A Bug’s Life is a powerful anti-capitalist movie that tells the story of Flik, an ant in an ant colony. The movie centers around Flik, who has many ideas and inventions that he believes will improve lives for those in his colony. However, the colony’s inhabitants are threatened by snakes, birds, and bigger bugs.
The movie is set in 2898-3000, and it shows bugs evolving more and more after the return of humans. The conspiracy theory alleges that a shadowy global elite conspires to control the world’s population, in part by forcing them to eat insects. This theory has made the leap from online message boards to national debates.
Another fan theory is that all insects are radioactive, and the circus takes place in an area with high nuclear fallout. However, A Bug’s Life is set in a world where humans are barely implied, and Flik develops class consciousness, which allows him and his ant comrades to rise up.
The movie also explores colonialism, with grasshoppers colonizing the ants through violence and violence. The circus bugs misunderstand the arrangement, thinking they are being hired for a show not a war. Flik was never meant to be a worker ant; he was a drone who was accidentally placed into the worker caste without anyone noticing the oversight.
Despite critics’ hang-ups, A Bug’s Life offers viewers a powerful anti-capitalist message.
📹 Insane Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out to be True
Conspiracy theories have been around for ages, and most of the time they are laughed about and pushed to the side.
Who did Boo grow up to be in theory?
One popular fan theory posits that Boo matured into Violet Parr and the Witch from Brave. However, an alternative theory proposes that she developed into Edna Mode, renowned for her expertise in designing suits for superheroes. This hypothesis gives rise to questions regarding her provenance.
Is the witch from Brave actually boo?
Upon the release of Brave in 2012, a new theory came to light regarding Boo. It goes that the witch in Brave is Boo grown up, and the witch’s magic stems from Boo trying to find a way back to Sully and Mike using portal magic, similar to the doors in Monsters Inc. This theory carried some weight due to a wood carving in the witch’s hut which resembled a familiar fuzzy face; Sully. It was also theorized that the witch could time-travel, as she had a carving of Pixar’s timeless Pizza Planet truck Easter egg. All this considered, it’s not unbelievable that Turning Red fits into Pixar’s shared universe by making Abby a teenage Boo.
Abby and Boo undoubtedly share an uncanny physical resemblance. The two have the same face shape, same big brown eyes, same hair color, and even the same bangs. But whereas Boo has her hair in pigtails, Abby has long hair that she wears down. It wouldn’t be abnormal for Boo to grow up and grow out of her pigtails, opting for a different style. She still has an affinity for hair accessories though, and swaps her pink hair ties for a glittery pink headband as she gets a little older. Mei’s costume reveals Turning Red ‘s ending, and her friends all have unique costuming, too. Miriam is coded green, Mei is red, Priya is yellow, and Abby is pink and purple – which is, coincidentally, Boo’s color palette. Furthermore, Abby’s purple overalls are scattered with little flowers, which could be a reference to Boo’s iconic door, and her heart earrings match the heart cut-out on Boo’s chair in her room.
Personality-wise, the two also seem incredibly similar. Boo is distinctly characterized by her fearlessness in the face of Sully, who is otherwise regarded by humans as a frightening monster. Likewise, Abby shows nearly no fear when encountering Mei’s panda for the first time. Instead, her eyes become huge and sparkly in true anime style (making Turning Red look different from other Pixar films,) and she lunges headfirst into the panda’s fluff. If the theory is true, Abby’s lack of fear may stem from the blue furry friend she had in her childhood.
What is the moral of the story a bug’s life?
Positive Messages Solutions to great problems can come from unlikely sources. It’s important to believe in yourself and have faith in your abilities. Nature has a certain order which is to be respected: “The sun grows the food; ants pick the food; grasshoppers eat the food; birds eat the grasshoppers.”
Common Sense Media Review. By Nell Minow, based on child development research. How do we rate?
Cute animated tale with some mild peril and scary bugs.
This is actually the first time Common Sense has led me astray. We showed this to my just turned 5 yr old son based on this rating and he was pretty scared throughout the whole movie and continues to talk about how scary it was. The grasshoppers look, sound, and act vicious and cruel. It’s extremely violent. There are full on fist fighting, so much that the cartoon ant has a black eye and bruises. They torture ants while others look on. Hopper, the lead grasshopper threatens to kill his own brother, does kill another fellow grasshopper, threatens to kill the ants, including the very young/baby one. Spoiler: he then gets fed to baby birds in a graphic screaming/flailing way. It was disturbing on many levels even as an adult. I honestly don’t understand why these choices are made for young kids. The overall message could be good, don’t keep doing something because it’s always been done that way, embrace new ideas, celebrate your individualism, etc. but all that to us was overshadowed by the violence.
What story is bugs Life based on?
Bug’s life, a (film) A hungry hoard of grasshoppers, led by Hopper, annually extort food from a timid ant colony. A klutzy but inventive worker ant, Flik, tries to increase production with a harvesting contraption, but his plans go awry, and he finds himself instead sent out of the colony to find a way to stop the grasshoppers. Flik recruits a bunch of inept flea-circus performers to rally against Hopper’s raid. Working together, they plan for a climactic confrontation with the grasshoppers. Directed by John Lasseter and Andrew Stanton. Released in Los Angeles on November 20, 1998 and nationwide on November 25. Voices include Dave Foley (Flik), Kevin Spacey (Hopper), Julia Louis-Dreyfus (Princess Atta), Hayden Panettiere (Princess Dot), Phyllis Diller (The Queen), Richard Kind (Molt), David Hyde Pierce (Slim), Joe Ranft (Heimlich), Denis Leary (Francis), Jonathan Harris (Manny), Madeline Kahn (Gypsy), Bonnie Hunt (Rosie), Michael McShane (Tuck & Roll), John Ratzenberger (P. T. Flea), Brad Garrett (Dim), Roddy McDowall (Mr. Soil). 95 min. Cinemascope. The second fully computer-animated film using Toy Story ‘s 3-D animation style to tell a story about the world of insects. Loosely based on Aesop’s fable, “The Ants and the Grasshopper,” the film was a collaboration of Disney and Pixar Animation Studios. Released on video in 1999 with consumers getting a choice of five package covers (featuring Flik, Francis, Heimlich, Dot, or Hopper).
Will there ever be a Bug’s Life 2?
Production. Development on A Bug’s Life 2 will begin in late Christmas 2023 after the release of A Bug’s Life and by February 2024, pre-production on the film was underway.
A Bug’s Life 2 is 2025 American computer-animated comedy – adventure film produced by Pixar Animation Studios and distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures. Directed by Brian Fee, Bob Peterson, and Mike Rich, it is the second installment of the A Bug’s Life film series and the stand-alone sequel to A Bug’s Life. It was executive-produced by John Lasseter. It is set to be released on November 14, 2025.
- Plot ( ). Cast ( ). Dave Foley as Flik
- Julia Louis-Dreyfus as Queen Atta
- Emily Hahn as Princess Dot
- Zach Granger as Billy (Giant Human / Elf Human)
- Michela Luci as Lyn (Giant Human / Elf Human)
- Max Charles as Kenny (Giant Human / Elf Human)
- Shay Rudolph as Mary (Giant Human / Elf Human)
- David Hyde Pierce as Slim / Grass
- Jerome Ranft as Heimlich (sound-alike replacement voice)
- Denis Leary as Francis
- Jim Cummings as Manny (replacement voice)
- Jennifer Aniston as Gypsy (replacement voice)
- Michael McShane as Tuck and Roll
- Bonnie Hunt as Rosie
- Brad Garrett as Dim / Valian
- John Ratzenberger as P. T. Flea
- Richard Kind as Molt (Tiny)
- Jonathan Freeman as Dinamos
- Ed Asner as Mr. Soil (replacement voice)
- Edie McClurg as Dr. Flora
- Alex Rocco as Thorny; David Ossman as Cornelius; Frank Welker as Thumper
Production ( ). Development on A Bug’s Life 2 will begin in late Christmas 2023 after the release of A Bug’s Life and by February 2024, pre-production on the film was underway. In June 2024, director of the A Bug’s Life film, John Lasseter, will reveal at the Germany International Film Festival that the film would feature a tribute to Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck ‘s film The Live of the Others.
Is Boo Andy’s mom?
Kristina Hubbard and Angel Adcock have posited that Boo’s true identity is Mary Gibbs, the same as her voice actor, which renders her an implausible candidate as Emily or Andy’s mother. Jay maintains that the references were merely coincidental, whereas Angel Adcock asserts that Jessie was presented to Boo as a singular and plausible connection.
What is the allegory of a bug’s life?
This quote smacks of colonialism, in which a much larger native population is managed by a heavily militarized though less numerous imperial power (a theme that also forms the backbone of Lagaan ). And what better medium for Disney to philosophize about colonialism than an ant colony ? While it is easy to dismiss A Bug’s Life (as movie critic Rob Gonsalves of eFilmCritic did) as a film that lacks “a vision beyond the Disney boardroom,” the truth is that this film speaks directly to the historical struggle of the oppressed. By placing ants and grasshoppers within the context of colonialism, A Bug’s Life slyly critiques economic exploitation and military expansion.
As it inveighs against colonialism, the film simultaneously celebrates the ideals of ingenuity and democracy that defined the early American Republic. For its target American audiences, Disney-Pixar offers us a quintessentially national hero: Flik as a miniature beacon of American individualism, constantly pushing the boundaries of what an ant can aspire to do. His “seed-to-tree” speech to Dot not only injects a dose of humor ( But it’s a rock—that rock will be a tree? ) but also gives us a powerful metaphor for valuing potential and ingenuity over all else. The focus of the film thus shifts from the ironically monarchical structure of the colony to the self-made Flik, who saves the colony through sheer hard work and brilliance.
By the same token, the film re-introduces audiences to the beloved American institution of “The Greatest Show on Earth” when it reveals that the “warrior bugs” Flik has recruited are actually performers in a flea circus. This revelation throws a monkey wrench into the ants’ plan to fight off the grasshoppers. It also appears to dash Flik’s romantic dreams, for his prospects with Princess Atta hinge entirely on the success of his plan. Still, the flea circus performers and Flik are able to come through, using their unique set of skills to set up a frenetic and creative ending that not only showcases old-fashioned American know-how but also turns the grasshoppers’ idea of “the circle of life”—in which ants are subservient to grasshoppers—on its head.
Nearly every aspect of A Bug’s Life is a calculated piece of an allegorical puzzle. But all this begs two important questions. Why this anti-colonial analogy in 1998? And why, given the strength and importance of this analogy, did A Bug’s Life fail to reach “iconic status”?
How accurate is a bug’s life?
Movie Version:. The grasshoppers in the movie are relatively accurate to the real insects. They fly and jump great distances, and are much larger than insects like ants. The most common predator of real grasshoppers is the bird, so it is very realistic that Hopper is terrified of birds and is eventually eaten by baby birds. His brother, Molt, sheds his skin in one scene out of fear, but it is unclear if grasshoppers shed their skins out of anything but necessity. Another fact that would have resulted in a very different film if it was utilized is that some species of ants attack and eat grasshoppers. Luckily for these antagonists, the cute ants only want their home to be left alone and not have to serve them anymore.
Ladybug. Ladybugs are perceived as very delicate and harmless, and they truly are for everyone except smaller bugs. Ladybugs eat small insects, like aphids and leaf cutters, and don’t harm humans. Many gardeners actually place ladybugs in their garden to eliminate the threat of those pesky bugs that love plants. The distinctive colors and spots on a ladybug differ with each one, and they are used to ward off predators. Ladybugs, or ladybirds, are interesting insects that are more useful to humans than annoying, assuming of course that they stay outside.
Movie Version:. Francis, the male ladybug in the film, is often mistaken for a female and it is always played up for laughs. It must come with the territory, since “lady” is in the name. He is a rougher character who gets verbally aggressive with anyone who makes fun of him, but he has a soft spot for his circus group and the young ants. The demeanor of male ladybugs versus females is unclear, but the main way to tell the difference between the real insects is that females tend to be larger than males.
Is a bug’s life about slavery?
Pixar’s “A Bug’s Life” is a new animated film that follows an ant colony that frees itself from slavery to grasshoppers. The film follows Flik, the smartest ant in the colony, who perfects an invention to harvest grain more quickly. The film is aimed at a broader audience and lacks the in-jokes of Disney’s “Antz”.
As the ants pile up the “Offer”, Flik spills the offering, and Hopper, the leader of the grasshoppers, is unhappy. Flik is sent to rebuild the Offering or face severe consequences. He apologizes to the Queen, is encouraged by Princess Atta, and resolves to fight back.
Flik uses a dandelion pod as an aircraft and flies off to find mercenaries to defend the colony. He finds nine mercenaries, including a walking stick named Slim, a praying mantis, a military caterpillar, and a black widow. The animators, led by director John Lasseter, provide rich images, such as a rainstorm feeling like the colony is being water-bombed, a circus trick involving matches and flypaper, and sneaky throwaway lines. The film is a powerful and entertaining animated film that showcases the power of a unified ant colony and the power of a unified hero.
What is bug life a metaphor for?
A Bug’s Life is a story of colonialism and capitalism, where grasshoppers colonize an ant colony through violence and force. The ants, who are the working class, give up most of their food to the grasshoppers, who demand half without payment and threaten to kill their leaders. This anti-colonialism story serves as a fictional example of colonized groups overcoming their colonizers. In 2020 economic terms, A Bug’s Life is also a story of capitalism vs.
Socialism. The ants, led by Hopper, are the working class, with no room for innovation. Once the grasshoppers are defeated, the ants create a socialist society, controlling production and living in harmony. This transition is easier to achieve in one ant colony than in a whole country. However, the question remains: why would ants choose to work for the grasshoppers if given the option not to?
What is the message behind a bug’s life?
The film places significant emphasis on the importance of self-belief and the capacity to effect change, irrespective of one’s perceived level of importance. The film reinforces a number of values, including cooperation, resourcefulness, courage, determination, and unity. These values can be taught to children. Furthermore, the film offers a valuable opportunity to engage in discourse with children on pertinent matters pertaining to reality.
📹 A Bug’s Life – ”Then they ALL might stand up to us”
EDIT— I DIDN’T DISABLE COMMENTS ON THIS VIDEO, YT DID!!! WITHOUT ASKING ME!!! This is how they keep us “in line”!
You covered prohibition but failed to cover the biggest reason it came about. It had nothing to do with people drinking alcohol, it had to do with people using homemade alcohol as gas for their vehicle. It would have crushed the oil industry which had just started getting their pockets fat with cash. The alcohol burnt much cleaner than gas so you can blame the government for all the pollution given off by gas vehicles. They are trying to push EV’s at this very moment when it was the same government that made the problem so bad. If people could still make their homemade alcohol to power their vehicle the atmosphere would be much cleaner than it is today. Technically you can still make it but after they removed an entire generation from the ability to do it after prohibition ended people didn’t start doing it again as gas was convenient, cheap, and required zero work from the people. And, all those nasty methane emissions from pumping out oil would be greatly reduced. I’m sure we would still use oil but not nearly at the levels required by today’s market. And, billions of dollars would stay in the hands of the people instead of going to fund terrorism around the world.
While in the 50’s tobacco companies lied about the health effects of cigarettes, nowadays companies are doing that with literally everything. I don’t think thats too far off. Thousands of years in the future, some intelligent beings are going to look through soil samples, and find layers of microplastics and all sorts of chemical residue, and they’re going to spend so much time figuring out how on earth that could’ve happened. (like, why did they just keep making stuff)
I’ve always struggled not to hate everyone involved with covering up the link between smoking & cancer (Christian, we’re not supposed to hate). I lost my dad to lung cancer when I was 16 in ’04. He was just 51. Cancer IRL isn’t like it’s usually portrayed on TV, no, everything that made him himself rotted away, with VERY rare periods where his mind would be clear. He’d lost a ton of weight, leading to me carrying him in my arms when he’d fall. Also… He was a chain smoker, which means I’ve had a LOT of second hand smoke. Sure hope cancer isn’t the way I go out. Had those people not done what they did, I may still have a dad instead of living over half my life without him. I can’t let hate consume me as it once did back then, so I’ve forgiven them. It’s just crazy to me how people put money before lives.
“The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory, is that conspiracy theorists believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is actually chaotic. The truth is that it is not The Iluminati, or The Jewish Banking Conspiracy, or the Gray Alien Theory. The truth is far more frightening. Nobody is in control. The world is rudderless.” – Alan Moore
Question: if smoking causes lung cancer, why have lung cancer rates increased while smoking has dramatically decreased over the past few decades? Always curious about that one. One theory is that the rise in lung cancer in the US during the 50s thru 70s was actually caused by a vast increase in the US highway system and many more people around car exhaust. I’m not sure the same is reflected in places in Europe where smoking is still quite common. I’m not saying smoking is healthy, but if these statistics were used to link cancer to smoking, how do they explain cancer rates now? We know those making the claim would never admit to being wrong, regardless of the evidence.
Here is a conspiracy theory I would like to see investigated well: back in 2019, the economy was strong. 99% of the time, incumbent presidents win a second term when the economy is strong as they seek re-election. Then, the Cxvix thing happened. In Democrat controlled states and big cities, there were strong lock-down and masking requirements. Small businesses were shut down and travel restricted. Shots were required that caused many to lose jobs. But in Republican controlled areas, the restrictions were much less strong. The economy had a slowdown. GDP went down, and unemployment went up. Trump lost by a small margin. So, was the Cxvix thing done intentionally in order to help Biden? Was the Cxvix bug released from lab on purpose? Enquiring minds want to know.
Interesting Fact: Conspiracy theories help us understand the worlds we do not want so we can create and anchor the worlds we do. When people feel threatened, they’re more prone to turn to conspiracy theories. It gives them more sense of control to imagine that, rather than random things happening, there are shadowy groups controlling it. Randomness is very discomforting to people.
I think about Mark Zuckerberg inviting himself to the Bohemian Club and making it awkward for all the other rich and powerful people by failing at small talk, smiling a weird smile, and eating ribs with the tips of his fingers while talking with his mouth full about Sweet Baby Ray’s Barbecue sauce (of which he brought his own miniature bottle). He thinks it went great.
9:30 Sure, but cigarattes were introduced in Europe in the first place b/c companies realized people that smoked tobacco had fewer sick days (that was during the first industrial revolution back in the 19th century (1800’s)). When you smoke, you’re less likely to catch a cold, and also it partially works as a painkiller. That’s why many people (including myself) keep smoking, despite the other health risks. Once, I quit smoking for 3 years, and I had to resume one day when I had several ailments at once (incl. a cold and various pains). Once I smoked the first cigarette after that, everything was gone immediately. I should have stopped right there (using the cigarette only as a cure), but then I kept on smoking again.
I’m so sick of ppl using “Bohemian” to mean whatever they want it to mean… it was a country in Europe, it is gone now (it doesn’t exist anymore) but it is still there on old maps (where it used to be). It is wrong to take the name of a nation which was dissolved to use as the name of the secret rich people club
The NFL has refs soft fix games for the chiefs by not calling flags for the offensive line in the post season. The reason behind this is that the chiefs are great for the casual fans and new fans of the sport. The NFL is always looking for ways to grow their fan base and nothing is better for it than dynasties
Shoeless Joe Jackson never admitted to throwing the game. He said he took the money from them but that he played his best anyway. If you look at his stats throughout the series, he actually played extremely well. But knowing what was going on and not saying anything is almost as bad as actually throwing it, I guess. It sux because he was an all-around amazing player. Would definitely be in the hall if not for that series.
Bohemian Grove has been known about for a long time, now. In fact, Jon Ronson was the one who exposed it in his work, “Them: Adventures with Extremists”, where he wrote about infiltrating the gathering, and he has gone on to show the footage he took of that night at author events and on ‘Never Mind the Buzzcocks’ (a British comedy and current events panel show). It’s so known about, the 5th season of House of Cards had an episode where Frank Underwood attended. The only thing odd or conspiratorial about it is that they talk about business and network before and after the event itself. Now, if you were to talk about Bilderberg, where these same rich and influential tap the next world leaders…
Always found these to be fascinating……. But there’s one of them, when you think about it logically will make every sceptic think again. Now, before you all pile on, just read the following, think about it, then decide……. How many grains of sand are on Earth?? For each grain of sand there’s a galaxy, then multiply the amount of galaxies by that same number for stars in those galaxies, and you’ll get to a number so vast, it’ll be hard to imagine……… so for there to be intelligent life on only one planet in that massive number seems statistically impossible, doesn’t it??
You’ve got to give Hopper credit, he wasn’t foolishly arrogant like so many Disney villains, sitting on a throne, believing the dwarves in the forest or the mice in the manor could never become a threat. He knew his power was fragile despite his size and strength and minions. He was a competent evil overlord. Imagine if he was a more powerful villain instead of a mere grasshopper. Scary thought.
A literal grasshopper was smarter and scarier than most villain archetypes. He never underestimated his enemies, made a brilliant speech that reminded his minions both why they shouldn’t question him and why he’s right (big difference those two points), and ultimately only lost because of something higher on the food chain.
A very great lesson to be learnt here. A tyrant, bully, oppressor is a coward and full of fears. That’s why he uses his power oppressively to keep his targets down, so that they don’t gain the courage to stand up to him. He is afraid of losing power and being humiliated. He does everything in his power to crush resistance. The histories of dictatorships, autocracies and fascists are great examples.
Hopper is a very under appreciated villain and all around character.A villain that realizes their greatest weakness is that their actually the weaker species is kinda admirable.I feel like if they made some of the other grass hoppers more likable like hopper you could actually be conflicted on who to rout for in the movie.
Hopper is, without a doubt, the greatest Pixar villian of all time. I can’t think of any other bad guy from the Pixar films that are as cruel, sadistic, serious, manipulative, and intimidating. Syndrome, Stinky Pete, and Lotso had sympathetic backstorys. Hopper, on the other hand, was just pure evil. A Bug’s Life is far from Pixar’s best movie, but it’s antagonist has always stood out.
Politicians: “If you let one commoner stand up to us, then they all might stand up. Those ‘lowly’ commoners outnumber us a thousand to one. And if they ever figure that out, there goes our AUTHORITATIVE POWER!! It’s not just about money or taxes. It’s also about keeping those commoners under our control. That’s why we’re going back. Does anybody else want to stay?”
Hopper gets it. He knows his overall power and control is very dependent on the ants willfully serving him and knows the moments the ants wise up to his manipulation, unite, and stop fearing him and the other grasshoppers, he’s DONE! Can’t rule over a group that severally outnumber you that all suddenly turn against you. That’s why people like Hopper are very dependent on division, deception, manipulation, and fear tactics to control the masses. This scene is always relevant, especially now due to what’s going on right now.
Say what you want about hopper, but he was one of the very few villains who was intelligent enough to realise how dangerous his enemies were and never underestimated them for a second, even at the height of their oppression towards the ants. There’s nothing worse or lazier than a cliche overconfident and cocky villain.
Dear NSA & Associates of Google, Thank you for allowing this article to be presented – as it is a clear look that the moment you inform “the powers that be” to make their next move, we “ants” will be ready for a fight. Since plenty of us are already prepared, all we ask of you is, to just bring it! -Nathan A. Charging citizen, 1 of many (and I do mean many!)
Strangely prophetic… 😡😡😡. Just one more example of these satanic elites telling us what they are doing… it’s not about your health… it’s about keeping us in line… turning our wonderful country into a Marxist one… We need to study our world history… Look at Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Castro, Mao… it’s ALWAYS bloody and horrible for us “little people” if they get in control. MILLIONS DIED EVERY SINGLE TIME… Stand up and stand firm for what’s right and Godly! These godless commies will not win! WE outnumber them 100 to 1… 🔥🔥🔥
The companies in the US are finding out. Kellogs was working people 80 hours a week. That’s abuse. Some jobs had no covid ppe protections but forced people back to work. Then they made commercials praising essential workers but didn’t pay them better, didn’t offer any additional benefit. We have to get rid of the idea that a business can mistreat people because they need a job. “If you don’t like it then leave” creates a toxic work environment. It was only a threat until it became sound advice.
Maybe I’m just too simple-minded to see the “bigger picture” here, but I’ve honestly never thought of the conflict in this movie (and this scene in particular) as being some sort of political metaphor. I mean, it could be if you try to look at it “a certain way,” but I really don’t it’s that deep. As far as I’m concerned, I just see the grasshoppers as a group of gangsters running a protection racket (remember in his introductory scene where he tells the queen “If you don’t keep your end of the bargain, then I can’t guarantee your safety, and there are insects out there that will take advantage of you”) and getting too comfortable/overconfident with how much power they have over the ants. If nothing else, at least Hopper is vigilant enough of a leader to recognize that they can’t afford to have any resistance against them, even if it’s from a single ant–someone as timid as Flik, at that.
DON’T let the message fly over your head this is more than likely meant to symbolyze how the privileged live off the working class and how they must make that working class fear them and/or think they need them. They need to maintain a statu quo, keeping workers in line, or else workers would question the social structure and how the privileged are nothing without them and at a moment like this it’s worth mentioning that this order includes making certain segments of the working class stand as a lower class so they can be coerced into accepting worse jobs with worse living conditions, among others
They twisted everything. They give you false choices, like capitalism or communism, like there are no alternatives to both that would suit mankind better. To support capitalism you must support big business and corporatism, to support communism you must support authoritarianism. These false choices are the perception created by the power structure which then gets folded into the law. So long as you’re divided so evenly accountability for those who are reaping what we sow is avoided. They keep the people divided and fearful, fearful of losing what they have, their lifestyle, their identity which has become their job, and fearful of the other half of the population who they have been convinced is their actual enemy. The social manipulation is on such a grand evil genius scale that it should of been devised by Magneto.
0:45 You let one theorist find out the truth then they’ll all find out the truth. THOSE gross conspiracy theorists are ahead of us one hundred steps, and if they figure out this is a hoax, there goes OUR way of LIFE. It’s not about a Virus, it’s about keeping their fear in their minds, THAT’S WHY WE MADE THE VAX. Does anyone else wanna get sick? Different message, same context