Magic: The Gathering (MTG) is a popular card game that has a vast number of unique cards, including over 22,630 printed Magic cards with their own unique names and in-game rules text. As of January 2024, there are over 27,076 Magic: The Gathering cards, including all those revealed up to and including the MTG Fallout decks. Card rarities in MTG include common, uncommon, rare, and mythic rare. Online platforms have revolutionized MTG trading, and as of the release of Strixhaven: School of Mages, there are 791 total lands, 12 basic lands, 26 snow lands, and 56 kindred.
Magic was the first product to combine randomized, collectible cards with deck-construction and was the first product to use deck-construction. The Alpha set consisted of 295 cards, each with its unique artwork and game mechanics. The total number of MTG cards depends on what Magic: The Gathering card count you want to use, with around 27,000 unique cards. Over twenty billion Magic cards were produced between 2008 and 2016, during which time it grew in popularity.
Currently, there are more than 27,000 unique Magic cards, with hundreds added each year. Cards are sold in a variety of languages and products, and more than 12,000 different trading cards have been created. Cartamundi and Wizards of the Coast are two popular games that have contributed to the growth of MTG.
📹 How Magic The Gathering Cards Are Made
“Gloria” played by AshlenRose – @ashlenrose Proxy Card Graphics by Josh Putz – @TheProxyGuy “That Kid” played by Johnny …
How many cards drawn in Magic?
In a Magic game, players start by shuffle their deck and draw seven cards to form their starting hand. If they don’t like their hand, they can mulligan. A player wins by eliminating all opponents. They usually start with 20 life and lose when their life total hits zero or they run out of cards. The London Mulligan rule was implemented in 2019 for competitive Magic formats. Players can mulligan as many times as they want, placing a card at the bottom of their library for each time they take a mulligan. At any given time, every card is located in one of the following “zones”.
How much did The One Ring sell for?
Rapper Post Malone purchased The One Ring for $2 million in August 2023, marking a significant increase in the value of trading cards. Wizards of the Coast announced a special version of the card in Magic’s Tales of Middle Earth set, featuring Elvish in Elvish. The value of trading cards has been heightened by incidents of theft, with $300, 000 worth of Magic cards stolen in 2023 and $250, 000 worth of Pokémon merchandise stolen in 2022. Tokyo police reported an unprecedented number of trading card thefts in the latter half of 2022, indicating a growing trend in card thefts.
What is the most rarest magic card?
Black Lotus, a rare Magic card, is highly valued due to its rarity and playability. With only 1, 008 cards in the Alpha set and 3, 025 in Beta, its value is sky high. The card is considered one of the most powerful in the Power Nine, a group of cards so potent that their use in gameplay was later restricted. In April 2024, a Limited Editon Alpha graded CGC Pristine 10 of Black Lotus sold for $3 million in a private sale, setting a record for the highest price paid for any Magic card.
Other high-priced versions of the card include $1615, 000, $540, 000, $511, 100, $220, 000, $186, 000, $174, 000, $156, 000, $132, 000, $108, 000, and $106, 250. These rare and valuable cards have been sold in various auctions, including Heritage Auctions, Heritage Auctions, and Heritage Auctions.
What is the most printed card in MTG?
The card with the most reprints in Magic’s expansions is Evolving Wilds, with 46 cards released as of Phyrexia: All Will Be One. In 2021, Ikoria: Lair of Behemoths had the most reprints with 37 cards in booster packs. This list is based on various sources, including Jeff Zandi’s “Magic’s Most-Reprinted Cards” and Aaron Forsythe’s “That Card Again”. The expansions with the most reprints include Ikoria: Lair of Behemoths, which has 37 reprinted cards in booster packs. The list of reprints in Magic’s expansions is a testament to the popularity and variety of the game’s cards. The list is a testament to the power of reprinting in the world of magic.
How many MTG cards have ever been printed?
The alpha print run for Magic: The Gathering consisted of 26, 000 60-card starter decks and 70, 000 15-card boosters, resulting in 2. 61 million cards. The beta print run was 78, 000 60-card starter decks and 210, 000 15-card boosters, totaling 7. 83 million cards. The print runs for Alpha were calculated using the numbers provided. Each starter deck contains 2 rare, 13 uncommon, and 45 common cards, while booster packs contain 1 rare, 3 uncommon, and 11 common card.
Has a Black Lotus card sold for $3 million?
The $3 million Black Lotus card, graded by CGC Cards as a 10, is the highest quality card ever sold. Lesser-quality Black Lotus cards have sold for mid-six figures. The most expensive Magic card was the One Ring card, which sold for $2 million to Post Malone. Post Malone already owns a Black Lotus signed by the card’s original artist, Christopher Rush, but the buyer for the $3 million card remains unknown.
What is the largest MTG set?
The Magic: The Gathering fifth edition, released in March 1997, is the largest version of the game, surpassing both the Fourth Edition and Chronicles. The set contains 449 white-bordered cards, including 165 commons, 132 uncommons, 132 rares, and 20 basic lands. The majority of the cards are from earlier sets, with the largest rotations coming from Ice Age, Arabian Nights, Antiquities, The Dark, Legends, Fallen Empires, Homelands, and a few returnees from Revised.
The set is the first to feature new artworks for 218 cards and has an estimated print run of 800 million. Over a hundred cards from Fourth Edition were removed in the design, with some removed for game balance reasons. Some spells, such as Strip Mine, Channel, and Mind Twist, were already banned from the Standard tournament environment due to their power. Others, like Serra Angel, were predicted for removal in every revision of the basic set.
Why is Black Lotus banned?
The Power Nine card, known for its power and limited print, is banned from most competitive Magic formats due to its power and scarcity. The only competitive setting where it is not banned is the “Vintage” format, where only one copy is allowed. The card was omitted from Revised Edition and none have been published in any subsequent set. Its power and limited print have made it the most expensive Magic card, with mint condition Alpha cards being among the most valued.
Publisher Wizards of the Coast stated that the card would not be reprinted, which would hurt its value among collectors. The 30th Anniversary set published by Wizards of the Coast in 2023 reprinted 15 cards from the original set, including Black Lotus, which are proxy cards with unique backs and use a modern card frame instead of the classic frame from the original version.
How many black lotuses are left?
The Black Lotus magic card, released in Magic the Gathering, was not widely used due to its rarity and lack of collectors. Around 5, 000 Black Lotus cards are still in sellable condition, with most being spoiled over time. The price of these cards has increased due to the growing awareness of their importance in the game. Outside of Magic the Gathering communities, it is believed that there will always be a surplus of Black Lotus cards in play. The state of the Black Lotus card market may change slightly if people manage to recover their previous collections. The Black Lotus MTG edition determines the number of copies produced.
Does anyone have every MTG card?
Magic: The Gathering collector MissouriMTG recently revealed that they had purchased a collection of every card ever printed, including every complete booster set, judge foil, secret lair, commander deck, Beatdown, anthologies, and Guru lands. The purchase was part of a “Buying trip” that took them to Seattle, Portland, Las Vegas, and New York City. The initial tweet about the trip garnered 132 likes and went viral among the MTG community. The singles were kept for MissouriMTG as part of his own collection, but the boosters were sold.
MissouriMTG also mentioned that booster boxes are available through DM, and the collection of singles is neatly organized in marked folders using each set’s icon and name. The initial tweet garnered 10, 000 likes, 803 retweets, and 455 bookmarks.
Is it worth collecting MTG sets?
In 2022, the optimal investment strategy for those interested in Standard-legal sets may be to wait four or five years before purchasing draft booster boxes, with the potential for a best-case return of approximately double the initial investment. This presents a unique opportunity for those willing to take calculated risks.
📹 The Genius Behind MTG’s First New Card Type in 15 Years – Extra Credits
Looking across the last 15 years of Magic the Gathering, we noticed the genius game design of their newest card, Battles! A card …
And just like every other extra credits article this one is complete garbage and unreached too battles have had little to no impact on the game with them findings almost zero competitive success they’re too weak too slow too clunky you’d have to double their strength in which case they’d be meta defining and that’s the only way to make them good
Lost me immediately at 0:50 😂 “Very stable” is not something I’d say to describe an R&D team that was threatened with being collectively fired more than 3 times for damaging the game so significantly. Urza block, and combo winter. Mirrodin block, and artifact synergies. The entire era of FIRE design with Throne of Eldraine. Admitting that commander cards is where they test design ideas for standard. Repeatedly abusing the letter of the law for the reserved list rather than follow the spirit of the law. The entirety of Universes Beyond having mechanically unique cards. I could go on, but the community is well aware that WotC is not something to be trusted. Edit: Listening again, I realize you mean that the leadership itself (the people that make it up) has not rotated nuch, and therefore you can track the history of design ideas developing, which is something I also greatly appreciate about the game! I still don’t trust them though
You should probably be more explicit about what format you’re talking about. I can’t keep straight if this is about limited or not, and I sure as hell can’t tell you what decade any of this happened. Also, just on paper, the way you describe it, these cards are were printed into a turn 1 aggro format and don’t payoff until you flip them, which uh, I don’t understand how this is fast enough to dissuade aggro in any meaningful way unless there’s also more anti-aggro factors here not mentioned. Not to say like YOU’RE WRONG because I mean hey I don’t even know what format you’re talking about. Also also, draft right now (OTJ) is in a place where aggro is bad – red is one of the worst colors, 2 drops are not winning most games, there’s a lot of grinding – and still, if a card costs 7 or more, it’s not really draft viable unless it’s a build around. So I’m not sure your “expensive cards were not viable in draft because of all the aggro” description really tells the whole story, either. Annwyay, made me think, so, good card discussion article.
I think you’re giving WOTC far too much credit, in theory and in practice, for battles. Battles were new card type created for… one set. (If that doesn’t raise alarm, I don’t know what would!) Battles are… yet another in a long line of convoluted double faced cards that allow WOTC to print still more text on cards. In practice, though, they play like 2 separate spells – (a) a sorcery and (b) a backside, usually a creature. In practice, battles do not play as you suggest; where they “give” your opponent extra life, because once you flip your battle into “usually a creature,” the creature tends to make up the difference fast. It’s not so much your opponent starts at 25 life, it’s that they start at 25 life… and you start with a 4/4 with Suspend 5. In fact, “usually a creature” ended up being win-more. Most battles that saw play were “good enough” as just a front side, so flipping it was all upside at that point. Furthermore, if you could flip it, you were already winning, and “already winning” + “usually a creature” turned out to be “win more”… I don’t mean to be so negative. As much as I dislike the execution (especially the DFC thing), I think battles could have created interesting design space. In practice, though, they played like planeswalkers you gave your opponent, and your opponent couldn’t “win the battle”; they could only defend it so you couldn’t win the battle. But I genuinely don’t think Battles were designed to do what you think they were; in fact one of the most salient pieces of drafting advice for the set was that the “aggro” WU shouldn’t play battles for very much the reason you mention; that there was never a good point to attack a battle over your opponent, and the payoffs were win more.
Hi, Extra Credits has been at this like a decade. AI in Games, No Clip and so many more websites exist now. All of you seem to be trying to expand overall knowledge of design across all types of games. But article game discourse is worse than ever. More toxic than its ever been. And major gaming & review websites are drowning us in misinformation. See the whole LMG mess from a month ago. For all the effort how we talk about games is broken. Thoughts? For clarity, not blaming any of you. That would be ridiculous. You all have been doing good work for years now. Take care and have a good one
Battles seem very pointless. Aside from their ETB effect, they’re slow, which I get it, they were supposed to slow the game down, but let’s say my opponent drops a battle on me. They waste attackers hitting that battle. So, that’s damage I didn’t take. They flip it and now have a big creature on the field. And I cast Day of Judgement, or overload a Cyclonic Rift, or just hit the creature with a Go For the Throat, or whatever. Now, they’ve gained nothing from hitting the battle, and whatever damage they could have done to me was wasted.
Battles arn’t doing much, imo. They are still permanents and spells, and so they still can be blown up and countered before they even get to flip. Competitive decks are absolutely replete with removal. For them to simply slot in a way to remove or often much more simply counter the battle is commonplace and easy to come by. Who cares what kind of effect the battle would have had on the game if your opponent removed it for less mana than it took to cast? The solution to fixing MTG’s speed problem could be simple, and thats making removal and counter spells less effective overall by printing more creatures that have a powerful defensive keyword like hexproof, shroud, indestructible, ward and/or “can’t be countered”, and giving them a downside like coming into play tapped, draining your life, making other things you cast cost more and other downsides that isn’t secretly an upside, like self milling or sac’ing a creature. Or just making removal worse by making it cost more, it only being sorcery speed or it having its owndownsides. From there, we would need safeguards in place to stop what happened to YGO’s powercreep, like what the power 9 did in the past. None of the blatant sidestepping of wording to get around defensive effects, like “I’m not destroying your monster, I’m sending it to the graveyard” or “I’m not targeting your monster, I’m choosing it” like what happened in YGO. And not only that but safeguards stopping the downsides I mentioned from being downsides, which is more likely the case that will happen.
From personal experience, and many other people I’ve spoken to: Battles are nearly useless Battles are 95% used for etb, 5% for whatever the flip is Whatever comes out of the battle, if its a creature – it nearly immediately dies to removal if it has any generally decent effect The only notable battle that has been used for more than just the etb is battle of Allara(that sorcery battle) as a combo. Battles are cool, but they didn’t achieve anything special, and the meta is fucked up with dumb aggro that has literally no gameplay past lie turn 4-5
This is a weird and alien take on “Battles”, most decks don’t even run Battles especially in Commander (Magic The Gathering’s most popular format) and if you are playing Battles it’s in a more casual settings. Battles don’t “Increase life” because there are spells that only do damage to targets not players. It’s just a weird and sophist stance to take.