platform, the creators, and all the successes as much as possible, and make it seem as though it’s not worth subscribing.
I had an absolute nightmare with Nebula’s partner, Curiosity Stream. TLDR: It was impossible to pay them, I ended up with a full year of the service comped (even after I didn’t want it). And was still asked to pay to extend my account even after repeatedly telling them I wanted to cancel my account, I didn’t want the free year or service and I did not want any billing emails. Their customer service was good at doing everything to prevent me from paying for an annual membership and then going out of their way to do everything I did not want.
I bought Nebula years ago just to watch a article about Bricks from Half As Interesting. As of now 2023 majority of the edutainment people I watch on Youtube are on Nebula. Although the site/app isnt very advanced, I love perusal articles there because I don’t need to search around my youtube homepage for the articles.
Fun Fact about Nebual: Anita Sarkeesian has a Nebula exclusive series that they fund! And yup, she’s still whining about GamerGate! So for just 250$ for life, 50$ a year, or 5$ a month, you can help fund an endlessly exposed career grifter’s rampant defamation and demonization about gamers everywhere! 😀 Isn’t it nice to inadvertently be funding hate towards yourself? That’s just the Nebula way!
The money split on the platform seems to be by view but they get more money from each individual viewer than YouTube since it’s a paid service. A lot of creators also create exclusive content for the platform. Honestly framing this as basically a pump and dump is really cynical. A cooperatively owned entity doesn’t just exist so everyone can sell it. It’s so nobody can tell them what to do or pretend they know what’s best for them.
I pay for nebula and regularly watch content on it, even if it’s not exclusive, because youtube is full of clickbait and nebula prioritizes quality content, so it’s easier to find good content sometimes. And the number of creators they got on is also insane!! Floatplane could never. It’s funny how Linus even essentially regrets doing it now
i mean I really think that Nebula is more profitable than Floatplane and that Linus is only defending Floatplane, because of the his own stake in the company. I do believe, that it would have been smarter to join the nebula community rather than creating own service, but if they now hop over there, it would be a pr nightmare, because of floatplaen, as long as is they don’t get to fuse those comapnies together, so that floatplane users get to use nebula as similarly as they’ve got to do so far
I know that Floatplane and Nebula don’t compete on the same space, but to counter Linus’ point about Nebula’s popularity, I can say that I know at least 6 popular (million + subs) YouTube websites on the platform, meanwhile the only high profile Floatplane streamer I know is Dankpods (bless that man).
it’s “lifetime” until it isn’t… yall better read what you are signing up to cos I bet there’s some very small line of text that says: “lifetime is considered for X amount of years and may or may not restructure the “lifetime” deal” or something along those lines… when something seems too good to be true you should ask yourself if it’s really true just sayin.
I don’t think it has anything to do with an exit strategy or similar. I don’t even get how that is suposed to be possible. as the creators being the owners is literally the entire point and it would be worth pretty much zero without them. and I think it is a way best business model. and it for sure is more profitable than adds especially if traffic isn’t so high. The problem with most streaming services like this is that supporting creators and subscriptions are fine but very few people gona spend 10 bucks a month on that. there is just to much different stuff you need to subsribe too and it would cost hundreds if you do that for all. A model which gives more than adds is not too expensive is in my opinion the future off online subscriptions. Either throw micro subscriptions or bundling. More people want an add free experience but also most people are not gona pay 10 bucks a month for perusal 2-3 youtubers.
I find Nebula and Curiosity advertising on other YouTube websites to be super annoying. The whole “if you just enjoyed this article, you now can’t watch another more detailed article without my paywall.” Put the article on there first, then move it to YouTube if you want a perk. Same reason I am not interested in Flow Plane. Put more content out, get more views, and make more money. Big media makes the same mistake of exclusive deals on only one platform at a time. Why not have it on all platforms, get more views and press, and earn more from the view count?
The curiosity stream + nebula is 30$ a year, if you assume nebula gets 50% of that (they probably get less) it’s 15$ a year. That means that if you pay 250$ you pay them for 16 years in advance. If they just invest it in bonds and just use the gains from those bonds as the subscription fee, assuming gains of 4% a year which is a reasonable they would make 10$ a year, in perpetuity for those 250$. This is an amazing deal for them. On the same note, it’s a better deal for you to invest 375$ and just use the profits to pay the 15$ a year. People don’t understand that money today is worth a lot more than money in the future.
Linus’ take seems to be very unfair and not particularly well informed. There is loads of creators on there specifically because they do educational content on music or other copyrighted material, which is obviously fair use but they can’t go to court over every single one of their articles. There are also a lot of science and engineering documentary type creators on there, and i doubt those guys are doing it for the big payout. And if that wasn’t enough to convince you, there is a lot of very left wing creators on there, and i extremely doubt they are doing it for their stake when it comes to sell. I’m not doubting that there is noone on there with that plan, but based on this fact alone you’d have to be cynical out of your mind to think that to the individual creator the point is solely to boost subscribers to sell for a lot of money. Fun fact, Taran is on there. Maybe Linus could ask him about his perspective. Who knows, maybe Linus got his take from a conversation with Taran, but honestly, Taran doesnt strike me as the guy to leverage his hobby for a big VC payout.
Nebula and in turn CuriosityStream is a very odd case, they really are not playing by the common ‘wisdom’ of subscription services. I’m not totally convinced by Linus’ explanation here that they are just trying to inflate subscriber count before selling out, I just haven’t seen them running stuff or expanding their platform in the same general way that we’ve seen other platforms do when that’s clearly the intention, plus they have been going on for a while now, they don’t seem to be in a rush to sell out (maybe the right time has been delayed?)… also also, I know several creators that joined because they want a platform where they have more creative control as a collective specifically (and based on who I’ve seen join Nebula, I’d say that Nebula is targeting those sort of creators specifically, as in they are interested in building a large community of like-minded creators)… but eh, I know nothing about business finances and strategy, so what do I know, their subscription model is suspiciously dirt cheap, so either they are doing something extremely right, something that we don’t know with a completely different mission, or Linus is 100% on point here.
I disagree. Creators put exclusives on nebula and often encourage people on perusal them on Nebula generally. If the only point was to sell subscriptions, they wouldn’t ask people to watch even regular Youtube articles on Nebula. I think even a $1/Month subscription, even with all the hosting and payment fees, makes more money than ad-supported youtube, and btw, that’s of course only the price for the first year, after that, the prices go up significantly. And regarding an exit strategy: Who would buy out Nebula and why? In this economy, who needs a platform that has no technical innovation and a lot of already established creators that would be a burden in any takeover?
$250/$11 per year means your actually paying for at their “often discounted price of $11” for 22 years of steaming up front. Lets be honest, in 22 years chances are a significant number of people have stopped using the service lost passwords. Looking at age ranges of 20 years, 10 to 32, 30-52, 50-72. Most peoples lives change significantly with in those numbers. finishing school, getting married, having children, retirement. This just looks like a calculated gamble on expanding instant cash on hand to build. Long term costs paying off the “loan” you gave yourself. The chances you are going to make more of a loss/gain than you are already making in a 20 year time period on the current cost is probably small. In fact you are likely to probably make more money from it because how many people are subscribed to the same service from 20 years ago. The number of companies I deal with from 20 years ago are most likely in single digits. So in the same way people are worried that Nebula might not be around in 5-10 years, nebula is worried subscribers might not be around in 1-2 years.
I only watch Nebula-only content there simply because, I want to add extra contribution to creators by both having a Nebula subscription and watch their content on YouTube (thus get their income from YouTube as well). If their Nebula income is based on watch time then I may start perusal more on Nebula instead…
Linus seems to be way off the mark, Luke seems to have hit the nail on the head. A one time purchase lifetime subscription isn’t going to make anyone more money in the long term, if I were buying a platform, why would I pay more money to purchase the financial burden of delivering digital content to people that will never have to pay me subscription fees. I’ve rewatched to see if I misheard and gave it some actual thought and the benefit of the doubt and the only sincere interpretation I can come up with for Linus’ answer is if he meant their lifetime subscription helps pay for better quality content on the platform and that would bring in more revenue via conventional subscriptions, but honestly that seems like a strategy of a group of people who want to build something and avoid cashing out, otherwise they would just go to VC’s and cut out all the extra steps.
If there wasn’t that browser add-on that shows if YT article is on Nebula (or Odysee), I’d probably watch 2-3 creators total on those sites. But since those add-ons exist and work well, I found a bunch more creators that I follow on Yt that I now follow on Nebula/Odysee as well and watch articles there. Odysee comments are garbage though, hate reflexly scrolling down, half are trashiest human trash. YT has bots, Odysee has trash.
The reason I got a year of nebula is because I was super bored on YouTube for a month and I was getting more and more stupid content. I thought this was somehow more interesting. It wasn’t. I literally opened the app one time to see what I paid for, another few times in the first week trying to find something interesting and one last time at the end of the year to cancel. I dont even remember perusal any exclusives because I wasn’t using the app. If I knew it would not have been so useful I’d just buy one month of it, cancel and send the annual cost to Patreon. But at least I used a discount, shared a few cents with a creator and got some experience not to buy an annual sub lol.
In light of the many rug pulls/bait and switch scams regarding “lifetime” models…….nooooooo thanks. Although my personal favourite is a much older, and much more widespread classic…… Lifetime, defined as “the lifetime of the product”. Sooooo, your warranty expires the moment the device dies.
Nebula WAS going public but IPOs(SPACs) took a major hit. Getting purchased and making money for shareholders are the 2 best options as of right now. Getting purchased is unlikely, since Nebula creators are not contract bound to produce content. Creators will likely disappear the day after the sale happens.
I think Nebula is a backup plan in case Google does something stupid. If YouTube somehow becomes unusable, there’s another site where these creators can put out content to independently. I tried their $12/yr membership once but the Nebula player and app are not that great so I ended up perusal on YouTube regardless.
Nebula really needs to improve their site and apps. They look nice, but they don’t feel particularly nice to use, at least with my connection and devices. Floatplane seems better from the time I took a look at it, but nothing beats YouTube, despite YouTube’s best effort to make itself more annoying that I resort to the Revan option.
I have a Nebula subscription, but I think I watch less than 10 articles a year on their site. There is some really good content, especially from Real Engineering, but the streaming quality is very low. I understand it’s difficult to make something on par with what big tech is capable of, but it’s still frustrating when you pay for a worse experience than you can get for free.
I really tried to support Nebula but the service is just awful compared to YouTube Premium. TONS of buffering, lower quality, somehow a worse app and interface, and creators who prioritize YouTube over Nebula to the point where they’ll literally re-upload their YouTube article to Nebula with all the in-line ads for YouTube that are supposed to be stripped away for Nebula (looking at you, MKBHD), or articles being uploaded to YouTube that for whatever reason aren’t uploaded to Nebula, and articles being uploaded to YouTube days or weeks before being uploaded to Nebula. So many issues.