In Fantastic Beasts, the protagonist, Newt Scamander, arrives in New York City with a mysterious suitcase. In the Harry Potter series, a class by Hagrid showed fourth-year students using Nifflers to find gold. The story takes place in 1926, years before the events of the Harry Potter series. Newt encounters various magical creatures, including a niffler Teddy and new monsters.
In Fantastic Beasts, the killing curse is retcons of the established rules of Avada Kedavra. The movie also introduces a unique magical effect called the golden flame, which produces a powerful jet of golden fire. The killing curse crops up twice in the movie, retconsing part of the established rules of Avada Kedavra.
Beasts were magical creatures that did not have sufficient intelligence to understand the laws of the magical community. In Fantastic Beasts, Grindelwald merely gestures a car to be thrown at Tina and Newt, demonstrating his mastery of wandless magic. G Glumbumble, an insect resembling a bumblebee, produces a treacle that induces melancholy in those who consume it. Golden Snidget, a small golden bird, is Newt’s job. His one job was to look out for the Golden Snitch, a small ball with wings that is hard to see and catch.
In summary, Fantastic Beasts is a captivating story that explores the magical world and the challenges faced by young wizards.
📹 FANTASTIC BEASTSCredencevs Albus Dumbledore fight Scene
Fantastic Beasts : The Secrets of Dumbledore – Action, adventure, Fantasy Movie 2022 Professor Albus Dumbledore must assign …
Why don’t they use Avada Kedavra in Fantastic Beasts?
The portrayal of wizards in the Fantastic Beasts films as more mature than their counterparts in the Harry Potter films, as well as the depiction of Grindelwald’s followers as more powerful than those involved in the curse in the latter series, may have a significant impact on their abilities.
Can Golden magic block Avada Kedavra?
In Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore, the killing curse rules are retconning due to the Qilin’s extraordinary magic abilities and the Dumbledore brothers’ protection spells. The Qilin’s mother is hit twice with the Avada Kedavra curse, but she doesn’t die immediately. The chase sequence with Newt and the newborn Qilin follows while the mother is still alive. The Harry Potter movies and books have previously established that the Avada Kedavra curse should cause instant death, so there shouldn’t be a need to cast a second curse.
At the end of Fantastic Beasts 3, Grindelwald attempts to use Avada Kedavra on Credence, but Albus and Aberforth Dumbledore successfully block it using golden magic. There are two possible explanations for the retconning of the killing curse rules in Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore. First, the Qilin’s extraordinary magic abilities could potentially delay the effects of the Avada Kedavra curse, albeit not prevent the outcome.
Second, the blocking of Grindelwald’s Avada Kedavra curse facilitates the destruction of the blood pack in a more satisfying and cinematic way than watching Dumbledore’s trial and error of spells back at Hogwarts.
Despite these in-universe explanations, the real reason for retconning the killing curse is likely down to the filmmakers serving the plot of Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore. The drawn-out death of the Qilin provides Newt with a character to comfort her in the last moments and discover the second baby Qilin.
What is the rarest magic in Harry Potter?
Ancient magic, a mysterious and powerful form of magic, was largely forgotten in the wizarding world by the late 19th century. Those who could perceive and wield it were considered to have a unique and rare ability. Ancient magic appeared in traces or “whispers” and could also access unique expressions of ordinary magic, augmenting their spells with increased power and potency. Three known inherent wielders of ancient magic began schooling at Hogwarts in their fifth year, linking the ability with late-blooming. Xenophilius Lovegood believed that love was a great blessing bestowed upon the world by practitioners of ancient magic.
Why can’t wizards just use Avada Kedavra?
The utilization of “EW” as a primary designation for witches and wizards is typically regarded as unfavorable and illicit, resulting in a diminished reliance on it. Such circumstances may prompt individuals to reassess their convictions and refrain from employing the term “EW” in any context.
Why is Imperio unforgivable?
The Ministry of Magic, after reforming the Wizards’ Council, declared the Imperius Curse, Cruciatus, and Killing Curses as “unforgivable” in 1717. The Imperius Curse was a tool of the Dark Arts and one of the three Unforgivable Curses. When cast successfully, the curse placed the victim under the caster’s control, making them obedient. However, a person with exceptional will could resist it, making it unique among the Unforgivable Curses. The curse can be broken upon the caster’s death or when they decide to lift it.
When properly cast, the Imperius Curse was not unpleasant, as it placed the victim in a calm, trance-like state, banishing responsibility and anxiety. However, Harry believed his curse may not have been very strong, making the sensation from casting a more powerful Imperius Curse more intense than known.
Which spell killed Voldemort?
Expelliarmus, or the Disarming Charm, is a spell that drives out a weapon, often a wand, and is often seen in duels. Harry, a skilled combatant, was deeply enamored with the spell and used it to defeat Lord Voldemort. Professor Snape, a former follower of Voldemort, taught Harry the spell during Professor Lockhart’s Duelling Club. Despite initially struggling with the Summoning Charm, Harry quickly developed an aptitude for Expelliarmus, which allowed him to use it in challenging situations.
Within months of learning it, Harry used it to retrieve Riddle’s diary from Malfoy and disarm Lockhart. He spent the final hours of the second year practicing Expelliarmus, becoming very good in the process. This relationship between Harry and Expelliarmus has both positive and negative aspects.
Who is stronger Credence or Voldemort?
Credence, a powerful wizard with the power to quickly defeat Dumbledore, is believed to have a significant advantage over Voldemort. The founders of Hogwarts could easily defeat Voldemort, but Godric Gryffindor, a duelist with strong values of bravery and chivalry, stands the best chance in a duel. Gryffindor’s primary values revolve around bravery and chivalry, making him a bigger threat than Salazar Slytherin.
He is considered the most accomplished duelist of his time and a significant opponent of Muggle discrimination. The Salazar Slytherin vs Voldemort debate has been resolved, but Gryffindor’s dedication to fighting the Dark Lord makes him a formidable opponent.
Can Dumbledore block Avada Kedavra?
The curse, Avada Kedavra, cannot be blocked by magic, even with counter spells. However, Dumbledore can use a large object between the wand and its target. This concept is primarily discussed in the battle between Dumbledore and Voldemort at the Ministry of Magic in “Harry Potter and The Order of the Phoenix”. The fight is more detailed in the books, with a headless golden statue of the wizard causing a crash between Harry and Voldemort. The spell only glances off its chest as the statue flung out its arms to protect Harry.
What is golden magic in Harry Potter?
Harry’s wand had a profound effect on the magical realm, whereby it acknowledged Voldemort as its “brother” and mortal enemy. This resulted in the generation of a formidable golden surge of energy, designated as the “golden flame.” This phenomenon may have been utilized by Voldemort prior to the Battle of Hogwarts.
What is the most powerful spell in Fantastic Beasts?
The video presents an in-depth examination of the potent spell “Protego Diabolica” within the Wizarding World, with a particular focus on Gellert Grindelwald and the Fantastic Beasts series.
Did Ron try to use Avada Kedavra on Nagini?
The Killing Curse is not confirmed to be Ron’s attempt to kill Voldemort’s snake, Nagini, with Avada Kedavra. In the movies, Ron is seen firing a green spell at the snake, which resembles the Curse. Harry had instructed Ron, Hermione, and Neville to kill Nagini before Voldemort could be defeated. The snake was attacking Ron and Hermione, giving Ron more reason to see it dead. Although Ron’s spell had no effect, it is likely due to defensive magic protecting Nagini, not a failure on Ron’s part.
📹 This Fantastic Beast Changes EVERYTHING | Harry Potter Film Theory
Today J dives into the Wizarding World of Harry Potter to discuss an overlooked development from Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets …
There are three requirements of a spell to work: magical power (not all wizards are capable of casting spells to the same degree,) intent (you have to want to cast the spell) and line of sight (most clearly demonstrated when Quirrell’s curse was obstructed during the Quidditch game is Philosopher’s Stone.) Avada Kedavra in particular, requires killing intent, as Belletrix explains that cruciatus curse, you have to want in pain (or for the purposes of Avada Kevavra, dead. Non of the protags display that intention, they might benefit from Voldemort’s death, maybe even seek it but none desire it, an important distinction for spellwork.)
Theoretically, you could stop it with that serpensortia spell Malfoy used against Harry in book 2. Create snake, snake hit spell, spell and snake gone. And this probably applies to conjuring like, physical objects (chairs and stuff) from thin air in the way of the spell, cause wouldn’t the spell just bounce off/destroy those too? Like the desk in voldy v dumbledore book 5?
Today, I was thinking that the similarities between Harry’s sacrifice in the end, and Dumbledore breaking the blood pact. In both situations there was the avada Kedavra cast by the elder wand by one side and the sheer will to protect someone else from the other side. This makes me think that the relation between Harry an Voldemort was a similar dark version of the pact between Dumbledore and Grindelwald
The explanation of defending yourself with object is pretty simple in my eyes: if the object isn’t touching you, it will take the full force of the killing curse, which will then expire (the statues); if you are holding the object, there is a good chance that the curse will run through it and still get to you (clothes).
Hi! As always: loved you theory! I like the idea that love still is the counter “action” for the course. Maybe the mom’s love for the unborn child protected her. Maybe she knew that it would not survive if she died, that’s why she made it through childbirth and was able to hold on a little longer…
fun fact – a qilin(also known as kirin) is basically the Chinese version of the unicorn. It is said its rare appearance often coincides with the imminent birth or death of a sage or illustrious ruler. It is said to be so benevolent that it never harms any living thing and when it walks, no blade of grass is bent and no insect is crushed beneath its hoof
Well, if a Qilin is covered in fur, then you can just harvest the fur, like how we harvest sheep wool. And if it is scales, then it most likely sheds its scales. Either of these methods would be a humane way to make, not armor, but a cloak. I sort of imagine it like the cloak of Drago Bloodfist in HTTYD 2, a cloak made of a material that can resist a powerful spell.
1:20 Yes; that often being what some call ‘birthday suit’, lolz … Spells are concentrated Aether; ultimately, if one can absorb Aether, they can block and absorb the spell, even one that powerful, and just as dirty. The one spell that would accomplish ceasing of life functionality? Talaruda. It summons the wrath of Talamiura, Governess of Death/Darkness. It’s a powerful spell, and will end any life, even non-sentient.
So, while we’re scrutinizing Avada Kedavera in detail, maybe we should give some thought to what it actually does and doesn’t actually do. In Half-blood Prince, we learn of a potion from Slughorn, called Draft of Living Death. This creates a perpetual stasis which resembles death in every way except the affected is not subject to decomposition or physical injury. The effect is indefinite until dispelled by the antidote, upon the administration of which, the affected is apparently instantly restored to life. At the end of Half-blood Prince, Dumbledore is Avada Kedavera’d. He falls from the parapet of the astronomy tower 100 feet to the rocky ground, but fails to become pavement pizza on impact. He is then entombed and lays in that tomb for over a year until at the end of Deathly Hallows part one Voldemort decides to rob his grave. When the tomb is opened, Dumbledore is shown to be completely intact, with no sign of decomposition whatsoever. The similarity between the effects of Avada Kedavera and Draft of Living Death is stark. The curse seems to have actually been modeled after the potion. The only difference being, that no antidote or counter charm has ever been created to dispell Avada Kedavera. But what if one was?
Ben for Kvothe!🧙🏻♂️🗡 J for Elodin!🗡🧙🏻♂️I think my favorite new fantastic beast is the Qilin. I wish they would do an updated fantastic beasts book with these new creatures included, but I think I also agree with your headcanon that Newt deliberately left some beasts out because they’re so rare. Also loved that Scott Sterling reference!😂
I’m saddened by their treatment of newt who previously we’ve seen be an exceptional wizard. not to mention his case is a practical pocket army.(he’d never use it as such but they would defend him to the death I believe) .Newt not putting up a proper fight bugs me. Hopefully the next one we’ll see him cut loose. in defense of animals .
Probably she didn’t die because of her hide. It is mentioned throughout the series that for example Dragons and Graphorns have very thick hides protected by some ancient magic (which we’ll probably explore in Hogwarts Legacy) which makes a lot of spells useless against these creatures. That’s why it takes more time and at least two spells to kill it. I think your theories are getting a bit to far fetched
Since the blood pact contains blood from both Dumbledore and Grindelwald, it’s possible that casting the Killing Curse on the blood pact would carry the spell through that blood link, and kill both of its creators. That may be why Dumbledore wouldn’t find a way to convey a request that someone else try it (because the blood pact would likely prevent him from asking outright). He’s not yet desperate enough to be willing to sacrifice himself for a chance to kill Grindelwald.
One more clever way for Harry to block a killing curse: to be the master of the wand being used against you. But really my takeaway here is that we’re coming up with all these reasons for Harry to survive killing curses because we just won’t face the fact that HARRY IS PART QILIN YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST!
I thought many magical creatures had this, like a nundu needed 100 skilled wizards to kill. But if you can just kill one with the killing curse, how could there be a 100 needed? But the hide could just be too thin given how it just passes through anything wearable and not even scratch the material. So it’s not about durability either.
Duel I’d like to see: Moldywarts versus Tatsuya Shiba from The Irregular at Magic High School. Not only does Tatsuya automatically reset to a prior state when his body drops below a certain threshold of combat ability, he can do a spell that is very similar to what Harry’s wand did to Lucius Malfoy’s wand when Voldy tried to kill Harry with it. Pieces of wand all over the place.
I wonder if the invisibility cloak had qilin properties since it was entirely spell resistant. It would also explain why qilins are so rare and hard to find they have the ability to hide impenetrably unless they wanted to be found. Which is why grindelwald needed newt to find the adult because it would trust that he was there to help
as i see it there are 5 main ways of avoiding it. You can dodge, apparate away, conjure objects to block it, summon objects near you to block it or finally rely on special circumstances such as love sacrifice, wand relation, wands not wanting to kill their true master, being bound to life by a lovecrux or horcruxes etc. The main flaw i see in the effectiveness of the curse is that for someone skilled at conjuration like Mcgonagall, it should be quite trivial to quickly conjure a sufficient object to take the hit just as easily as casting a shield charm.
And perhaps it could be two things at play: The Mother qillen had love for her born and yet not born calf, which the love may have kept her alive long enough to birth The intent of the caster may not have been all in on killing the mother, at least while they still had not yet had the calf in their possession. After which, yeah, sure, intent to kill.
Love your theories. I just want to throw something in here. In the HP books, it is said and repeated over and over how death eaters learned things from Voldemort. Characters make this reference quite a lot. So, while I have seen the killing curse being used in Fantastic Beasts, I guess there is some room of possibility that the spell’s become more evolved during Voldemort’s era? Idk =( what do you guys think?
Did anyone ever consider in the battle of the 7 potters that it wasn’t the wand that saved harry? Voldemort uses Avada kadavra and the golden flames shoot out seemingly by themselves. What if it was the part of Voldemorts soul that took control. As moody/crouch Jr. Explained that the entire class could have pointed their wands and said the words and he would have little more then a nose bleed. We also know that you really have to mean to kill and that the horocruxes can protect themselves. Putting this together Voldemort might want to kill harry but certainly doesn’t want to kill himself. The horocruxes was protective of the vessel and the spell was weakened because of the link between souls. Also actually they also share blood at this point and he is a lovecrux for harry! It’s not his wand doing the work here it’s everything else at play that keeps harry alive and the killing curse from doing its job.
I think it makes sense to say if someone else came up with the idea of using avada kedavra on the blood pact he would have been safe from getting killed by it but that if he had asked someone else to do it that it would fall under him trying to go against the blood pact in turn resulting in the same outcome as if he were to try himself
I love this the only thing I see is that we know the reason Gellert used the knife-it was because he needed the blood of the Qilin to use it almost like the opposite of a Pensive. Instead of seeing the past, the blood of the Qilin gives the ability of precognition-to see the future. So he needed the blood ASAP and wasn’t going to 1. wait for the Qilin to die from the spell 2. cut it’s throat. He needed the blood immediately-hence the knife as soon as they arrived.
There are just some creatures that are more resistant to spells, dragons, for example, Qilin could just have the same type of naturally resistant hide, it doesn’t necessarily need to be because they are so pure. If the Qilin is resistant to the killing curse would unicorns, therefore, be as well? The killing curse doesn’t always kill, Crouch even mocks the class and tells them none of them could even give him a nosebleed if they were to use it. If the Qilin’s resistance to the killing curse stems from its purity and goodness, wouldn’t its skin be useless? After all phoenix feathers wouldn’t help you either, only being a phoenix would work, I think the same stands true for the Qilins.
Thanks! I love your analysis. Your website has given me great joy since 2015. I can’t wait for the article on the qilin bowing to Dumbledore. That headstone intrigues me. If ordinary stone blocks AK, then it stands to reason that other mundane but strong materials could block it as well, such as Kevlar. I like that idea because we never get to see muggles provide their wizarding friends and family with an edge. I love the delicious irony inherent in Dumbledore winning the 1945 duel thanks to Jake putting his MacGyver hat on. Here’s a question for you. Since qilin seem to be sentient in this universe, if a qilin were to give Harry or another hero their hide fashioned into armor after the qilin’s natural death, would the hide then work as effective armor since it’s used with the consent of the former owner? If so, would it then be doubly effective because the qilin gave their hide out of love for the hero and/or country/greater cause? 🤔
Since I saw this article when you released it I have been thinking of other ways that my block Avada Kedavra and I think that each of the Deathly Hallows can, especially as I am listening to this audiobook again 🙂 The Elder Wand is meant to make the wielder undefeatable, it would have to be able to block Avada Kedavra in some way. Weather this is like in the books where Dumbledoor manipulated statues (and Fawkes?) to take the curse on behalf of himself and Harry, or in the movies where Voldemort appeared to use the killing curse multiple times and was blocked with a red spell. The Invisible Cloak while Harry, Ron and Hermione were visiting Xenophilius Lovegood he described it as “giving constant and impenetrable concealment, no matter what spells are cast at it.” The cloak is shown in the book to not be removed when a Death Eater tried to summon it from him when they went back to Hogsmeade during the Caterwauling Charm going off. I also feel that it wouldn’t be stretch to think that the Resurrection Stone may also be able to block the killing curse. If you had summoned someone who had died, it is likely that this “spirit” version could block the spell and since they are already dead wouldn’t be able to die again. Perhaps you might need to summon them again… Perhaps this might be part of the reason they are the Deathly Hallows, they are all able to prevent the owner from being killed with Avada Kedavra. Although it is often said during in the story that no known way to block the killing curse is known.
I love the theory, but I think I figured something out that might lessen its believability just a bit. To quote the Harry Potter Fandom Page (which could be wrong): ” Dragonhide is resistant to the spells cast by a single, average wizard, as revealed in “The Goblet of Fire.” A dragon can be killed by Avada Kedavra, but it would take multiple wizards or an especially powerful wizard to work”. This reminded me of the Qilin from the movie, just being resistant to it. I dunno, y’all are way more knowledgable than me, just curious is all. Thank you for the continued great content!
imo all the spells require many factors to work effectively; intent, magical power, skills, control, as well as the victim’s conditions. such as purity of heart (or will, in the case of Imperius). If what i think is correct, any human (no one is that pure) who’s directly hit by the killing curse will almost always die, unless there’s a powerful charm at play: the sacrificial love – because to use it, you would need unconditional love – which is pure in my book. it doesn’t technically make you pure, but the purity of the charm can blocks the harmful curses, not just the killing curse. which was the case for Harry’s sacrifice for Hogwarts this is why i think just the hide wouldn’t be enough.
QUESTION: we hear about brother wands and how they react if fighting against each other…but how exactly do we think magic would be effected if the brother wands are defending each other? or even casting with the intent of casting the same spell together. obviously one can assume it would be a stronger casting…but would there be something on the same scale as Priori Incantatum?
But what IF the quillan had already died, but you didn’t kill it…and you happened to stumble upon it shortly after it had died? Would you then (assuming it was an adult size, like Mama one is) theoretically be able to use the hide to make anti-avada kadavra armour or cloak to protect you? Personally, I think in such a case that you would be able to do so because: A.) you weren’t the one to unalive it & B.) the Universe and/or the unalive quillan’s spirit would then allow an innocent passerby who happened upon their unalived body to keep & use it’s hide for protection. But that’s just my own personal theory. Was just curious what you think about my theory?
Not to go full Muggle on this, but if solid objects can block it (gravestone) why not just use a regular shield? Or if it being in contact with you is dangerous, a shield enchanted to hover nearby? You might need to do some material/thickness tests, but don’t see why it wouldn’t work. Perhaps the assumption is that the wizard would fire some kind of material disintegration spell first, followed by the killing curse? But even then, a one spell advantage might be the difference between life and death
Loving sacrifice being the only spell that can block the killing curse makes sense since it costs your life in order to activate it and you have to be willing to sacrifice your life. Also why I do believe the spell is unblockable? I think that just means defensive magic will not be able to fend against it in the movies. The way I think they’ve been blocking it is to simply fire an attack spell at the vodacadabra to counter it as long as it’s at similar power. Now we see that Dumbledore fires the expelliarmus at the vaticanabra and since they’re equally matched in terms of power, the continued spells continue to clash as they try and overwhelm each other with their spells. We also see that Ron’s mother in the last movie seems to fire off a counterspell l or a counter attack whenever that spell is launched at her and the two spells look like they’ve collided and just cancel each other out. So I believe counter attacks of around the same power to the power of the vaticanabra. Since if you poor or more magic or energy into a spell, you can make it more powerful. So there’s a difference between casters casting the same spell l based on the proficiency of someone having in that spell, as well as the power of the wizard themselves
Didn’t Newt shortly after the scene with the mom Qilin deflect a similar burst of green energy? Also, it’s my understanding that you can’t cast unforgivable curses without uttering the incantation? I might be wrong about that, though. However, Barty Crouch Jr. while he was teaching at Hogwards as Moody did say that the class could all point their wands at him and cast the killing curse yet he would only suffer a nosebleed, if that. Leads me to think that while a perfect Avada Kedavra is surely lethal an inperfect one might not be. A nonverbal casting would probably increase the difficulty even further, meaning that the spells effects could be further diminished (delayed reaction, not killing the target, etc.). Another alternative is that the directors just decided “green bad” and most of the bad guys’ spells are green by default.
It’s easy Avada Kedavra stops once it hits a living animal or human regardless of size as seen when fake moody uses it on the spider and when faux blocks it from hitting Dumbledore so the best fool proof way to stop the spell is make a living suit which can be done one of two ways 1. you can use transfiguration as seen in CoS when Ron transforms Scabbers shouldn’t be too hard to make a living suit instead of a cup 2. cover yourself in insects you could either find a way to command all of them to stay on you which could allow multiple blocks or go the muggle route and cover yourself in sticky paper and keep them on you that way
in reference to the Qilin curse, as created in the theory of this article, it sounds like these creatures still naturally die so couldn’t one get around this needing to slay it if they just wait for the current, hopefully fully grown Qilin, to die naturally and then use the hide to make the armor? I can’t imagine you get cursed for making armor from a corpse you didn’t cause the creation of right? fun article as always and an interesting thought experiment
The Qilin in FB are derived from the qilin of real world eastern Asian folklore. They also appear in Dungeons and Dragons, Fifth Edition as the Ki-Rin: Celestial creatures of the Upper Planes that frequently serve as messengers, scouts, guardians and protectors for good-aligned deities. They have the ability to travel between the Upper Planes of the gods to the Prime Material Plane of mortals. To actually see one is considered to be a great omen for mortals of good heart. (My aasimar Celestial Warlock has one as his patron)
I think the reason why mama qilin didn’t die immediately is similar to why the cruciatus curse doesn’t even remotely affect Harry after he has come back from the dead in the forest (I think they say something like the fact that he survived caused something like a patronus within his heart). I think those (really cute) qilins are so pure (and lovable) that they have this patronus like protection within them. I mean… I don’t really know if a patronus would save you from avada kedavra but I can imagine a similar effect than what happened to the mama qilin – not dying instantly but still being affected. What are your thoughts?
If I remember correctly, if the caster of the killing curse doesn’t have a strong intent the spell barely does anything. Based on this it seems that a persons’ willpower is part of the spell. This kind of explanation, give credence as to why Voldemort hates Dumbledore, because his will is to strong to overcome normally. And because people in the wizarding world don’t legally cast the curse, and don’t have the experience of it, they don’t know that tidbit of info. Hence why the killing curse always works, because people believe it’s unblock-able.
The Quilin might have some sort of ancient magic in their skin like dragon hide,but much stronger due to theyre purity.Which might be why they resists the killing curse.Its just part of the “magic-ness” of the world.And while it did affect the mother Chilin quite a bit,I think she died not from the spell but the spell causing complications through the birth of her second calf.
I don’t think Chillin Armor would be very effective. We see a living Qilan get hit and resist the effects for long enough to give birth, but what J is talking about is using the hide from a dead Qilan to reflect the killing curse. It’s a huge assumption to believe that it is the hide that resisted the spell. It could have been a motherly love for her unborn offspring that kept the spell from affecting her. There are any number of other explanations; perhaps magical beats all have a resistance to that spell.
I wonder if Newt could have kept the baby qilin and like, harvested the scales it loses as it grows to make Avada Kedavra proof armor. I’m assuming that like almost any other animal they shed, and collecting their scales in a non-violent way might keep away any ill effect of harming such a pure creature
You should publish a book ok a collection of your Harry Potter film theories as a sort of commentary on the story. That would open up these ideas and your website to a group of people who otherwise may not have been exposed to it. Furthermore it should be relatively easy compared to making a whole new book as you likely have the scripts for the articles still saved
Weren’t there also two different times in Secrets of Dumbledore where Dumbledore blocks Avada Kadavra – first right at the beginning of the fight with Credence and then again when Grindelwald uses it at the end right before his fight starts with Dumbledore? Also was it just me or did they also canonize that a lot of characters can fly by having the mid-apparition fighting happen? In the HP books during the Battle of the Seven Potters, the Death Eaters were riding brooms and Voldemort was flying. In the movie, they use the same visualization for Voldemort flying and the mid-apparition fighting (which the Death Eaters use a number of times). For the HP movies, that was fine because they aren’t canon, but now it seems like the Voldemort flying ability has been shown in a number of other wizards??
Don’t you guys think with “it cannot be blocked”, they simply mean you can’t shake it off like the other 2 unforgivable curses? With enogh will power, you don’t need a counter spell to ‘block’ these spells. But you cannot defy Avada Kedavra with will power. So maybe you can block all 3 curses with spells, but only 2 of them with will power.
I believe that the mother qilin summoned every ounce of resistance and protection to the spell she has to ensure her last baby was delivered healthy and alive. She took the curse’s damage to her own body and made sure it didn’t reach her womb. That is a choice. Even though she wasn’t verbally given the choice to get out of the way and live, she could have utilized her energy reserves to save herself or flee. She put them instead towards the protection and delivery of her second child. This could imbue her baby with protection similar to Harry’s.
How about how many magical animal languages are there? Parseltongue seems based because snakes are inherently magical creatures (and connected to humans via maledictus curse). My expected ones: cats- due to common companionship with witches Birds- especially magical (phoenixes) and common companions (owls). Also Veela turn into bird/human Harpies Fish- connection to merpeople (siren, selkies, etc) I think even dragon because of how magical but that wouldn’t really make sense? Maybe just telepathy or something
The Qilin was’t killed by Avada Kedavra. The Script never specified the spell used, it just says that Rosier and Carrow shoot some curses, that hit the Qilin – Mother. Neither the color of the spell nor the name of the spell were ever mentioned. It was just the decision of the VFX – Team. So I would’t rely on that theory.
Actually, I think there is better armour. Every time something is hit by the spell, it absorbs it all, then dies, and there doesn’t seem to be a minimum-sized creature so all you need is a living armour of Insects (imagine Shino Aburame from Naruto), maybe an Ant Farm armour or Earthworm Armour. Something to cover your body from head to toe, be alive and be challenging to miss and hit you and not be one and done.
Hey… Could it be that Qillin’s mama didn’t die because she wanted to protect another baby that was still in the womb? I mean… In the end she still died, but didn’t die right away when the curse hit… and also… when the curse hit, she only had one baby at that time… So maybe… she’s trying to hold on just for another kid? I don’t really think that Qillin can really dispel curses… because if so.. then Qillin mama won’t die in the end… and if you guys argue about armor… well in the end the qillin armor can’ t protect the mama Qillin from the killing curse (it still dead) and also…because of her pure nature, perhaps the desire to protect her unborn child allowed her to at least survive until her second child was born. (this is just my theory…and sorry if my english is really bad…)
I don’t think it necessarily follows that quilin hide is resistant just because they’re creatures of love. Love isn’t a physical thing stored on the skin or hair, it’s part of their living selves. I think it’s just as reasonable to assume that once the creature is dead, any ‘love powered resistance’ would be gone. They might just be resistant as a magical beast though, and THAT might still be there after death..
Avada kedavra was originaly created to “destroy bad things” in a person. Killing is an unintended sideeffect. If you look at it like that, it makes sense, chilin is resistant, or outright imune to it. But since it is not a physical property, but spiritual, armor made of chilin would be worthless in this regard. Or at least, that is my opinion on this.
All that leadup only to reveal that you still don’t understand at all how qilin/kirin soul sense works. Also, what proof do you have that the qilin was even hit by the killing curse? There was no incantation, it could have just been a different offensive spell. Afterall, even Voldemort doesn’t cast the unforgivable curses non-verbally.
Just because these spells look like green blasts, it doesn’t mean the spell was Avada Cedavra. If I recollect correctly, Avada Cedavra was invented by Lord Voldy, which means, the spells in Fantastic Beasts could not be Avada Cedavra. Avada Cedavra being recently invented could also mean that effective ways to counter it are simply not found yet.
It’s my theory that Dumbledore can survive Avada purely due to possessing the Elder Wand for that fight. It’s a similar theory for if you tried it on Grindelwald. The Deathly Hallows are supposed to make you a master of death. So naturally, possessing one should potentially come with some protection against… well… the KILLING curse. Just a theory.
The blood pact being the thing that kills you physically doesn’t make any sense at all. First, it would be no advantage to have it near you of you are on the opposing side of the person with whom you have the pact with. I mean, if Grindelwald thought about betraying Dumbledore (and he DOES, even sending Credence to kill him) doesn’t makenthe pact pendant thingy go all the way to strangle Grindewald. So basically to be free from it, one could basically bury it inside a metal box and keep it far away so that you could plot against someone and betray them at will.
So, clothes won’t block the Killing Curse. A suit of armor probably wouldn’t either. But what about… magical-grade Riot Shield? Extremely cumbersome? Yes. Potential to physically block the Killing Curse? Perhaps? The mental image of an Auror busting in with a Riot Shield and Wand? I think it’s really funny
Here’s a potential theory to talk about later: (spoilers if you haven’t seen the movie yet! But if we’re already talking theories here I’ll assume veryone has) In a previous article, you talk about how Dumbledore’s soul (gonna guess his soul, as his body was still there) might have turned into a Phoenix after his funeral. And as we’re pretty sure Credence, or Aurelius I guess, is still likely to die by the end of this story, maybe he becomes Fawks? Would make sense why he seems to have a bond with Dumbledore, because he likes to hang around with his Uncle Al. Would also explain why Aberforth seems to like Albus even less when they’re older than he does in Fantastic beasts, because he keeps his own son as his pet.
Counter curse doesn’t mean unblockable, it means it cannot be reversed. Meaning you can block it absolutely, but if you fail and it hits you, you die. So for many they wouldn’t even attempt it and would prefer to flee or evade it al together. Being Dark Magic, it also can have enough strength to go through normal shields like protego, but a strong enough wizard might have a shield powerful enough to block Avada Kadavra. Problem was, Voldy was so powerful, that nobody could rival his version of the spell. Should notice that it is not a commonly used spell however, it was Voldy’s signature spell. The others Death Eater used more common curses, and rarely used the killing curse. You would think for such a powerful and unstoppable spell, everyone would use it, but that is not the case. To me that is telling that, it’s not usually unblockable at all, it’s just Voldy’s that sort of was.
There are so many holes in what you said in this article. Maybe the reason it didn’t die immediately is because the spells were cast and not cast with full force or the size of the creature matters in how effective the spell is against it. THAT or the creature is resistant to magic casts. Aren’t giants magically resistant? Also isn’t the blood needed to be spilled to see into the future so why would a killing curse be used?
If a headstone can easily defend you against a simple juggle knight’s shield should be easily able to as well or even if just physically touching it when it happens does somehow kill you you could just use magic to make it levitate in front of you and use it to block the spell that way or if metal somehow would be the problem just use a different material like a rock it honestly how would it be any different from it just hitting a solid object
I think quilin wasnot harmed by the avada kadavra curse at all. She died during childbirth. May be its their biology,dying after childbirth (like preying mantis get killed after mating). Becoz they said when new leader is about to be born, there is a birth of quilin. I mean why would they need a baby quilin for choosing the leader instead of older one. May be becoz old quilin dies after childbirth naturally. And baby quilin chooser the leader.
Certain magical creatures are partially resistant to certain magic. Just like a dragon cannot easily be stunned, requiring multiple stunning curses, it is possible that Avada Kedavra does not necessarily immediately kill every single living being. It is more than enough to kill a human, but that doesn’t mean that one cast of the spell will immediately kill every kind of creature. Another argument that could be made is that Credence didn’t really mean it. For the unforgivable curses to work, you have to really mean it. Did Credence really want to kill the Qilin? Or was he only doing it half-heartedly, which therefore required multiple castings of the spell? And finally, I would think that not only would killing Qilins give you a half-life, a cursed life (which I think is pretty much proven by what happens to Credence throughout the rest of Secrets of Dumbledore, after he murdered the Qilin), it also destroys the pureness of your soul, therefore rendering any use of Qilin armour useless. I think that the pureness of the Qilin, which could partially protect it from Avada Kedavra is lost when the Qilin is killed, and certainly does not extend to whoever seeks to use the Qilin hide as armour.
What about this… Grindlewald used Vulnera Sanentur to heal the wound of the Qilin. But, wasn’t that spell developed by Snape? I guess in your articles as well, you mentioned at instances that Snape created the spell Sectum Sempra which could only be countered by another spell of his creation Vulnera Sanentur. What gives!?
Here’s the deal for me. If magic can create enough power to kill someone no questions asked then it should also be capable of preventing that from happening. If the HP universe were real you know there would be a department that spent all it’s time crafting ways to counter things like the killing curse. Just like in real life….bigger guns lead to better armour eventually.
The question on my mind ismagic is a kind of energy. In this case qinnlin should the magic of that specific qinnlin not stop to exist/ produced. If should skin of that qinnlin not stop/ fast loos the ability to repelled/block/les de damages? If zo it should mean if ask me that whering the skin of a died ormurderd qinnlin would not help/do somthing against avadakadavra! What do think I would love to hear!
I have a theory I haven’t seen anyone elaborate on! Voldemort is defeated by Harry in the first book… when he drinks the unicorn blood. There are so many times in the stories where Harry gets just insanely lucky. But you can also look at those moments as Voldemort being insanely UNlucky. Why is he so unlucky? Because he’s living a cursed life from drinking the unicorn blood. Really, once you start dissecting it almost every time Harry gets lucky it’s to Voldemort’s detriment. So Harry isn’t lucky at all and the main reason he beats Voldemort is because Voldemort is so cursed that none of his plans come to fruition.